ASA 800 - Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks - July 2016
In ForceCTH
Jurisdiction
Commonwealth
Collection
legislative instrument
Plain English Summary
6/10 complexity
This Auditing Standard (ASA 800) sets rules for auditors who examine financial reports prepared under special purpose frameworks. It requires auditors, when accepting and performing an engagement, to assess whether the framework is acceptable, identify the report’s purpose and intended users, apply relevant Australian Auditing Standards (including ASA 700 for reporting) and include an Emphasis of Matter that the report may not be suitable for other purposes.
Management decides the framework and prepares the report; the entity funds the audit; auditors decide whether to accept and what procedures to perform, increasing compliance and disclosure needs (see Aus 0.1; Para.8; Para.14).
Mechanically, Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations , Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as compiled to 7 September 2021) sets out the auditor’s obligations when auditing financial reports prepared under special purpose frameworks. The standard applies where an audit is of a financial report for a financial year or half‑year under the Corporations Act 2001, or an audit of a financial report or complete set of financial statements for any other purpose (Aus 0.1). The operative date for the compilation is for reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016 (Aus 0.3). The compilation incorporates subsequent amending standards listed in the Compilation Details (Table of Standards).
At a granular level the Standard requires auditors to:
determine the acceptability of the special purpose financial reporting framework by obtaining an understanding of the report’s purpose, the intended users and the steps management took to determine the framework’s acceptability (see Para. 8; Aus A5-A8);
determine whether application of the Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration for the engagement (Para. 9; Aus A9.1);
obtain an understanding of the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies and, where the report is based on a contract, understand any significant interpretations of the contract that management has applied (Para. 9(2); ASA 315 cross‑reference);
apply ASA 700 when forming an opinion and reporting on the special purpose financial report, and ensure the auditor’s report adequately describes the applicable framework, the report’s purpose and, where necessary, the intended users (Para. 11; Para. 12);
include in the auditor’s report an Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and therefore may not be suitable for other purposes (Para. 14; Para. A20-A21).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in ASA 800 - Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks - July 2016.
32
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standa
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
The most recently compiled versions of Auditing Standards, original Standards and amending Standards (see Compilation Details) are available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au
Contact Details
Contact Details
Contact Details
Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardPodium LevelLevel 14, 530 Collins StreetMelbourne Victoria 3000AUSTRALIA
Phone: (03) 8080 7400E‑mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Otherwise, no part of this Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.
This Auditing Standard reproduces substantial parts of the corresponding International Standard on Auditing issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), in the manner described in the statement on Conformity with International Standards on Auditing. The AUASB acknowledges that IFAC is the owner of copyright in the International Standard on Auditing incorporated in this Auditing Standard throughout the world.
All existing rights in this material are reserved outside Australia. Reproduction outside Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non‑commercial use only.
Further information and requests for authorisation to reproduce this Auditing Standard for commercial purposes outside Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Any decision to approve a request may also require the agreement of IFAC.
ISSN 1833‑4393
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
COMPILATION DETAILS
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement......................................8
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit..............................9-10
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations.................................11-14
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Definition of Special Purpose Framework.......................................A1-A4
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement..................................A5-A8
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit...........................A9-A12
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations...............................A13-A21
Appendix 1: Illustrations of Independent Auditor’s Reports on a Special Purpose Financial Report
COMPILATION DETAILS
COMPILATION DETAILS
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
The most recently compiled versions of Auditing Standards, original Standards and amending Standards (see Compilation Details) are available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au
Contact Details
Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardPodium LevelLevel 14, 530 Collins StreetMelbourne Victoria 3000AUSTRALIA
Phone: (03) 8080 7400E‑mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Otherwise, no part of this Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.
This Auditing Standard reproduces substantial parts of the corresponding International Standard on Auditing issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), in the manner described in the statement on Conformity with International Standards on Auditing. The AUASB acknowledges that IFAC is the owner of copyright in the International Standard on Auditing incorporated in this Auditing Standard throughout the world.
All existing rights in this material are reserved outside Australia. Reproduction outside Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non‑commercial use only.
Further information and requests for authorisation to reproduce this Auditing Standard for commercial purposes outside Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Any decision to approve a request may also require the agreement of IFAC.
ISSN 1833‑4393
CONTENTS
COMPILATION DETAILS
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement......................................8
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit..............................9-10
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations.................................11-14
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Definition of Special Purpose Framework.......................................A1-A4
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement..................................A5-A8
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit...........................A9-A12
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations...............................A13-A21
Appendix 1: Illustrations of Independent Auditor’s Reports on a Special Purpose Financial Report
COMPILATION DETAILS
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as Amended)
This compilation takes into account amendments made up to and including 7 September 2021 and was prepared on 10 November 2021 by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB).
This compilation is not a separate Auditing Standard made by the AUASB. Instead, it is a representation of ASA 800 (July 2016) as amended by other Auditing Standards which are listed in the Table below.
Table of Standards
Standard
Date made
Operative Date
ASA 800 [A]
26 July 2016
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2017‑1 [B]
30 May 2017
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2020-2 [C]
30 June 2020
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 July 2020
ASA 2021-4 [D]
7 September 2021
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2021
ASA 2020-1 [E]
3 March 2020
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2021[*]
[A] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2016L01268, 8 August 2016.
