The Order contains several technical features that can produce unintended cost or compliance outcomes if not handled deliberately. Below are concrete “gotchas” rooted in the text.
Group aggregation removes individual caps. Clause 3(2) caps the experience-adjusted premium for individual employers by reference to basic tariff bands (T−A). Clause 3(3) then states that if the employer is a member of a group, subclause (2) does not apply and the caps are instead determined by the sum of basic tariff premiums less apprentice incentive amounts for the entire group (TG−AG). Mechanism: group aggregation may increase or decrease the applicable cap for any member; employers should identify whether they qualify as a group under the Order (Schedule 1 cl 2(3) and related grouping rules) because caps that would otherwise limit an employer’s premium volatility may not apply at the single‑employer level when the group aggregation rule is invoked.
Failure to supply wages/ITC notices produces adverse defaults. Schedule 1 cl 9(2) creates a formulaic adverse default where an employer fails to furnish returns: the prior period’s wages are multiplied by 1.3 for current calculation. Schedule 8 cl 2 treats failure to notify input tax credit entitlement as a 100% entitlement default (which affects I). Schedule 10 cl 2(2) sets A to zero if the required wages notice is missing. Mechanism: missing notices increase the base tariff or remove incentives, so ensure timely and correct wage and ITC notices to insurers.
Minimum premium applies after discount. Schedule 6 cl 3 says the reference to the premium that would be payable includes premiums discounted under clause 4. Mechanism: even after applying the 3% discount (clause 4), the insurer must bump the discounted premium up to the $175 minimum if the discounted result is below the minimum. Employers expecting a near-zero premium because their calculated premium is very small will still pay the $175.
Classification default is the highest rate. Schedule 3 cl 2 instructs insurers to classify a business in the class with the highest percentage rate that appears applicable if the employer does not supply sufficient classification information. Mechanism: incomplete or ambiguous business descriptions can lead to assignment to a higher rate class, increasing T.
Odometer methods have lock-in and record-retention quirks. If an employer chooses the averaging method (Schedule 1 cl 5), that method requires detailed 12‑week odometer recording for the first period and then permits using that percentage for the next four periods of insurance unless the Authority directs otherwise or the employer wants to re-record. Mechanism: adopting averaging reduces record burdens in future periods but requires accurate initial records and obliges the employer to re-record after five successive periods. Failure to maintain or supply odometer readings where required risks disallowing exclusion of allowances.
Experience factor reduction is discretionary and needs Authority application. Schedule 4 cl 5 permits the Authority to reduce S where there have been breaks in insurance, but only on application and subject to criteria that the Authority “may develop” and guidelines it “may issue”. Mechanism: there is no automatic reduction; employers with gaps must apply and be assessed under Authority criteria that may be unpublished at the time of application.
Caps on experience-adjusted premium expressed relative to T−A. Clause 3(2) uses T−A (basic tariff premium less apprentice incentive) as the denominator for caps on the experience adjusted premium. Mechanism: large apprentice incentive amounts reduce the denominator and may change the cap boundary; employers and brokers should check the sequencing of A and application of caps.
Multiple instruments and Gazette tables control inputs. Table A and Table B (Schedules 11 and 12) contain the class rates and ICCRs; the Order’s calculations depend on those tables published in the Gazette (Schedule 1 editorial notes). Mechanism: changes to those tables by Gazette notice or later orders will change T or ICCR inputs without the need to amend the core Order language.
Currency of numeric caps and indices. The Order contains specific dollar figures that anchor liabilities ($175 minimum premium; $1,716.40 cap in clause 5 and clause 7). Mechanism: these fixed figures apply to the 2010-2011 period. Users must check for updated Orders or subsequent instruments before applying the same numbers in later years.
Small employer special rules for per-capita classes. Schedule 1 cl 2(2) says for employers in some per-capita classes, the small-employer test is applied only by reference to basic tariff premium (not wages). Mechanism: employers in per-capita classes should not rely on the wages test when assessing small employer status; per-capita counts determine T directly and the small employer classification depends on T.
Late payment rate compounding. Clause 6 prescribes 0.961% per month compounded monthly for ss 170(8) and 172(5) of the Act. Mechanism: monthly compounding leads to a higher effective annual rate than simple 12× monthly rate. Check accounting for compounding in ledger systems and client advice.
Experience premium complexity and data demands. Schedule 5 requires multiple historical inputs (C0, C1, C2; W0, W1, W2) and computed ECCRs and ICCRs, including industry‑weighted ICCR calculations where multiple classes apply (Schedule 5 cl 1(7)). Mechanism: insurers and employers must retain and provide accurate historical claim cost and wages data for at least two prior 12‑month periods, and correctly handle per-capita components and multi-class apportionments.