The date of the spirometry used must be appropriate to the period of assessment: the spirometry should be not more than six months older than the relevant time in the assessment period to which the information is to be applied.
The nature of the spirometry should be appropriate: the nature of the spirometric readings should be consistent with the known conditions affecting the veteran and should also be consistent with such other information (eg, old spirometry) as is available or can reasonably be obtained. There should be no unexplained inconsistencies between the various reports.
If the nature of the spirometry cannot be reconciled with other relevant information, the spirometry may need to be repeated or the veteran referred to a respiratory physician for clarification of the situation.
If a veteran has emphysema, as evidenced by diminished carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, and diagnosed by a specialist respiratory physician, assessment can be made on the basis of effort tolerance alone.
Step 3: Determine the impairment rating based on effort tolerance.
To determine the impairment rating based on effort tolerance follow the substeps below.
(Each step is elaborated in the following pages.)
Substep 3A
Determine the symptomatic activity level by applying Table1.1 — Activity Levels (with energy expenditure in METs).
Page 10
Substep 3B
Convert that symptomatic activity level into an impairment rating. This step involves consulting either Table 1.2 — Loss of Cardiorespiratory Function: Exercise Tolerance (Males); or Table 1.3 — Loss of Cardiorespiratory Function: Exercise Tolerance (Females).
Page 13
After both substeps have been completed, a single rating will have been obtained. This rating is known as the impairment rating for effort tolerance.
If symptoms do not occur, a rating for the condition may be found in Table 1.6 (Cardiac Failure) if applicable, or in the relevant Other Impairment table.
Substep 3A: Determine the symptomatic activity level.
The symptomatic activity level is the exercise level (measured in METs) at which symptoms occur. One MET represents the energy expenditure associated with the consumption of 3.5 mL oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute. Table 1.1 lists various activities grouped according to their energy expenditure in METs.
The symptomatic activity level is the level at which the activities from within any one METs category consistently give rise to symptoms of the accepted cardiorespiratory condition, such as angina, dyspnoea, palpitations, or fatigue. The symptomatic activity level may be determined by reference to a report specifically provided for the purpose as well as by reference to clinical notes and by comparison of the information with the activities listed in Table 1.1. (The symptomatic activity level may be determined by reference to activities other than those contained in Table 1.1 if the energy expenditure (in METs) of those activities is available in the medical or scientific literature.)
Section full-source-retrieval-0003 - Guide to Determining Impairment and Compensation 2016 - Document excerpt 3 | Zoe
In determining the symptomatic activity level, greater reliance is to be placed on activities that involve steady, as opposed to sporadic, expenditure of energy. Such activities are more reliable as indicators of exercise tolerance. Less reliance is to be placed on activities that can be completed in less than a few minutes, as symptoms may take longer than this to occur.
Responses of the type ‘I cannot do such and such’ or ‘I do not do so and so’ are not useful in assessing the symptomatic activity level. What must be established is that level of exercise that the veteran is able to do but which results in angina, breathlessness, or some other cardiorespiratory symptom.
Symptoms that occur while an activity is performed are not necessarily a result of the energy expenditure occasioned by the activity. Many specific activities can be performed in a way that would mean that they were no longer examples of the METs level in which they are placed in Table 1.1. For example, while driving a car sedately is an example of 2–3 METs, driving a car in a Grand Prix is not.
Estimations of exercise tolerance above the 6‑7 METs level should only be made using exercise tests. The activities above the 6‑7 METs level are listed for information only.
TABLE 1.1 Combined male and female symbol
CARDIORESPIRATORY IMPAIRMENT: ACTIVITY LEVELS
(with energy expenditure in METs)
1‑2 METs
Energy expended at rest or minimal activity<br> Lying down.<br> Sitting and drinking tea.<br> Using sewing machine (electric).<br> Sitting down.<br> Sitting and talking on telephone.<br> Travelling in car as passenger.<br> Standing.<br> Sitting and knitting.<br> Playing cards.<br> Strolling (slowly).<br> Light sweeping.<br> Clerical work (desk work only).
2–3 METs
Energy expanded in dressing, washing and performing light household duties<br> Light household duties.<br> Walking slowly (3.5 km/h).<br> Playing piano, violin, or organ.<br> Typing.<br> Cooking or preparing meals.<br> Playing billiards.<br> Clerical work which involves moving around.<br> Setting table.<br> Driving power boat.<br> Washing dishes.<br> Playing golf (with power buggy).<br> Bench assembly work (seated).<br> Dressing, showering.<br> Horseback riding at walk.<br> Using self‑propelled mower.<br> Light tidying, dusting.<br> Lawn bowls.<br> Polishing silver.<br> Driving car.
