Financial Sector (Collection of Data) determination No. 68 of 2005 - Reporting Standard ARS 113.0 (2005) - Market Risk
Table 16: If within limit throughout theTable 16: If within limit throughout the quarter
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Table 16: If within limit throughout the
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Financial Sector (Collection of Data) determination No. 68 of 2005 - Reporting Standard ARS 113.0 (2005) - Market Risk.
Within the limits approach, ADIs may choose one of three approaches to calculate internal limits: the contingent loss method; a VaR model based on the same parameters for the holding period and confidence interval as specified in the internal model approach (i.e. 10 days and 99 per cent (refer paragraph 22 of Guidance Note AGN 113.2 The Internal Model Approach)); or a VaR model based on a different holding period and confidence interval to those specified in the internal model approach.
For ADIs using the contingent loss method or a VaR model based on a 10 day holding period and 99 per cent confidence interval, the resulting limit for each asset class should be entered in the column labelled Internal Limit. The sum of these limits should be entered in the row labelled Total. ADIs using a VaR model based on parameters for the holding period and confidence interval which differ from those required by the internal model approach should first enter these limits for each asset class in the Internal Limits column. The limits should then be re-scaled to obtain 10 day, 99 per cent equivalents. If an ADI specifies internal limits based on a VaR model which uses a 1 day, 95 per cent (two tail) confidence interval, for example, the internal limits should be re-scaled to 10 day, 99 per cent equivalents by multiplying each limit by 10 (to take the holding period up to ten days), dividing the limit by 1.96 (to reverse the 95 per cent scaling effect) and then multiplying the result by 2.33 (to arrive at a 99 per cent confidence interval). The total internal limit is then the sum of the re-scaled limit amounts.
For all three methods, the scaling factor consists of a multiplication factor and a plus factor (refer paragraph 22(j) of Guidance Note AGN 113.2 The Internal Model Approach). The multiplication factor is determined by APRA on a case by case basis.
The capital requirement is the product of the total internal limit across all asset classes and the scaling factor.
Backtesting exceptions
To complete this section the most recent 250 days of aggregated profit and loss and VaR data, up to and including the last day in the quarter, is needed (refer paragraphs 54 to 82 of Guidance Note AGN 113.2 The Internal Model Approach). The aggregated data should be that profit and loss and VaR data that applies to all asset classes for which the internal limit method is being used to calculate the capital charge. Using this data, compare each day’s trading outcome (profit or loss) with the corresponding VaR number. If the trading outcome on a particular day is a loss that exceeds the corresponding VaR number for that day then the result is recorded as an exception. Count the number of exceptions that occur over the 250 days.
The Prudential Standard allows ADIs to perform back testing based on either actual or hypothetical profit and loss. All ADIs using the internal limit method must complete at least one of the two back testing rows in Table 16. Those ADIs that have the capacity to back test using both actual and hypothetical profit and loss must report the results of back testing on both bases.
Table 17: If limit exceeded during the quarter
Enter the largest end-of-day exposure experienced across all asset classes over the reporting period. ADIs using a VaR model based on parameters for the holding period and confidence interval which differ from those required by the internal model approach should first re-scale their peak exposure to a 10 day, 99 per cent equivalent.
The scaling factor consists of a multiplication factor and a plus factor (refer to paragraph 22(j) of Guidance Note AGN 113.2 The Internal Model Approach). The multiplication factor is determined by APRA on a case by case basis.
To calculate the capital charge multiply the largest end-of-day exposure by the penalty factor and the scaling factor.
Backtesting exceptions
To complete this section the most recent 250 days of aggregated profit and loss and VaR data, up to and including the last day in the quarter, is needed (refer paragraphs 54 to 82 of Guidance Note AGN 113.2 The Internal Model Approach). The aggregated data should be that profit and loss and VaR data that applies to all asset classes for which the internal limit method is being used to calculate the capital charge. Using this data, compare each day’s trading outcome (profit or loss) with the corresponding VaR number. If the trading outcome on a particular day is a loss that exceeds the corresponding VaR number for that day then the result is recorded as an exception. Count the number of exceptions that occur over the 250 days.
The Prudential Standard allows ADIs to perform back testing based on either actual or hypothetical profit and loss. All ADIs using the internal limit method must complete at least one of the two back testing rows in Table 17. Those ADIs that have the capacity to back test using both actual and hypothetical profit and loss must report the results of back testing on both bases.
Stress testing
All ADIs using internal models, including users of the internal limits approach, are required to complete Tables 18 to 25 where they have positions in the relevant asset/product. It should be noted that the stress test calculations are not part of the calculation of market risk capital requirements.
In each case the ADI should revalue its portfolio for the specified yield or price shifts and report the resultant change in mark-to-market value (both profits and losses). Full revaluation is required rather than estimates of changes in portfolios based on delta, duration, etc.
Tables 20 to 25 specify simultaneous shifts in underlying prices and the implied option volatility. Those ADIs with no option positions in a particular asset class need complete only the middle row of the relevant table (the zero change in volatility row).
All price and volatility scenarios are expressed as proportional shifts, for example, if the AUD/JPY exchange rate volatility is currently 10 per cent, a scenario of a 100 per cent increase corresponds to the volatility level increasing to 20 per cent; similarly a 50 per cent fall scenario implies that the exchange rate volatility would move to 5 percent.
