Fair Work Act 2009
558BResponsibility of responsible franchisor entities and holding companies for certain contraventions
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 558B
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Fair Work Act 2009.
558B Responsibility of responsible franchisor entities and holding companies for certain contraventions
Responsible franchisor entities
(1) A person contravenes this subsection if:
(a) an employer who is a franchisee entity of a franchise contravenes a civil remedy provision referred to in subsection (7); and
(b) the person is a responsible franchisor entity for the franchisee entity; and
(c) the contravention by the franchisee entity occurs in the franchisee entity’s capacity as a franchisee entity; and
(d) either:
(i) the responsible franchisor entity or an officer (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001) of the responsible franchisor entity knew or could reasonably be expected to have known that the contravention by the franchisee entity would occur; or
(ii) at the time of the contravention by the franchisee entity, the responsible franchisor entity or an officer (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001) of the responsible franchisor entity knew or could reasonably be expected to have known that a contravention by the franchisee entity of the same or a similar character was likely to occur.
Note: This subsection is a civil remedy provision (see this Part).
Holding companies
(2) A person contravenes this subsection if:
(a) the person is a body corporate; and
(b) a subsidiary (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001) of the body corporate who is an employer contravenes a civil remedy provision referred to in subsection (7); and
(c) either:
(i) the body corporate or an officer (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001) of the body corporate knew or could reasonably be expected to have known that the contravention by the subsidiary would occur; or
(ii) at the time of the contravention by the subsidiary, the body corporate or an officer (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001) of the body corporate knew or could reasonably be expected to have known that a contravention by the subsidiary of the same or a similar character was likely to occur.
Note: This subsection is a civil remedy provision (see this Part).
Reasonable steps to prevent a contravention of the same or a similar character
(3) A person does not contravene subsection (1) or (2) if, as at the time of the contravention referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (2)(b), the person had taken reasonable steps to prevent a contravention by the franchisee entity or subsidiary of the same or a similar character.
(4) For the purposes of subsection (3), in determining whether a person took reasonable steps to prevent a contravention by a franchisee entity or subsidiary (the contravening employer) of the same or a similar character, a court may have regard to all relevant matters, including the following: