These Regulations set out the official forms, fee schedules, prescribed templates and penalty levels required under the Heritage Act 2017. They specify how to nominate places or objects, apply for permits, consents or exclusion determinations, and the documentation and fees to be lodged.
Most costs fall on applicants and owners (including government asset managers and public authorities); decisions and limited fee-waiver power rest with the Executive Director and the Heritage Council (see reg 26). Several provisions link to the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 (CHMP requirements).
Mechanically, the Heritage Regulations 2017 prescribe the administrative forms, fee structure, fee exemptions and waiver powers, infringement offences and penalty amounts, and a set of operational documents that implement many procedural requirements in the Heritage Act 2017. The Regulations do three types of work.
First, they specify the form and content required for discrete steps under the Act. Examples include the form for nominating a place or object for the Heritage Register (Schedule 1, reg 5), the permit application form (Schedule 6, reg 12), the site card and survey report for archaeological finds (Schedules 9 and 9A, regs 27 and 27A), interim protection order and notice forms (Schedules 10 and 11, regs 28 and 29), identity cards for inspectors (Schedule 12, reg 30), and a range of other prescribed forms set out in the Schedules. The Regulations therefore standardise what information must accompany applications, nominations, notices and other procedural instruments required by the Act.
Second, the Regulations prescribe fees and how they are calculated in fee units for many of the Act’s administrative processes. Those fees are expressed in fee units, with multiple regimes: nomination review fees (reg 6), exclusion determination fees for major developments (regs 6C-6F), heritage certificate fees (reg 9), a graduated fee scale tied to the estimated cost of works for permit applications (reg 13(1)(b)(i)-(xiii)), higher fees for demolition applications (reg 14), percentage-based fees for amending applications (regs 15-19), and consent fees for archaeological works (reg 23). The Regulations also prescribe how to calculate fees when multiple classes of works are applied for (reg 13(2)). Fee amounts in fee units must be multiplied by the value of a fee unit under the Monetary Units Act 2004 (endnotes, Explanatory details).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in Heritage Regulations 2017.
59
21A
Form of application for exemption from requirement to obtain consent 10
21A Form of application for exemption from requirement to obtain consent 10
22
Form of application for consent 10
22 Form of application for consent 10
23 Fees for application for consent to undertake works or activities in relation to archaeological sites or archaeological artefacts 11
23A Form of application to request amendment of consent 13
23B Fee to apply for an amendment of consent 13
24 Fee for review of Executive Director's determination in relation to consent 14
25 Exemption from fees 14
26 Waiver of fees for certain works or activities in relation to registered place, registered object, archaeological site or archaeological artefact 15
27 Form of site card 16
27A Form of survey report 16
28 Form of interim protection order 16
29 Form of notice of existence of an interim protection order 16
30 Form of identity card for inspectors 16
31 Infringement offences and infringement penalties 16
Schedule 1—Form of nomination of a place or object for inclusion in the Heritage Register 17
Schedule 1A—Form of nomination of object integral or additional land to a registered or nominated place 23
Schedule 1B—Form of application for an exclusion determination that a place or object not be included in the Heritage Register 27
Schedule 2—Form for submission to the Heritage Council 34
Schedule 3—Form of application for heritage certificate 37
Schedule 4—Form of notice of intention to sell registered place or registered object 39
Schedule 5—Form of notice for alterations for the purposes of religious services or rites 41
Schedule 6—Form of permit application 44
Schedule 7—Form of request to amend permit 49
Schedule 7A—Form of request to make minor amendment to permit 54
Schedule 7B—Form of application for exemption from consent 59
Schedule 8—Form of application for consent 64
Schedule 8A—Form of application for amendment of consent 70
Schedule 9—Form of site card 75
Schedule 9A—Form of survey report 80
Schedule 10—Form of interim protection order 83
Schedule 11—Form of notice of existence of an interim protection order 87
Schedule 12—Form of identity card for inspectors 90
Schedule 13—Infringement offences and infringement penalties 91
═════════════
Endnotes 94
1 General information 94
2 Table of Amendments 96
3 Explanatory details 97
Version No.004
Heritage Regulations 2017
S.R. No. 108/2017
Version incorporating amendments as at
1
Objectives
1 Objectives
The objectives of these Regulations are—
(a) to prescribe forms and documents for the purposes of the Heritage Act 2017; and
Reg. 1(b) amended by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 5(1).
(b) to prescribe fees payable in relation to certain permits, reviews, consents, exclusions and certificates under the Act; and
Reg. 1(c) amended by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 5(2).
(c) to exempt particular classes of people from certain fees; and
(d) to authorise the Heritage Council to waive certain fees prescribed in these Regulations; and
(e) to prescribe infringement offences and infringement penalties; and
(f) to prescribe other matters for the purposes of the Act.
2
Authorising provisions
2 Authorising provisions
These Regulations are made under sections 255 and 256 of the Heritage Act 2017.
3
Commencement
3 Commencement
These Regulations come into operation on 1 November 2017.
4
Definitions
4 Definitions
In these Regulations—
community group means a not-for-profit society, association or club (other than a charity)—
(a) established for the purpose of educating the community about, or to protect, a place or object; and
(b) whose officers receive no remuneration or gratuity for their services to the society, association or club;
Reg. 4 def. of the Act amended by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 6(1).
the Act means the Heritage Act2017;
Reg. 4 def. of traditional owner inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 6(2).
traditional owner has the same meaning as it has in section 7 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006.
5
Form of application to nominate place or object for inclusion in the Heritage Register
5 Form of application to nominate place or object for inclusion in the Heritage Register
For the purposes of section 27(2) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 1.
Reg. 5A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 7.
5A
Form of nomination of object integral to place
5A Form of nomination of object integral to place
For the purposes of section 27A(3) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 1A.
Reg. 5B inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 7.
5B
Form of nomination of additional land as part of a place
5B Form of nomination of additional land as part of a place
For the purposes of section 27B(3) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 1A.
6
Fee for lodging review of Executive Director's refusal of nomination for the Heritage Register
6 Fee for lodging review of Executive Director's refusal of nomination for the Heritage Register
Subject to regulation 26, for the purpose of section 30(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 25 fee units.
Reg. 6A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6A
Persons or bodies that may apply for an exclusion determination
6A Persons or bodies that may apply for an exclusion determination
(1) For the purposes of section 36A(1) of the Act, in the case of an exclusion determination required for the sole purpose of facilitating a major development, the following persons or bodies are prescribed—
(a) the government asset manager that is responsible for the major development;
(b) the Department Head within the meaning of section 4(1) of the Public Administration Act 2004 who is responsible for the major development;
(c) the public authority that is responsible for the major development;
(d) the Administrative Office Head within the meaning of section 4(1) of the Public Administration Act 2004 who is responsible for the major development.
(2) In this regulation—
major development includes the carrying out of one or more, or an interrelated series of one or more, activities including the following activities, the cost of which is more than $5 million—
(a) the construction, alteration or extension of a building or transport infrastructure;
(b) the construction or the carrying out of works;
(c) the demolition or removal of a building, transport infrastructure or works;
(d) the subdivision or consolidation of land, airspace or buildings;
(e) the installation or provision, or operation of, facilities or services;
(f) the relocation, deepening or widening of a waterway;
transport infrastructure has the same meaning as in the Major Transport Projects Facilitation Act 2009.
Reg. 6B inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6B
Persons who may prepare an application for an exclusion determination
6B Persons who may prepare an application for an exclusion determination
For the purposes of section 36A(2)(b) of the Act, the following persons are prescribed—
(a) a person who is suitably qualified and experienced in identifying and assessing the cultural heritage significance of places, objects or land;
(b) a person or a member of a class of persons approved by the Executive Director for the purposes of this regulation.
Reg. 6C inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6C
Form of application for an exclusion determination
6C Form of application for an exclusion determination
For the purposes of section 36A(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 1B.
Reg. 6D inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6D
Fee to apply for an exclusion determination
6D Fee to apply for an exclusion determination
For the purposes of section 36A(2)(e) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 480 fee units.
Reg. 6E inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6E
Fee to request review of decision to make or refuse to make exclusion determination
6E Fee to request review of decision to make or refuse to make exclusion determination
Subject to regulation 26, for the purposes of section 36E(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 25 fee units.
Reg. 6F inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6F
Fee for applicant to request review of decision to refuse to make an exclusion determination
6F Fee for applicant to request review of decision to refuse to make an exclusion determination
For the purposes of section 36E(4)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 960 fee units.
7
Form of submission to the Heritage Council
7 Form of submission to the Heritage Council
For the purposes of section 44(2) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 2.
8
Form of application for heritage certificate
8 Form of application for heritage certificate
For the purposes of section 58(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 3.
9
Fee for application for heritage certificate
9 Fee for application for heritage certificate
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purposes of section 58(2)(c) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 3·75 fee units.
10
Form of notice of intention to sell registered place or registered object
10 Form of notice of intention to sell registered place or registered object
For the purposes of section 59 of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 4.
11
Form of notice for alterations for the purposes of religious services or rites
11 Form of notice for alterations for the purposes of religious services or rites
For the purposes of section 90(4)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 5.
12
Form of permit application
12 Form of permit application
For the purposes of section 93(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 6.
13
Fees for application for permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object
13 Fees for application for permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object
(1) Subject to subregulation (2) and regulations 14, 25 and 26, for the purposes of section 93(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fees are as follows—
(a) for a permit application for the subdivision, consolidation or realignment of a boundary of a registered place or the subdivision of a building on that registered place—100 fee units;
Reg. 13(1)(b) substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 5.
(b) for a permit application for works or activities to a registered place or registered object, if the estimated cost of the works or activities is—
(i) less than $10 000—20 fee units; or
(ii) $10 000 or more but less than $20 000—75 fee units; or
(iii) $20 000 or more but less than $100 000—200 fee units; or
(iv) $100 000 or more but less than $250 000—300 fee units; or
(v) $250 000 or more but less than $500 000—367·4 fee units; or
(vi) $500 000 or more but less than $1 million—442·4 fee units; or
(vii) $1 million or more but less than $5 million—760·3 fee units; or
(viii) $5 million or more but less than $10 million—885·8 fee units; or
(ix) $10 million or more but less than $30 million—1017 fee units; or
(x) $30 million or more but less than $50 million—1149·1 fee units; or
(xi) $50 million or more but less than $100 million—1712 fee units; or
(xii) $100 million or more but less than $200 million—2149 fee units; or
(xiii) $200 million or more—2431 fee units.
(2) The prescribed fee for an application for a permit to carry out more than one class of works or activities set out in subregulation (1) is the sum of—
(a) the highest of the fees which would have applied if a separate application had been made; and
(b) 50 per cent of each of any other fee that would have applied if a separate application had been made.
14
Fee for application for permit to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
14 Fee for application for permit to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26 and sections 49(3) and 92 of the Act, for the purposes of section 93(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fees are as follows—
Reg. 14(a) amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 6.
(a) for an application to demolish or destroy the whole of a registered place—885·8 fee units or, if the estimated cost of the works or activities is $10 million or more, the fee set out in regulation 13(1)(b)(ix) to (xiii) that corresponds with that estimated cost;
Reg. 14(b) amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 6.
(b) for an application to demolish or destroy the whole of a registered object—885·8 fee units or, if the estimated cost of the works or activities is $10 million or more, the fee set out in regulation 13(1)(b)(ix) to (xiii) that corresponds with that estimated cost.
15
Fees to amend permit application to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object
15 Fees to amend permit application to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 96(3)(b) of the Act, in respect of a permit application to carry out works or activities in relation to a registered place or registered object—
(a) for a permit application that has not been on public display in accordance with section 94 of the Act, the prescribed fee is 45 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 13; or
(b) for a permit application that has been on public display in accordance with section 94 of the Act, the prescribed fee is 75 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 13.
16
Fees to amend permit application to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
16 Fees to amend permit application to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 96(3)(b) of the Act, in respect of a permit application to demolish or destroy the whole of a registered place or registered object—
(a) for a permit application that has not been on public display in accordance with section 94 of the Act, the prescribed fee is 20 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 14; or
(b) for a permit application that has been on public display in accordance with section 94 of the Act, the prescribed fee is 30 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 14.
17 Form for amendment of permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object or to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
For the purposes of section 105(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 7.
18
Fee for amendment of permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object
18 Fee for amendment of permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 105(2)(b) of the Act, in respect of an amendment to a permit to carry out works or activities in relation to a registered place or registered object, the prescribed fee is 75 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 13.
19
Fee for amendment of permit to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
19 Fee for amendment of permit to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 105(2)(b) of the Act, in respect of an amendment to a permit to demolish or destroy the whole of a registered place or registered object, the prescribed fee is 30 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 14.
Reg. 19A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 9.
19A
Form for request to make minor amendment to permit
19A Form for request to make minor amendment to permit
For the purposes of section 105B(2) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 7A.
20
Fee for review of Executive Director's determination in relation to permits
20 Fee for review of Executive Director's determination in relation to permits
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 106(3) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 200 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 13.
21 Fee for review of Executive Director's determination in relation to refusal of a permit to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 106(3) of the Act, in respect of a review of a determination by the Executive Director in relation to a refusal of a permit to demolish or destroy the whole of a registered place or registered object, the prescribed fee is 40 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 14.
Reg. 21A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 10.
21A Form of application for exemption from requirement to obtain consent
For the purposes of section 123A(3) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 7B.
22 Form of application for consent
For the purposes of section 124(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 8.