[B] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2017L00693, 19 June 2017
[C] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2020L00885, 7 July 2020
[D] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2021L01301, 20 September 2021
[E] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2020L00252, 13 March 2020
Table of Amendments
Paragraph affected
How affected
By … [paragraph]
Renumbering of paragraphs Aus 1.1 – 1.3
Amended
ASA 2017-1 [12-14]
A18
Deleted
ASA 2017-1 [15]
Aus A18.1
Addition
ASA 2017-1 [16]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2020-2 [83] to [87]
Aus A1.1
Amended
ASA 2021-4 [8]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2021-4 [9]
Appendix 1[Aus] Illustration 4
Deleted
ASA 2021-4 [10]
10Footnote 5
Amended
ASA 2020-1 [212]
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as amended to 7 September 2021) is set out in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A21 and Appendix 1.
This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied. This Auditing Standard is to be read also in conjunction with ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard‑setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
The equivalent requirements and related application and other explanatory material included in ISA 800 in respect of “relevant ethical requirements”, have been included in Auditing Standard, ASA 102 Compliance with Ethical Requirements when Performing Audits, Reviews and Other Assurance Engagements. There is no international equivalent to ASA 102.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 800.
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Consid
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as Amended)
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as Amended)
This compilation takes into account amendments made up to and including 7 September 2021 and was prepared on 10 November 2021 by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB).
This compilation is not a separate Auditing Standard made by the AUASB. Instead, it is a representation of ASA 800 (July 2016) as amended by other Auditing Standards which are listed in the Table below.
Table of Standards
Table of Standards
Table of Standards
Standard
Date made
Operative Date
ASA 800 [A]
26 July 2016
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2017‑1 [B]
30 May 2017
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2020-2 [C]
30 June 2020
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 July 2020
ASA 2021-4 [D]
7 September 2021
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2021
ASA 2020-1 [E]
3 March 2020
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2021[*]
[A] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2016L01268, 8 August 2016.
[B] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2017L00693, 19 June 2017
[C] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2020L00885, 7 July 2020
[D] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2021L01301, 20 September 2021
[E] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2020L00252, 13 March 2020
Table of Amendments
Table of Amendments
Table of Amendments
Paragraph affected
How affected
By … [paragraph]
Renumbering of paragraphs Aus 1.1 – 1.3
Amended
ASA 2017-1 [12-14]
A18
Deleted
ASA 2017-1 [15]
Aus A18.1
Addition
ASA 2017-1 [16]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2020-2 [83] to [87]
Aus A1.1
Amended
ASA 2021-4 [8]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2021-4 [9]
Appendix 1[Aus] Illustration 4
Deleted
ASA 2021-4 [10]
10Footnote 5
Amended
ASA 2020-1 [212]
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as amended to 7 September 2021) is set out in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A21 and Appendix 1.
This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied. This Auditing Standard is to be read also in conjunction with ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard‑setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
The equivalent requirements and related application and other explanatory material included in ISA 800 in respect of “relevant ethical requirements”, have been included in Auditing Standard, ASA 102 Compliance with Ethical Requirements when Performing Audits, Reviews and Other Assurance Engagements. There is no international equivalent to ASA 102.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 800.
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as amended to 7 September 2021) is set out in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A21 and Appendix 1.
This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied. This Auditing Standard is to be read also in conjunction with ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Conformity with International Standards
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard‑setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
The equivalent requirements and related application and other explanatory material included in ISA 800 in respect of “relevant ethical requirements”, have been included in Auditing Standard, ASA 102 Compliance with Ethical Requirements when Performing Audits, Reviews and Other Assurance Engagements. There is no international equivalent to ASA 102.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 800.
Auditing Standard ASA 800
Auditing Standard ASA 800
Auditing Standard ASA 800
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) made Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, on 26 July 2016.
This compiled version of ASA 800 incorporates subsequent amendments contained in other Auditing Standards made by the AUASB up to and including 7 September 2021 (see Compilation Details).
Auditing Standard ASA 800
Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard
The Australian Standards on Auditing in the 100–700 series apply to an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard deals with special considerations in the application of those Australian Auditing Standards to an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework.
This Auditing Standard is written in the context of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. ASA 805[1] deals with special considerations relevant to an audit of a single financial statement or of a specific element, account or item of a financial statement.
This Auditing Standard does not override the requirements of the other Auditing Standards; nor does it purport to deal with all special considerations that may be relevant in the circumstances of the engagement.
Effective Date
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus 0.3]
Objective
The objective of the auditor, when applying Australian Auditing Standards in an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework, is to address appropriately the special considerations that are relevant to:
The acceptance of the engagement;
The planning and performance of that engagement; and
Forming an opinion and reporting on the financial report.
Definitions
For the purposes of this Auditing Standard, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:
Special purpose financial statements – Financial statements prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para.A4)
Special purpose framework – A financial reporting framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users. The financial reporting framework may be a fair presentation framework or a compliance framework.[2] (Ref: Para. A1–A4)
Aus 6.1 Special purpose financial report means a complete set of financial statements[*], including an assertion statement[#] by those responsible for the financial report, prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para. A1-A4)
Reference to “financial statements” in this Auditing Standard means “a complete set of special purpose financial statements”. The requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework determine the presentation, structure, and content of the financial statements, and what constitutes a complete set of financial statements. Reference to “special purpose financial statements” includes the related disclosures.