3–4 METs
Energy expended in walking at an average pace<br> Walking at average walking pace (5 km/h).<br> Golf (pulling buggy).<br> Machine assembly.<br> Cleaning car (excludes vigorous polishing).<br> Minor car repairs.<br> Tidying house.<br> Welding.<br> Cleaning windows.<br> Table tennis.<br> Pushing light power mower over flat suburban lawn at slow steady pace<br> Vacuuming.<br> Sedate cycling (10 km/h)<br> Shifting chairs.<br> Light gardening (weeding and water).<br> Hanging out washing.<br> Making bed.
4–5 METs
Moderate activity: encompasses more strenuous daily activities with the exclusion of manual labour and vigorous exercise<br> Mopping floors.<br> Golf (carrying bag).<br> Light carpentry (eg, chiselling, hammering).<br> Scrubbing floors.<br> Ballroom dancing.<br> Beating carpets.<br> Tennis doubles (social, non‑competitive).<br> Stocking shelves with light objects.<br> Polishing furniture.<br> Wallpapering.<br> Shopping and carrying groceries (10 kg).<br> Gentle swimming.<br> Painting outside of house.<br> Hoeing (soft soil).<br> Stacking firewood.
5–6 METs
Heavy exercise: manual labour or vigorous sports<br> Walking 6.5 km/h (sustained brisk walk, discomfort in talking at the same time).<br> Walking slowly but steadily up stairs.<br> Carpentry (eg. Sawing and planing with hand tools).<br> Swimming laps (non‑competitive).<br> Pushing a full wheelbarrow (20 kg).<br> Shovelling dirt (12 throws a minute).<br> Digging in garden.
6–7 METs
Badminton (competitive)<br> Tennis (singles, non‑competitive).<br> Water skiing.<br> Loading truck with bricks.<br> Using a pick and shovel to dig trenches.
7–8 METs
Very heavy exercise<br> Jogging (8 km/h).<br> Horseback riding (galloping).<br> Carrying heavy objects (30 kg) on level ground.<br> Sawing hardwood with hand tools.
Running quickly (10 km/h).<br> Cycling quickly (25 km/h).<br> Carrying loads (10 kg) up a gradient.<br> Football (any code).
The activities listed under each heading are examples. There will be other activities that have the same METs expenditure and hence can be used for reference if their METs level is known.
Ratings derived from METs are age adjusted
Alternate procedures for establishing the symptomatic activity level
1. The symptomatic activity level may be determined by exercise tests. These tests include:
use of treadmills; or
cycles; or
rowing machines.
Because of their greater objectivity, the results of exercise tests (when available) are to be used in preference to the method of calculating exercise tolerance as described above. Moreover, exercise tests must always be used to make an estimate of exercise tolerance above 6–7 METs.
2. If certain levels of activity have been prohibited by the treating doctor, because of the adverse effect the prohibited activity is likely to have on the veteran’s health as a result of the accepted condition, then the level of exercise that has been prohibited may be regarded as the symptomatic activity level.
Substep 3B: Convert the symptomatic activity level into an impairment rating.
The symptomatic activity level is used, in conjunction with the veteran’s age, height, and sex, to obtain an impairment rating.
In the case of a male, Table 1.2 is to be applied.
In the case of a female, Table 1.3 is to be applied.
For the purposes of Tables 1.2 and 1.3, a veteran’s age is taken to be his or her age in whole years at the date of the report relating to the exercise tolerance (unless the report is of a retrospective type and clearly refers to some earlier period, in which case the veteran’s age is taken to be his or her age in whole years at the relevant time).
Step 4: (Omit this step if no respiratory disease is present.) Determine the impairment rating based on measurements of lung function.
FEVl, FVC, and MEF 25–75 are the usual physiological measurements of lung function. Determinations of FEVl, FVC, and MEF 25–75 should be conducted by an experienced operator without specific administration of a bronchodilator. The best set of results should be selected, that is, the set of results which indicates the greatest degree of health and, consequently, the lowest degree of impairment.
If both pre‑bronchodilator and post‑bronchodilator results are available the pre‑bronchodilator results are to be applied in determining the impairment rating based on measurements of lung function.
To determine the impairment rating based on measurements of lung function, follow the substeps below.
Substep 4A
Obtain the measured FEVl, FVC, and MEF 25–75 from the data.
Substep 4B
Work out the predicted FEVl, FVC, and MEF 25–75 for a person of the same age, height, and gender. This can be done either by applying the nomograms Figure 1a (for males) or Figure 1b (for females) or by applying the formula relating to each nomogram.
