Section 1 - Grant Guidelines for the Linkage Program (2018) Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities - Grant Guidelines for the Linkage Program (2018) Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities | Zoe
Grant Guidelines for the Linkage Program (2018) Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities
1Grant Guidelines for the Linkage Program (2018) Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 1
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Grant Guidelines for the Linkage Program (2018) Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities.
Researchers are required to direct requests for information to the Research Office within the Administering Organisation.<br>ARC Contacts are on the ARC website.
Type of grant opportunity:
Restricted competitive
Australian Research Council Act 2001
I, Dan Tehan, Minister for Education, having satisfied myself of the matters set out in section 59 of the Australian Research Council Act 2001, approve these grant guidelines under section 60 of that Act.
Linkage Program: Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities processes
The Linkage Program is designed to achieve the Australian Government’s objectives for research and innovation.
This grant program contributes to the ARC’s Outcome 1, which is to grow knowledge and innovation through managing research grants, measuring research excellence and providing advice.
The following process flowchart applies to the Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities (LIEF) grant opportunity.
The grant opportunity opens.
We (the ARC) publish the grant guidelines and advertise on GrantConnect.
You (the Administering Organisation) complete and submit an application.
We manage the assessment of all applications.
We manage the assessment of applications against eligibility criteria and assessment criteria including an overall consideration of value for money.
Your application will be assigned to Detailed Assessors to undertake in-depth assessments. You will have an opportunity to respond to Detailed Assessors’ written comments through a rejoinder.
Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) members will then assess Your application, consider the Detailed Assessors’ ratings and comments and Your rejoinder and assign a final score.
We make grant recommendations.
The SAC will collectively consider all applications and recommend to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) the applications to be funded, and the level and duration of funding for each project.
The CEO will then recommend to the Minister the applications to be funded, and the level and duration of funding for each grant.
In making recommendations to the Minister, the CEO will consider the applicant’s response to the National Interest Test. The CEO will seek information from Administering Organisations on applications where there is concern about how they meet the National Interest Test based on the information provided in the application form. The CEO will make grant recommendations to the Minister that satisfy the National Interest Test and which are eligible for funding.
Grant decisions are made.
The Minister decides which applications are approved, and the level of funding and duration of funding for each approved project. The Minister may consider the National Interest Test in determining which applications to approve.
We notify You of the outcome . We advise You if Your application was successful or not through the Research Management System (RMS).
We enter into a grant agreement with You.
We will enter into a grant agreement with You through RMS.
Delivery of the grant.
You undertake the grant activity and report to Us as set out in Your grant agreement. We manage the grant by monitoring Your progress and making payments.
Evaluation of the grant opportunity.
We evaluate the specific grant activity and the grant opportunity as a whole. We will use information You provide to Us through Your reports to inform evaluations.
2. Introduction
2.1. These guidelines contain information for the LIEF grant opportunity.
2.2. This document sets out:
the objectives of the grant opportunity;
b. the eligibility and assessment criteria;
c. how grant applications are considered and selected;
d. how grantees are notified and receive grant payments;
e. how grantees will be monitored and evaluated; and
f. responsibilities and expectations in relation to the LIEF grant opportunity.
2.3. In these grant guidelines:
an application refers to the completed documentation submitted to Us requesting a grant for a specific grant opportunity. If an application is successful, the grant activity is then referred to as a project.
b. the glossary provides a list of defined terms and the definitions that apply to these terms throughout this document.
2.4. You and the named participants must read this document before filling out an application for a LIEF grant opportunity.
3. About the Linkage Program
3.1. These grant guidelines establish the rules which govern the administration of the Linkage Program including the application, eligibility, and selection processes to be followed and the selection criteria that will be used to recommend grant recipients.
3.2. The Linkage Program is one of two Programs under the ARC National Competitive Grants Program (NCGP).
Objectives
3.3. The Linkage Program supports the growth of research partnerships between university-based researchers and researchers in other sectors in Australia and overseas for projects that generate new knowledge, technologies and innovations.
3.4. The purpose of the Linkage Program is to promote national and international research partnerships between researchers and business, industry, community organisations and other publicly funded research agencies. By supporting the development of partnerships, the ARC encourages the transfer of skills, knowledge and ideas as a basis for securing commercial and other benefits of research.
3.5. The ARC's Linkage Program encourages and extends cooperative approaches to research and improve the use of research outcomes by strengthening links within Australia’s innovation system and with innovation systems internationally.
3.6. The objectives of the Linkage Program are to deliver outcomes of benefit to Australia and build Australia’s research and innovation capacity through support for:
collaborative research between university-based researchers and researchers in other sectors;
research training and career opportunities that enable Australian and international researchers and research students to work with industry and other end-users; and
research in priority areas.
3.7. The grant opportunities currently available under the Linkage Program are:
Industrial Transformation Research Program (ITRP) comprising of:
- Industrial Transformation Research Hubs (Research Hubs);
- Industrial Transformation Training Centres (Training Centres);
b. Linkage Projects;
c. LIEF;
d. ARC Centres of Excellence;
e. Special Research Initiatives (SRI);
f. Learned Academies Special Projects; and
g. Supporting Responses to Commonwealth Science Council Priorities.
Intended Outcome
3.8. The intended outcome of the Linkage Program is to increase Australia’s research and innovation capacity to generate new knowledge and result in the development of new technologies, products and ideas, the creation of jobs, economic growth and an enhanced quality of life in Australia.
Scope and Timeframes
3.9. Linkage Program grants are awarded on the basis of excellence through a competitive peer review processes for each opportunity.
3.10. Depending on the grant opportunity, grant applications may be accepted once a year, on a continuous basis or as required.
Key performance indicators
3.11. The key performance indicators (KPIs) for the Linkage Program are identified each year in the ARC Portfolio Budget Statements and the ARC corporate plan. Reporting is provided every year in Our annual report.
3.12. The KPIs focus on long-term outcomes as well as medium-term outcomes relating to building Australia’s research capacity, for example, research careers and training, contributions in areas of national need and research collaboration.
Other relevant information
3.13. The Linkage Program is undertaken according to the Australian Research Council Act 2001 (ARC Act) and the Commonwealth Grants Rules and Guidelines (CGRGs) 2017.
3.14. These grant guidelines are a legislative instrument current as at the date of signing by the Minister and have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the ARC Act in force at that date.
4. About the Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities grant opportunity
Important dates
4.1. The grant commencement date for LIEF for funding commencing in 2020 will be 1 January 2020.
4.2. The active project assessment date for LIEF for funding commencing in 2020 will be 1 July 2020.
Description
4.3. The LIEF grant opportunity provides funding for research infrastructure, equipment and facilities to Eligible Organisations. It enables researchers to participate in cooperative initiatives so that expensive research infrastructure, equipment and facilities can be shared between higher education organisations and also with Industry. The scheme also fosters collaboration through its support of the cooperative use of international or national research facilities.
4.4. Participating organisations involved in LIEF projects must commit a significant contribution of cash and/or in-kind and/or other material resources to the application having regard to the total cost of the proposed LIEF project and the relative contribution of named participants at the organisation.
Objectives
4.5. The objectives of the LIEF grant opportunity are to:
encourage Eligible Organisations to develop collaborative arrangements with other Eligible Organisations and/or Partner Organisations to develop and support research infrastructure;
b. support large-scale national or international cooperative initiatives allowing expensive research infrastructure to be shared and/or accessed;
c. support areas of existing and/or emerging research strength; and
d. support and develop research infrastructure for the broader research community.
