sec.423Reporting tampering or suspected tampering with approved intelligent transport system

sec.423 Reporting tampering or suspected tampering with approved intelligent transport system

If an intelligent access program service provider knows, or has reasonable grounds to suspect, an approved intelligent transport system has been tampered with, the service provider must report the matter to the Regulator— within 7 days; and in the approved form. Maximum penalty—$6000. If an intelligent access program service provider knows, or has reasonable grounds to suspect, a back-office intelligent transport system has been tampered with, the service provider must report the matter to TCA— within 7 days; and in the approved form. Maximum penalty—$6000. For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2) , an intelligent access program service provider does not know, or have reasonable grounds to suspect, an approved intelligent transport system or back-office intelligent transport system has been tampered with merely because the service provider has— accessed a report made by the system (including a noncompliance report) indicating that apparent tampering with the system has been detected electronically; or analysed information generated by the system. In this section— back-office intelligent transport system means that part of an approved intelligent transport system that is not fitted, and is not intended to be fitted, to an intelligent access program vehicle. s 423 amd 2016 No. 65 s 139 (sec.423-ssec.1) If an intelligent access program service provider knows, or has reasonable grounds to suspect, an approved intelligent transport system has been tampered with, the service provider must report the matter to the Regulator— within 7 days; and in the approved form. Maximum penalty—$6000. (sec.423-ssec.2) If an intelligent access program service provider knows, or has reasonable grounds to suspect, a back-office intelligent transport system has been tampered with, the service provider must report the matter to TCA— within 7 days; and in the approved form. Maximum penalty—$6000. (sec.423-ssec.3) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2) , an intelligent access program service provider does not know, or have reasonable grounds to suspect, an approved intelligent transport system or back-office intelligent transport system has been tampered with merely because the service provider has— accessed a report made by the system (including a noncompliance report) indicating that apparent tampering with the system has been detected electronically; or analysed information generated by the system. (sec.423-ssec.4) In this section— back-office intelligent transport system means that part of an approved intelligent transport system that is not fitted, and is not intended to be fitted, to an intelligent access program vehicle.

• (a) within 7 days; and
• (b) in the approved form.
• (a) within 7 days; and
• (b) in the approved form.