Requirements
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.[3] In an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of: (Ref: Para. A5–A8)
The purpose for which the financial report is prepared;
The intended users; and
The steps taken by management to determine that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit
ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit.[4] In planning and performing an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall determine whether application of the Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration in the circumstances of the engagement. (Ref: Para. A9–A12)
ASA 315 requires the auditor to obtain an understanding of the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies.[5] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of any significant interpretations of the contract that management made in the preparation of that financial report. An interpretation is significant when adoption of another reasonable interpretation would have produced a material difference in the information presented in the financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations
When forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall apply the requirements in ASA 700.[6] (Ref: Para. A13–A19)
Description of the Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 700 requires the auditor to evaluate whether the financial report adequately refers to or describes the applicable financial reporting framework.[7] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall evaluate whether the financial report adequately describes any significant interpretations of the contract on which the financial report is based.
ASA 700 deals with the form and content of the auditor’s report, including the specific ordering for certain elements. In the case of an auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report:
The auditor’s report shall also describe the purpose for which the financial report is prepared and, if necessary, the intended users, or refer to a note in the special purpose financial report that contains that information; and
If management has a choice of financial reporting frameworks in the preparation of such a financial report, the explanation of management’s[8] responsibility for the financial report shall also make reference to its responsibility for determining that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Alerting Readers that the Financial Report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework
The auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report shall include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users of the auditor’s report that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and that, as a result, the financial report may not be suitable for another purpose. (Ref: Para. A20–A21)
* * *
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Definition of Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para 6)
Examples of special purpose frameworks are:
A tax basis of accounting for a financial report that accompanies an entity’s tax return;
The cash receipts and disbursements basis of accounting for cash flow information that an entity may be requested to prepare for creditors;
The financial reporting provisions established by a regulator to meet the requirements of that regulator; or
The financial reporting provisions of a contract, such as a bond indenture, a loan agreement, or a project grant.
Aus A1.1 The Corporations Act 2001,[*] other applicable law or regulation, or certain parties, may determine whether a financial report is required to be prepared and whether compliance with Australian Accounting Standards is required. Australian Accounting Standards set out requirements for General Purpose Financial Statements. In some circumstances, entities are permitted to prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements as defined in AASB 1054 Australian Additional Disclosures. Such circumstances include for-profit private sector entities required only by their constituting document or another document (e.g., a loan agreement) to prepare financial statements that comply with Australian Accounting Standards, provided that the relevant document was created or last amended before 1 July 2021, as well as not-for-profit entities that assess themselves to be non-reporting entities.
There may be circumstances where a special purpose framework is based on a financial reporting framework established by an authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation, but does not comply with all the requirements of that framework. An example is a contract that requires a financial report to be prepared in accordance with most, but not all, of the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X. When this is acceptable in the circumstances of the engagement, it is inappropriate for the description of the applicable financial reporting framework in the special purpose financial report to imply full compliance with the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation. In the above example of the contract, the description of the applicable financial reporting framework may refer to the financial reporting provisions of the contract, rather than make any reference to the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X.
In the circumstances described in paragraph A2, the special purpose framework may not be a fair presentation framework even if the financial reporting framework on which it is based is a fair presentation framework. This is because the special purpose framework may not comply with all the requirements of the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation that are necessary to achieve fair presentation of the financial report.
A financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework may be the only financial report an entity prepares. In such circumstances, that financial report may be used by users other than those for whom the financial reporting framework is designed. Despite the broad distribution of the financial report in those circumstances, the financial report is still considered to be a special purpose financial report for purposes of the Australian Auditing Standards. The requirements in paragraphs 13–14 are designed to avoid misunderstandings about the purpose for which the financial report is prepared. Disclosures comprise explanatory or descriptive information, set out as required, expressly permitted or otherwise allowed by the applicable financial reporting framework, on the face of a financial report, or in the notes, or incorporated therein by cross‑reference.[9]
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework (Ref: Para. 8)
In the case of a special purpose financial report, the financial information needs of the intended users are a key factor in determining the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting standards established by an organisation that is authorised or recognised to promulgate standards for a special purpose financial report. In that case, those standards will be presumed acceptable for that purpose if the organisation follows an established and transparent process involving deliberation and consideration of the views of relevant stakeholders. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may prescribe the financial reporting framework to be used by management in the preparation of a special purpose financial report for a certain type of entity. For example, a regulator may establish financial reporting provisions to meet the requirements of that regulator. In the absence of indications to the contrary, such a financial reporting framework is presumed acceptable for a special purpose financial report prepared by such entity.
Where the financial reporting standards referred to in paragraph A6 are supplemented by legislative or regulatory requirements, ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine whether any conflicts between the financial reporting standards and the additional requirements exist, and prescribes actions to be taken by the auditor if such conflicts exist.[10]
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting provisions of a contract, or sources other than those described in paragraphs A6 and A7. In that case, the acceptability of the financial reporting framework in the circumstances of the engagement is determined by considering whether the framework exhibits attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks as described in Appendix 2 of ASA 210. In the case of a special purpose framework, the relative importance to a particular engagement of each of the attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks is a matter of professional judgement. For example, for purposes of establishing the value of net assets of an entity at the date of its sale, the vendor and the purchaser may have agreed that very prudent estimates of allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable are appropriate for their needs, even though such financial information is not neutral when compared with financial information prepared in accordance with a general purpose framework.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit (Ref: Para. 9)
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A9.1]
Aus A9.1 ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with (a) relevant ethical requirements, including those pertaining to independence, relating to financial report audit engagements, and (b) all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit. It also requires the auditor to comply with each requirement of an Australian Auditing Standard unless, in the circumstances of the audit, the entire Auditing Standard is not relevant or the requirement is not relevant because it is conditional and the condition does not exist; or application of the requirement(s) would relate to classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures that the auditor has determined are immaterial. In rare and exceptional circumstances, when there are factors outside the auditor’s control that prevent the auditor from complying with a requirement, the auditor where possible, performs appropriate alternative audit procedures.[11]
Application of some of the requirements of the Auditing Standards in an audit of a special purpose financial report may require special consideration by the auditor. For example, in ASA 320, judgements about matters that are material to users of the financial report are based on a consideration of the common financial information needs of users as a group.[12] In the case of an audit of a special purpose financial report, however, those judgements are based on a consideration of the financial information needs of the intended users.