Timeframe
4.6. LIEF grant applications are accepted once a year.
5. Grant amount and grant period
5.1. For the LIEF grant opportunity, applications for the levels of funding listed in Table 1 will be considered.
5.2. Table 1: LIEF funding and grant duration
Category
Details
LIEF funding level
Minimum $150,000 per year.<br>Maximum 75 per cent of the total direct cost of the eligible budget items.
LIEF funding duration
One year; or<br>One to five years if the application is for the construction of research infrastructure, or subscription or coordinated access to international facilities and major national facilities.
5.3. We reserve the right to recommend funding levels which may be less than that requested in the application, and a project duration that may differ from that requested in the application.
5.4. All funding decisions regarding the LIEF grant opportunity will be made by the Minister in accordance with the ARC Act.
5.5. If successful, You can only spend grant funds on eligible grant activities as defined in section 7 of these grant guidelines and the grant details in Your grant agreement.
6. Grant eligibility criteria
6.1. We cannot recommend Your application to the Minister for funding if it does not satisfy all grant eligibility criteria.
6.2. This section of the grant guidelines provides details of the eligibility requirements for:
eligible applications; and
b. eligible participants being:
- Administering Organisations
- Other Eligible Organisations
- Other Organisations;
- Partner Organisations; and
- named participants.
What are the eligibility requirements for applications?
6.3. To be eligible, Your LIEF application must:
nominate at least one Chief Investigator (CI); the first-named CI must be from Your organisation and will be the Project Leader;
b. nominate no more than 15 CIs and PIs in total. Of these You may nominate a maximum of five CIs from any one Eligible Organisation; and a maximum of five PIs from any one Partner Organisation. Other users may be listed in the project description section of the application;
c. have a duration of one year, or one or more years (maximum of five years). You may apply for one or more years if it is for:
- the construction of research infrastructure, which may include (for example) building equipment or facilities, or the development of an online archive ; or
- subscription or coordinated access to international facilities and major national facilities.
6.4. You and each of the Other Eligible Organisations on the application must make a cash contribution.
6.5. Organisational cash contributions for direct costs must make up a minimum of 25 per cent of the total direct cost of the research infrastructure. Cash contributions from You, Other Eligible Organisation(s), Partner Organisation(s) and Other Organisation(s) are all eligible to make up this minimum of 25 per cent. The cash contributions should be a demonstration of significant commitment to the project.
6.6. Organisational cash contributions for indirect costs are not eligible to make up part of the minimum of 25 per cent of the total direct cost of the research infrastructure.
Who is eligible to apply for a grant?
6.7. We will only accept applications from the Eligible Organisations listed below.
6.8. The Eligible Organisation that submits the application will be the ‘Administering Organisation’ and is referred to as ‘You’. All Other Eligible Organisations listed on the application will be an ‘Other Eligible Organisation’.
6.9. Eligible Organisations
Australian Capital Territory
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS)
The Australian National University
University of Canberra
New South Wales
Australian Catholic University
Charles Sturt University
Macquarie University
Southern Cross University
The University of New England
The University of New South Wales
The University of Newcastle
The University of Sydney
University of Technology Sydney
University of Wollongong
Western Sydney University
Northern Territory
Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education
Charles Darwin University
Queensland
Bond University
Central Queensland University
Griffith University
James Cook University
Queensland University of Technology
The University of Queensland
University of Southern Queensland
University of the Sunshine Coast
South Australia
Flinders University
The University of Adelaide
Torrens University Australia
University of South Australia
Tasmania
University of Tasmania
Victoria
Deakin University
Federation University Australia
La Trobe University
Monash University
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University)
Swinburne University of Technology
The University of Melbourne
University of Divinity
Victoria University
Western Australia
Curtin University
Edith Cowan University
Murdoch University
The University of Notre Dame Australia
The University of Western Australia
Who is eligible to be a Partner Organisation?
6.10. To be eligible as a Partner Organisation, an organisation cannot be:
an Eligible Organisation;
b. a controlled entity of any Eligible Organisation; or
c. an entity (for example a joint venture) where more than 50 per cent is owned by one or more Eligible Organisations.
6.11. Each Partner Organisation is expected to participate in the project for the project activity period unless otherwise approved by Us.
6.12. Each Partner Organisation must make a contribution of cash and/or in-kind and/or other material resources that is specific to the project, and having regard to the total cost of the project and not be part of a broader contribution to Your organisation or an Other Eligible Organisation.
be sourced from funds awarded or appropriated by the Commonwealth or an Australian State or Territory Government for the purposes of the same research infrastructure as the application, nor from funds previously used to leverage government research or research infrastructure funding; or
be a contribution to salaries for CIs and/or PIs on the application.
Who is eligible to be an Other Organisation?
6.14. Organisations that are not Eligible Organisations and not Partner Organisations but that are named as organisational participants on an application will be Other Organisations.
6.15. Other Organisations are not required to make a cash or in-kind contribution to the project, but must be relevant to and involved with the LIEF project.
Who is eligible to be a named participant?
6.16. Named participants are those individual researchers who are nominated for the particular roles required for each grant opportunity.
6.17. Roles that named participants may be nominated for under the LIEF grant opportunity are:
Chief Investigators (CIs); and
Partner Investigators (PIs).
6.18. All CIs and PIs named in an application must satisfy the eligibility criteria for the role they are to perform. Details of these eligibility criteria are provided in these grant guidelines.
6.19. All CIs and PIs named in an application must take responsibility for the authorship and intellectual content of the application, appropriately citing sources and acknowledging all significant contributions, including from third parties.
6.20. Every CI and PI (and/or their research group) must be a significant and regular user of the research infrastructure, for a minimum of 10 per cent of the available time of the research infrastructure. Where there are more than ten named participants on an application, the minimum usage is the pro rata percentage of the available time.
6.21. A project cannot commence until all CIs and PIs meet the eligibility criteria in these grant guidelines.
Chief Investigator
6.22. CIs are expected to:
take significant intellectual responsibility for the conception and conduct of the project and for any strategic decisions called for in its pursuit and the communication of results;
b. ensure effective supervision, support and mentoring at all times of research personnel, including Higher Degree by Research (HDR) candidates and postdoctoral researchers for who they are responsible; and
c. make a commitment to carrying out the project and not assume the role of a supplier of resources for work that will largely be undertaken by others.
6.23. The CI who is also the Project Leader must have a demonstrated capacity to manage the project.
Eligibility to apply
6.24. To be eligible to apply as a CI, the individual nominated must, as at the grant opportunity closing date, have met their obligations regarding previously funded projects, including submission to the ARC of satisfactory final reports.
6.25. An individual is not eligible to be nominated as a CI if, as at the grant commencement date, or during the project’s active period, the individual is undertaking an HDR. Individuals are eligible to be a CI if they are undertaking an HDR during the application period but the HDR is conferred prior to the grant commencement date.
Eligibility to hold
6.26. As at the grant commencement date, and for the grant activity period when the CI is engaged in the project, the CI must meet at least one of the following criteria:
be an employee for at least 20 per cent of Full Time Equivalent (0.2 FTE) at an Eligible Organisation; or
be a holder of an honorary academic appointment (as defined in the glossary) at an Eligible Organisation.
6.27. A CI must reside predominantly in Australia for the project activity period. Any significant absences including fieldwork or study leave directly related to the project must have approval from You and must not total more than half the project activity period. In extraordinary circumstances, changes must be approved via a Variation.
Partner Investigator
6.28. PIs are expected to take significant intellectual responsibility for the planning and conduct of the project and for any strategic decisions required in its pursuit and the communication of results.
Eligibility to apply
6.29. A PI may, or may not, be an employee of a Partner Organisation.
6.30. A PI must not be eligible to be a CI at the grant commencement date.
6.31. To be eligible as a PI, the individual nominated must, as at the grant opportunity closing date, have met their obligations regarding previously funded projects, including submission to the ARC of satisfactory final reports.