23 Fees for application for consent to undertake works or activities in relation to archaeological sites or archaeological artefacts
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purposes of section 124(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fees are as follows—
(a) for an application for consent to uncover and expose—
in order to assess the condition and potential of the archaeology for the purposes of—
(iii) constructing one domestic residential dwelling on a lot or allotment; or
(iv) constructing an extension to one domestic residential dwelling on a lot or allotment—20 fee units;
(b) for an application for consent to excavate—
for the purposes of—
(iii) constructing one domestic residential dwelling on a lot or allotment; or
(iv) constructing an extension to one domestic residential dwelling on a lot or allotment—30 fee units;
(c) for an application for consent to uncover and expose—
in order to assess the condition and potential of the archaeology for all other purposes—50 fee units;
(d) for an application for consent to excavate—
for all other purposes—72·4 fee units;
(e) for an application for consent to damage and disturb an archaeological site or part of an archaeological site for—
(i) the construction of one domestic residential dwelling on a lot or allotment; or
(ii) the construction of an extension to one domestic residential dwelling on a lot or allotment—50 fee units;
(f) for an application for consent to damage and disturb an archaeological site for all other purposes, where damage is less than 50 per cent—200 fee units;
(g) for an application for consent to damage and disturb an archaeological site for all other purposes, where damage is 50 per cent or more—400 fee units;
(h) for an application for consent to possess, or dispose of archaeological artefacts, to undertake geotechnical or soil testing, trenching or boring in order to install, maintain or upgrade service utilities, a test archaeological excavation as part of a cultural heritage management plan or for all other purposes for which a consent is required in relation to an archaeological artefact, archaeological site or a site recorded in the Heritage Inventory—72·4 fee units.
Reg. 23A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 11.
23A
Form of application to request amendment of consent
23A Form of application to request amendment of consent
For the purposes of section 124A(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 8A.
Reg. 23B inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 11.
23B
Fee to apply for an amendment of consent
23B Fee to apply for an amendment of consent
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purposes of section 124A(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fee to accompany an application to amend a consent issued under section 124 of the Act is 30 per cent of the fee set out in regulation 23 required to accompany an application for that consent.
24
Fee for review of Executive Director's determination in relation to consent
24 Fee for review of Executive Director's determination in relation to consent
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 126(2)(c) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 45 per cent of the corresponding consent application fee in regulation 23.
25
Exemption from fees
25 Exemption from fees
A person who is an eligible beneficiary within the meaning of the State Concessions Act 2004 is exempt from paying a fee in respect of the following—
Reg. 25(a) amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 7.
(a) an application under section 93(1), 96(1), 105(1) or 106(1) of the Act that relates to—
(i) a registered place of which the applicant is the owner and which is the applicant's principal place of residence; or
(ii) a registered object of which the applicant is the owner;
Reg. 25(b) amended by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 12.
(b) an application or request under sections 124(1), 124A(1) and 126(1) of the Act that relates to an archaeological site or archaeological artefact situated in or under land that the applicant owns and which is the applicant's principal place of residence.
Reg. 26 (Heading) amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 8(1).
Reg. 26 amended by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 13.
26 Waiver of fees for certain works or activities in relation to registered place, registered object, archaeological site or archaeological artefact
The Heritage Council may waive the fees prescribed by regulations 6, 6E, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 23B and 24 if the Heritage Council is satisfied that the works, activities or review to which the application relates—
(a) is for the purposes of the conservation or research of a registered place, a registered object, an archaeological site or an archaeological artefact; or
(b) is to educate the public as to the cultural heritage significance of a registered place, a registered object, an archaeological site or an archaeological artefact; or
(c) is for the safety of the public; or
(d) is the same, or primarily the same, as those for which a permit or consent has previously been issued to the applicant in relation to a registered place, a registered object, an archaeological site or an archaeological artefact; or
Reg. 26(e) substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 8(2)(a).
(e) is in respect of an application from a community group; or
Reg. 26(f) amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 8(2)(b).
(f) is for a review of a determination by the Executive Director from a community group that has an interest in the application.
Reg. 26(g) revoked by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 8(2)(c).
Reg. 27 substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 9.
27
Form of site card
27 Form of site card
For the purposes of the definition of site card in section 3(1) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 9.
Reg. 27A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 14.
27A
Form of survey report
27A Form of survey report
For the purposes of section 127(7)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form of a survey report is the form set out in Schedule 9A.
28
Form of interim protection order
28 Form of interim protection order
For the purposes of section 143(2) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 10.
29
Form of notice of existence of an interim protection order
29 Form of notice of existence of an interim protection order
For the purposes of section 147(3) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 11.
30
Form of identity card for inspectors
30 Form of identity card for inspectors
For the purposes of section 195(2) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 12.
Reg. 31 amended by S.R. No. 54/2018 reg. 4, substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 10.
31
Infringement offences and infringement penalties
31 Infringement offences and infringement penalties
For the purposes of Division 4 of Part 10 of the Act—
(a) an offence against a section of the Act set out in Column 2 of Schedule 13 is prescribed as an infringement offence; and
(b) the prescribed infringement penalty for an infringement offence referred to in paragraph (a) is the penalty set out in Column 3 of Schedule 13 in respect of the infringement offence.
Regs 32, 33 revoked by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 10.
Sch. 1 substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 11.
Sch 1
Form of nomination of a place or object for inclusion in the Heritage Register
Schedule 1—Form of nomination of a place or object for inclusion in the Heritage Register
Section 27(2) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 5
Nominator details
Details of owner or government asset manager of nominated place or object (if known)
If the nominator is not the owner or the government asset manager (or acting on behalf of the owner or the government asset manager) details of the owner or government asset manager of the place or object:
Nomination details
Nomination Type
*Place
*If place, do you also intend to nominate one or more objects integral to the place? *Yes/*No
*Object
Place or object details
Name of *place/*object:
Address or GPS coordinates of *place/*object:
Who is the responsible authority or, if the responsible authority is not the municipal council, the municipal council for the place or object?
Extent of nomination
For a place: briefly describe the place.
For an object: briefly describe the object or objects. Please include an inventory in the supporting documents if nominating a collection of objects.
Is the place located entirely on Crown land? *Yes/*No
Local Heritage Overlay information
Does this place have a local Heritage Overlay (HO) within a planning scheme? *Yes/*No
If yes, what is the HO number?
Supporting documents
You must provide the following (if applicable) when submitting your nomination—
• a copy of the certificate/s of title issued within 30 days before the nomination for the place is lodged (not necessary for places on Crown land or if nominating objects only);
• a simple and accurate extent diagram clearly showing the extent (boundaries) of the nominated place or object;
Note: This may take the form of spatial files or a copy of an existing map or plan with a clear hand drawn line around the extent showing the land, buildings and other key features you are nominating.
• copies of any heritage studies or guiding documents for the conservation and management of the nominated place or object if they exist;
• if you are nominating a collection of objects, please provide an inventory of those objects;
• recent photographs of the place or object (you may also include historical photographs).
Heritage significance
Heritage Council criteria
Which Heritage Council criteria does this place or object meet?
Note: For a place or object to be included in the Heritage Register it must be of State-level cultural heritage significance based on at least one of the Heritage Council assessment criteria. You must choose one or more of the relevant criteria and provide reasons why the place or object should be included in the Heritage Register based on the criteria chosen. The Executive Director may refuse a nomination if they are not satisfied that the place or object has a reasonable prospect of inclusion in the Heritage Register.
For further information on the Heritage Council criteria and thresholds please refer to the current website of the Heritage Council.
Reasons for State-level cultural heritage significance
Provide reasons why the place or object is of State-level cultural heritage significance based on the criteria selected:
Statement of cultural heritage significance
Please describe the place or object according to the following, naming the most significant elements:
What is significant?
How is it significant?
Why is it significant?
Other information
History of the place or object
Please provide a comprehensive history of the place or object which explores its historical associations and details its development over time.
Comparative analysis
Provide comparisons (relevant to State-level cultural heritage significance) to similar places or objects included in the Heritage Register or describe how the place or object differs from similar places or objects which are the subject of determinations to not include those places or objects in the Heritage Register.
Aboriginal cultural heritage values (if known)
Who are the traditional owners of this place or object?
Does this place or object have Aboriginal cultural heritage values in addition to non-Aboriginal cultural heritage values (shared values)? *Yes/*No
If yes, please provide details below.
Note: If the place or object is of cultural heritage significance only on the grounds of its association with Aboriginal tradition, Aboriginal traditional use, or Aboriginal archaeology, it may be more appropriate for registration in the Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register. Please refer to the current website of the Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register.
Please name key sources that may provide historical information about this place or object. This could include books, publications, websites, the names of experts or any other resource.
Condition, intactness and integrity of the place or object
Condition
The condition of the place or object is generally: *Excellent/*Good/*Fair/*Poor
Is there any damage to the fabric (the materials from which the place or object is made)? *Yes/*No
If yes, please specify which materials and the extent of damage:
Intactness and integrity
How much of the original form or appearance of the place or object remains?
What alterations are present and why was the place or object altered?
Is it still possible to interpret the heritage values of the place or object if it has changed or been altered?
Threat
Is the place or object under immediate or imminent threat? *Yes/*No/*Don't know
If yes, please describe the threat:
Has a demolition permit been issued under the Building Act 1993? *Yes/*No/*Don't know
Has a planning permit been issued by the responsible authority for the redevelopment of the land? *Yes/*No/*Don't know
Is there evidence of plant and equipment being mobilised to demolish the place? *Yes/*No/*Don't know
Is there evidence of an imminent proposal to destroy, remove or disassemble the object (or group of objects) or elements of the place? *Yes/*No/*Don't know
Are there any known proposals to relocate buildings or the object(s) to another location? *Yes/*No/*Don't know
Is the deteriorating condition of the place or object(s) posing a threat to its intactness or integrity? *Yes/*No/*Don't know
Please provide any other additional details about the threat:
Statement
Name of *nominator/*person acting on behalf of nominator:
Sch. 1A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 15, amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 12.
Sch 1A
Form of nomination of object integral or additional land to a registered or nominated place
Schedule 1A—Form of nomination of object integral or additional land to a registered or nominated place
Sections 27A(3) and 27B(3) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulations 5A and 5B
Location of place
Location selection method
If the place is not yet registered, the nomination reference number (provided by Heritage Victoria when the initial nomination of the place was lodged):
(If you cannot find your reference number, please contact Heritage Victoria).
Place name:
Nominator details
Details of owner or government asset manager of place or object (if known)
If the nominator is not the owner or the government asset manager (or acting on behalf of the owner or the government asset manager) details of the owner or government asset manager of the place:
Is common property included in this place? *Yes/*No
Nomination details
What do you want to nominate?
*Additional land to a place/*objects integral to a place:
What are the reasons for lodging this nomination?
Is there a threat to the place?
*Yes/*No/*Don't know
If yes, what is the threat?
If nominating additional land to a place
• Is the additional land of significance? *Yes/*No
If yes, please explain why:
• Is the additional land needed as a buffer? *Yes/*No
If yes, please explain why:
Note: For example, the State-level cultural heritage significance of the place would be substantially less if the additional land or any part of the additional land which is or has been used in conjunction with the place were developed; or the additional land surrounds the place and is important to the protection or conservation of the place or contributes to the understanding of the place.
Describe the additional land you want to include
Describe the additional land.
(You may reference title details of the land, or attach an extent diagram showing the boundaries of the land or physical landmarks.)
If adding objects integral to a registered or nominated place
Please provide information on the object or collection of objects and explain why the objects are integral to the cultural heritage significance of the place.
If nominating additional land
Is the additional land located entirely on Crown land? *Yes/*No
Who is the responsible authority or, if the responsible authority is not the municipal council, the municipal council for the additional land?
Who are the traditional owners of the nominated additional land or object/s (if known)?
Supporting documents
You must provide the following (if applicable) when submitting your nomination—
• a copy of the certificate/s of title for the additional land, issued within 30 days before the nomination (unless located entirely on Crown land, or if only nominating objects integral);
• a simple and accurate extent diagram clearly showing the extent (boundaries) of any additional land nominated;
Note: This may take the form of spatial files or a copy of an existing map or plan with a clear hand drawn line around the extent showing the land, buildings and other key features you are nominating.
• copies of any heritage studies or guiding documents for the conservation and management of the additional land or object integral if they exist;
• if you are nominating a collection of objects, please provide an inventory of those objects;
• recent photographs of the nominated *additional land/*object integral (you may also include historical photographs).
Nominator statement
I state that the information that I have given on this form is true and correct to the best of my knowledge:
Name of *nominator/*person acting on behalf of nominator:
Sch. 1B inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 15.
Sch 1B
Form of application for an exclusion determination that a place or object not be included in the Heritage Register
Schedule 1B—Form of application for an exclusion determination that a place or object not be included in the Heritage Register
Section 36A(2)(a) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 6C
Applicant's details
If applicant is a Department Head or Administrative Office Head:
Title:
If applicant is a government asset manager or public authority:
Name of *Minister/*entity/*public authority:
If a person is applying on behalf of the applicant:
Details of person who prepared application (if not the applicant)
If acting on behalf of a body corporate or organisation:
Name of body corporate or organisation:
Details of owner or government asset manager of place or object
If the applicant is not the owner or government asset manager of the place or object (or acting on behalf of the owner or the government asset manager), details of the owner or government asset manager:
Has the applicant had a pre-application discussion with Heritage Victoria in relation to this application?
If yes, please insert the pre-application reference number:
Major development
Provide a brief description of the major development to which the application relates:
Estimated cost of the major development
$
Note: The cost of the major development must be at least $5 million.
Impact of major development on place or object
Explain the potential impact of the major development on the place or object.
Details of the place or object
Type
*Place/*object:
Location
Name of the *place/*object:
Address of place or object:
Who is the responsible authority or, if the responsible authority is not the municipal council, the municipal council for the place or land on which the object is located:
Heritage Inventory number (if any):
National Trust reference number (if known):
Has the place or object previously been identified in a heritage study? *Yes/*No
Local Heritage Overlay information if place
Does this place have a local Heritage Overlay (HO) within a planning scheme? *Yes/*No
If yes, please provide the HO number:
Extent of place or object
*Briefly describe the object/s and their nature.
Note: If your application relates to an object or collection of objects, you must provide an inventory that includes the details below for each object including each object within a collection.
*Briefly describe the extent of the place and what it includes and if you are including part of a land parcel, please describe that part. You may refer to title details, an extent diagram or physical landmarks, etc.
Is the proposed major development to be carried out entirely on Crown land?
Heritage Council assessment criteria
Assessment of State-level cultural heritage significance
Include reasons why the place or object should not be included in the Heritage Register. These must be reasons based on the assessment against all criteria published by the Heritage Council. This means you must provide reasons why the place or object does not meet the threshold of State‑level cultural heritage significance in relation to each of the criteria.
For further information on the Heritage Council assessment criteria and thresholds please refer to website of the Heritage Council.