In the case of a special purpose financial report, such as those prepared in accordance with the requirements of a contract, management may agree with the intended users on a threshold below which misstatements identified during the audit will not be corrected or otherwise adjusted. The existence of such a threshold does not relieve the auditor from the requirement to determine materiality in accordance with ASA 320 for purposes of planning and performing the audit of the special purpose financial report.
ASA 260 requires the auditor to determine the appropriate person(s) within the entity’s governance structure with whom to communicate.[13] ASA 260 notes that, in some cases, all of those charged governance are involved in managing the entity, and the application of the communication requirements is modified to recognise this position.[14] When a general purpose financial report is also prepared by the entity, those person(s) responsible for the oversight of the preparation of the special purpose financial report may not be the same as those charged with governance responsible for the oversight of the preparation of that general purpose financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations (Ref: Para. 11)
The Appendix to this Auditing Standard contains illustrations of independent auditors’ reports on a special purpose financial report. Other illustrations of auditor’s reports may be relevant to reporting on a special purpose financial report (see for example, the Appendices to ASA 700, ASA 705,[15] ASA 570,[16] ASA 720, and ASA 706[17]).
Application of ASA 700 When Reporting on a Special Purpose Financial Report
Paragraph 11 of this Auditing Standard explains that the auditor is required to apply ASA 700 when forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report. In doing so, the auditor is also required to apply the reporting requirements in other Auditing Standards and may find the special considerations addressed in paragraphs A15–A19 below helpful.
Going Concern
A special purpose financial report may or may not be prepared in accordance with a financial reporting framework for which the going concern basis of accounting is relevant (e.g., the going concern basis of accounting is not relevant for some financial report prepared on a tax basis in particular jurisdictions).[18] Depending on the applicable financial reporting framework used in the preparation of the special purpose financial report, the description in the auditor’s report of management’s responsibilities[19] relating to going concern may need to be adapted as necessary. The description in the auditor’s report of the auditor’s responsibilities[20] may also need to be adapted as necessary depending on how ASA 570 applies in the circumstances of the engagement.
Key Audit Matters
ASA 700 requires the auditor to communicate key audit matters in accordance with ASA 701[21] for audits of a general purpose financial report of listed entities. For audits of a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 only applies when communication of key audit matters in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report is required by law or regulation or the auditor otherwise decides to communicate key audit matters. When key audit matters are communicated in the auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 applies in its entirety.[22]
Other Information
ASA 720[23] deals with the auditor’s responsibilities relating to other information. In the context of this Auditing Standard, reports containing or accompanying the special purpose financial report—the purpose of which is to provide owners (or similar stakeholders) with information on matters presented in the special purpose financial report—are considered to be annual reports for the purpose of ASA 720. In the case of a financial report prepared using a special purpose framework, the term “similar stakeholders” includes the specific users whose financial information needs are met by the design of the special purpose framework used to prepare the special purpose financial report. When the auditor determines that the entity plans to issue such a report, the requirements in ASA 720 apply to the audit of the special purpose financial report.
Name of the Engagement Partner
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A18.1]
Aus 18.1 The requirement in ASA 700 for the name of the engagement partner to be included in the auditor’s report where required by law or regulation also applies to audits of special purpose financial reports.[*]
Inclusion of a Reference to the Auditor’s Report on the General Purpose Financial Report
The auditor may deem it appropriate to refer, in an Other Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report, to the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report or to matter(s) reported therein (see ASA 706).[24] For example, the auditor may consider it appropriate to refer in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report to a Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern section included in the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report.
Alerting Readers that the Financial report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para. 14)
The special purpose financial report may be used for purposes other than those for which they were intended. For example, a regulator may require certain entities to place the special purpose financial report on public record. To avoid misunderstandings, the auditor alerts users of the auditor’s report by including an Emphasis of Matter paragraph explaining that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and, therefore, may not be suitable for another purpose. ASA 706 requires this paragraph to be included within a separate section of the auditor’s report with an appropriate heading that includes the term “Emphasis of Matter”.[25]
Restriction on Distribution or Use (Ref: Para. 14)
In addition to the alert required by paragraph 14, the auditor may consider it appropriate to indicate that the auditor’s report is intended solely for the specific users. Depending on the law or regulation of the particular jurisdiction, this may be achieved by restricting the distribution or use of the auditor’s report. In these circumstances, the paragraph referred to in paragraph 14 may be expanded to include these other matters, and the heading modified accordingly (see illustrations in the Appendix to this Auditing Standard).
Special Considerations—Audits of Financi
Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks
Auditing Standard ASA 800
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) made Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, on 26 July 2016.
This compiled version of ASA 800 incorporates subsequent amendments contained in other Auditing Standards made by the AUASB up to and including 7 September 2021 (see Compilation Details).
Auditing Standard ASA 800
Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard
The Australian Standards on Auditing in the 100–700 series apply to an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard deals with special considerations in the application of those Australian Auditing Standards to an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework.
This Auditing Standard is written in the context of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. ASA 805[1] deals with special considerations relevant to an audit of a single financial statement or of a specific element, account or item of a financial statement.