Eligibility to hold
6.32. A PI must not meet the eligibility criteria for a CI at any time during the project activity period.
6.33. You may name a participant as a PI, who would otherwise be a CI but who does not reside predominantly in Australia.
What are the limits on the number of applications and projects per named participant?
6.34. These limits do not apply to PIs or to unnamed participants on projects such as HDR students, postdoctoral researchers and research assistants.
6.35. A named participant can apply for and be concurrently funded for a maximum of two LIEF projects as a CI.
6.36. We will calculate limits of projects and applications as at the closing time of submission of applications, and may re-calculate this limit as other grant opportunity announcements are made, by totalling:
the number of LIEF CI roles that the participant will hold as active projects as at the active project assessment date (1 July 2020); and
b. the number of LIEF applications We are currently assessing which include that participant as a CI.
6.37. It is Your responsibility to determine if applying for, or holding, a project under these guidelines will affect an individual researcher’s eligibility for the other ARC grant opportunities as other ARC grant opportunities may have different project limits. We reserve the right to change project and application limits in future grant opportunities. All 2018 ARC grant guidelines are available on GrantConnect. For previous years, please visit the ARC website.
6.38. We must approve the relinquishment of a project or role before the closing time of submission of applications. Any relinquishment made or approved after the grant opportunity closing date will not be taken into account for the purposes of calculating the number of projects and applications for limit considerations.
7. What the grant money can be used for
Eligible grant activities
7.1. Research activities that meet the definition of research infrastructure stated in the glossary in these grant guidelines for use in research projects are eligible to be supported under the LIEF grant opportunity.
Activities not supported
7.2. The LIEF grant opportunity does not support applications that involve medical research as detailed in the ARC Medical Research Policy on the ARC website.
7.3. Except where such activities meet the definition of research stated in the glossary in these grant guidelines, the LIEF grant opportunity does not support research infrastructure for the production of teaching materials.
7.4. The LIEF grant opportunity does not support the management of access to existing infrastructure, equipment or facilities, including those already funded by the Commonwealth. As per 7.5 d below, coordinated access to international facilities and major national facilities is supported.
Eligible expenditure
7.5. Grant money may be requested and used for budget items that directly support the provision of research infrastructure for use in research projects, including the following items:
purchase, upgrade, transportation of, installation of, maintenance of and/or management of access to the research infrastructure, including costs such as import taxes (and other similar expenses) for purchasing equipment, and salaries, including 30 per cent on-costs, directly associated with these activities;
construction of research infrastructure (which may (for example) include building equipment or facilities, or the development of an online archive), for up to five years. This includes salaries, including 30 per cent on-costs, directly associated with this activity;
integrated research facilities consisting of multiple components which can be used either simultaneously or serially for research projects (where each of these research projects is integrated by having a single research aim or theme). However multiple components that are not genuinely integrated, cannot be requested solely to reach the minimum level of funding required for a grant application to be considered eligible;
subscription or coordinated access to international facilities and major national facilities, for up to five years, enabled under a written agreement between the Administering Organisation and the relevant international or national facility. As per 7.4, the management of access to existing infrastructure, equipment or facilities is not supported;
specialised computing facilities and software essential to the project; and
compilations, catalogues, clearing houses or bibliographies that build on and develop other current or recently competitively funded projects/programs.
7.6. You must justify all items for which grant funds are sought in Your application to Our satisfaction. This includes confirmation that competitive quotes were negotiated for the research infrastructure.
7.7. Any salary costs requested under 7.5 a. or 7.5 b. requires thorough justification.
7.8. You can only spend grant funds on eligible grant activities as defined in these grant guidelines and any additional expenditure conditions specified in the grant agreement.
What the grant money cannot be used for
7.9. You cannot request or use the grant money for the following activities:
bench fees or similar laboratory access fees;
basic facilities that should normally be funded by an Administering Organisation, Eligible Organisation and/or Partner Organisation (including standard refurbishment costs of a laboratory);
costs of accommodation associated with the use of the proposed research infrastructure;
maintenance costs of the proposed research infrastructure after the first year of the project, including for multi-year projects;
operational costs;
costs not directly related to the project, including but not limited to professional membership fees, professional development courses, fees for patent application and maintenance, equipment for live music or drama performances, visas, relocation costs, entertainment costs, insurance, mobile phones (purchase or call charges) and other indirect costs. Professional membership fees may be allowable if related to the subscription or coordinated access to international facilities and major national facilities;
fees for international students or the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) and Higher Education Loan Program (HELP) liabilities for students;
salaries and/or on-costs, in whole or in part, for CIs or PIs;
salaries and/or on costs, in whole or in part, for personnel using the facility (for example, for research support personnel);
teaching and/or teaching relief;
travel costs associated with use of the proposed research infrastructure; and
fee-for-service costs where the application does not lead to capability building or development of the research infrastructure.
7.10. The following basic facilities must be provided (where relevant) and funded by You, or the Other Eligible Organisations or Partner Organisations and are not funded by the ARC:
access to a basic library collection;
b. access to film or music editing facilities;
c. work accommodation (for example, laboratory and office space, suitably equipped and furnished);
d. basic computer facilities and standard software; and
e. standard reference materials or funds for abstracting services.
8. The assessment criteria
8.1. You must address all of the relevant assessment criteria in Your application. Different weightings may be assigned to individual criterion.
8.2. The application form asks questions that relate to the assessment criteria. The amount of detail and supporting evidence You provide in Your application should be relative to the project size, complexity and grant amount requested. The application form includes character, word and page limits.
8.3. The Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities assessment criteria are:
Project quality and innovation 25%
Describe the:
– nature of the research, including aims and significance;
– relevance of the proposed research infrastructure to the needs of ARC and other competitively funded research projects/programs;
– enhancement of support for areas of existing and/or emerging research strength; and
– demonstrated national or international focus for large scale cooperative initiatives.
b. Feasibility 25%
Describe the:
– relevance of the research to the strategic priorities of the organisations;
– evidence that each of the organisations is genuinely committed to, and prepared to collaborate in, the project;
– existing or planned strategic research alliances between the higher education organisation(s) and other organisation(s); and
– effectiveness of cooperative arrangements for the management and sharing of the proposed research infrastructure, including arrangements for ongoing operational expenditure where applicable.
c. Investigator(s) 20%
Describe the:
– track record of investigators relevant to the use of the proposed research infrastructure, with consideration given to Research Opportunity and Performance Evidence (ROPE);
– for CIs and PIs who will manage the purchase, design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and coordination of access to the proposed research infrastructure, a demonstrated record in these activities;
– evidence of research training, mentoring and supervision; and
– relevance of the research infrastructure to the research capacity and planned activities of each CI and PI on the application and, where relevant, to the research groups represented on the application.
d. Benefit 30%
Describe the:
– availability of and access to similar research infrastructure at organisational, regional, national and/or international level;
– demonstrated needs from the researchers and/or research projects that they will utilise the proposed research infrastructure, including level of demand and likely measurable impact on the research program, including beyond the project activity period;
– value for money and budget justification for cash and in-kind contributions, and the expected rate of use of the proposed research infrastructure;
– planned use of the proposed research infrastructure, including proposed arrangements for broader access to individuals not named on the application and the alignment of this planned use with other similar existing infrastructure within Australia and/or internationally;
– plans to ensure that publicly funded research data generated from LIEF infrastructure is made open;
– special needs for regional or otherwise remote institutions;
– benefit of the proposed research infrastructure to the national research community; and
– capacity for freedom to operate in the Intellectual Property and patent landscape to enable future benefits to industry (where relevant).