Other information
Note: Information in this section should provide evidence as to why this place or object has no reasonable prospect of inclusion in the Heritage Register. Information should be based on robust research and analysis. Exclusion determinations can be overturned if significant new information is identified.
Physical description
Please describe the place or object, identifying any elements referred to in the assessment of State-level cultural significant significance.
History of the place or object
Please provide a comprehensive history of the place or object which explores its historical associations and details its development over time.
Comparative analysis
Provide comparisons to similar places or objects recorded in the Heritage Register relevant to State-level cultural heritage significance or to places and objects where a determination has been made not to include them in the Heritage Register.
Aboriginal cultural heritage values (if known)
Who are the traditional owners of the place or object (if known)?
Does this place or object have Aboriginal cultural heritage values? *Yes/*No
If yes, please provide details below.
Note: If the place or object is of cultural heritage significance only on the grounds of its association with Aboriginal tradition, Aboriginal traditional use, or Aboriginal archaeology, it may be appropriate for consideration for the Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register. Please refer to the website of the Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register.
Please list the key sources relied on in your assessment. This could include books, publications, websites, the names of experts or any other resources.
Condition, intactness and integrity of the place or object
Condition
The condition of the place or object is generally: *Excellent/*Good/*Fair/*Poor
Is there any damage to the fabric (the materials from which the place or object is made)? *Yes/*No
If yes, please specify which materials and the extent of damage.
Intactness and integrity
How much of the original form or appearance of the place or object remains?
What alterations are present and why was the place or object altered?
Have the changes or alterations affected the heritage value of the place or object?
Supporting documents
• copy of the certificate/s of title issued within 30 days before this application is lodged (not necessary for places located entirely on Crown land or if nominating objects only);
• recent photographs of the place or object. You may include historical photographs as well;
• a simple and accurate extent diagram clearly showing the extent (boundaries) of the place or object subject to this exclusion determination application;
Note: This may take the form of spatial files or a copy of an existing map or plan with a clear hand drawn line around the extent showing the land, buildings and other key features.
• if your application relates to a collection of objects,
an inventory of the objects.
Applicant statement
I state that the application has been made to facilitate a major development costing at least $5 million.
Name of *applicant/*person applying on behalf of applicant:
Sch. 2 substituted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 16, amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 13.
Sch 2
Form for submission to the Heritage Council
Schedule 2—Form for submission to the Heritage Council
Section 44(2) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 7
Submitter details
If you are lodging this form on behalf of a body corporate, organisation or natural person, please provide the following information as applicable:
*First name of natural person:
*Last name of natural person:
Executive Director's recommendation
Place or object name or description of land:
Location (address or GPS coordinates):
Date of recommendation:
Recommendation was to: *Include/*Not include/*Amend/*Not amend
Purpose of submission
*Recommendation to *include/*not include
Note: This submission is in relation to the recommendation of the Executive Director to include or not include a place or object in the Heritage Register and must relate only to whether or not—
• a place or object is of State-level cultural heritage significance; or
• whether objects recommended as objects integral to a place are integral to understanding the cultural heritage significance of the place; or
• whether additional land is integral to understanding the cultural heritage significance of the place; or
• in relation to the recommended extent of registration; or
• in relation to the permit policy or permit exemptions.
This submission:
*Supports the Executive Director's recommendation.
*Does not support the Executive Director's recommendation.
*Supports the "Extent of Registration" recommended by the Executive Director.
*Supports the categories of works or activities that can be carried out without a permit (permit exemptions) recommended by the Executive Director.
*Does not support the "Extent of Registration" recommended by the Executive Director.
*Does not support to the categories of works or activities that can be carried out without a permit (permit exemptions) recommended by the Executive Director.
*Other (please state other reason for submission):
Reasons for submission:
Please attach documents in support of your submission.
*Recommendation to *amend/*not amend a place or object in the Heritage Register
Note: This submission is in relation to a recommendation of the Executive Director to amend or remove a place or object included in the Heritage Register.
This submission:
*Supports the Executive Director's recommendation.
*Does not support the Executive Director's recommendation.
*Other (please state other reason for submission):
Reasons for submission:
Please attach documents in support of your submission.
Hearings
I wish to request a Heritage Council hearing in relation to a recommendation of the Executive Director under section 37, 38 or 39 of the Heritage Act 2017: *Yes/*No
If a hearing is requested by another party do you wish to be heard? *Yes/*No
Note: If a hearing is to be conducted you may be requested to lodge a detailed submission to support your position.
I wish to make a written submission but if a hearing is conducted in relation to this matter, I do not wish to participate in the hearing. *Yes/*No
Note: If a hearing is not requested the Heritage Council may determine the matter on written submissions.
Submitter statement
I state that the information that I have given on this form is true and correct to the best of my knowledge:
Name of *submitter/*person acting on behalf of submitter:
Sch. 3 amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 14.
Sch 3
Form of application for heritage certificate
Schedule 3—Form of application for heritage certificate
Section 58(2)(a) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 8
Applicant details
*Body corporate name:
*Organisation name:
Place or object location details
Note: only one of the following subitems needs to be completed:
2.1 Street address
Unit/flat number:
Street number:
Street name:
Street type:
Suburb/town or locality:
Postcode:
2.2 Volume/folio number
Volume number:
Folio number:
2.3 Lot on plan
Lot(s):
Plan type:
Plan number:
Block:
2.4 Council property number
Council property number:
Municipality:
2.5 Standard parcel identifier (SPI):
2.6 Crown allotment
Allotment:
Block:
Portion:
Subdivision:
Parish or township:
Sch. 4 substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 15.
Sch 4
Form of notice of intention to sell registered place or registered object
Schedule 4—Form of notice of intention to sell registered place or registered object
Section 59 of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 10
Owner details
*Body corporate or organisation name:
If acting on behalf of the owner:
Sale details
I have entered into a contract of sale for *the whole of/*part of the *place/*object.
Date contract of sale entered into:
Purchaser details
Statement
Name of *owner/*person acting on behalf of owner:
Sch. 5 substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 16.
Sch 5
Form of notice for alterations for the purposes of religious services or rites
Schedule 5—Form of notice for alterations for the purposes of religious services or rites
Section 90(4)(a) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 11
Owner details
If acting on behalf of the owner:
Proposed works or activities
Note: Exemptions from permits to carry out works or activities may apply if:
a registered place is a place of worship or in the precincts of a place of worship; or
a registered object is in a place of worship or in the precincts of a place of worship.
Provide a brief description of the relevant works or activities. State how the proposed works or activities are for the purposes of religious services or rites.
Note: If you do not demonstrate this here, you may be asked for additional information. If the Executive Director is not satisfied that the proposed works or activities are for the purposes of religious services or rites, your exemption will be withdrawn. If your exemption is withdrawn, you will need to apply for a permit.
$
Date that works or activities are to commence:
Note: Please submit notice at least 20 business days before works or activities are to commence.
Supporting documents
Plans showing the extent and nature of the proposed works or activities must be submitted with this notice (if applicable).
Declaration by officer of place of worship
Note: A declaration by an officer of the place of worship that the proposed works or activities are required for the purposes of religious services or rites must be included with this notice.
Statement
I state that the information I have given on this form is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that Heritage Victoria staff may need to inspect the registered place or registered object in relation to this notice. Heritage Victoria will explain the purpose of the visit and what needs to be done in relation to the notice. Heritage Victoria will agree a time and date for any inspection with the relevant contact.
Name of *owner/*person acting on behalf of owner:
Sch. 6 substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 17.
Sch 6
Form of permit application
Schedule 6—Form of permit application
Section 93(2)(a) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 12
Pre-application details
Has the applicant had a pre-application discussion with Heritage Victoria in relation to this application? *Yes/*No
If yes, please provide the identifier provided for the pre‑application discussion (P number):
Applicant details
Details of owner or government asset manager of registered place or registered object
If the applicant is not the owner or the government asset manager (or acting on behalf of the owner or the government asset manager) details of the owner or government asset manager of the registered place or registered object:
Proposed works or activities
Type of permit
Provide a description of the proposed works or activities:
If the works or activities relate to part of the registered place or registered object only, indicate the part to which the proposed works or activities relate:
Reason and purpose for works or activities
State the reason and purpose for which the proposed works or activities are required:
Impact on heritage values
State the impact of the proposed works or activities on the heritage values of the registered place or registered object:
Are the proposed works or activities to be carried out entirely on Crown land?
Who is the responsible authority or, if the responsible authority is not the municipal council, the municipal council for the registered place or registered object?
$
Cultural heritage management plan
A Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) is a requirement of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006. It includes results of an assessment of the potential impact of a proposed activity on Aboriginal cultural heritage. It outlines measures to be taken before, during and after an activity in order to manage and protect Aboriginal cultural heritage in the activity area.
Is a CHMP required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 in relation to carrying out the proposed works or activities? *Yes/*No
Note: You can submit your application now and provide the approved CHMP later; however, a decision on your application cannot be made until you provide a copy of the CHMP. In accordance with section 52(3) of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, a permit cannot be issued under the Heritage Act 2017 for works or activities that are inconsistent with an approved CHMP.
*Approved—If the CHMP is approved, are any of the proposed works or activities inconsistent with the requirements of the approved CHMP? *Yes/*No
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with the approved CHMP.
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with any previously approved CHMP.
Supporting documents
a Heritage Impact Statement (a statement describing the impact of the proposed works or activities on the heritage values of the place or object);
if not entirely on Crown land, a copy of the certificate/s of title of the land on which the registered place or registered object is located, issued within 30 days before this application is lodged;
evidence of the cost of works or activities;
owners corporation consent (for works or activities proposed for common property);
consent of the owner or government asset manager to the issue of the permit (if the owner or government asset manager is not the applicant);
an approved CHMP (if required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006).
Statement
I state that the information supplied in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that Heritage Victoria staff may need to inspect the registered place or registered object in relation to this application. Heritage Victoria will explain the purpose of the visit and what needs to be done in relation to the application. Heritage Victoria will agree a time and date for any inspection with the relevant contact.
Sch. 7 substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 18.
Sch 7
Form of request to amend permit
Schedule 7—Form of request to amend permit
Section 105(2)(a) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 17
Details of owner or government asset manager of registered place or registered object
If the applicant is not the owner or the government asset manager (or acting on behalf of the owner or the government asset manager) details of the owner or government asset manager of the registered place or registered object:
Proposed amended works or activities
Permit number for which amendment is sought:
Type of permit to be amended:
Description of proposed amendment to permit
Provide details describing how the amendment varies the issued permit. Please identify the part of the registered place or registered object to which the proposed amendment relates.
Reason and purpose for proposed amendment to permit
Please state the reason and purpose for which the amendment to the permit is required:
Are the proposed works or activities to be carried out under the permit entirely on Crown land?
Who is the responsible authority or, if the responsible authority is not the municipal council, the municipal council for the registered place or registered object?
A Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) is a requirement of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006. It includes results of an assessment of the potential impact of a proposed activity on Aboriginal cultural heritage. It outlines measures to be taken before, during and after an activity in order to manage and protect Aboriginal cultural heritage in the activity area.
Is a CHMP required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 in relation to carrying out the proposed works or activities? *Yes/*No
Note: You can submit your application now and provide the approved CHMP later; however, a decision on your application cannot be made until you provide a copy of the CHMP. In accordance with section 52(3) of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, an amendment to the permit cannot be issued under the Heritage Act 2017 for works or activities that are inconsistent with an approved CHMP.
*Approved—If the CHMP is approved, are any of the proposed works or activities inconsistent with the requirements of the approved CHMP? *Yes/*No
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with the approved CHMP.
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with any previously approved CHMP.
a Heritage Impact Statement (a statement describing the impact of the proposed works or activities on the heritage values of the place or object);
if not entirely on Crown land, a copy of the certificate/s of title of the land on which the registered place or registered object is located, issued within 30 days before this application is lodged;
evidence of the cost of works or activities;
owners corporation consent to amendment of the permit (for works or activities proposed for common property);
consent of the owner or government asset manager to amendment of the permit (if the owner or government asset manager is not the applicant);
an approved CHMP (if required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006).
Statement
I state that the information supplied in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that Heritage Victoria staff may need to inspect the registered place or registered object in relation to this application. Heritage Victoria will explain the purpose of the visit and what needs to be done in relation to the application. Heritage Victoria will agree a time and date for any inspection with the relevant contact.
Sch. 7A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 17, amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 19.
Sch 7A
Form of request to make minor amendment to permit
Schedule 7A—Form of request to make minor amendment to permit
Section 105B(2) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 19A
Owner or government asset manager of registered place or registered object
If the applicant is not the owner or the government asset manager (or acting on behalf of the owner or government asset manager), details of the owner or government asset manager of the registered place or registered object:
Proposed amended works or activities
Permit number for which minor amendment is sought:
Type of permit to be amended
Description of proposed minor amendment to permit
Please ensure you describe how the amendments vary the issued permit and if the minor amendment application is in relation to an extension of the validity period of the permit, please state the length of the extension:
Reason for proposed minor amendment
Please state the reason and purpose for which the minor amendment to the permit is required:
Are the proposed works or activities to be carried out under the permit entirely on Crown land?
Who is the responsible authority or, if the responsible authority is not the municipal council, the municipal council for the registered place or registered object?
A Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) is a requirement of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006. It includes results of an assessment of the potential impact of a proposed activity on Aboriginal cultural heritage. It outlines measures to be taken before, during and after an activity in order to manage and protect Aboriginal cultural heritage in the activity area.
Is a CHMP required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 in relation to carrying out the proposed works or activities? *Yes/*No
Note: You can submit your application now and provide the approved CHMP later; however, a decision on your application cannot be made until you provide a copy of the CHMP. In accordance with section 52(3) of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, a minor amendment to the permit cannot be issued under the Heritage Act 2017 for works or activities that are inconsistent with an approved CHMP.
*Approved—If the CHMP is approved, are any of the proposed works or activities inconsistent with the requirements of the approved CHMP? *Yes/*No
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with the approved CHMP.
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with any previously approved CHMP.