This Auditing Standard does not override the requirements of the other Auditing Standards; nor does it purport to deal with all special considerations that may be relevant in the circumstances of the engagement.
Effective Date
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus 0.3]
Objective
The objective of the auditor, when applying Australian Auditing Standards in an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework, is to address appropriately the special considerations that are relevant to:
The acceptance of the engagement;
The planning and performance of that engagement; and
Forming an opinion and reporting on the financial report.
Definitions
For the purposes of this Auditing Standard, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:
Special purpose financial statements – Financial statements prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para.A4)
Special purpose framework – A financial reporting framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users. The financial reporting framework may be a fair presentation framework or a compliance framework.[2] (Ref: Para. A1–A4)
Aus 6.1 Special purpose financial report means a complete set of financial statements[*], including an assertion statement[#] by those responsible for the financial report, prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para. A1-A4)
Reference to “financial statements” in this Auditing Standard means “a complete set of special purpose financial statements”. The requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework determine the presentation, structure, and content of the financial statements, and what constitutes a complete set of financial statements. Reference to “special purpose financial statements” includes the related disclosures.
Requirements
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.[3] In an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of: (Ref: Para. A5–A8)
The purpose for which the financial report is prepared;
The intended users; and
The steps taken by management to determine that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit
ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit.[4] In planning and performing an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall determine whether application of the Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration in the circumstances of the engagement. (Ref: Para. A9–A12)
ASA 315 requires the auditor to obtain an understanding of the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies.[5] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of any significant interpretations of the contract that management made in the preparation of that financial report. An interpretation is significant when adoption of another reasonable interpretation would have produced a material difference in the information presented in the financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations
When forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall apply the requirements in ASA 700.[6] (Ref: Para. A13–A19)
Description of the Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 700 requires the auditor to evaluate whether the financial report adequately refers to or describes the applicable financial reporting framework.[7] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall evaluate whether the financial report adequately describes any significant interpretations of the contract on which the financial report is based.
ASA 700 deals with the form and content of the auditor’s report, including the specific ordering for certain elements. In the case of an auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report:
The auditor’s report shall also describe the purpose for which the financial report is prepared and, if necessary, the intended users, or refer to a note in the special purpose financial report that contains that information; and
If management has a choice of financial reporting frameworks in the preparation of such a financial report, the explanation of management’s[8] responsibility for the financial report shall also make reference to its responsibility for determining that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Alerting Readers that the Financial Report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework
The auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report shall include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users of the auditor’s report that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and that, as a result, the financial report may not be suitable for another purpose. (Ref: Para. A20–A21)
* * *
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Definition of Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para 6)
Examples of special purpose frameworks are:
A tax basis of accounting for a financial report that accompanies an entity’s tax return;
The cash receipts and disbursements basis of accounting for cash flow information that an entity may be requested to prepare for creditors;
The financial reporting provisions established by a regulator to meet the requirements of that regulator; or
The financial reporting provisions of a contract, such as a bond indenture, a loan agreement, or a project grant.
Aus A1.1 The Corporations Act 2001,[*] other applicable law or regulation, or certain parties, may determine whether a financial report is required to be prepared and whether compliance with Australian Accounting Standards is required. Australian Accounting Standards set out requirements for General Purpose Financial Statements. In some circumstances, entities are permitted to prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements as defined in AASB 1054 Australian Additional Disclosures. Such circumstances include for-profit private sector entities required only by their constituting document or another document (e.g., a loan agreement) to prepare financial statements that comply with Australian Accounting Standards, provided that the relevant document was created or last amended before 1 July 2021, as well as not-for-profit entities that assess themselves to be non-reporting entities.
There may be circumstances where a special purpose framework is based on a financial reporting framework established by an authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation, but does not comply with all the requirements of that framework. An example is a contract that requires a financial report to be prepared in accordance with most, but not all, of the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X. When this is acceptable in the circumstances of the engagement, it is inappropriate for the description of the applicable financial reporting framework in the special purpose financial report to imply full compliance with the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation. In the above example of the contract, the description of the applicable financial reporting framework may refer to the financial reporting provisions of the contract, rather than make any reference to the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X.
In the circumstances described in paragraph A2, the special purpose framework may not be a fair presentation framework even if the financial reporting framework on which it is based is a fair presentation framework. This is because the special purpose framework may not comply with all the requirements of the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation that are necessary to achieve fair presentation of the financial report.
A financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework may be the only financial report an entity prepares. In such circumstances, that financial report may be used by users other than those for whom the financial reporting framework is designed. Despite the broad distribution of the financial report in those circumstances, the financial report is still considered to be a special purpose financial report for purposes of the Australian Auditing Standards. The requirements in paragraphs 13–14 are designed to avoid misunderstandings about the purpose for which the financial report is prepared. Disclosures comprise explanatory or descriptive information, set out as required, expressly permitted or otherwise allowed by the applicable financial reporting framework, on the face of a financial report, or in the notes, or incorporated therein by cross‑reference.[9]
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework (Ref: Para. 8)
In the case of a special purpose financial report, the financial information needs of the intended users are a key factor in determining the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting standards established by an organisation that is authorised or recognised to promulgate standards for a special purpose financial report. In that case, those standards will be presumed acceptable for that purpose if the organisation follows an established and transparent process involving deliberation and consideration of the views of relevant stakeholders. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may prescribe the financial reporting framework to be used by management in the preparation of a special purpose financial report for a certain type of entity. For example, a regulator may establish financial reporting provisions to meet the requirements of that regulator. In the absence of indications to the contrary, such a financial reporting framework is presumed acceptable for a special purpose financial report prepared by such entity.