9. How to apply
9.1. Before You submit an application, You and the named participants must read these grant guidelines, the sample application form, the instructions to applicants, and the draft grant agreement. These documents may be found at GrantConnect. Any additional documents will be published on GrantConnect and by registering on this website You will be automatically notified of any changes.
9.2. You must also consult the LIEF register to prevent the unnecessary duplication of research infrastructure, equipment and facilities. This register is available on the ARC website.
9.3. To apply, You must:
complete the application form in the format We require;
address all of the eligibility and assessment criteria to be considered for a grant;
ensure the application contains all the information necessary for assessment, including eligibility assessment, without the need for further written or oral explanation, or reference to additional documentation. We may request additional information;
for each named participants list (i) all current grants and requested funding under any ARC grant program, and (ii) all current grants under any other Commonwealth grant program for research infrastructure, or where similar infrastructure is used. Full details of any financial assistance received for, or in connection with, the research activities or project must be disclosed in the application and on an ongoing basis;
only submit one application for the same project in any grant opportunity. This includes applications which fundamentally have the same research intent, approach and outcomes, regardless of any variations in the research, the named participants and/or Administering Organisations;
make sure that Your application is submitted in accordance with these grant guidelines, grant agreement, instructions to applicants and application form. You must only submit an application, if it and the named participants, will be eligible for the grant opportunity as per these grant guidelines; and
certify that the application is compliant with these grant guidelines and all relevant laws and regulations.
9.4. Where Your application is for subscription or coordinated access to international facilities and major national facilities, You must have commenced discussions and negotiations with the specific international facility prior to the submission of the application and provide evidence of this.
9.5. Your application:
must identify where the research infrastructure will be located. The expectation is that it will be located at Your institution, and be listed on Your assets register. If this is not the case and You request that the research infrastructure be located in more than one organisation, you must demonstrate clearly in Your application that:
– the facilities are genuinely integrated and collaborative;
– the items of research infrastructure are complementary; and
– the overall research outcomes will be enhanced by this arrangement.
b. must provide details of the usage of the research infrastructure by participants;
c. must include details of the proposed collaborative arrangements and governance processes to be implemented, including how each Partner Organisation will be involved in the project;
d. must set out the agreement between You and each organisation named in Your application for the following:
– the terms and conditions of access for participants named on the application;
– the terms and conditions of access for researchers not associated with the application; and
– details of the arrangements and costs of managing the research infrastructure (including any recurrent expenditure) and how any costs will be distributed.
e. should only include in the application budget items of eligible expenditure as specified in the eligible expenditure section of these grant guidelines.
9.6. Your Partner Organisations’ cash contributions must not be a contribution to salaries for CIs and/or PIs on the project.
9.7. In-kind contributions must be essential and central to the application. It is Your responsibility to establish the merit of the case for recognition of in-kind contributions.
9.8. In-kind contributions in the budget section of the application should not include basic salary for any Commonwealth Fellowships, unless it is salary over and above the Commonwealth component supported.
9.9. Your application cannot include cash or in-kind contributions in years beyond the project activity period.
9.10. We reserve the right to determine the value of Partner Organisation contributions and may, for the purposes of assessment, determine contributions to be at levels that may differ from those in Your application.
9.11. Partner Organisation contributions must be specified in Australian dollars and, subject to these grant guidelines, contributed at the specified level regardless of currency fluctuations.
9.12. You must:
submit your application through Your Research Office;
submit Your application on the relevant application form available in the Research Management System (RMS) unless We advise You otherwise; and
certify Your application online in RMS. Research Offices must ensure that the person assigned the Research Office Delegate role in RMS is authorised to certify and submit applications.
9.13. You are responsible for ensuring that Your application is complete and all details in the application are accurate and current at the time of submission. Giving incomplete, false or misleading information will exclude Your application from further consideration.
9.14. You cannot change Your application (additions, deletions or modifications) after the grant opportunity closing date and time.
9.15. We reserve the right at any point in the process to seek evidence from You to support the certification of applications. We are not obliged to accept any additional information, nor requests from You to correct or amend applications after the closing time.
9.16. We may approve the withdrawal of an application upon receipt of a written request with justification from You. We will only approve such a request in exceptional circumstances.
9.17. We cannot fund the same research activities, infrastructure or project previously funded or currently being funded through any other Commonwealth grant.
9.18. The application form includes help information and further information is in the instructions to applicants document on GrantConnect. If You have any technical difficulties, please contact arc-systems@arc.gov.au.
Attachments to the application
9.19. You must attach supporting documentation to the application form in line with the instructions provided in these grant guidelines, within the form or in the instructions to applicants. You should only attach requested documents. We will not consider information in attachments that We do not request.
Timing of the grant opportunities
9.20. We publish information on GrantConnect for all Linkage Program grant opportunities and this includes the relevant timing for the submission of applications.
9.21. You must submit Your application to Us between the grant opportunity opening and closing date and time specified on GrantConnect. We will not accept late applications, other than in exceptional circumstances (such as due to natural disasters) in which case We will discuss this with You, and if We agree, invite You to make a late application.
9.22. Subject to these grant guidelines, a grant will commence on or after the grant commencement date for the grant opportunity.
Questions during the application period
9.23. Questions during the application period should be directed to Your Research Office. Answers to frequently asked questions may also be posted on GrantConnect.
10. The grant selection process
10.1. All applications will be considered through a competitive assessment process.
Who will assess applications?
10.2. Applications submitted for LIEF grants will be assessed by Detailed Assessors and a SAC comprising General Assessors.
10.3. Detailed Assessors are discipline-specific and interdisciplinary experts in their knowledge fields drawn from the ARC assessor community. Detailed Assessors are assigned applications to review based on their specific expertise in one or more fields of research.
10.4. We appoint one SAC for the LIEF grant opportunity. The SAC may consist of both eminent academic experts and/or ARC College of Expert members.
10.5. Any Detailed Assessors or General Assessors who are not Australian Public Servants must adhere to and uphold the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2018).
10.6. Any College of Experts or SAC members who are not an Australian Public Servant must uphold the Australian Public Service Values and Code of Conduct in accordance with Part 1, section 2.9 of the CGRGs.
10.7. We have procedures in place for managing organisational and personal Conflicts of Interest for Detailed Assessors, SAC members and ARC staff. Details of these procedures are in the relevant section of these grant guidelines and in the ARC’s Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Policy.
What is the grant assessment process?
Eligibility process
10.8. We will review Your application against all the eligibility criteria contained in these grant guidelines.
10.9. We may determine whether an application meets the eligibility requirements in these grant guidelines at any stage during assessment of the application.
10.10. If We consider that an application is ineligible, the application may not be progressed through the assessment process.
10.11. If an application is ineligible, We must not recommend the application for funding.
The assessment process
10.12. All applications which meet the eligibility criteria will be assessed and merit ranked using all assessment criteria.
10.13. We manage the assessment of applications. Your application will be considered on its merits, based on:
10.14. The process that We will undertake includes the following steps:
We assign applications to General Assessors.
Applications are assigned to Detailed Assessors. In assigning assessors, We may take requests not to assess into account (see below for further information).
Detailed Assessors provide assessments to Us with scores and written comments against assessment criteria for each application.
Applicants are provided with Detailed Assessors’ comments and are invited to submit a rejoinder to the assessment text (see below for further information on this process).
Applications, scores and comments provided in the detailed assessments and the applicant’s rejoinder are provided to the General Assessors for consideration. General Assessors assign their own scores against the relevant assessment criteria.
The SAC meets to discuss the ranking of each application relative to other applications and determines funding recommendations.
The SAC makes recommendations to the CEO on which applications should be approved for funding, which applications should not be approved for funding, and the level of funding and duration of each grant. The CEO will make recommendations for funding to the Minister based on any number of assessments.