• a Heritage Impact Statement (a statement describing the impact of the proposed works or activities on the heritage values of the place or object);
• if not located entirely on Crown land, a copy of the certificate/s of title of the land on which the registered place or registered object is located, issued within 30 days before this application is lodged;
• evidence of cost of works or activities;
• owners corporation consent to amendment of the permit (for works or activities proposed for common property);
• consent of the owner or government asset manager to amendment of the permit (if the owner is not the same as the applicant);
• an approved cultural heritage management plan (if required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006).
I state that I am authorised to make this application in relation to the registered place or registered object and that the information supplied in this application is true and correct. I understand that Heritage Victoria staff may need to inspect the registered place or registered object in relation to this application. Heritage Victoria will explain the purpose of the visit and what needs to be done in relation to the application. Heritage Victoria will agree a time and date for any inspection with the relevant contact.
Sch. 7B inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 17, amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 20.
Sch 7B
Form of application for exemption from consent
Schedule 7B—Form of application for exemption from consent
Section 123A(3) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 21A
Location of site or archaeological artefact
*Heritage Inventory number:
Name of site recorded in the Heritage Inventory:
*Name of *body corporate/*organisation:
Owner or government asset manager
If the applicant is not the owner or the government asset manager (or acting on behalf of the owner or government asset manager), details of the owner or government asset manager of the site or archaeological artefact:
Cultural heritage management plan
A Cultural Heritage Management
Plan (CHMP) is a requirement of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006. It includes results of an assessment of the potential impact of a proposed activity on Aboriginal cultural heritage. It outlines measures to be taken before, during and after an activity in order to manage and protect Aboriginal cultural heritage in the activity area.
Is a CHMP required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 in relation to carrying out the proposed works or activities? *Yes/*No
Note: You can submit your application now and provide the approved CHMP later; however, a decision on your application cannot be made until you provide a copy of the CHMP. In accordance with section 52(3) of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, a determination that a consent for works or activities is not required under Part 6 of the Heritage Act 2017 cannot be made if the works or activities are inconsistent with an approved CHMP.
*Approved—If the CHMP is approved, are any of the proposed works or activities inconsistent with the requirements of the approved CHMP? *Yes/*No
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with the approved CHMP.
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with any previously approved CHMP.
Proposed works or activities in relation to site or archaeological artefact
Please provide a detailed description of the proposed works or activities:
Reason and purpose for the works or activities
Please state the reason and purpose for which the proposed works or activities are required:
Impact on heritage
Please state the impact of the proposed works or activities and why the impact will not harm the archaeological features, deposits or archaeological artefacts within the site:
Note: A consent will be required if the Executive Director considers that any damage or disturbance to the site or archaeological artefact would be more than negligible.
Who is the responsible authority or, if the responsible authority is not the municipal council, the municipal council?
$
• outline of proposed works or activities relating to the site or archaeological artefact, identifying any area of potential impact for heritage;
• description and background history of the site or archaeological artefact;
• statement of significance for the site if recorded in the Heritage Inventory;
• research design;
• excavation methodology;
• archaeological artefact retention and discard policy;
• archaeological artefact management proposal;
• curriculum vitae of the project archaeologist and conservator;
• letter detailing engagement of project conservator (if any);
• unexpected finds protocol;
• spatial files;
• consent of the owners corporation (for works or activities proposed for common property);
• consent of owner or government asset manager of the site or archaeological artefact if the applicant is not the owner or government asset manager of the site or archaeological artefact.
I state that I am authorised to make this application in relation to the site or archaeological artefact described in this application, and that the information supplied in this application is true and correct. I understand that Heritage Victoria staff may need to inspect the site or archaeological artefact in relation to this application and that Heritage Victoria will agree on a time and date for any inspection with the relevant contact person.
Sch. 8 substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 21.
Sch 8
Form of application for consent
Schedule 8—Form of application for consent
Section 124(2)(a) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 22
Details of site or archaeological artefact
Identify location of the archaeological site or artefact:
Heritage Inventory number (if recorded in Inventory):
Name of archaeological site or artefact:
*Archaeological site reported to the Executive Director in accordance with section 127(2) of the Heritage Act 2017.
Note: Select this for an archaeological site discovered in the course of any construction or excavation on any land for which a decision on whether to include the site in the Heritage Inventory is pending.
Note: If the Executive Director considers the application is urgent, the Executive Director may consider the application but must not determine it until the Executive Director—
(a) records the archaeological site in the Heritage Inventory under section 118(1)(a) of the Heritage Act 2017; or
(b) determines that the site has low archaeological value. If the site is determined to have low archaeological value, a consent is not required.
Site card application reference:
Explain reasons for urgency (if decision to include site or archaeological artefact in the Heritage Inventory is pending):
Note: In urgent cases, Heritage Victoria may consider but will not determine a consent application if a decision has not yet been made on whether to record the site in the Heritage Inventory. In these cases, the site card must have been submitted following a discovery of an archaeological site during an investigation or survey of land, or during construction or excavation of land.
Details of owner or government asset manager of site or archaeological artefact
If the applicant is not the owner or the government asset manager (or acting on behalf of the owner or the government asset manager) details of the owner or government asset manager of the site or archaeological artefact:
Type of consent
*To uncover or expose a site recorded in the Heritage Inventory or reported to the Executive Director in accordance with section 127(2) of the Heritage Act 2017:
*for all other purposes
*To excavate a site recorded in the Heritage Inventory or reported to the Executive Director in accordance with section 127(2) of the Heritage Act 2017:
*for all other purposes
*To damage or disturb a site recorded in the Heritage Inventory or reported to the Executive Director in accordance with section 127(2) of the Heritage Act 2017:
*for all other purposes:
o *if damage to the site is less than 50 per cent
o *if damage to the site is 50 per cent or more
*To possess, dispose of or trade archaeological artefacts, or for all other purposes for which a consent is required
Are the proposed works or activities to be carried out entirely on Crown land?
Who is the responsible authority or, if the responsible authority is not the municipal council, the municipal council for the site or archaeological artefact?
A Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) is a requirement of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006. It includes results of an assessment of the potential impact of a proposed activity on Aboriginal cultural heritage. It outlines measures to be taken before, during and after an activity in order to manage and protect Aboriginal cultural heritage in the activity area.
Is a CHMP required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 in relation to carrying out the proposed works or activities? *Yes/*No
Note: You can submit your application now and provide the approved CHMP later; however, a decision on your application cannot be made until you provide a copy of the CHMP. In accordance with section 52(3) of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, a consent cannot be issued under the Heritage Act 2017 for works or activities that are inconsistent with an approved CHMP.
*Approved—If the CHMP is approved, are any of the proposed works or activities inconsistent with the requirements of the approved CHMP? *Yes/*No
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with the approved CHMP.
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with any previously approved CHMP.
Proposed works or activities
Please provide a detailed description of the proposed works or activities to be carried out in relation to the site or archaeological artefact including the location within the site to which the proposed works or activities relate.
Supporting documents
outline of proposed works or activities relating to the site or archaeological artefact, identifying any area of potential for heritage impact;
description and background history of the site or archaeological artefact;
statement of significance for the site;
research design;
excavation methodology;
artefact retention and discard policy;
artefact management proposal;
curriculum vitae of the project archaeologist and conservator;
letter detailing engagement of project conservator
(if any);
unexpected finds protocol;
spatial files;
consent of the owners corporation (for works or activities proposed for common property);
consent of the owner or government asset manager of the site or archaeological artefact if the applicant is not the owner or government asset manager of the site or archaeological artefact.
Statement
I state that the information supplied in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that Heritage Victoria staff may need to inspect the site or archaeological artefact in relation to this application. Heritage Victoria will explain the purpose of the visit and what needs to be done in relation to the application. Heritage Victoria will agree a time and date for any inspection with the relevant contact.
Sch. 8A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 18, amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 22.
Sch 8A
Form of application for amendment of consent
Schedule 8A—Form of application for amendment of consent
Section 124A(2)(a) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 23A
Location of site or archaeological artefact
Heritage Inventory number:
Name of site or archaeological artefact:
*ABN/*ACN/*ARBN
Owner or government asset manager
If the applicant is not the owner or the government asset manager (or acting on behalf of the owner or government asset manager), details of the owner or government asset manager of the listed Heritage Inventory site or archaeological artefact:
Proposed amendment of works or activities subject to consent
Consent number:
Detailed description of amendments
Describe in detail the amendments to the proposed works or activities:
Provide the reasons for the amendments to proposed works or activities:
Are the proposed works or activities to be carried out entirely on Crown land? *Yes/*No
Identify the part of the site or archaeological artefact to which the amendments relate:
A Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) is a requirement of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006. It includes results of an assessment of the potential impact of a proposed activity on Aboriginal cultural heritage. It outlines measures to be taken before, during and after an activity in order to manage and protect Aboriginal cultural heritage in the activity area.
Is a CHMP required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 in relation to carrying out the proposed works or activities? *Yes/*No
Note: You can submit your application now and provide the approved CHMP later; however, a decision on your application cannot be made until you provide a copy of the CHMP. In accordance with section 52(3) of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, an amended consent cannot be issued under the Heritage Act 2017 for works or activities that are inconsistent with an approved CHMP.
*Approved—If the CHMP is approved, are any of the proposed works or activities inconsistent with the requirements of the approved CHMP? *Yes/*No
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with the approved CHMP.
Please provide a statement describing how the proposed works or activities are consistent/inconsistent with any previously approved CHMP.
• outline of proposed works or activities relating to the site or archaeological artefact, identifying any area of potential for heritage impact;
• description and background history of the site or archaeological artefact;
• statement of significance for the site if recorded in the Heritage Inventory;
• research design;
• excavation methodology;
• artefact retention and discard policy;
• artefact management proposal;
• curriculum vitae of the project archaeologist and conservator;
• letter detailing engagement of project conservator (if any);
• unexpected finds protocol;
• spatial files;
• consent of the owners corporation (for works or activities proposed for common property);
• consent of owner or government asset manager of the site or archaeological artefact if the applicant is not the owner or government asset manager of the site or archaeological artefact.
I state that I am authorised to make this application in relation to the site or archaeological artefact described in this application, and that the information supplied in this application is true and correct. I understand that Heritage Victoria staff may need to inspect the site or archaeological artefact in relation to this application and that Heritage Victoria will agree on a time and date for any inspection with the relevant contact person.
Sch. 9 substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 23.
Sch 9
Form of site card
Schedule 9—Form of site card
Definition of site card in section 3(1) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 27
Archaeological site details
Site name:
Heritage Inventory number (if any):
Other or former names of the site (if any):
Who is the responsible authority or, if the responsible authority is not the municipal council, the municipal council for the place or land on which the archaeological site is located?
Address or GPS coordinates of place:
Mapsheet name and number (1:100 000 only):
Cadastral location of place
County:
Parish:
Township:
Allotment:
Standard Parcel Identifier (SPI):
Is the site on common property?
Details of person providing site card
*If acting on behalf of a body corporate or organisation:
*Name of body corporate or organisation:
If the archaeologist is not the person providing the site card, details of the archaeologist:
*Last name
*Name of body corporate or organisation:
*Email:
*Contact number:
*Postal address:
Details of owner or government asset manager of place
If the person providing the site card is not the owner or the government asset manager of the place, details of the owner or government asset manager:
*Email:
*Contact number:
*Postal address:
Occupant of archaeological site
If the occupant is not the owner or the government asset manager of the archaeological site, details of the occupant:
Aboriginal cultural heritage
The archaeological site has known Aboriginal cultural heritage value: *Yes/*No
The archaeological site is recorded on the Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register: *Yes/*No
Who are the traditional owners of the archaeological site (if known)?
Site assessment
Current description of the archaeological site:
Date recorded:
Is the archaeological site included in the Heritage Register: *Yes/*No (If yes, please advise Heritage Register number)
Is the archaeological site included in the Heritage Overlay? *Yes/*No (If yes, please advise HO number)
Are there any associated archaeological sites? *Yes/*No (If yes, please provide details:)
Place history
Please provide a brief history of the archaeological site (at least 1 to 2 paragraphs):
Analysis of site (interpretation)
Analysis must consider the former use/s of the archaeological site and how it is demonstrated in the historical archaeological features or artefacts and how its current use may have impacted the archaeological remains.
Statement of significance of the archaeological site:
What is significant?
How is it significant?
Why is it significant?
Key sources
Please list the key sources relied on. This could include books, publications, websites, the names of experts or any other resources.
Threat
Is the archaeological site under immediate or imminent threat? *Yes/*No/*Don't know
If yes, please provide details:
Investigation or survey information
Is the site card being submitted following a discovery of an archaeological site during an investigation or survey of land that has been previously reported to Heritage Victoria under section 127 of the Heritage Act 2017?
Supporting documents
a map showing the location of the archaeological site, clearly identifying the recorded area;
a plan showing all archaeological features, and any built cultural heritage (the plan must be labelled and the scale noted—e.g. 1:100 000);
current photographs of the site;
historical documentation (historical photographs, historical plans and historical maps);
any other documents or notes produced as a result of the survey;
spatial files;
owners details or certificate/s of title issued within 30 days before the site card is provided must be submitted with the site card (not required for property entirely located on Crown land).
Statement
I state that the information I have given on this site card is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Name of person who provided site card:
Sch. 9A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 19, amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 24.
Sch 9A
Form of survey report
Schedule 9A—Form of survey report
Section 127(7)(a) of the Heritage Act 2017
Regulation 27A
Heritage Inventory numbers
The report must include Heritage Inventory numbers for archaeological sites discovered during an investigation or survey or any construction or excavation of land. Site cards must be submitted to Heritage Victoria prior to the completion of the survey report to allow site numbers to be included.
Heritage Inventory numbers of archaeological sites
*None identified/*Numbers:
Details of person providing survey report
If acting on behalf of a body corporate, organisation or a natural person:
Name of body corporate, organisation or natural person:
Position title:
Survey report content
Project information
General information which outlines the following:
• date of investigation or survey;
• reason for investigation or survey;
• location of investigation or survey;
• key stakeholders.
Desktop assessment
Please provide background project information about the investigation or survey area, including the following:
• historical research, including plans and images;
• environmental history;
• reference to prior studies;
• summary of places with current heritage listings within the study area.
Maps
Please include maps and plans of the following:
• location of the investigation or survey area;
• location and extent of known or discovered archaeological sites in the investigation or survey area (locate all objects and features referred to in the site description);
• existing heritage listings within or in direct proximity to the investigation or survey area.