Where the financial reporting standards referred to in paragraph A6 are supplemented by legislative or regulatory requirements, ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine whether any conflicts between the financial reporting standards and the additional requirements exist, and prescribes actions to be taken by the auditor if such conflicts exist.[10]
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting provisions of a contract, or sources other than those described in paragraphs A6 and A7. In that case, the acceptability of the financial reporting framework in the circumstances of the engagement is determined by considering whether the framework exhibits attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks as described in Appendix 2 of ASA 210. In the case of a special purpose framework, the relative importance to a particular engagement of each of the attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks is a matter of professional judgement. For example, for purposes of establishing the value of net assets of an entity at the date of its sale, the vendor and the purchaser may have agreed that very prudent estimates of allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable are appropriate for their needs, even though such financial information is not neutral when compared with financial information prepared in accordance with a general purpose framework.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit (Ref: Para. 9)
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A9.1]
Aus A9.1 ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with (a) relevant ethical requirements, including those pertaining to independence, relating to financial report audit engagements, and (b) all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit. It also requires the auditor to comply with each requirement of an Australian Auditing Standard unless, in the circumstances of the audit, the entire Auditing Standard is not relevant or the requirement is not relevant because it is conditional and the condition does not exist; or application of the requirement(s) would relate to classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures that the auditor has determined are immaterial. In rare and exceptional circumstances, when there are factors outside the auditor’s control that prevent the auditor from complying with a requirement, the auditor where possible, performs appropriate alternative audit procedures.[11]
Application of some of the requirements of the Auditing Standards in an audit of a special purpose financial report may require special consideration by the auditor. For example, in ASA 320, judgements about matters that are material to users of the financial report are based on a consideration of the common financial information needs of users as a group.[12] In the case of an audit of a special purpose financial report, however, those judgements are based on a consideration of the financial information needs of the intended users.
In the case of a special purpose financial report, such as those prepared in accordance with the requirements of a contract, management may agree with the intended users on a threshold below which misstatements identified during the audit will not be corrected or otherwise adjusted. The existence of such a threshold does not relieve the auditor from the requirement to determine materiality in accordance with ASA 320 for purposes of planning and performing the audit of the special purpose financial report.
ASA 260 requires the auditor to determine the appropriate person(s) within the entity’s governance structure with whom to communicate.[13] ASA 260 notes that, in some cases, all of those charged governance are involved in managing the entity, and the application of the communication requirements is modified to recognise this position.[14] When a general purpose financial report is also prepared by the entity, those person(s) responsible for the oversight of the preparation of the special purpose financial report may not be the same as those charged with governance responsible for the oversight of the preparation of that general purpose financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations (Ref: Para. 11)
The Appendix to this Auditing Standard contains illustrations of independent auditors’ reports on a special purpose financial report. Other illustrations of auditor’s reports may be relevant to reporting on a special purpose financial report (see for example, the Appendices to ASA 700, ASA 705,[15] ASA 570,[16] ASA 720, and ASA 706[17]).
Application of ASA 700 When Reporting on a Special Purpose Financial Report
Paragraph 11 of this Auditing Standard explains that the auditor is required to apply ASA 700 when forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report. In doing so, the auditor is also required to apply the reporting requirements in other Auditing Standards and may find the special considerations addressed in paragraphs A15–A19 below helpful.
Going Concern
A special purpose financial report may or may not be prepared in accordance with a financial reporting framework for which the going concern basis of accounting is relevant (e.g., the going concern basis of accounting is not relevant for some financial report prepared on a tax basis in particular jurisdictions).[18] Depending on the applicable financial reporting framework used in the preparation of the special purpose financial report, the description in the auditor’s report of management’s responsibilities[19] relating to going concern may need to be adapted as necessary. The description in the auditor’s report of the auditor’s responsibilities[20] may also need to be adapted as necessary depending on how ASA 570 applies in the circumstances of the engagement.
Key Audit Matters
ASA 700 requires the auditor to communicate key audit matters in accordance with ASA 701[21] for audits of a general purpose financial report of listed entities. For audits of a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 only applies when communication of key audit matters in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report is required by law or regulation or the auditor otherwise decides to communicate key audit matters. When key audit matters are communicated in the auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 applies in its entirety.[22]
Other Information
ASA 720[23] deals with the auditor’s responsibilities relating to other information. In the context of this Auditing Standard, reports containing or accompanying the special purpose financial report—the purpose of which is to provide owners (or similar stakeholders) with information on matters presented in the special purpose financial report—are considered to be annual reports for the purpose of ASA 720. In the case of a financial report prepared using a special purpose framework, the term “similar stakeholders” includes the specific users whose financial information needs are met by the design of the special purpose framework used to prepare the special purpose financial report. When the auditor determines that the entity plans to issue such a report, the requirements in ASA 720 apply to the audit of the special purpose financial report.
Name of the Engagement Partner
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A18.1]
Aus 18.1 The requirement in ASA 700 for the name of the engagement partner to be included in the auditor’s report where required by law or regulation also applies to audits of special purpose financial reports.[*]
Inclusion of a Reference to the Auditor’s Report on the General Purpose Financial Report
The auditor may deem it appropriate to refer, in an Other Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report, to the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report or to matter(s) reported therein (see ASA 706).[24] For example, the auditor may consider it appropriate to refer in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report to a Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern section included in the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report.