The CEO will make grant recommendations to the Minister who may make a decision on which applications are approved for funding.
National interest test
10.15. On the application form, You must provide a separate response on the national interest of the research proposal.
10.16. In making recommendations to the Minister, the CEO will.
consider the recommendations from the SAC;
b. consider the applicant’s response to the National Interest Test;
c. see information about Administering Organisations on applications where there is concern about how they meet the National Interest Test based on the information provided in the application form; and
d. make grant recommendations to the Minister that satisfy the National Interest Test and which are eligible for funding.
Requests not to assess process
10.17. You may name up to three persons whom You do not wish to assess an application by submitting a ‘Request Not to Assess’ form as detailed on GrantConnect and the ARC website. This form must be received by Us two weeks prior to the grant opportunity closing date.
10.18. Only one request containing the names of up to three individual assessors may be submitted per application.
10.19. If You name a current ARC College of Experts member, as listed on the ARC website at the time of submitting the ‘Request Not to Assess’ form, the request must be accompanied by comprehensive evidence justifying the request for the ARC College of Experts member or members named. If We consider the evidence is not sufficient for the named ARC College of Experts member or members, We will reject part, or all, of the request.
10.20. You may submit a ‘Request Not to Assess’ form naming more than three persons whom You do not wish to assess an application. Any request containing more than three names must be accompanied by comprehensive evidence justifying the request for all persons listed. If We consider the evidence is not sufficient for one or more of the named people, We will reject part, or all, of the request.
10.21. We will have absolute discretion about whether We accept or refuse a Request Not to Assess. We will not notify you of the outcome.
Rejoinder Process
10.22. You will be given the opportunity to respond to assessors’ written comments through a rejoinder, and to provide any additional information requested by Us. Names of assessors will not be provided. Further information on the rejoinder process is available on the ARC website.
Who will approve grants?
10.23. In accordance with the ARC Act, Our CEO will submit grant recommendations to the Minister for consideration.
10.24. The Minister will determine which grants to approve. In addition to the assessment criteria set out in Section 8, the Minister may consider the national interest in determining which applications to approve. Under the ARC Act, the Minister may (but is not required to) rely solely on recommendations made by the CEO.
10.25. The Minister’s decision is final in all matters, including:
the approval of the grant;
the grant funding amount to be awarded;
the duration of the grant; and
the terms and conditions of the grant.
10.26. The ARC Act states that the Minister must not approve a grant for any application that fails to:
meet the eligibility criteria;
b. comply with the assessment process; and
c. satisfy the requirements for financial assistance.
10.27. The CGRGs state that the Minister must consider the key principle of achieving value with money when approving a grant.
10.28. Any successful application awarded a grant will be subject to sufficient funds being available for the Program and the provisions of the ARC Act.
11. Notification of application outcomes
11.1. You will be notified of the outcome of Your application via RMS, following a decision by the Minister. The notification in RMS will include information on:
successful and unsuccessful applications;
feedback on unsuccessful, eligible applications;
grant amounts;
any specific conditions to be included in the grant agreement; and
the commencement of the grant period. This is usually the grant commencement date.
11.2. If You are unsuccessful, You may be able to submit a new application for the same, or similar, research in future grant opportunity rounds. This will depend on the specifics of the grant opportunity You are applying for. You should include new or more information to address any weaknesses that may have prevented Your previous application from being successful.
11.3. If Your application is found to be ineligible, You will be notified of this through RMS.
Feedback on Your application
11.4. If Your application was unsuccessful and found to be eligible, feedback will be provided through RMS.
12. Successful grant applications
The grant agreement
12.1. If You are successful, You must enter into a legally binding grant agreement with the Commonwealth represented by the ARC.
12.2. We use the ARC Linkage Program LIEF grant agreement which contains standard terms and conditions that cannot be changed. A sample grant agreement is available on GrantConnect. Any additional conditions attached to the grant will be identified in the grant offer.
12.3. You will have 28 calendar days from the date of the grant offer to execute this grant agreement with the Commonwealth.
12.4. We must execute a grant agreement with You before We can make any payments. We are not responsible for any of Your project expenditure until a grant agreement is executed. You must not start any activities until all third party agreements are executed.
12.5. You must list the contributions of each organisation in the ensuing contractual agreements between Your organisation and the other organisations.
12.6. If You enter an agreement for a Linkage Program grant, You cannot receive other grants for the same budgeted grant activities from other Commonwealth grant programs.
12.7. You will be required to conduct the project substantially in accordance with the ‘Project Description’ contained in the application for that project. Your application forms part of the grant agreement.
12.8. We will recover grant funds and terminate the project if You fail to meet the obligations of the grant agreement.
Specific research policies and practices
12.9. You and each project research participant are required to be compliant with all relevant laws and regulations. In particular, You must certify in Your application that You comply with the following requirements.
Ethics and Research Practices
12.10. All applications and ARC-funded research projects must comply with the requirements specified in the following and successor documents:
the ARC Research Integrity and Research Misconduct Policy (2016);
the National Principles of Intellectual Property Management for Publicly Funded Research (2017);
the ARC Open Access Policy (2017);
the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2018);
as applicable, the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2015);
as applicable, Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders (2018);
as applicable, Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Guidelines for Ethical Research in Australian Indigenous Studies (2012);
as applicable, Australia Council for the Arts Protocols for Producing Indigenous Australian Music; Writing; Visual Arts; Media Arts; and Performing Arts (2007); and
as applicable, the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (2013).
12.11. If there is any conflict between a successor document and its predecessor, then the successor document prevails to the extent of any inconsistency. These documents are all available on the ARC website.
Misconduct, Incomplete or Misleading Information
12.12. All research projects funded by Us must comply with the ARC Research Integrity and Research Misconduct Policy.
12.13. If We consider that an application is incomplete We may in Our absolute discretion decide to recommend that the application not be approved for a grant.
12.14. If We consider that an application is inaccurate or contains false or misleading information, or involves misconduct, We will in Our absolute discretion decide to recommend that the application not be approved for a grant.
12.15. Examples of misleading information and misconduct include:
providing fictitious Research Opportunity and Performance Evidence (ROPE);
plagiarism;
making false claims in relation to the authorship of the application;
failing to make adequate acknowledgement of intellectual, design or other significant contributions to the application;
making false claims in publications records (such as describing a paper as accepted for publication when it has only been submitted);
making false claims in relation to qualifications and/or appointments;
making false certifications; and
failing to disclose the existence, and nature, of actual or potential Conflicts of Interest of any of the parties involved in the application/project (such as any affiliations or financial interest in any organisation that has a direct interest in the matter or outputs of the project).
Intellectual Property
12.16. We do not claim ownership of any intellectual property in an application or in any research arising from a project.
12.17. You must adhere to an intellectual property policy, approved by Your governing body, which has as one of its aims the maximisation of benefits to Australia arising from publicly funded research. You should ensure that individuals applying for ARC grants are familiar with the current intellectual property and patent landscape for the research areas included in the application. Unless otherwise approved by the Commonwealth, Your intellectual property policy must comply with the National Principles of Intellectual Property Management for Publicly Funded Research and/or any successor document(s). These document(s) are available on the ARC website.
Publication and Dissemination of Research Outputs and Research Data
12.18. All research projects funded by Us must comply with the ARC Open Access Policy on the dissemination of research findings, which is on the ARC website.
12.19. Participants and institutions have an obligation to collect and maintain research data in accordance with the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2018). We strongly encourage the depositing of data arising from a project in an appropriate publicly accessible discipline and/or institutional repository. Participants must outline briefly in their application how they plan to manage research data arising from a project.