Investigation or survey methodology
Please set out the methodology used for the investigation or survey, including the following:
• investigation or survey rationale;
• investigation or survey method;
• limitations of the methodology.
Investigation or survey results
Please provide the findings of the investigation or survey, including the following:
• a detailed and current description of the archaeological site;
• details of archaeological sites identified during the investigation or survey;
• copies of any relevant site cards;
• allocated Heritage Inventory numbers;
• photographs—with a photographic scale (include photographs of any major features referred to in the site description);
• current or future threats to the physical fabric of the archaeological site/s (if known);
• other relevant details and information including any other site information obtained during the investigation or survey (such as information obtained by research or by traversing the land by any means);
• concise statement of significance for the archaeological site.
Limitations
Please list any limitations relating to the investigation or survey.
Note: These may include issues arising from the execution of the methodology, including constraints and/or limitations, access restrictions or poor visibility, etc.
Recommendations:
*Additional investigations; and
*Project outcomes and options; and
*Urgent site management or protection requirements.
Please name key sources used in the investigation or survey. This could include books, publications, websites, the names of experts or any other resources.
Appendices
Statement of person providing survey report
I state that the information that I have given in this archaeological survey report is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Name of person who provided survey report:
Sch 10
Form of interim protection order
Schedule 10—Form of interim protection order
Regulation 28
Title:
Business/organisation name:
Address:
SUBURB STATE POSTCODE
Dear [Name]
VICTORIAN HERITAGE REGISTER INTERIM PROTECTION ORDER
You are the [owner/occupier/personapparently in charge] of the [place/object] located at [address] which is categorised as a [Heritage Act category] under section 25 of the Heritage Act 2017.
In the opinion of the [Heritage Council/Executive Director] it is [necessary/desirable] to make an interim protection order under section 143 of the Heritage Act 2017 for the purposes of that Act.
TAKE NOTICE THAT:
The [Heritage Council/Executive Director] causes this interim protection order to be served on you.
On service of this order on you and while this order remains in force the [place/object] at [address] is taken to be included in the Victorian Heritage Register in the category specified.
If a place is taken to be a registered place, the Heritage Act 2017 provides that—
| A person must not: | The maximum penalty: |
| remove, relocate or demolish; ordamage or despoil; ordevelop or alter; orexcavate—<br>all or any part of that place. | Under section 87(1) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person knowingly or recklessly performing the act—<br>4800 penalty units, or imprisonment for 5 years, or both for a natural person;9600 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| | Under section 88(1) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person negligently performing the act—<br>2400 penalty units, or imprisonment for 2 years, or both for a natural person;4800 penalty units for a body corporate.<br>Under section 89(1) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person performing the act—<br>48 penalty units for a natural person;240 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| remove, relocate or demolish; ordamage or despoil; oralter—<br>a registered object. | Under section 87(2) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person knowingly or recklessly performing the act—<br>4800 penalty units, or imprisonment for 5 years or both for a natural person;9600 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| | Under section 88(2) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person negligently performing the act—<br>2400 penalty units, or imprisonment for 2 years or both for a natural person;4800 penalty units for a body corporate.<br>Under section 89(2) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person performing the act—<br>48 penalty units for a natural person;240 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| disturb the position of an object that is a fixed registered object. | Under section 87(3) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person knowingly or recklessly performing the act—<br>4800 penalty units, or imprisonment for 5 years or both for a natural person;9600 penalty units for a body corporate.<br>Under section 88(3) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person negligently performing the act—<br>2400 penalty units, or imprisonment for 2 years or both for a natural person;4800 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| | Under section 89(3) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person performing the act—<br>48 penalty units for a natural person;240 penalty units for a body corporate. |
Under section 144 of the Heritage Act 2017, this order comes into force on service on you.
This order—
(a) continues in force for a period of 4 months or for any further period specified by the Minister; or
(b) until—
(i) the place or object is included in the Victorian Heritage Register; or
(ii) the Heritage Council determines that the place or object does not warrant inclusion in the Victorian Heritage Register; or
(iii) the Heritage Council removes the order—
whichever occurs first.
Under section 147 of the Heritage Act 2017, on service of this order on you, you must display a notice in the prescribed form of the existence of this order in a conspicuous position on the place to which this order relates while the order is in force.
The maximum penalty for a contravention of section 147 is 120 penalty units for a natural person, or 240 penalty units for a body corporate.
Dated:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HERITAGE VICTORIA/EXECUTIVE OFFICER HERITAGE COUNCIL/CHAIR HERITAGE COUNCIL
Sch 11
Form of notice of existence of an interim protection order
Schedule 11—Form of notice of existence of an interim protection order
Regulation 29
An interim protection order made by the Executive Director/Heritage Council has been served for the following place/object:
NAME OF PLACE/OBJECT:
ADDRESS:
SPECIFIED CATEGORY (under section 25 of the Heritage Act 2017):
TAKE NOTICE THAT:
While the Interim Protection Order remains in force the above place/object is taken to be included in the Victorian Heritage Register in the category specified.
If a place is taken to be a registered place, the Heritage Act 2017 provides that—
| A person must not: | The maximum penalty: |
| remove, relocate or demolish; ordamage or despoil; ordevelop or alter; orexcavate—<br>all or any part of that place. | Under section 87(1) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person knowingly or recklessly performing the act—<br>4800 penalty units, or imprisonment for 5 years, or both for a natural person;9600 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| | Under section 88(1) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person negligently performing the act—<br>2400 penalty units, or imprisonment for 2 years, or both for a natural person;4800 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| | Under section 89(1) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person performing the act—<br>48 penalty units for a natural person;240 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| remove, relocate or demolish; ordamage or despoil; oralter—<br>a registered object. | Under section 87(2) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person knowingly or recklessly performing the act—<br>4800 penalty units, or imprisonment for 5 years or both for a natural person;9600 penalty units for a body corporate.<br>Under section 88(2) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person negligently performing the act—<br>2400 penalty units, or imprisonment for 2 years or both for a natural person;4800 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| | Under section 89(2) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person performing the act—<br>48 penalty units for a natural person;240 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| disturb the position of an object that is a fixed registered object. | Under section 87(3) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person knowingly or recklessly performing the act—<br>4800 penalty units, or imprisonment for 5 years or both for a natural person;9600 penalty units for a body corporate. |
| | Under section 88(3) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person negligently performing the act—<br>2400 penalty units, or imprisonment for 2 years or both for a natural person;4800 penalty units for a body corporate.<br>Under section 89(3) of the Heritage Act 2017, for a person performing the act—<br>48 penalty units for a natural person;240 penalty units for a body corporate. |
Under section 144 of the Heritage Act 2017, this order comes into force on service on you.
This order—
(a) continues in force for a period of 4 months or for any further period specified by the Minister; or
(b) until—
(i) the place or object is included in the Victorian Heritage Register; or
(ii) the Heritage Council determines that the place or object does not warrant inclusion in the Victorian Heritage Register; or
(iii) the Heritage Council removes the order—
whichever occurs first.
Under section 147 of the Heritage Act 2017, on service of this order on you, you must display a notice in the prescribed form of the existence of this order in a conspicuous position on the place to which this order relates while the order is in force.
The maximum penalty for a contravention of section 147 is 120 penalty units for a natural person, or 240 penalty units for a body corporate.
Sch 12
Form of identity card for inspectors
Schedule 12—Form of identity card for inspectors
Regulation 30
Heritage Act 2017
Heritage Regulations 2017
Identity card for inspectors
I certify that the bearer, [name], has been appointed an inspector under section 194 of the Heritage Act 2017.
Signed: Executive Director/Delegate
Inspector number:
[include photograph of inspector]
Sch. 13 inserted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 25.
Sch 13
Infringement offences and infringement penalties
Schedule 13—Infringement offences and infringement penalties
Regulation 31
Column 1<br>Item
Column 2<br>Prescribed infringement offence
Column 3<br>Prescribed infringement penalty
1.
Section 43
12 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
2.
Section 59
6 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
3.
Section 60(1)
6 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
4.
Section 60(2)
6 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
5.
Section 64(3)
6 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
6.
Section 78(5)
2 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>10 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
7.
Section 89(1)
10 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
8.
Section 89(2)
10 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
9.
Section 89(3)
10 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
10.
Section 104
12 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
11.
Section 125
12 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
12.
Section 126A
6 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
13.
Section 127(4)
6 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
14.
Section 127(5)
6 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
15.
Section 127(6)
6 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
16.
Section 128(3)
12 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
17.
Section 147(1)
12 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
18.
Section 147(2)
12 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
19.
Section 163
12 penalty units in the case of a natural person<br>20 penalty units in the case of a body corporate
═════════════
Endnotes
1 General information
See www.legislation.vic.gov.au for Victorian Bills, Acts and current Versions of legislation and up-to-date legislative information.
The Heritage Regulations 2017, S.R. No. 108/2017 were made on 24 October 2017 by the Governor in Council under sections 255 and 256 of the Heritage Act 2017, No. 7/2017 and came into operation on 1 November 2017: regulation 3.
The Heritage Regulations 2017 will sunset 10 years after the day of making on 24 October 2027 (see section 5 of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994).
INTERPRETATION OF LEGISLATION ACT 1984 (ILA)
Style changes
Section 54A of the ILA authorises the making of the style changes set out in Schedule 1 to that Act.
References to ILA s. 39B
Sidenotes which cite ILA s. 39B refer to section 39B of the ILA which provides that where an undivided regulation, rule or clause of a Schedule is amended by the insertion of one or more subregulations, subrules or subclauses the original regulation, rule or clause becomes subregulation, subrule or subclause (1) and is amended by the insertion of the expression "(1)" at the beginning of the original regulation, rule or clause.
Interpretation
As from 1 January 2001, amendments to section 36 of the ILA have the following effects:
• Headings
All headings included in a Statutory Rule which is made on or after
1 January 2001 form part of that Statutory Rule. Any heading inserted in a Statutory Rule which was made before 1 January 2001, by a Statutory Rule made on or after 1 January 2001, forms part of that Statutory Rule.
This includes headings to Parts, Divisions or Subdivisions in a Schedule; Orders; Parts into which an Order is divided; clauses; regulations; rules; items; tables; columns; examples; diagrams; notes or forms.
See section 36(1A)(2A)(2B).
• Examples, diagrams or notes
All examples, diagrams or notes included in a Statutory Rule which is made on or after 1 January 2001 form part of that Statutory Rule. Any examples, diagrams or notes inserted in a Statutory Rule which was made before 1 January 2001, by a Statutory Rule made on or after 1 January 2001, form part of that Statutory Rule. See section 36(3A).
• Punctuation
All punctuation included in a Statutory Rule which is made on or after
1 January 2001 forms part of that Statutory Rule. Any punctuation inserted in a Statutory Rule which was made before 1 January 2001, by a Statutory Rule made on or after 1 January 2001, forms part of that Statutory Rule.
See section 36(3B).
• Provision numbers
All provision numbers included in a Statutory Rule form part of that Statutory Rule, whether inserted in the Statutory Rule before, on or after
1 January 2001. Provision numbers include regulation numbers, rule numbers, subregulation numbers, subrule numbers, paragraphs and subparagraphs. See section 36(3C).
• Location of "legislative items"
A "legislative item" is a penalty, an example or a note. As from 13 October 2004, a legislative item relating to a provision of a Statutory Rule is taken to be at the foot of that provision even if it is preceded or followed by another legislative item that relates to that provision. For example, if a penalty at the foot of a provision is followed by a note, both of these legislative items will be regarded as being at the foot of that provision. See section 36B.
• Other material
Any explanatory memorandum, table of provisions, endnotes, index and other material printed after the Endnotes does not form part of a Statutory Rule. See section 36(3)(3D)(3E).
2 Table of Amendments
This publication incorporates amendments made to the Heritage Regulations 2017 by statutory rules, subordinate instruments and Acts.
These Regulations provide for fees by reference to fee units within the meaning of the Monetary Units Act 2004.
The amount of the fee is to be calculated, in accordance with section 7 of that Act, by multiplying the number of fee units applicable by the value of a fee unit.
The value of a fee unit for the financial year commencing 1 July 2024 is $16.33. The amount of the calculated fee may be rounded to the nearest 10 cents.
The value of a fee unit for future financial years is to be fixed by the Treasurer under section 5 of the Monetary Units Act 2004. The value of a fee unit for a financial year must be published in the Government Gazette and a Victorian newspaper before 1 June in the preceding financial year.
Penalty Units
These Regulations provide for penalties by reference to penalty units within the meaning of section 110 of the Sentencing Act 1991. The amount of the penalty is to be calculated, in accordance with section 7 of the Monetary Units Act 2004, by multiplying the number of penalty units applicable by the value of a penalty unit.
The value of a penalty unit for the financial year commencing 1 July 2024 is $197.59. The amount of the calculated penalty may be rounded to the nearest dollar.
The value of a penalty unit for future financial years is to be fixed by the Treasurer under section 5 of the Monetary Units Act 2004. The value of a penalty unit for a financial year must be published in the Government Gazette and a Victorian newspaper before 1 June in the preceding financial year.
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from Victorian Legislation (legislation.vic.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
1 Heritage Regulations 2017
Version No. 004
Heritage Regulations 2017
S.R. No. 108/2017
Version incorporating amendments as at
1 April 2025
TABLE OF PROVISIONS
Regulation Page
1 Objectives 1
2 Authorising provisions 1
3 Commencement 1
4 Definitions 2
5 Form of application to nominate place or object for inclusion in the Heritage Register 2
5A Form of nomination of object integral to place 2
5B Form of nomination of additional land as part of a place 2
6 Fee for lodging review of Executive Director's refusal of nomination for the Heritage Register 3
6A Persons or bodies that may apply for an exclusion determination 3
6B Persons who may prepare an application for an exclusion determination 4
6C Form of application for an exclusion determination 4
6D Fee to apply for an exclusion determination 4
6E Fee to request review of decision to make or refuse to make exclusion determination 5
6F Fee for applicant to request review of decision to refuse to make an exclusion determination 5
7 Form of submission to the Heritage Council 5
8 Form of application for heritage certificate 5
9 Fee for application for heritage certificate 5
10 Form of notice of intention to sell registered place or registered object 5
11 Form of notice for alterations for the purposes of religious services or rites 5
12 Form of permit application 6
13 Fees for application for permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object 6
14 Fee for application for permit to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object 7
15 Fees to amend permit application to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object 8
16 Fees to amend permit application to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object 8
17 Form for amendment of permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object or to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object 9
18 Fee for amendment of permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object 9
Third, the Regulations set out exemptions and waiver powers and identify infringement offences with prescribed infringement penalties (regs 25-26 and reg 31 with Schedule 13). Regulation 25 exempts eligible beneficiaries under the State Concessions Act 2004 from certain fees, and regulation 26 authorises the Heritage Council to waive particular fees where the Council is satisfied that the works or review relate to named public purposes such as conservation, research, education, safety, or applications from community groups. The Regulations also prescribe which sections of the Act are infringement offences and the corresponding infringement penalties (Schedule 13, reg 31).