Substep 4C
Express the measured FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted FEV1, and Express the measured FVC as a percentage of the predicted FVC, and Express the measured MEF 25–75 (if appropriate) as a percentage of the predicted MEF 25–75.<br>These conversions are performed by applying the formula:<br>Start formula, measured value as % of predicted value equals, start fraction, actual value times 100 over predicted value, end fraction, end formula
Substep 4D
Determine an impairment rating from a physiological measurement by using the percentage obtained in substep 4C in conjunction with Table 1.4. Separate impairment ratings can be obtained from each physiological measurement (that is, from the FEV1, FVC, and MEF 25–75).
Substep 4E
The final impairment rating is the highest (or equal highest) of the ratings obtained in substep 4D.
Function Loss Table 1.2 Combined male and female symbol
LOSS OF CARDIORESPIRATORY FUNCTION: EXERCISE TOLERANCE
(Males)
Age Symptomatic Activity Level Age Symptomatic Activity Level
*One MET represents the energy expenditure associated with the consumption of 3.5mL oxygen/kg body weight/min.
Ratings derived from METs are age adjusted
FIGURE 1a ‑ PREDICTION NOMOGRAM: MALE (BTPS)
Graph depicting a prediction nomogram for males
FIGURE 1b ‑ PREDICTION NOMOGRAM: FEMALE (BTPS)
Graph depicting a prediction nomogram for females
Functional Loss Table 1.4 Combined male and female symbol
LOSS OF CARDIORESPIRATORY FUNCTION: PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS
ImpairmentRating FEV1 as apercentageof predicted FVC as apercentageof predicted MEF 25–75 as apercentageof predicted
NIL 85 85 85
TWO 84
SIX 84 84
SEVEN 83
EIGHT 83 83
TEN 82 82
ELEVEN 81 82 81
TWELVE
THIRTEEN 80 80
FOURTEEN 79 81 79
FIFTEEN
SIXTEEN 78 80 78
SEVENTEEN 77 77
EIGHTEEN 76 79 76
NINETEEN
TWENTY 75 78 75
TWENTY‑ONE 74 74
TWENTY‑TWO 73 77 73
TWENTY‑THREE 72 72
TWENTY‑FOUR 71 76 71
TWENTY‑FIVE
TWENTY‑SIX 70 75 70
TWENTY‑SEVEN 69 74 69
TWENTY‑EIGHT 68 68
TWENTY‑NINE 67 73 67
THIRTY 66 72 66
THIRTY‑ONE 65 71 65
THIRTY‑TWO 64 64
THIRTY‑THREE 63 70 63
THIRTY‑FOUR 62 69 62
THIRTY‑FIVE 61 68 61
THIRTY‑SIX 60 67 60
THIRTY‑SEVEN 59 59
Functional Loss Table 1.4 (continued) Combined male and female symbol
LOSS OF CARDIORESPIRATORY FUNCTION: PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS
ImpairmentRating FEV1 as apercentageof predicted FVC as apercentageof predicted MEF 25–75 as apercentageof predicted
THIRTY‑EIGHT 58 66 58
THIRTY‑NINE 57 65 57
FORTY 64
FORTY‑ONE 56 63 56
FORTY‑TWO 55 62 55
FORTY‑THREE 54 61 54
FORTY‑FOUR 53 60 53
FORTY‑FIVE 52 52
FORTY‑SIX 51 59 51
FORTY‑SEVEN 50 58 50
FORTY‑EIGHT 49 57 49
FORTY‑NINE 48 56 48
FIFTY 47 55 47
FIFTY‑ONE 46 54 46
FIFTY‑TWO 45 53 45
FIFTY‑THREE 44 52 44
FIFTY‑FOUR 43 51 43
FIFTY‑FIVE 42 50 42
FIFTY‑SIX 41 49 41
FIFTY‑SEVEN 40 40
FIFTY‑EIGHT 39 48 39
FIFTY‑NINE 38 47 38
SIXTY 37 46 37
SIXTY‑ONE 36 45 36
SIXTY‑TWO 35 44 35
SIXTY‑THREE 34 43 34
SIXTY‑FOUR 33 42 33
SIXTY‑FIVE 32 41 32
SIXTY‑SIX 31 40 31
SIXTY‑SEVEN 30 39 30
SIXTY‑EIGHT 29 38 29
SIXTY‑NINE 28 37 28
SEVENTY 27 36 27
Ratings derived from this table are age adjusted
Whenever the measured parameter is less than 85% of the predicted, Table 1.4 corresponds to the following formulas:
Start formula, impairment rating based on FEV1 equals 98 –% FEV1 plus, start fraction, 50 over, open parentheses, % FEV1 minus 90, close parentheses, end fraction, end formula