Section 367 - Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 – Guide to the Assessment of the Degree of Permanent Impairment Edition 3.0 - The adjusted WPI assessment may not exceed the maximum WPI rating available in each individual table. | Zoe
Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 – Guide to the Assessment of the Degree of Permanent Impairment Edition 3.0
367The adjusted WPI assessment may not exceed the maximum WPI rating available in each individual table.
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 367
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 – Guide to the Assessment of the Degree of Permanent Impairment Edition 3.0.
| 0 | No significant clinical findings, no muscular guarding, no documented neurological impairment, no significant loss of motion segment integrity, no other indication of impairment related to injury.<br>or<br>No fractures. |
| 8 | Clinical history and examination findings compatible with specific injury. Findings may include: muscle guarding or spasm; asymmetric loss of range of motion or non-verifiable radicular complaints defined as complaints of radicular pain without objective findings.<br>and<br>No alteration of structural integrity.<br>or<br>Clinically significant radiculopathy and objectively demonstrated disc herniation consistent with the radiculopathy (improved following non-operative treatment).<br>or<br>Fractures:<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of less than 25%; orPosterior element fracture without dislocation – healed without loss of structural integrity or radiculopathy; orSpinous or transverse process fracture with displacement. |
| 10–18 | Significant signs of radiculopathy, such as pain and/or sensory loss in a dermatomal distribution, loss or alteration of relevant reflex(es), loss of muscle strength, or unilateral atrophy compared with the unaffected side, measured at the same distance above or below the elbow. The neurological impairment may be verified by electrodiagnostic findings.<br>or<br>Clinically significant radiculopathy and objectively verified disc herniation consistent with the radiculopathy, or with improved radiculopathy following surgery.<br>or<br>Fractures:<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of 25% to 50% – healed without loss of structural integrity, with or without radiculopathy; orPosterior element fracture with displacement disrupting the spinal canal – healed without loss of structural integrity, with or without radiculopathy.<br>Note: In the case of fractures, differentiation from a congenital or developmental condition should be accomplished, if possible, by examining pre-injury roentgenograms, if available, or by a bone scan performed after the onset of the condition. |
| 28 | Alteration of motion segment integrity (at least 3.5mm of translation of one vertebra on another or angular motion of more than 11° greater than at each adjacent level).<br>or<br>Bilateral or multilevel radiculopathy with objectively verified disc herniation consistent with the radiculopathy.<br>or<br>Loss of motion of a motion segment due to a developmental fusion or successful or unsuccessful attempt at surgical arthrodesis.<br>or<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of more than 50% without residual neural compromise. |
| 38 | Significant upper extremity impairment requiring the use of upper extremity external functional or adaptive device(s). There may be total neurological loss at a single level or severe, multilevel neurological dysfunction.<br>or<br>Structural compromise of the spinal canal with severe upper extremity motor and sensory deficits but without lower extremity involvement. |
Note to Table 9.15
Assessors should refer to the Principles of Assessment for guidance on awarding an impairment value within a range.
| 0 | No significant clinical findings, no muscular guarding, no documented neurological impairment, no significant loss of motion segment integrity, no other indication of impairment related to injury.<br>or<br>No fractures. |
| 8 | History and examination findings compatible with a specific injury. Findings may include: significant muscle guarding or spasm; asymmetric loss of range of motion (dysmetria); or non-verifiable radicular complaints, defined as complaints of radicular pain without objective findings.<br>and<br>No alteration of motion segment integrity.<br>or<br>Herniated disc at the level and on the side that would be expected from objective clinical findings, but without radicular signs following conservative treatment.<br>or<br>Fractures:<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of less than 25%; orPosterior element fracture without dislocation – healed without alteration of motion segment integrity or radiculopathy; orSpinous or transverse process fracture with displacement, but without a vertebral body fracture. |
| 10–18 | Ongoing neurological impairment of the lower extremity related to a thoracolumbar injury, documented by alteration of motor and sensory functions, altered reflexes, or findings of unilateral atrophy above or below the knee related to no other condition (may be verified by electrodiagnostic testing).<br>or<br>Clinically significant radiculopathy and objectively verified disc herniation consistent with the radiculopathy, or with improved radiculopathy following surgery.<br>or<br>Fractures:<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of 25% to 50% – healed without alteration of structural integrity; orPosterior element fracture with mild displacement disrupting the canal – healed without alteration of structural integrity.<br>Note: Differentiation from a congenital or developmental condition should be accomplished, if possible, by examining pre-injury roentgenograms, if available, or by a bone scan performed after the onset of the condition. |
| 23 | Alteration of motion segment integrity (more than 2.5mm translation of one vertebra on another).<br>or<br>Bilateral or multilevel radiculopathy with objectively verified disc herniation consistent with the radiculopathy.<br>or<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of more than 50% without residual neural compromise. |
| 28 | Significant signs of radiculopathy, such as dermatomal pain and/or in a dermatomal distribution, sensory loss, loss of relevant reflex(es), loss of muscle strength or measured unilateral atrophy above or below the knee compared to measurements on the contralateral side at the same location (may be verified by electrodiagnostic findings).<br>and<br>Alteration of motion segment integrity (more than 2.5mm translation of one vertebra on another).<br>or<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body by more than 50% with neural motor compromise, but not bilateral involvement. In that instance, refer notes concerning corticospinal tract impairment evaluation<br>(Part III – Introduction). |
Note to Table 9.16
Assessors should refer to the Principles of Assessment for guidance on awarding an impairment value within a range.