12.20. We strongly encourage all participants applying for grants to have an Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) Identifier in their RMS Profile.
How We pay the grant
12.21. Payments will be made as set out in the grant agreement.
12.22. The grant offer will specify the approved amount for that project, or as otherwise varied by Us in accordance with the grant agreement.
12.23. Any project expenditure incurred by You for a project additional to the approved amount for that project specified in the grant offer, or as otherwise varied by us, is Your responsibility. We will not reimburse You for such costs under any circumstances.
12.24. You are responsible for any and all financial and taxation implications associated with receiving funds. Grant funding may be indexed. Grant funding will typically be paid annually through Our payment system.
12.25. Once the grant agreement is signed by the Commonwealth payment will be made on the next available date for grant payments after the grant commencement date.
12.26. Any grant awarded will be subject to sufficient funds being available for the project, the provisions of the ARC Act and continued satisfactory progress of the project.
12.27. All amounts referred to in these grant guidelines are to be read as exclusive of GST, unless expressly stated otherwise.
12.28. Funding for a project may only be carried forward for a maximum of two years from the grant commencement date, except under exceptional circumstances and only with Our approval.
Grant agreement variations
12.29. We recognise that unexpected events may affect the progress of a project. In these circumstances, You can request a variation to Your grant agreement, including:
changing a project’s internal budget or research plan;
extending the timeframe for completing the project; and/or
changing participants or organisations named on the project
12.30. You cannot request an increase to the agreed amount of grant funds.
12.31. If You want to propose changes to the grant agreement, You must submit a Variation of grant agreement (Variation) to Us in RMS.
12.32. If a CI is at any time no longer able to work as proposed on the project, the project may be continued, provided any replacement CI meets the CI eligibility criteria. We must approve these changes via a Variation.
12.33. If a PI is at any time no longer able to work as proposed on the project, the project may be continued, provided any replacement PI meets the PI eligibility criteria. We must approve these changes via a Variation.
12.34. A Variation must be approved by Us to be a valid part of the grant agreement. We will consider Your request based on factors such as:
how it affects the project outcome; and
consistency with the grant opportunity objectives, the project’s aim and objectives and any relevant ARC policies.
12.35. We will notify You of the outcome of a Variation.
Keeping Us informed
12.36. You should let Us know if anything is likely to affect Your project.
12.37. You must also inform Us of any changes to Your:
name;
b. address(es);
c. nominated contact details; and
d. bank account details.
12.38. If You become aware of a breach of terms and conditions under the grant agreement, You must contact Us immediately.
13. Announcement of grants
13.1. If successful, Your grant will be listed on the GrantConnect website 21 calendar days after the date of effect as required by Section 5.3 of the CGRGs.
13.2. We may publicise and report offers and grants awarded, including the following information about the project:
Your name and any other parties involved in or associated with the project;
b. named participants and their organisations;
c. the research project (the title and summary descriptions);
d. classifications and international collaboration country names; and
e. the ARC grant funding amount.
13.3. You should ensure that information contained in the project title and summary descriptions will not compromise Your requirements for confidentiality (such as protection of intellectual property).
13.4. In making public information about a project that has been approved for a grant, We may use a project description, including title and summary, which differs from that provided in the application.
13.5. We will also list the research infrastructure in the LIEF Register on the ARC website under the Administering Organisations.
14. How We monitor Your grant activity
14.1. We will monitor the grant activities through the requirements of the grant agreement for You:
to submit end-of-year reports, progress reports by exception, a mid term progress report (where relevant) and final reports; and
b. to provide information, as requested, for program or grant opportunity evaluations.
14.2. You must submit reports in line with the grant agreement. Reports must be submitted to Us through RMS, unless otherwise advised by Us.
14.3. The amount of detail You provide in Your reports should be relative to the project’s size, complexity and grant amount.
14.4. We will monitor progress by assessing reports You submit and may conduct site visits or request records to confirm details of Your reports if necessary. We may occasionally need to re-examine claims, seek further information or request an independent audit of claims and payments.
End of Year Reports
14.5. You must submit an end of year financial report by 31 March in the year following each calendar year for which the grant was awarded, in accordance with the instructions We provide each year. We will make the form for these reports available in RMS, with instructions on the ARC website.
Progress Reporting by Exception
14.6. A progress report by exception must be completed as part of the End of Year Report only if significant issues are affecting the progress of the project.
14.7. If We are not satisfied with the progress of any project, further payment of funds will not be made until satisfactory progress has been made on the project. If satisfactory progress is still not achieved within a reasonable period of time, the grant may be terminated and all outstanding monies will be recovered by Us.
Mid-Term Progress Reports
14.8. You must submit a progress report in year three for a four or five year project.
Final Report
14.9. You must submit a final report for the project within 12 months of the final ARC approved project end date. We will make the form for this report available in RMS, with instructions on the ARC website.
14.10. The final report must address compliance with the conditions on which funding was granted, as set out in the grant agreement. It must also contain information which We may publicise regarding the details of the research infrastructure, equipment or facilities, including access arrangements.
14.11. You must ensure that all participants have completed all obligations for the final report.
14.12. If the final report is not submitted or are not satisfactory to Us this will be considered as an eligibility matter for future ARC applications for the named participants on the project.
14.13. We may also seek additional information about subsequent research outputs after submission of the final report.
Compliance visits and record keeping
14.14. We may visit You during or at the completion of Your project to review Your compliance with the grant agreement. We may also inspect the records You are required to keep under the grant guidelines and grant agreement. We will provide You with reasonable notice of any compliance visit.
14.15. You must retain the evidence and paperwork relied upon to certify Your application in RMS and make this available to Us if requested.
Evaluation
14.16. We undertake evaluations of the performance and administration of the grant opportunities under the Linkage Program. Your grant agreement requires You to provide information to help with these evaluations.
Acknowledgement
14.17. Subject to commercial sensitivities and intellectual property considerations, the outcomes of projects are expected to be communicated to the research community and to the community at large.
14.18. You must ensure that Our contribution and support of the project is acknowledged in a prominent place and a form acceptable to Us. This clause applies to any website established for the LIEF project.
14.19. Advice of acceptable forms of acknowledgement and use of the ARC logo is provided on the ARC website. Any published research output must include acknowledgement of ARC funding and the ARC Project ID.
15. Probity
15.1. We will make sure that the grant opportunity processes are fair, in accordance with the published grant guidelines, incorporate appropriate safeguards against fraud, unlawful activities and other inappropriate conduct and are consistent with the ARC Act and the CGRGs.
Appeals process
15.2. We will only consider appeals against the administrative process and not against committee decisions, assessor ratings and comments or the assessment outcome. Appellants must identify the specific guideline/legislative instrument clause, policy or procedure which they believe has been incorrectly applied.
15.3. You are able to submit an appeal against the administrative process used to assess applications. The appeals process is designed to ensure that the application has been treated fairly and consistently in the context of selection processes.
15.4. You must submit an appeal using the ARC Appeals Form on the ARC website and have it authorised by a Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research) or equivalent. Appeals must be received within 28 days of the date You receive notification of the outcome of Your application. We will not accept appeals later than 5.00pm (AEDT/AEST) on the appeals submission due date.
15.5. Appeals must be submitted to Us electronically to ARC-NCGP@arc.gov.au.
15.6. If You do not agree with the way We have handled Your appeal, You may complain to the Commonwealth Ombudsman. The Ombudsman will not usually look into a complaint unless the matter has first been raised directly with the ARC. The Commonwealth Ombudsman can be contacted on:
15.7. Applicants for funding may at any time seek to appeal ARC decisions using available external appeal options. Regarding available options for external appeal, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal does not have general power to review ARC decisions.