The Regulations state their objectives explicitly in regulation 1, namely to prescribe forms and fees, to exempt classes from fees, to authorise fee waivers by the Heritage Council, to prescribe infringement offences and penalties, and to prescribe other matters for the purposes of the Act. The Regulations are made under sections 255 and 256 of the Heritage Act 2017 (reg 2), and came into operation on 1 November 2017 (reg 3). The instrument has been amended several times, with additions of exclusion determination material and new forms in the 2024 and 2025 amendment instruments, as indicated by the amendment notes appearing after particular regulations.
This description is descriptive of the Regulations’ mechanical effect. The stated policy purpose appears in the Regulations themselves (reg 1). The rest of this note tests the operational consequences of those mechanical rules, with reference to the specific regulatory provisions and the explanatory endnotes for fee and penalty unit conversion where relevant.
Main concepts
The Regulations operationalise a small number of recurring administrative concepts that appear throughout the Heritage Act 2017. Those concepts, and the concrete regulatory mechanisms that implement them, are:
Prescribed forms and structured information capture: the Regulations translate statutory references to "form" into specific Schedules. For example, Schedule 1 is the prescribed nomination form for section 27(2) of the Act (reg 5), Schedule 6 is the prescribed permit application form for section 93(2)(a) (reg 12), Schedule 8 is the consent form for archaeological consents required by section 124 (reg 22), and so on. Each Schedule lists required fields, supporting documents and applicant declarations, creating a standardised evidentiary packet.
Fee units and fee scales: fees are expressed in fee units for consistency with the Monetary Units Act 2004. The Regulations set fee levels in fee units, and the explanatory notes record the fee unit value for the 2024-25 year at $16.33 (Explanatory details). The fee schedule contains both fixed fees (for example, 25 fee units for lodging a review of the Executive Director’s refusal of nomination, reg 6) and graduated fees that scale with the estimated cost of works (a multi‑tiered schedule in reg 13(1)(b)(i)-(xiii)). Some fees for review are expressed as percentages of the original fee (for example reg 20 prescribes a review fee equal to 200 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee).
Exclusion determinations for major developments: the Regulations add a discrete process and fees for "exclusion determinations" associated with major developments. Regulation 6A prescribes who may apply for an exclusion determination where the exclusion is "required for the sole purpose of facilitating a major development", and defines "major development" by a monetary threshold (more than $5 million) and by enumerated activities (construction, demolition, subdivision, relocation of waterways and so on). The Regulations also prescribe who may prepare such applications (reg 6B), the application form (Schedule 1B, reg 6C) and fees (reg 6D for application, reg 6E-6F for review-related fees).
Interplay with Aboriginal heritage approvals: multiple forms and schedules require a Cultural Heritage Management Plan where the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 makes one necessary, and the Regulations expressly cross‑reference that statutory requirement. Permit and consent forms include specific fields about CHMP status and a note that "a decision on your application cannot be made until you provide a copy of the CHMP" where the Aboriginal Heritage Act requires it (Schedules 6, 7, 8 et al). The Regulations therefore make compliance with Aboriginal heritage processes a gating condition for Heritage Act permits and consents in many cases.
Waivers and exemptions: regulation 25 provides eligibility-based exemptions tied to the State Concessions Act 2004, and regulation 26 authorises the Heritage Council to waive many prescribed fees where the Council is satisfied the application concerns conservation, research, education, safety, repeat‑work scenarios, or is from a community group (and a related waiver for community-group reviews).
Interim protection and immediate effect: Schedule 10 is the interim protection order form for section 143(2) of the Act (reg 28). The form expressly states that on service the place or object is taken to be included in the Victorian Heritage Register (Schedules 10 and 11), and it reproduces the Act’s criminal penalties for destroying or altering a place or registered object (referencing sections 87-89 as reproduced in the Schedule). The order comes into force on service under section 144, and display obligations for a notice are imposed with an infringement penalty structure specified.
Infringement schedule: regulation 31 and Schedule 13 list specific sections of the Act that are infringement offences and set the infringement penalty in penalty units. The explanatory details set the penalty unit value for 2024-25 (endnotes), so the cash amounts can be converted but are listed in penalty units in the Regulations.
These core concepts recur in a system that links evidence, fee signalling, gating with Aboriginal heritage processes, and executive discretion via waivers and the Heritage Council. The main implementation levers therefore are standardised forms (reducing information asymmetry and enabling rapid triage), a finely tiered fee schedule (signalling cost of regulatory processing and potentially discouraging trivial applications), and explicit waiver pathways that introduce administrative discretion.
Who it affects
The Regulations affect a set of identifiable actors by prescribing who must provide information, who pays, who may apply for particular determinations, and which public authorities may act under the Regulations.
Nominees and applicants: individuals and entities nominating a place or object for inclusion on the Heritage Register must use the prescribed nomination form (Schedule 1, reg 5). Applicants for permits to carry out works to registered places or objects must use the permit form (Schedule 6, reg 12), and must supply the supporting documents listed in the Schedule, including title documents, extent diagrams, heritage impact statements and, where relevant, an approved Cultural Heritage Management Plan (Schedules 6 and 7).
Owners and government asset managers: many forms require owner or government asset manager details, and several applications require the consent of the owner or government asset manager if the applicant is not the owner (Schedules 1, 6, 7, 8, 7B). For sale notices (Schedule 4, reg 10) and notices of alterations for religious services (Schedule 5, reg 11), the owner or the person acting on the owner’s behalf is identified as the responsible actor.
Community groups and eligible concession beneficiaries: regulation 4 defines "community group" for fee waiver and policy purposes, and reg 26 lists community groups as a class for which the Heritage Council may waive prescribed fees. Regulation 25 exempts "eligible beneficiaries" under the State Concessions Act 2004 from certain fees for owner-occupiers of registered places and registered objects and for owner-occupier archaeological sites on principal residence land, which affects pensioners and concession-card holders.
Public authorities, government asset managers and senior public servants in major developments: regulation 6A prescribes that where an exclusion determination is required solely to facilitate a major development, the applicants who may apply are tightly described, and include the government asset manager responsible for the major development, the Department Head responsible for the major development, the public authority responsible for the project, and the Administrative Office Head responsible for the major development. The restriction is important because it limits who can seek an exclusion determination for a major development, excluding private developers unless they are in the class of listed public bodies or act through them.
Persons who prepare exclusion applications and archaeologists: regulation 6B prescribes who may prepare an exclusion determination application, including persons "suitably qualified and experienced" in cultural heritage assessment or those approved by the Executive Director. For archaeological consents, the application forms require archaeological specialists and CVs in support (Schedules 7B, 8, 8A).
Applicants for reviews and parties to hearings: the Regulations set fees for reviews of Executive Director determinations (reg 20), and the submission form (Schedule 2) contemplates hearings before the Heritage Council and the possibility of being represented and heard. The prescribed review fees apply to the person requesting review, subject to the exemptions and waiver powers.
Owners corporations: where works involve common property, many forms require owners corporation consent (Schedules 1, 6, 7, 7A, 7B, 8). This brings bodies corporate into the compliance chain for strata properties.
Inspectors and Heritage Victoria: the Regulations prescribe an identity card form for inspectors (Schedule 12), indicating administrative control over who exercises inspection powers, and set the form and content of site cards and survey reports that Heritage Victoria will receive and rely on (Schedules 9 and 9A).
Who pays: the Regulations make applicants the primary payers of fees for nominations, permits, consents and reviews, unless an exemption or waiver applies (regs 25-26). The fee schedule uses fee units and some fees are substantial, especially those tied to the estimated cost of works or to exclusion determinations for major developments (regs 13, 6D). The State Concessions Act and Heritage Council waiver power reduce financial burden for certain classes, but that relief is discretionary for waivers and statutory for eligible beneficiaries (regs 25-26).
Who decides: Heritage Victoria’s Executive Director performs triage and makes determinations that can be reviewed, the Heritage Council has waiver and review powers and hears submissions (Schedule 2), and the Minister has a role in extending interim protection orders (Schedule 10). The Executive Director also approves persons who may prepare exclusion applications (reg 6B) and can be the issuer of interim protection orders (Schedule 10). The Heritage Council can exercise waiver discretion (reg 26), which centralises substantial administrative discretion within the statutory body.
Key duties and rights
The Regulations convert a range of statutory duties and procedural rights from the Heritage Act into concrete administrative obligations, and they also define rights to access processes such as reviews and exclusions.
Key duties:
Use prescribed forms and supply specified information: applicants must use the forms prescribed by regulations when seeking nomination, permits, consents, amendments, or exclusion determinations (regs 5, 5A, 5B, 12, 17, 19A, 6C). Each Schedule sets out required supporting documents, such as title certificates within 30 days (Schedules 1, 1A, 6), extent diagrams, photographs, heritage impact statements, evidence of cost, and owners corporation consent where relevant (Schedules 1, 6, 7, 8). Failure to supply required documents may impede decision-making.
Pay prescribed fees unless exempt or waived: numerous regulations set fees in fee units (reg 6, reg 6D, reg 9, reg 13, reg 14, reg 23 etc). The Regulations explicitly make many fees subject to regulations 25 and 26, which provide exemptions and waiver powers. Applicants therefore have a duty to calculate and pay fees, but also a duty to consider whether they qualify for exemption or waiver.
Display notices where interim protection orders are served: Schedule 10 and Schedule 11 require a display of a prescribed notice on a place subject to an interim protection order, and they note the maximum penalty for failing to comply with section 147 (Schedule 10 and 11 refer to section 147 and the associated penalty). The interim protection order takes effect on service (Schedule 10, para 4).
Provide CHMPs where required: multiple Schedules require applicants to identify whether a Cultural Heritage Management Plan is required under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, and to provide an approved CHMP where required, noting that a permit or amendment cannot be issued if works are inconsistent with an approved CHMP (Schedules 6, 7, 7A, 8, 8A, 7B). Thus applicants have a duty to ensure consistency with Aboriginal heritage approvals before Heritage Victoria will finalise a decision.
Key rights:
Right to administrative review: applicants have the right to request a review of the Executive Director’s determinations in several contexts. Regulation 6 prescribes a fee to lodge review of Executive Director’s refusal of a nomination (25 fee units, subject to reg 26), regulation 20 prescribes a review fee equal to 200 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee for reviews of determinations in relation to permits, and regulation 24 prescribes a review fee for consents set at 45 per cent of the consent fee in regulation 23. Those review rights exist under the Act and the Regulations set the fee and the applicable form where required.
Right to request exclusion determinations (limited classes): regulation 36A of the Act is implemented by the Regulations in regs 6A-6F, which carve out a right to apply for an exclusion determination in major development cases for a specified class of public authorities and government asset managers. The right is therefore not universal but is prescribed for a limited class of public actors where the purpose is to facilitate a major development.
Right to seek Heritage Council hearings and make submissions: Schedule 2 (reg 7) provides the form for submissions to the Heritage Council and includes fields indicating whether the submitter requests a hearing and whether they wish to be heard if another party requests a hearing, which operationalises a party’s right to participate in Heritage Council processes.
Right to fee waiver or exemption in limited circumstances: regulation 25 provides an entitlement to exemptions for eligible beneficiaries under the State Concessions Act 2004 in listed scenarios, which is a statutory exemption right. Regulation 26, by contrast, provides the Heritage Council with discretion to waive fees where the Council is satisfied specified conditions are met, giving affected parties a route to fee relief subject to administrative decision.
Rights connected to interim protection orders: the Regulations formalise the effects of an interim protection order on a place or object, including the immediate imputation of registered status on service (Schedules 10 and 11), which triggers the Act’s criminal prohibitions on demolition, removal or damaging acts and therefore affords substantive protective rights to the site while the order is in force.
These duties and rights are operationalised through prescribed documents, evidentiary lists and fee mechanisms. The combination of mandatory document sets, fee signals, CHMP gating and waiver discretion defines the practical obligations applicants will face and the relief mechanisms they may seek.
Penalties and enforcement
The Regulations set out two interlocking enforcement systems: criminal and civil-infringement (penalty unit-based) mechanisms imported from the Act, and administrative enforcement via procedural requirements, fees and waiver controls.
Criminal penalties and interim protection:
Interim protection orders change legal status on service: Schedules 10 and 11 reproduce the effect that once an interim protection order is served the place or object is taken to be included in the Victorian Heritage Register and the Act’s criminal prohibitions apply immediately (Schedule 10 paras 2-3 and Schedule 11 para 1). The Schedules reproduce the criminal penalties in sections 87-89 of the Act, specifying severe maximum penalties including imprisonment and very large penalty unit totals for natural persons and bodies corporate for knowingly or recklessly performing prohibited acts such as demolition, damage, removal or excavation (Schedule 10, table reproducing s 87-89).
Immediate risk profile on service: because an interim protection order takes effect on service (Schedule 10 para 4), acts done after service can expose actors to the maximum penalties reproduced in the Schedules. The order must be displayed on the place and failure to display can attract a prescribed maximum penalty (Schedules 10 and 11 refer to section 147 which carries a maximum prescribed penalty).
Infringement offences and penalty units:
Prescribed infringement offences and penalties: regulation 31 and Schedule 13 list specific sections of the Act that are treated as infringement offences and specify the infringement penalty in penalty units for natural persons and bodies corporate. Examples include section 43 (12 penalty units for a natural person), section 59 (6 units for a natural person), section 89(1)-(3) (10 units for a natural person), section 104, section 125 and several others (Schedule 13).
