Integrated Resort Development Act 1987
sec.175UReview criteria
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.175U
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Integrated Resort Development Act 1987.
sec.175U Review criteria
The review criteria are each of the following— the appropriateness of the reviewable terms for achieving a fair and reasonable balance between the interests of the body corporate and the service contractor; whether the reviewable terms impose conditions that— are unreasonably difficult to comply with; or are not necessary and reasonable for the protection of the legitimate interests of the body corporate or the service contractor; the consequences of complying with, or contravening, the reviewable terms and whether the consequences are unfairly harsh or beneficial to the body corporate or the service contractor; whether the reviewable terms are appropriate for the approved scheme; the term of the engagement as service contractor and the period of the term remaining. The review criterion mentioned in subsection (1) (d) is to be applied having regard, in particular, to the nature, features and characteristics of the approved scheme. s 175U ins 2009 No. 26 s 43 (sec.175U-ssec.1) The review criteria are each of the following— the appropriateness of the reviewable terms for achieving a fair and reasonable balance between the interests of the body corporate and the service contractor; whether the reviewable terms impose conditions that— are unreasonably difficult to comply with; or are not necessary and reasonable for the protection of the legitimate interests of the body corporate or the service contractor; the consequences of complying with, or contravening, the reviewable terms and whether the consequences are unfairly harsh or beneficial to the body corporate or the service contractor; whether the reviewable terms are appropriate for the approved scheme; the term of the engagement as service contractor and the period of the term remaining. (sec.175U-ssec.2) The review criterion mentioned in subsection (1) (d) is to be applied having regard, in particular, to the nature, features and characteristics of the approved scheme.
- (a) the appropriateness of the reviewable terms for achieving a fair and reasonable balance between the interests of the body corporate and the service contractor;
- (b) whether the reviewable terms impose conditions that— (i) are unreasonably difficult to comply with; or (ii) are not necessary and reasonable for the protection of the legitimate interests of the body corporate or the service contractor;
- (i) are unreasonably difficult to comply with; or
- (ii) are not necessary and reasonable for the protection of the legitimate interests of the body corporate or the service contractor;
- (c) the consequences of complying with, or contravening, the reviewable terms and whether the consequences are unfairly harsh or beneficial to the body corporate or the service contractor;
- (d) whether the reviewable terms are appropriate for the approved scheme;