Conflict of interest
15.8. Our purpose is to support the highest quality research and as such Our conflict of interest policy is designed to ensure that all material personal interests are disclosed. As a result, conflicts of interest are identified and managed in a rigorous and transparent way to ensure the integrity, legitimacy, impartiality and fairness of Our processes. Management of conflicts of interest in this way is designed to maintain public confidence in Our business processes.
15.9. Any conflicts of interest could affect conduct of the selection processes and/or the performance of the grant. There may be a conflict of interest, or perceived conflict of interest, if the relevant ARC staff, an assessor, member of a committee or advisor and/or You or any of Your personnel:
has a professional, commercial or personal relationship with a party who is able to influence the application selection process, such as an Australian Government officer;
b. has a relationship with, or interest in, an organisation, which is likely to interfere with or restrict the applicants from carrying out the proposed activities fairly and independently; or
c. has a relationship with, or interest in, an organisation from which they will receive personal gain because the organisation receives a grant under the NCGP.
15.10. You will be asked to certify, as part of Your application, any perceived or existing conflicts of interests or that, to the best of Your knowledge, there is no conflict of interest. Each individual or organisation named in an application must declare to the Administering Organisation at the date of submission any conflict of interest that exists or is likely to arise in relation to any aspect of the application or project.
15.11. If a Conflict of Interest exists or arises, You must have documented processes in place for managing the Conflict of Interest for the duration of the project. Such processes must comply with the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2018), the ARC Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Policy and any relevant successor documents.
15.12. If You later identify that there is an actual, apparent, or potential conflict of interest or that one might arise in relation to an application, You must inform Us in writing immediately.
15.13. We will handle any conflicts of interest as set out in Australian Government policies and procedures. Conflicts of interest for Australian Government staff will be handled as set out in the Australian Public Service Code of Conduct (Section 13(7)) of the Public Service Act 1999. Committee members and other officials including the decision maker must also certify any conflicts of interest.
15.14. We publish Our Conflict of Interest Policy on ARC website.
Privacy: confidentiality and protection of personal information
15.15. We treat Your personal information according to the 13 Australian Privacy Principles and the Privacy Act 1988. This includes letting You know:
what personal information We collect;
b. why We collect Your personal information; and
c. who We give Your personal information to.
15.16. You are required, as part of Your application, to certify Your compliance with the Privacy Act 1988, including the Australian Privacy Principles and impose the same privacy obligations on any subcontractors You engage to assist with the activity. You must ask for the Australian Government’s consent in writing before disclosing confidential information.
15.17. Your personal information can only be disclosed to someone else :
if you are given reasonable notice of the disclosure;
b. where disclosure is authorised or required by law or is reasonably necessary for the enforcement of the criminal law;
c. if it will prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to a person’s life or health; or
d. if You have consented to the disclosure.
15.18. The Australian Government may also use and disclose information about grant applicants and grant recipients under the Program in any other Australian Government business or function. This includes giving information to the Australian Taxation Office for compliance purposes.
15.19. We may reveal confidential information to:
assessors, the SAC and other Commonwealth employees and contractors to help Us manage the program effectively and in accordance with any other provision of these grant guidelines or subsequent grant agreement;
the Minister and their staff;
employees and contractors of Our entity so We can research, assess, monitor and analyse Our programs and activities;
employees and contractors of other Commonwealth agencies for any purposes, including government administration, research or service delivery;
other Commonwealth, State, Territory or local government agencies in program reports and consultations;
the Auditor-General, Ombudsman or Privacy Commissioner; and
a House or a Committee of the Australian Parliament.
15.20. We may share the information You give with other Commonwealth agencies for any purposes including government administration, research or service delivery and according to Australian laws, including the:
Crimes Act 1914;
Criminal Code Act 1995;
Privacy Act 1988;
Public Service Act 1999;
Public Service Regulations 1999; and
Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.
15.21. We will treat the information You give Us as sensitive and therefore confidential if it meets one of the four conditions below:
You clearly identify the information as confidential and explain why We should treat it as confidential;
the information is commercially sensitive;
revealing the information would cause unreasonable harm to You or someone else; or
You provide the information with an understanding that it will stay confidential.
15.22. The grant agreement will include any specific requirements about special categories of information collected, created or held under the grant agreement.
Freedom of information
15.23. All documents in the possession of the Australian Government, including those about the Program, are subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act).
15.24. The purpose of the FOI Act is to give members of the public rights of access to information held by the Australian Government and its entities. Under the FOI Act, members of the public can seek access to documents held by the Australian Government. This right of access is limited only by the exceptions and exemptions necessary to protect essential public interests and private and business affairs of persons in respect of whom the information relates.
15.25. All Freedom of Information requests must be referred to the Freedom of Information Coordinator in writing.
16.1. The ARC may conduct a survey of Eligible Organisations after the outcomes of each selection round are announced. Outcomes of the survey will be considered in the development of subsequent grant guidelines.
17. Acronyms
ARC
Australian Research Council
ARC Act
Australian Research Council Act 2001
CEO
Chief Executive Officer
CGRGs
Commonwealth Grants Rules and Guidelines
CI
Chief Investigator
FTE
Full Time Equivalent
FOI
Freedom of Information
GST
Goods and Services Tax
HDR
Higher Degree by Research
HECS
Higher Education Contribution Scheme
HELP
Higher Education Loan Program
KPI
Key Performance Indicator
NCGP
National Competitive Grants Program
LIEF
Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities
ORCID
Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier
PI
Partner Investigator
RMS
Research Management System
ROPE
Research Opportunity and Performance Evidence
SAC
Selection Advisory Committee
18. Glossary
18.1. For the purposes of the Linkage Program: LIEF grant guidelines, terms have the meanings defined below.
Term Definition
active project a project that is receiving funding according to the terms of an existing Funding Agreement or grant agreement, or has any carryover funds approved by the ARC, or an approved variation to the project end date.
active project assessment date the date on which active project eligibility will be considered for project and application limits per named participant.
Administering Organisation an Eligible Organisation which submits an application for a grant and which will be responsible for the administration of the grant if the application is approved for funding.
applicant the Administering Organisation.
application a request for funding submitted through RMS by an Administering Organisation seeking grant funding under an ARC grant program. It includes the specifics of a proposed grant activity as well as the administrative information required to determine the eligibility of the application.
ARC assessor community the Australian and international assessors that assess applications submitted to the ARC that are within their areas of expertise.
ARC College of Experts the body of experts of international standing appointed to assist the ARC to identify research excellence, moderate external assessments and recommend applications for funding. Its members are specialist and generalist experts in their knowledge fields drawn from the Australian research community. The ARC website provides information on who is a member of the College of Experts.
ARC Project ID the identifier assigned through RMS when an application is commenced.
assessment criteria the specified principles or standards, against which applications will be considered. These criteria are also used to assess the merits of applications and, in the case of a competitive grant opportunity, to determine application rankings.
bench fees fees that an organisation charges for an individual to use infrastructure which would normally be provided by the organisation for their employees. This infrastructure may vary and could include, for example, an office or laboratory space with appropriate equipment, or access to non-specialised equipment owned by the organisation.
Cash contribution the cash from an organisation, which is transferred to and managed by the Administering Organisation.
Chief Executive Officer means the person holding the position of ARC Chief Executive Officer in accordance with the ARC Act or any person acting in that position.
Chief Investigator a participant who satisfies the eligibility criteria for a CI under these grant guidelines.
combined cash contribution means the total combined cash contribution from the Administering Organisation, Other Eligible Organisation(s), Partner Organisation(s) and Other Organisations.
Commonwealth the Commonwealth of Australia, as represented by the Australian Research Council specified in these grant guidelines and includes, where relevant, its officers, employees, contractors and agents.