Monetary value of penalty units: the Explanatory details set out how to convert penalty units to dollars, noting the value of a penalty unit for the financial year commencing 1 July 2024 is $197.59, and the value of a fee unit for that year is $16.33 (Explanatory details). That means, for example, an infringement of section 43 attracting 12 penalty units would be approximately $2,371 under the 2024-25 penalty unit rate, subject to rounding. The Regulations leave the conversion to fee/penalty unit schedules governed by the Monetary Units Act and the Sentencing Act 1991.
Administrative enforcement and financial sanctions:
Fee charging as behavioural control: the Regulations use fees and review fees (sometimes multiple times the original fee, for example reg 20 sets a review fee at 200 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee) as administrative levers. Where a review is costly, some applicants may elect not to pursue a review, which is an indirect enforcement mechanism shaping behaviour.
Waivers and exemptions as enforcement modulation: the Heritage Council’s discretionary waiver power in regulation 26 can reduce or remove fee obstacles where the Council is satisfied the purpose falls within listed grounds. That discretion is an enforcement modulation tool, because it provides a route to reduced financial sanction where the Council chooses to employ it.
Operational enforcement actors and documentary enforcement:
Inspectors: Schedule 12 provides the form of identity card for inspectors appointed under the Act (reg 30). Inspectors, once appointed and carrying the prescribed identity card, are enforcement actors able to exercise inspection powers under the Act.
Documentary obligations provide grounds for administrative refusal or delay: failure to supply required supporting documents, failure to obtain or present an approved CHMP when required, or failure to secure owners corporation consent where necessary are grounds on which decisions can be delayed or refused, which is an administrative enforcement mechanism built into the Schedules.
Together, the Regulations implement both criminal-state enforcement (imprisonment and very high penalty unit totals for serious offences), increased administrative costs through fees and review fees, and lower-level infringement penalties for a set of breaches. The conversion of units to dollars is controlled by other statutes, so the Regulations anchor monetary exposure in unit counts while actual dollar amounts vary with the published unit rate for each financial year.
How it interacts with other laws
The Regulations are built as an operational layer on top of the Heritage Act 2017 and explicitly reference, and cross‑link, to several other legislative regimes, creating interdependencies and gating effects.
Heritage Act 2017:
Primary authorising law: these Regulations are made under sections 255 and 256 of the Heritage Act 2017 (reg 2). Many prescribed forms and fees map directly to specific sections of the Act, for example reg 5 prescribes the form for section 27(2) of the Act, reg 12 prescribes the form for section 93(2)(a), and so on. The Regulations therefore operationalise procedural steps set by the Act.
Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006:
CHMP requirement gating: multiple Schedules make a Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) a required supporting document where the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 requires a CHMP for proposed works, and they explicitly cite section 52(3) of that Act as the legal basis for the gating rule that a permit cannot be issued while works are inconsistent with an approved CHMP (Schedules 6, 7, 7A, 8, 8A, 7B). The Regulations therefore create a direct dependency where Heritage Act permits are conditional on compliance with the Aboriginal Heritage Act processes, and applicants must manage compliance with both Acts.
Major Transport Projects Facilitation Act 2009 and Public Administration Act 2004:
Cross-references for eligibility: regulation 6A’s definition of "transport infrastructure" uses the Major Transport Projects Facilitation Act 2009 for definition (reg 6A(2)). Regulation 6A also references the Public Administration Act 2004 for definitions of "Department Head" and "Administrative Office Head" when prescribing who may apply for an exclusion determination for a major development (reg 6A(1)(b) and 6A(1)(d)). These cross-references align the exclusion determination applicant class with public authority definitions from other statutes.
State Concessions Act 2004:
Fee exemptions tied to concessions: regulation 25 exempts "eligible beneficiaries" within the meaning of the State Concessions Act 2004 from paying particular fees for some applications. That creates a statutory cross-check for fee exemption eligibility.
Monetary Units Act 2004 and Sentencing Act 1991:
Fee and penalty valuation: the Regulations set fees and infringement penalties in fee units and penalty units, and the Explanatory details explain that calculation is governed by the Monetary Units Act 2004 and section 110 of the Sentencing Act 1991 respectively. The Regulations therefore rely on external provisions to compute dollar amounts each financial year.
Building Act 1993 and planning scheme Heritage Overlay:
Operational linkage to planning and building approvals: the nomination form asks whether a demolition permit has been issued under the Building Act 1993 and whether a planning permit has been issued by the responsible authority, signalling that those approvals are relevant to the Heritage Act process (Schedule 1). The nomination also asks for local Heritage Overlay (HO) information, so the Regulations make the heritage registration process mindful of concurrent planning approvals.
Administrative law and review processes:
Review and hearing rights under the Act: the Regulations set fees and forms for seeking review of Executive Director determinations and for making submissions to the Heritage Council, but the detailed rights of review, merits review or judicial review remain as provided in the Act and the general administrative law framework. The Regulations therefore interact with general administrative law rights without displacing them.
Taken together, the Regulations do not operate in isolation. They create procedural linkages and gating conditions with Aboriginal heritage processes, planning and building approvals, concession regimes, and the unit-based financial regime under the Monetary Units Act. Practically, applicants must coordinate compliance with multiple statutes and administratively manage the interplay between approvals, CHMPs and fee exposure.
Amendment history
The Regulations were made on 24 October 2017 and commenced on 1 November 2017 (reg 3). The instrument includes amendment annotations in the body of the text and an endnotes table listing later amending instruments. The Regulation has been amended multiple times with identifiable insertions and substitutions, as recorded in the text.
Principal amending instruments and notable insertions:
Heritage Amendment Regulations 2018, S.R. No. 54/2018: made on 15 May 2018 with commencement 1 June 2018, recorded in the endnotes table. The 2018 instrument appears in the table but the text does not show a large number of consequential changes referenced directly in the main body.
Heritage Amendment Regulations 2024, S.R. No. 3/2024: made on 30 January 2024 and commenced 1 February 2024 (endnotes). This instrument added several provisions that are visible in the text as insertion or amendment notes. Notably, reg 5A and reg 5B (forms for nomination of object integral to a place and nomination of additional land) were inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 (reg 7). Regulation 4’s definition of "traditional owner" was inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 (reg 6(2)), and regs 6A-6F, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E and 6F concerning exclusion determinations, who may apply and who may prepare applications were inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 (reg 8). Schedules were substituted or amended (e.g., Schedule 2 substituted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg 16). Schedule 7A and Schedule 8A and other forms were also added under the 2024 instrument.
Heritage Amendment Regulations 2025, S.R. No. 13/2025: made on 25 March 2025 and commenced 1 April 2025 (endnotes). Multiple substitution and amendment notes in the Regulations show the 2025 instrument substantially updated schedules and some fee provisions. For example, Schedule 1 was substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 11, several fees were amended (reg 13(1)(b) substitution noted), regulation 27 was substituted (reg 9), and numerous Schedules were substituted or amended (Schedules 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9A and more note S.R. No. 13/2025 as the amending instrument). Regulation 31 was amended and Schedule 13 inserted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 25, which established the current list of infringement offences and penalties.
Textual amendment annotations within the Regulations identify the exact regulations amended or inserted by the amending instruments, for example "Reg. 5A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 7" and "Sch. 1 substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 11". Those marginal notes are the authoritative record within this Version No. 004.
Implication of amendment pattern:
The 2024 instrument introduced a discrete exclusion determination pathway for major developments and added a number of forms for nomination of objects integral to places and additional land. The 2025 instrument substituted whole Schedules and adjusted fee and penalty structures, including inserting the infringement schedule and moving some forms and requirements into updated Schedules.
For practitioners, the amendment history means that forms and fee amounts are subject to change and that the current operative wording must be checked against the amending instruments cited in the regulation annotations. The endnotes also state that the Regulations will sunset ten years after the day of making on 24 October 2027 under the Subordinate Legislation Act 1994, which is a temporal constraint on the instrument as originally made (Endnotes, General information).
Litigation history
The Regulations themselves do not record any cases or judicial determinations. There are no entries in the text naming litigation, and the Schedules and endnotes do not identify any judicial review or appellate decisions that interpret the Regulations. The document therefore contains no litigation history to report.
Practical implications of the absence of recorded cases in the instrument:
No statutory precedent captured in the Regulations: because the Regulations do not record litigation, practitioners must look to case law under the Heritage Act 2017 and general administrative law for judicial interpretation of the underlying Act and of any disputes arising from the exercise of powers conferred by the Act or the application of the Regulations. The Regulations are primarily procedural and fees-based, and disputes about the exercise of discretion, the lawfulness of waivers, the validity of interim protection orders or the correctness of Heritage Council decisions will be litigated under the Act and administrative law, not within the Regulations themselves.
Expect litigation under the Act rather than the Regulations: disputes about the substantive heritage significance of places or objects, and appeals of Executive Director determinations or Heritage Council decisions, would be subject to the Act’s review processes and, where relevant, judicial review in Victorian courts. Practitioners should therefore consult case law under the Heritage Act 2017 and related judicial decisions when advising clients, because the Regulations provide the procedural skeleton but not the interpretation of substantive statutory duties.
In short, there is no litigation history embedded in this Regulations text. Any precedent that interprets these procedures will be found in published decisions concerning the Heritage Act 2017 and associated administrative decisions, rather than in the Regulations’ Schedules.
Gotchas
The Regulations create several practical pitfalls that can impose cost, delay or forfeiture risks if they are not followed. The following are concrete operational issues drawn from the text.
Fee conversion and shifting dollar amounts: most fees are stated in fee units, and the actual dollar amount depends on the fee unit value set under the Monetary Units Act 2004. The Explanatory details show the fee unit value for the financial year beginning 1 July 2024 is $16.33 (Explanatory details). Practitioners must therefore calculate current dollar fees at the time of lodgement and allow for changes in the fee unit value and rounding rules. Failure to pay the correct dollar amount due to miscalculation could result in non‑acceptance of an application.
Substantial fees for exclusion determinations and reviews: an application for an exclusion determination is 480 fee units (reg 6D), which at the 2024-25 fee unit rate would be approximately $7,838, subject to rounding rules in the Monetary Units Act (Explanatory details). An applicant requesting review of a decision to refuse an exclusion determination faces 960 fee units (reg 6F), around $15,676 at the 2024-25 fee unit value. These are significant amounts and can materially affect developers’ costs, particularly where decisions are contested. Remember that these fees are "subject to regulation 26", meaning the Heritage Council can waive them in qualifying circumstances.
Review fees that are large multiples of original fees: regulation 20 sets review fees equal to 200 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee in regulation 13. That creates a deliberate cost multiplier that increases the economic barrier to review. Practitioners should budget for high review fees where an applicant intends to contest an Executive Director determination.
Multi-class permit applications add to fees: where an application covers more than one class of works, regulation 13(2) prescribes a combined fee calculated as the highest applicable fee plus 50 per cent of each other applicable fee. That can produce non‑intuitive totals for complex projects where multiple categories of works are proposed.
CHMP gating and sequencing: many forms explicitly state that a permit cannot be issued until an approved CHMP is provided where the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 requires one (Schedules 6, 7, 7A, 8, 8A). Failure to obtain the CHMP or to show consistency with an approved CHMP will delay or prevent permit issuance. Practically, an applicant must parallel-track Aboriginal heritage approvals and Heritage Act applications to avoid delays.
Owner and owners corporation consent requirements: several forms require owners or government asset manager consent if the applicant is not the owner, and owners corporation consent where common property is involved (Schedules 1, 6, 7, 7A, 7B, 8). Failing to obtain those consents can obstruct applications.
Strict documentary currency for titles: the nomination and many application forms require copies of title certificates issued within 30 days prior to lodgement (Schedules 1, 1A, 6). Use of an out-of-date title may be fatal to acceptance.
Interim protection order immediate effect and display obligations: an interim protection order takes effect on service (Schedule 10 para 4) and requires that a notice of existence be displayed on the place (Schedule 10 para 6; Schedule 11). Failing to display the prescribed notice or continuing works after service exposes parties to the criminal penalties reproduced in the Schedules and to infringement penalties. Check immediately whether a site is subject to an interim protection order before proceeding with any works.
Narrow eligibility for exclusion determinations for major developments: regulation 6A limits applicants who may seek an exclusion determination for the sole purpose of facilitating a major development to particular public sector actors and government asset managers. Private developers cannot invoke reg 6A unless they are acting through or as one of those prescribed bodies. This is a practical constraint on private parties seeking to use the exclusion pathway.
Heritage Council waiver is discretionary and conditional: although reg 26 authorises the Heritage Council to waive prescribed fees in several situations, the waiver is conditional on the Council being satisfied as to the specified grounds. Applicants cannot assume an entitlement to waiver and must make a persuasive case linked to the enumerated grounds.
Infringement penalties are capped in Schedule 13 but more serious statutory criminal sanctions remain for offences covered by sections referenced in Schedules 10 and 11. Practitioners must identify whether a breach is an infringement (Schedule 13) or a criminal offence attracting much larger penalties and potentially imprisonment (Schedules 10 and 11 reproducing sections 87-89).
Multiple forms and form versions: the Regulations have been amended and whole Schedules substituted (see amendment notes). Using an old or superseded form risks rejection. Always use the current published version of the Schedules referenced by the Regulations.
These "gotchas" are concrete compliance risks created by the Regulations’ structure of forms, fee units, gating with CHMPs, and the immediate legal effects of interim protection orders.
How to comply
Compliance under the Regulations is a combination of procedural accuracy, sequencing (especially where Aboriginal heritage approvals apply), correct fee calculation, and, where relevant, engagement with waiver or exemption pathways. The following practical steps set out a compliance checklist tied to the Regulations.
Identify which form applies and use the current Schedule.
For nominations under s 27(2) of the Act, use Schedule 1 (reg 5). For objects integral to a place or additional land nominations, use Schedule 1A (regs 5A and 5B). For permits use Schedule 6 (reg 12). For consents relating to archaeological matters use Schedule 8 (reg 22). For amendments, use Schedules 7 or 7A as appropriate (regs 17 and 19A). For exclusion determinations for major developments use Schedule 1B (reg 6C). Always confirm you have the most recent Schedule version, given the 2024 and 2025 substitution history noted in the Regulations.