| 0 | No significant clinical findings, no observed muscle guarding or spasm, no documented neurological impairment, no documented alteration in structural integrity, and no other indication of impairment related to injury.<br>or<br>No fractures. |
| 8 | Clinical history and examination findings compatible with a specific injury. Findings may include: significant muscle guarding or spasm; asymmetric loss of range of motion; or non-verifiable radicular complaints, defined as complaints of radicular pain without objective findings.<br>and<br>No alteration of the structural integrity and no significant radiculopathy.<br>or<br>Prior clinically significant radiculopathy and objectively demonstrated disc herniation, consistent with the radiculopathy, but radiculopathy no longer present following conservative treatment.<br>or<br>Fractures:<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of less than 25%; orPosterior element fracture without dislocation (not developmental spondylolysis) that has healed without alteration of motion segment integrity; orSpinous or transverse process fracture with displacement without a vertebral body fracture, with no disruption of the spinal canal. |
| 10–13 | Significant signs of radiculopathy, such as dermatomal pain and/or in a dermatomal distribution, sensory loss, alteration of relevant reflex(es), loss of muscle strength or measured unilateral atrophy above or below the knee compared to measurements on the contralateral side at the same location (may be verified by electrodiagnostic findings).<br>or<br>History of a herniated disc at the level and on the side consistent with objective clinical findings, associated with radiculopathy, or now asymptomatic following surgery for radiculopathy.<br>or<br>Fractures:<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of 25% to 50% – healed without alteration of structural integrity; orPosterior element fracture with displacement disrupting the spinal canal – healed without alteration of structural integrity. |
| 23 | Loss of motion segment integrity (at least 4.5mm of translation of one vertebra on another, or angular motion greater than 15° at L1-2, L2-3, and L3-4, greater than 20° at L4-5, and greater than 25° at L5-S1). May have complete, or near complete, loss of motion of a motion segment due to developmental fusion, or successful or unsuccessful attempt at surgical arthrodesis.<br>or<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of more than 50%, without residual neurological compromise. |
| 28 | Both radiculopathy and loss of motion segment integrity are present, with significant lower extremity impairment indicated by atrophy or loss of reflex(es), pain, and/or sensory changes within an anatomic distribution (dermatomal), verified by electrodiagnostic findings.<br>and<br>Loss of motion segment integrity (at least 4.5mm of translation of one vertebra on another or angular motion greater than 15° at L1-2, L2-3, and L3-4, greater than 20° at L4-5, and greater than 25° at L5-S1).<br>or<br>Compression fracture of one vertebral body of more than 50%, with unilateral neurological compromise. |
Note to Table 9.17
Assessors should refer to the Principles of Assessment for guidance on awarding an impairment value within a range.
| 0 | Healed fracture:<br>without displacement or residual signsof one or both rami with displacement but without residual signsof ischium or ilium with displacement but without residual signsof coccyx with displacement but without residual signsof one pubic ramus with displacement, deformity and residual signs. |
| 2 | Healed fracture of ilium with displacement, deformity and residual signs. |
| 5 | Healed fracture of:<br>sacrum with displacement but without residual signssymphysis pubis without separation and without residual signsboth pubic rami with displacement, deformity and residual signs.<br>Non-union of coccyx fracture.<br>Excision of coccyx. |
| 10 | Healed fracture of:<br>ischium with displacement of 2.5cm or more, deformity and residual signssacrum involving sacro-iliac joint. |
| 15 | Healed fracture of symphysis pubis with separation or displacement. |
| Evaluate in accordance with Table 9.4: Hips | Fracture involving acetabulum. |
CHAPTER 10 – THE URINARY SYSTEM
10.0 Introduction
369 In conducting an assessment, the assessor must have regard to the Principles of Assessment and the definitions contained in the Glossary.