Alerting Readers that the Financial report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para. 14)
The special purpose financial report may be used for purposes other than those for which they were intended. For example, a regulator may require certain entities to place the special purpose financial report on public record. To avoid misunderstandings, the auditor alerts users of the auditor’s report by including an Emphasis of Matter paragraph explaining that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and, therefore, may not be suitable for another purpose. ASA 706 requires this paragraph to be included within a separate section of the auditor’s report with an appropriate heading that includes the term “Emphasis of Matter”.[25]
Restriction on Distribution or Use (Ref: Para. 14)
In addition to the alert required by paragraph 14, the auditor may consider it appropriate to indicate that the auditor’s report is intended solely for the specific users. Depending on the law or regulation of the particular jurisdiction, this may be achieved by restricting the distribution or use of the auditor’s report. In these circumstances, the paragraph referred to in paragraph 14 may be expanded to include these other matters, and the heading modified accordingly (see illustrations in the Appendix to this Auditing Standard).
Application
Application
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Operative Date
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Introduction
Auditing Standard ASA 800
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) made Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, on 26 July 2016.
This compiled version of ASA 800 incorporates subsequent amendments contained in other Auditing Standards made by the AUASB up to and including 7 September 2021 (see Compilation Details).
Auditing Standard ASA 800
Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard
The Australian Standards on Auditing in the 100–700 series apply to an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard deals with special considerations in the application of those Australian Auditing Standards to an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework.
This Auditing Standard is written in the context of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. ASA 805[1] deals with special considerations relevant to an audit of a single financial statement or of a specific element, account or item of a financial statement.
This Auditing Standard does not override the requirements of the other Auditing Standards; nor does it purport to deal with all special considerations that may be relevant in the circumstances of the engagement.
Effective Date
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus 0.3]
Objective
The objective of the auditor, when applying Australian Auditing Standards in an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework, is to address appropriately the special considerations that are relevant to:
The acceptance of the engagement;
The planning and performance of that engagement; and
Forming an opinion and reporting on the financial report.
Definitions
For the purposes of this Auditing Standard, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:
Special purpose financial statements – Financial statements prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para.A4)
Special purpose framework – A financial reporting framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users. The financial reporting framework may be a fair presentation framework or a compliance framework.[2] (Ref: Para. A1–A4)
Aus 6.1 Special purpose financial report means a complete set of financial statements[*], including an assertion statement[#] by those responsible for the financial report, prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para. A1-A4)
Reference to “financial statements” in this Auditing Standard means “a complete set of special purpose financial statements”. The requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework determine the presentation, structure, and content of the financial statements, and what constitutes a complete set of financial statements. Reference to “special purpose financial statements” includes the related disclosures.
Requirements
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.[3] In an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of: (Ref: Para. A5–A8)
The purpose for which the financial report is prepared;
The intended users; and
The steps taken by management to determine that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit
ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit.[4] In planning and performing an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall determine whether application of the Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration in the circumstances of the engagement. (Ref: Para. A9–A12)
ASA 315 requires the auditor to obtain an understanding of the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies.[5] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of any significant interpretations of the contract that management made in the preparation of that financial report. An interpretation is significant when adoption of another reasonable interpretation would have produced a material difference in the information presented in the financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations
When forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall apply the requirements in ASA 700.[6] (Ref: Para. A13–A19)
Description of the Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 700 requires the auditor to evaluate whether the financial report adequately refers to or describes the applicable financial reporting framework.[7] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall evaluate whether the financial report adequately describes any significant interpretations of the contract on which the financial report is based.
ASA 700 deals with the form and content of the auditor’s report, including the specific ordering for certain elements. In the case of an auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report:
The auditor’s report shall also describe the purpose for which the financial report is prepared and, if necessary, the intended users, or refer to a note in the special purpose financial report that contains that information; and
If management has a choice of financial reporting frameworks in the preparation of such a financial report, the explanation of management’s[8] responsibility for the financial report shall also make reference to its responsibility for determining that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Alerting Readers that the Financial Report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework
The auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report shall include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users of the auditor’s report that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and that, as a result, the financial report may not be suitable for another purpose. (Ref: Para. A20–A21)
* * *
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Definition of Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para 6)
Examples of special purpose frameworks are:
A tax basis of accounting for a financial report that accompanies an entity’s tax return;
The cash receipts and disbursements basis of accounting for cash flow information that an entity may be requested to prepare for creditors;
The financial reporting provisions established by a regulator to meet the requirements of that regulator; or
The financial reporting provisions of a contract, such as a bond indenture, a loan agreement, or a project grant.
Aus A1.1 The Corporations Act 2001,[*] other applicable law or regulation, or certain parties, may determine whether a financial report is required to be prepared and whether compliance with Australian Accounting Standards is required. Australian Accounting Standards set out requirements for General Purpose Financial Statements. In some circumstances, entities are permitted to prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements as defined in AASB 1054 Australian Additional Disclosures. Such circumstances include for-profit private sector entities required only by their constituting document or another document (e.g., a loan agreement) to prepare financial statements that comply with Australian Accounting Standards, provided that the relevant document was created or last amended before 1 July 2021, as well as not-for-profit entities that assess themselves to be non-reporting entities.
There may be circumstances where a special purpose framework is based on a financial reporting framework established by an authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation, but does not comply with all the requirements of that framework. An example is a contract that requires a financial report to be prepared in accordance with most, but not all, of the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X. When this is acceptable in the circumstances of the engagement, it is inappropriate for the description of the applicable financial reporting framework in the special purpose financial report to imply full compliance with the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation. In the above example of the contract, the description of the applicable financial reporting framework may refer to the financial reporting provisions of the contract, rather than make any reference to the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X.