Compile required supporting documents exactly as the Schedule requires.
Certificate(s) of title issued within 30 days before lodgement where required (Schedules 1, 1A, 6). Extent diagrams or spatial files clearly showing boundaries. Recent photographs and historical photographs if available. Heritage Impact Statement where works or activities require it (Schedules 6 and 7). Owners corporation consent and owner/government asset manager consent when the applicant is not the owner (Schedules 1, 6, 7, 8). For archaeological or survey matters, submit site cards and survey reports in the forms specified (Schedules 9 and 9A, regs 27 and 27A).
Check CHMP requirements and sequence the approvals.
If the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 requires a CHMP for the proposed activity, ensure a CHMP is obtained and identify whether any proposed works are inconsistent with an approved CHMP. The Schedules make clear that a permit cannot be issued if the works are inconsistent with an approved CHMP (e.g. Schedule 6 note referencing s 52(3) of the Aboriginal Heritage Act). Where a CHMP is required, plan for the timing and obtain the approved CHMP before expecting a final permit decision.
Calculate and pay the correct fees in fee units and dollars.
Identify the correct fee in fee units from the relevant regulation (for example reg 13 for permit applications or reg 6D for exclusion determination applications). Convert fee units into dollars using the current fee unit value under the Monetary Units Act 2004, noting the Explanatory details report the 2024-25 fee unit value as $16.33 but that future values will be published by the Treasurer. Round in accordance with the Monetary Units Act. Remember that many fees are expressly subject to regs 25 and 26, so consider whether an exemption or waiver applies before payment.
Assess eligibility for exemption or waiver early.
Evaluate whether the applicant qualifies as an "eligible beneficiary" under the State Concessions Act 2004 for the exemptions listed in regulation 25. If not, consider applying to the Heritage Council for a waiver under regulation 26 where the works are for conservation, research, public education, safety, are the same as previous permits, or are from a community group. Where a waiver is plausible, make the waiver submission at lodgement and provide supporting evidence linking the application to the statutory waiver grounds.
For major developments, confirm applicant eligibility for exclusion determinations.
If seeking an exclusion determination to facilitate a major development (cost over $5 million and activities listed in reg 6A(2)), ensure the applicant is one of the prescribed public entities (government asset manager, Department Head, public authority, Administrative Office Head) per reg 6A(1). If not, the exclusion pathway under reg 6A will not be available. Be prepared to identify the "major development" and supply the estimated cost and relevant documentation in Schedule 1B where applicable.
Plan for review costs and strategic decisions.
Because review fees can be substantial, and in some cases are a multiple of the original fee (reg 20, reg 24), assess whether a review is cost-effective. If contemplating a review, consider the waiver power in reg 26 as part of your strategy, and ensure compliance with submission requirements in Schedule 2 if seeking a Heritage Council hearing.
Be strict about interim protection orders.
Check whether a place is subject to an interim protection order before commencing works. If an order is served, the place is treated as registered on service (Schedules 10 and 11) and criminal prohibitions apply. If served, display the prescribed notice and halt any proposed works that would contravene the Act. Consult the interim protection order form (Schedule 10) to understand the obligations and penalties reproduced there.
Use pre-application discussions where suggested.
Many forms ask whether a pre-application discussion with Heritage Victoria has occurred and request the P number if so (for example Schedule 6). Use pre-application discussions to identify evidentiary gaps, CHMP expectations, and likely fee bands, which reduces the risk of rejection or delay.
Keep contemporaneous records and consider indemnities in contracts.
For owners and developers, ensure sale contracts, construction contracts and tender documents allocate responsibility for heritage compliance, CHMP procurement, fees and the risk of interim protection orders. Include obligations to inform purchasers and contractors about s 59 sale notices and interim protection orders if relevant (Schedule 4, reg 10). Ensure owners corporation consents are obtained well before lodgement where common property is involved.
Following this checklist aligns with the requirements embedded in the Schedules and regulations. The critical practical sequencing constraints are the CHMP gating rule, owners/owners corporation consents, up-to-date title documentation, timely fee calculation using the current fee unit value, and attention to the Heritage Council’s discretionary waiver powers where financial relief is needed.
19 Fee for amendment of permit to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object 9
19A Form for request to make minor amendment to permit 9
20 Fee for review of Executive Director's determination in relation to permits 10
21 Fee for review of Executive Director's determination in relation to refusal of a permit to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object 10
21A Form of application for exemption from requirement to obtain consent 10
22 Form of application for consent 10
23 Fees for application for consent to undertake works or activities in relation to archaeological sites or archaeological artefacts 11
23A Form of application to request amendment of consent 13
23B Fee to apply for an amendment of consent 13
24 Fee for review of Executive Director's determination in relation to consent 14
25 Exemption from fees 14
26 Waiver of fees for certain works or activities in relation to registered place, registered object, archaeological site or archaeological artefact 15
27 Form of site card 16
27A Form of survey report 16
28 Form of interim protection order 16
29 Form of notice of existence of an interim protection order 16
30 Form of identity card for inspectors 16
31 Infringement offences and infringement penalties 16
Schedule 1—Form of nomination of a place or object for inclusion in the Heritage Register 17
Schedule 1A—Form of nomination of object integral or additional land to a registered or nominated place 23
Schedule 1B—Form of application for an exclusion determination that a place or object not be included in the Heritage Register 27
Schedule 2—Form for submission to the Heritage Council 34
Schedule 3—Form of application for heritage certificate 37
Schedule 4—Form of notice of intention to sell registered place or registered object 39
Schedule 5—Form of notice for alterations for the purposes of religious services or rites 41
Schedule 6—Form of permit application 44
Schedule 7—Form of request to amend permit 49
Schedule 7A—Form of request to make minor amendment to permit 54
Schedule 7B—Form of application for exemption from consent 59
Schedule 8—Form of application for consent 64
Schedule 8A—Form of application for amendment of consent 70
Schedule 9—Form of site card 75
Schedule 9A—Form of survey report 80
Schedule 10—Form of interim protection order 83
Schedule 11—Form of notice of existence of an interim protection order 87
Schedule 12—Form of identity card for inspectors 90
Schedule 13—Infringement offences and infringement penalties 91
═════════════
Endnotes 94
1 General information 94
2 Table of Amendments 96
3 Explanatory details 97
Version No.004
Heritage Regulations 2017
S.R. No. 108/2017
Version incorporating amendments as at
1 April 2025
1 Objectives
The objectives of these Regulations are—
(a) to prescribe forms and documents for the purposes of the Heritage Act 2017; and
Reg. 1(b) amended by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 5(1).
(b) to prescribe fees payable in relation to certain permits, reviews, consents, exclusions and certificates under the Act; and
Reg. 1(c) amended by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 5(2).
(c) to exempt particular classes of people from certain fees; and
(d) to authorise the Heritage Council to waive certain fees prescribed in these Regulations; and
(e) to prescribe infringement offences and infringement penalties; and
(f) to prescribe other matters for the purposes of the Act.
2 Authorising provisions
These Regulations are made under sections 255 and 256 of the Heritage Act 2017.
3 Commencement
These Regulations come into operation on 1 November 2017.
4 Definitions
In these Regulations—
community group means a not-for-profit society, association or club (other than a charity)—
(a) established for the purpose of educating the community about, or to protect, a place or object; and
(b) whose officers receive no remuneration or gratuity for their services to the society, association or club;
Reg. 4 def. of the Act amended by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 6(1).
the Act means the Heritage Act2017;
Reg. 4 def. of traditional owner inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 6(2).
traditional owner has the same meaning as it has in section 7 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006.
5 Form of application to nominate place or object for inclusion in the Heritage Register
For the purposes of section 27(2) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 1.
Reg. 5A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 7.
5A Form of nomination of object integral to place
For the purposes of section 27A(3) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 1A.
Reg. 5B inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 7.
5B Form of nomination of additional land as part of a place
For the purposes of section 27B(3) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 1A.
6 Fee for lodging review of Executive Director's refusal of nomination for the Heritage Register
Subject to regulation 26, for the purpose of section 30(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 25 fee units.
Reg. 6A inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6A Persons or bodies that may apply for an exclusion determination
(1) For the purposes of section 36A(1) of the Act, in the case of an exclusion determination required for the sole purpose of facilitating a major development, the following persons or bodies are prescribed—
(a) the government asset manager that is responsible for the major development;
(b) the Department Head within the meaning of section 4(1) of the Public Administration Act 2004 who is responsible for the major development;
(c) the public authority that is responsible for the major development;
(d) the Administrative Office Head within the meaning of section 4(1) of the Public Administration Act 2004 who is responsible for the major development.
(2) In this regulation—
major development includes the carrying out of one or more, or an interrelated series of one or more, activities including the following activities, the cost of which is more than $5 million—
(a) the construction, alteration or extension of a building or transport infrastructure;
(b) the construction or the carrying out of works;
(c) the demolition or removal of a building, transport infrastructure or works;
(d) the subdivision or consolidation of land, airspace or buildings;
(e) the installation or provision, or operation of, facilities or services;
(f) the relocation, deepening or widening of a waterway;
transport infrastructure has the same meaning as in the Major Transport Projects Facilitation Act 2009.
Reg. 6B inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6B Persons who may prepare an application for an exclusion determination
For the purposes of section 36A(2)(b) of the Act, the following persons are prescribed—
(a) a person who is suitably qualified and experienced in identifying and assessing the cultural heritage significance of places, objects or land;
(b) a person or a member of a class of persons approved by the Executive Director for the purposes of this regulation.
Reg. 6C inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6C Form of application for an exclusion determination
For the purposes of section 36A(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 1B.
Reg. 6D inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6D Fee to apply for an exclusion determination
For the purposes of section 36A(2)(e) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 480 fee units.
Reg. 6E inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6E Fee to request review of decision to make or refuse to make exclusion determination
Subject to regulation 26, for the purposes of section 36E(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 25 fee units.
Reg. 6F inserted by S.R. No. 3/2024 reg. 8.
6F Fee for applicant to request review of decision to refuse to make an exclusion determination
For the purposes of section 36E(4)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 960 fee units.
7 Form of submission to the Heritage Council
For the purposes of section 44(2) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 2.
8 Form of application for heritage certificate
For the purposes of section 58(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 3.
9 Fee for application for heritage certificate
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purposes of section 58(2)(c) of the Act, the prescribed fee is 3·75 fee units.
10 Form of notice of intention to sell registered place or registered object
For the purposes of section 59 of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 4.
11 Form of notice for alterations for the purposes of religious services or rites
For the purposes of section 90(4)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 5.
12 Form of permit application
For the purposes of section 93(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 6.
13 Fees for application for permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object
(1) Subject to subregulation (2) and regulations 14, 25 and 26, for the purposes of section 93(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fees are as follows—
(a) for a permit application for the subdivision, consolidation or realignment of a boundary of a registered place or the subdivision of a building on that registered place—100 fee units;
Reg. 13(1)(b) substituted by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 5.
(b) for a permit application for works or activities to a registered place or registered object, if the estimated cost of the works or activities is—
(i) less than $10 000—20 fee units; or
(ii) $10 000 or more but less than $20 000—75 fee units; or
(iii) $20 000 or more but less than $100 000—200 fee units; or
(iv) $100 000 or more but less than $250 000—300 fee units; or
(v) $250 000 or more but less than $500 000—367·4 fee units; or
(vi) $500 000 or more but less than $1 million—442·4 fee units; or
(vii) $1 million or more but less than $5 million—760·3 fee units; or
(viii) $5 million or more but less than $10 million—885·8 fee units; or
(ix) $10 million or more but less than $30 million—1017 fee units; or
(x) $30 million or more but less than $50 million—1149·1 fee units; or
(xi) $50 million or more but less than $100 million—1712 fee units; or
(xii) $100 million or more but less than $200 million—2149 fee units; or
(xiii) $200 million or more—2431 fee units.
(2) The prescribed fee for an application for a permit to carry out more than one class of works or activities set out in subregulation (1) is the sum of—
(a) the highest of the fees which would have applied if a separate application had been made; and
(b) 50 per cent of each of any other fee that would have applied if a separate application had been made.
14 Fee for application for permit to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26 and sections 49(3) and 92 of the Act, for the purposes of section 93(2)(b) of the Act, the prescribed fees are as follows—
Reg. 14(a) amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 6.
(a) for an application to demolish or destroy the whole of a registered place—885·8 fee units or, if the estimated cost of the works or activities is $10 million or more, the fee set out in regulation 13(1)(b)(ix) to (xiii) that corresponds with that estimated cost;
Reg. 14(b) amended by S.R. No. 13/2025 reg. 6.
(b) for an application to demolish or destroy the whole of a registered object—885·8 fee units or, if the estimated cost of the works or activities is $10 million or more, the fee set out in regulation 13(1)(b)(ix) to (xiii) that corresponds with that estimated cost.
15 Fees to amend permit application to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 96(3)(b) of the Act, in respect of a permit application to carry out works or activities in relation to a registered place or registered object—
(a) for a permit application that has not been on public display in accordance with section 94 of the Act, the prescribed fee is 45 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 13; or
(b) for a permit application that has been on public display in accordance with section 94 of the Act, the prescribed fee is 75 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 13.
16 Fees to amend permit application to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 96(3)(b) of the Act, in respect of a permit application to demolish or destroy the whole of a registered place or registered object—
(a) for a permit application that has not been on public display in accordance with section 94 of the Act, the prescribed fee is 20 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 14; or
(b) for a permit application that has been on public display in accordance with section 94 of the Act, the prescribed fee is 30 per cent of the corresponding permit application fee set out in regulation 14.
17 Form for amendment of permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object or to demolish or destroy registered place or registered object
For the purposes of section 105(2)(a) of the Act, the prescribed form is the form set out in Schedule 7.
18 Fee for amendment of permit to carry out works or activities in relation to registered place or registered object
Subject to regulations 25 and 26, for the purpose of section 105(2)(b) of the Act, in respect of an amendment to a permit to carry out works or activities in relation to a registered place or registered object, the prescribed fee is 75
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.