Health Ombudsman Act 2013
sec.68BVarying interim prohibition order on application by health practitioner
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.68B
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Health Ombudsman Act 2013.
sec.68B Varying interim prohibition order on application by health practitioner
A health practitioner may apply to the health ombudsman to vary an interim prohibition order if there is a material change in relation to the matter giving rise to the issue of the interim prohibition order. An application under subsection (1) must— be in the approved form; and be accompanied by any other information reasonably required by the health ombudsman. In deciding the application, the health ombudsman— must consider whether the material change justifies varying the action taken; and is limited to the grounds mentioned in section 68 . The health ombudsman must decide to do 1 of the following— vary the interim prohibition order in the way requested in the application; vary the interim prohibition order in a way that is different to that requested in the application; not to vary the interim prohibition order. If the health ombudsman decides to vary the interim prohibition order in the way requested in the application— the health ombudsman must give the practitioner who made the application notice of the decision; and sections 71 , 73 , 76 , 78 , 79 , 94 and 279 apply to the variation decision as if it were, to the extent of the variation, a decision to issue an interim prohibition order. If the health ombudsman proposes to vary the interim prohibition order in a way that is different to that requested in the application, sections 69 (1) to (3) , 70 , 71 , 73 to 76 , 78 , 79 , 94 and 279 apply to the variation decision as if it were, to the extent of the variation, a decision to issue an interim prohibition order. If the health ombudsman proposes not to vary the interim prohibition order, the health ombudsman must give the practitioner who made the application notice— stating the proposed decision; and inviting the practitioner to make a submission to the health ombudsman, within a stated period of at least 5 business days, about the proposed decision. The practitioner may make submissions orally or in writing. The health ombudsman must have regard to any submissions made by the practitioner within the stated period before deciding not to vary the interim prohibition order. If the health ombudsman decides not to vary the interim prohibition order, the health ombudsman must give notice of the decision to the practitioner stating the following— the decision; the reasons for the decision; that the practitioner may apply to QCAT for a review of the decision; how, and the period within which, the practitioner may apply for the review of the decision. s 68B ins 2017 No. 32 s 70 amd 2019 No. 38 s 27 sch 2 ; 2019 No. 38 s 27 sch 2 (sec.68B-ssec.1) A health practitioner may apply to the health ombudsman to vary an interim prohibition order if there is a material change in relation to the matter giving rise to the issue of the interim prohibition order. (sec.68B-ssec.2) An application under subsection (1) must— be in the approved form; and be accompanied by any other information reasonably required by the health ombudsman. (sec.68B-ssec.3) In deciding the application, the health ombudsman— must consider whether the material change justifies varying the action taken; and is limited to the grounds mentioned in section 68 . (sec.68B-ssec.4) The health ombudsman must decide to do 1 of the following— vary the interim prohibition order in the way requested in the application; vary the interim prohibition order in a way that is different to that requested in the application; not to vary the interim prohibition order. (sec.68B-ssec.5) If the health ombudsman decides to vary the interim prohibition order in the way requested in the application— the health ombudsman must give the practitioner who made the application notice of the decision; and sections 71 , 73 , 76 , 78 , 79 , 94 and 279 apply to the variation decision as if it were, to the extent of the variation, a decision to issue an interim prohibition order. (sec.68B-ssec.6) If the health ombudsman proposes to vary the interim prohibition order in a way that is different to that requested in the application, sections 69 (1) to (3) , 70 , 71 , 73 to 76 , 78 , 79 , 94 and 279 apply to the variation decision as if it were, to the extent of the variation, a decision to issue an interim prohibition order. (sec.68B-ssec.7) If the health ombudsman proposes not to vary the interim prohibition order, the health ombudsman must give the practitioner who made the application notice— stating the proposed decision; and inviting the practitioner to make a submission to the health ombudsman, within a stated period of at least 5 business days, about the proposed decision. (sec.68B-ssec.8) The practitioner may make submissions orally or in writing. (sec.68B-ssec.9) The health ombudsman must have regard to any submissions made by the practitioner within the stated period before deciding not to vary the interim prohibition order. (sec.68B-ssec.10) If the health ombudsman decides not to vary the interim prohibition order, the health ombudsman must give notice of the decision to the practitioner stating the following— the decision; the reasons for the decision; that the practitioner may apply to QCAT for a review of the decision; how, and the period within which, the practitioner may apply for the review of the decision.