Table 18: Yield curve scenarios
All positions forming part of the trading book in debt or other interest rate related securities must be included in the stress test calculations. Using the scenarios set out in Table 18, separate stress test results should be presented (in a separate row) for positions in each material currency. Positions in immaterial currencies need not be included in the stress testing scenarios. Within each material currency ADIs may net across all positions when applying the stress scenarios. In applying these yield curve shifts, ADIs should use the same interpolation method used within their internal model to obtain intermediate points on the yield curve.
It should be noted that the stress tests are expressed in terms of proportional changes in interest rates. An example of the yield curves that would result from the two scenarios, given a hypothetical initial yield curve, is shown in the table below.
Cash
90 days
180 days
1 year
3 years
5 years
10 years
15 years
Hypothetical initial yield curve
5.40
5.00
5.10
5.30
5.60
5.90
6.40
6.60
Yield curve scenario 1 (Yield x 1.2)
6.48
6.00
6.12
6.36
6.72
7.08
7.68
7.92
Yield curve scenario 2 (Yield x 0.8)
4.32
4.00
4.08
4.24
4.48
4.72
5.12
5.28
Table 19: Interest rate volatility scenarios
Those ADIs with interest rate options must complete this table. Separate stress results should be presented for interest rate options in different material currencies. Within each currency ADIs may net across all options. Positions in immaterial currencies need not be included in the stress testing scenarios.
Table 20: Equity scenarios
All equity positions within the trading book must be included in the stress test portfolio revaluations. In assessing the change in portfolio value arising from the prespecified scenarios, ADIs may net all positions within each national market (refer paragraph 36 of Guidance Note AGN 113.3 The Standard Method). A separate scenario matrix should be completed for each national market. In the column representing a negative change in volatility, only the entry corresponding to a zero per cent change in price needs to be filled out. The changes in price in the first column should be -50%, -25%, 0%, +10%, +20%.
Table 21: Exchange rate scenarios
All exchange rate sensitive positions (as specified in paragraph 57 of Guidance Note AGN 113.3 The Standard Method) must be included in the stress test portfolio revaluations. Positions in gold, however, should be excluded.
A separate scenario matrix should be completed for each material currency. For example, the USD scenario should include all spot and forward positions in USD (as specified in paragraph 57(a) to (e) of Guidance Note AGN 113.3 The Standard Method), options on USD/AUD and options on USD against all non-AUD currencies. A decrease in price should be interpreted as a depreciation in the USD. Similarly for the other currency scenarios a decrease in price should be interpreted as a depreciation in the specified currency. No separate AUD scenario matrix is needed.
In the column representing a negative change in volatility, only the entry corresponding to a zero per cent change in price needs to be filled out. The changes in price in the first column should be -20%, -10%, 0%, +10%, +20%.
Table 22: Gold and other precious metals scenarios
All positions in gold and other precious metals (including silver, platinum and palladium) must be included in the stress test portfolio revaluations. The price shifts should be applied to each commodity separately; a separate scenario matrix should be completed for each commodity. In assessing the change in portfolio value for each commodity, positions of differing maturity may be netted. In the column representing a negative change in volatility, only the entry corresponding to a zero per cent change in price needs to be filled out. The changes in price in the first column should be -30%, -15%, 0%, +15%, +30%.
Table 23: Base metals scenarios
All positions in base metals (including copper, aluminium, zinc, nickel and tin) must be included in the stress test portfolio revaluations. The price shifts should be applied to each commodity separately; a separate scenario matrix should be completed for each base metal. In assessing the change in portfolio value for each base metal, positions of differing maturity may be netted. In the column representing a negative change in volatility, only the entry corresponding to a zero per cent change in price needs to be filled out. The changes in price in the first column should be -50%, -25%, 0%, +25%, +50%.
Table 24: Soft commodities scenarios
All positions in soft commodities (such as wool, wheat, corn, and sugar) must be included in the stress test portfolio revaluations. The price shifts should be applied to each commodity separately; a separate scenario matrix should be completed for each commodity. In assessing the change in portfolio value for each commodity, positions of differing maturity may be netted. In the column representing a negative change in volatility, only the entry corresponding to a zero per cent change in price needs to be filled out. The changes in price in the first column should be -30%, -15%, 0%, +20%, +40%.
Table 25: Energy commodity scenarios
All positions in energy commodities (including oil, gas, and electricity) must be included in the stress test portfolio revaluations. The price shifts should be applied to each commodity separately; a separate scenario matrix should be completed for each energy commodity. In assessing the change in portfolio value for each commodity, positions of differing maturity may be netted. In the column representing a negative change in volatility, only the entry corresponding to a zero per cent change in price needs to be filled out. The changes in price in the first column should be -40%, -20%, 0%, +20%, +40%.
Note on References to Accounting Standards
This Note is about references in these instructions to an accounting standard or accounting standards, e.g. where the instructions say that something must be done in accordance with a particular AASB or international accounting standard, or must be done in accordance with the accounting standards (however described) generally.
Where you see such a reference, you must read it as meaning the version of the accounting standard, or versions of the accounting standards, applying to reporting periods (within the meaning of the accounting standards) beginning immediately before 1 January 2005.
Accordingly, the new AASB standards for 2005 are not to be applied.
Similarly, a reference to principles or conventions (however described) governing an accounting procedure or treatment shall be taken to refer to principles or conventions applicable in relation to reporting periods (within the meaning of the accounting standards) that began immediately before 1 January 2005.
Part Table 16: If within limit throughout the - Financial Sector (Collection of Data) determination No. 68 of 2005 - Reporting Standard ARS 113.0 (2005) - Market Risk - Table 16: If within limit throughout the quarter | Zoe