Commonwealth Fellowship a position held by a participant where the salary is funded wholly or partly by the Commonwealth.
date of effect the date on which a grant agreement is signed or a specified starting date.
Detailed Assessors assessors drawn from the ARC assessor community who are assigned applications to review for their specific expertise in a field of research.
eligibility criteria the mandatory criteria which must be met to qualify for a grant. Assessment criteria may apply in addition to eligibility criteria.
Eligible Organisation an organisation listed in section 6.9 of these grant guidelines.
field research the collection of information integral to the project outside a laboratory, library or workplace setting and often in a location external to the individual’s normal place of employment.
General Assessors the members that make up a grant opportunity’s Selection Advisory Committee. General Assessors utilise knowledge of their disciplinary areas and a broad understanding of intellectual and methodological issues and good research planning. Each application has a lead General Assessor (known as Carriage 1) who is typically close to the academic field of the application, and one or more General Assessors (known as Other Carriages) with supplementary expertise.
grant activity the project/tasks/services that the grantee is required to undertake. A project consists of a number of grant activities.
grant agreement the agreement entered into by the ARC and an Administering Organisation when an application from that organisation is approved for grant funding. This was previously referred to as a ‘Funding Agreement’.
grant commencement date the date on which grant funding may commence.
grant offer the details listed in the ARC’s RMS under ‘Funding Offers’ showing the project details and grant amount.
GrantConnect the Australian Government’s whole-of-government grants information system, which centralises the publication and reporting of Commonwealth grants in accordance with the CGRGs.
grantee the Administering Organisation which has been selected to receive a grant.
grant opportunity the specific grant round or process where a Commonwealth grant is made available to potential grantees. Grant opportunities may be open or targeted, and will reflect the relevant grant selection process.
GST the meaning as given in section 195-1 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999.
Higher Degree by Research (HDR) a ‘Research Doctorate or Research Masters program, for which at least two-thirds of the student load for the program is required as research work’ as defined by the Commonwealth Scholarships Guidelines (Research) 2017.
honorary academic appointment any honorary position that gives full academic status, as certified by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research) (or equivalent) in the application. For ARC purposes this relationship must include access to research support comparable to employees e.g. an emeritus appointment. The person would not be considered to hold an honorary academic appointment for the purposes of these grant guidelines if they hold a substantive, paid position elsewhere.
in-kind contributions a contribution of goods, services, materials and/or time to the project from an individual, business or organisation. Values should be calculated based on the most likely actual cost, for example, current market, preferred provider or internal provider rates/valuations/rentals/charges (that is in the financial year of the date of the application) of the costs of labour, work spaces, equipment and databases. The calculations covering time and costs should be documented by the Administering Organisation. We may require these calculations to be audited.
instructions to applicants a set of instructions prepared by the ARC to assist applicants in completing the application form.
key performance indicators (KPIs) a set of quantifiable measures that the ARC use to monitor and report on progress of research outcomes.
legislative instrument a law on matters of detail made by a person or body authorised to do so by the relevant enabling legislation.
Linkage Program for the purposes of eligibility, the grant opportunities funded under the Linkage Program of the NCGP which consist of: ARC Centres of Excellence, Industrial Transformation Research Hubs, Industrial Transformation Training Centres, Linkage Projects, Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities, Learned Academies Special Projects, Supporting Responses to Commonwealth Science Council Priorities, Special Research Initiatives and other grant opportunities as announced from time to time under the Linkage Program.
LIEF the Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities scheme.
medical research medical research as defined in the ARC Medical Research Policy available on the ARC website.
Minister the Minister responsible for the administration of the ARC Act, or the Minister’s delegate.
named participants individual researchers nominated for particular roles in an application.
national interest the extent to which the research contributes to Australia’s national interest through its potential to have economic, commercial, environmental, social or cultural benefits to the Australian community.
officials officials of a Commonwealth entity. An official of a Commonwealth entity is an individual who is in, or forms part of the entity (see section 8 of the PGPA Act).
ORCID Identifier a persistent digital identifier for an individual researcher available on the ORCID website, www.orcid.org.
Other Eligible Organisation an organisation listed in section 6 of these grant guidelines which is not the Administering Organisation on an application.
other material resources resources where a monetary value is not relevant or to which it is difficult to assign a monetary value, for example, access to restricted data, samples or documents.
Other Organisation an organisation that is not an Eligible Organisation and not a Partner Organisation that contributes to the research project.
Participants all named participants on an application (ie CIs and PIs; and all unnamed researchers such as postdoctoral research associates and postgraduate researchers working on a project.
Partner Investigator a named participant who satisfies the eligibility criteria for a PI under these grant guidelines.
Partner Organisation an Australian or overseas organisation, other than an Eligible Organisation, which satisfies the eligibility requirements for a Partner Organisation and is to be a cash and/or in-kind or other material resources contributor to the project.
project an application approved by the Minister to receive funding from the ARC through an application.
project activity period the period during which a project is receiving funding according to the original grant offer, or has any carryover funds approved by the ARC, or an approved variation to the project’s end date. During this period, the project is known as an active project.
project end date the expected date that the project activity is completed and the grant spent by.
Project Leader means the named participant from the Administering Organisation who is the first-named CI on an application.
recipient an individual or organisation who has received grant funding from the ARC.
research for the purposes of these grant guidelines, the creation of new knowledge and/or the use of existing knowledge in a new and creative way so as to generate new concepts, methodologies, inventions and understandings. This could include synthesis and analysis of previous research to the extent that it is new and creative. This definition of research is consistent with a broad notion of research and experimental development comprising “creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of man [humankind], culture and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications” OECD (2002), Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, Paris (Page 30).
research infrastructure the assets, facilities, services, and coordinated access to major national and/or international research facilities or consortia which directly support research in higher education organisations and more broadly, and which maintain the capacity of researchers to undertake excellent research and deliver innovative outcomes.
Research Office a business unit within an Eligible Organisation that is responsible for contact with the ARC regarding applications and projects.
Research Opportunity and Performance Evidence (ROPE) an ARC policy framework used to consider and assess the quality and research excellence of a named participant within the context of the participant’s career and life experiences. One key element is that the assessment process takes into account the quality rather than simply the volume or size of the research contribution.
research output all products of a research project.
Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) a group of experts from academia and industry appointed to assist the ARC to assess applications and to provide a recommendation for funding to the CEO. A SAC may be drawn from the ARC College of Experts.
selection criteria the eligibility criteria and assessment criteria.
selection process the method used to select potential grantees. This process may involve comparative assessment of applications or the assessment of applications against the eligibility criteria and/or the assessment criteria.
Special Condition a condition specified in a grant offer which governs the use of the funding provided by the ARC.
technical workshop services the specialised construction and maintenance activities carried out by a technician, often within a dedicated facility for working with materials such as wood, glass, metal, plastics or electronics.
travel costs the domestic and international economy travel costs associated with the project, including to foster and strengthen collaboration between researchers in Australia and overseas.
total direct cost total amount that can be completely attributed to the eligible budget items (excluding indirect costs such as depreciation and administrative expenses).
value for money ‘value for money’ is a judgement based on the grant application representing an efficient, effective, economical and ethical use of public resources determined from a variety of considerations: merit of the application, risk, cost and expected contribution to outcome achievement.
Variation of grant Agreement (Variation) a request submitted to the ARC in RMS to agree a change in the grant agreement. This is also referred to as a ‘Variation of Funding Agreement’.
We the Australian Research Council (ARC). ‘Us’ and ‘Our’ are also used in this context.
You the Eligible Organisation that submitted the application. ‘Your’ is also used in this context.