TASIn ForceAct
Juries Act 2003
35Peremptory challenges in criminal trials
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 35
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Juries Act 2003.
### 35 Peremptory challenges in criminal trials
> > (1) Each person arraigned in a criminal trial is allowed to challenge peremptorily 6 potential jurors.
>
> > (2) [*\[Section 35 Subsection (2) omitted by No. 7 of 2005, s. 7, Applied:01 Jan 2006\]*](/view/html/inforce/2006-01-01/act-2005-007#GS7@EN) . . . . . . . .
>
> > (3) A person arraigned may –
> >
> > > > (a) if that person has peremptorily challenged 6 potential jurors, challenge peremptorily one reserve juror; or
> > >
> > > > (b) if that person has peremptorily challenged fewer than 6 potential jurors, challenge peremptorily a number of reserve jurors that is equal to 6 minus the number of potential jurors challenged under [subsection (1)](#GS35@Gs1@EN) plus one.
>
> > (4) This section does not apply to an investigation under the [Criminal Justice (Mental Impairment) Act 1999](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/act-1999-021) .
>
> > (5) Unless the court orders otherwise, a potential juror in respect of whom a peremptory challenge is made –
> >
> > > > (a) is to return to the panel; and
> > >
> > > > (b) may be selected on a jury for another trial.