In the circumstances described in paragraph A2, the special purpose framework may not be a fair presentation framework even if the financial reporting framework on which it is based is a fair presentation framework. This is because the special purpose framework may not comply with all the requirements of the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation that are necessary to achieve fair presentation of the financial report.
A financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework may be the only financial report an entity prepares. In such circumstances, that financial report may be used by users other than those for whom the financial reporting framework is designed. Despite the broad distribution of the financial report in those circumstances, the financial report is still considered to be a special purpose financial report for purposes of the Australian Auditing Standards. The requirements in paragraphs 13–14 are designed to avoid misunderstandings about the purpose for which the financial report is prepared. Disclosures comprise explanatory or descriptive information, set out as required, expressly permitted or otherwise allowed by the applicable financial reporting framework, on the face of a financial report, or in the notes, or incorporated therein by cross‑reference.[9]
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework (Ref: Para. 8)
In the case of a special purpose financial report, the financial information needs of the intended users are a key factor in determining the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting standards established by an organisation that is authorised or recognised to promulgate standards for a special purpose financial report. In that case, those standards will be presumed acceptable for that purpose if the organisation follows an established and transparent process involving deliberation and consideration of the views of relevant stakeholders. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may prescribe the financial reporting framework to be used by management in the preparation of a special purpose financial report for a certain type of entity. For example, a regulator may establish financial reporting provisions to meet the requirements of that regulator. In the absence of indications to the contrary, such a financial reporting framework is presumed acceptable for a special purpose financial report prepared by such entity.
Where the financial reporting standards referred to in paragraph A6 are supplemented by legislative or regulatory requirements, ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine whether any conflicts between the financial reporting standards and the additional requirements exist, and prescribes actions to be taken by the auditor if such conflicts exist.[10]
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting provisions of a contract, or sources other than those described in paragraphs A6 and A7. In that case, the acceptability of the financial reporting framework in the circumstances of the engagement is determined by considering whether the framework exhibits attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks as described in Appendix 2 of ASA 210. In the case of a special purpose framework, the relative importance to a particular engagement of each of the attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks is a matter of professional judgement. For example, for purposes of establishing the value of net assets of an entity at the date of its sale, the vendor and the purchaser may have agreed that very prudent estimates of allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable are appropriate for their needs, even though such financial information is not neutral when compared with financial information prepared in accordance with a general purpose framework.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit (Ref: Para. 9)
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A9.1]
Aus A9.1 ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with (a) relevant ethical requirements, including those pertaining to independence, relating to financial report audit engagements, and (b) all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit. It also requires the auditor to comply with each requirement of an Australian Auditing Standard unless, in the circumstances of the audit, the entire Auditing Standard is not relevant or the requirement is not relevant because it is conditional and the condition does not exist; or application of the requirement(s) would relate to classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures that the auditor has determined are immaterial. In rare and exceptional circumstances, when there are factors outside the auditor’s control that prevent the auditor from complying with a requirement, the auditor where possible, performs appropriate alternative audit procedures.[11]
Application of some of the requirements of the Auditing Standards in an audit of a special purpose financial report may require special consideration by the auditor. For example, in ASA 320, judgements about matters that are material to users of the financial report are based on a consideration of the common financial information needs of users as a group.[12] In the case of an audit of a special purpose financial report, however, those judgements are based on a consideration of the financial information needs of the intended users.
In the case of a special purpose financial report, such as those prepared in accordance with the requirements of a contract, management may agree with the intended users on a threshold below which misstatements identified during the audit will not be corrected or otherwise adjusted. The existence of such a threshold does not relieve the auditor from the requirement to determine materiality in accordance with ASA 320 for purposes of planning and performing the audit of the special purpose financial report.
ASA 260 requires the auditor to determine the appropriate person(s) within the entity’s governance structure with whom to communicate.[13] ASA 260 notes that, in some cases, all of those charged governance are involved in managing the entity, and the application of the communication requirements is modified to recognise this position.[14] When a general purpose financial report is also prepared by the entity, those person(s) responsible for the oversight of the preparation of the special purpose financial report may not be the same as those charged with governance responsible for the oversight of the preparation of that general purpose financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations (Ref: Para. 11)
The Appendix to this Auditing Standard contains illustrations of independent auditors’ reports on a special purpose financial report. Other illustrations of auditor’s reports may be relevant to reporting on a special purpose financial report (see for example, the Appendices to ASA 700, ASA 705,[15] ASA 570,[16] ASA 720, and ASA 706[17]).
Application of ASA 700 When Reporting on a Special Purpose Financial Report
Paragraph 11 of this Auditing Standard explains that the auditor is required to apply ASA 700 when forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report. In doing so, the auditor is also required to apply the reporting requirements in other Auditing Standards and may find the special considerations addressed in paragraphs A15–A19 below helpful.
Going Concern
A special purpose financial report may or may not be prepared in accordance with a financial reporting framework for which the going concern basis of accounting is relevant (e.g., the going concern basis of accounting is not relevant for some financial report prepared on a tax basis in particular jurisdictions).[18] Depending on the applicable financial reporting framework used in the preparation of the special purpose financial report, the description in the auditor’s report of management’s responsibilities[19] relating to going concern may need to be adapted as necessary. The description in the auditor’s report of the auditor’s responsibilities[20] may also need to be adapted as necessary depending on how ASA 570 applies in the circumstances of the engagement.
Key Audit Matters
ASA 700 requires the auditor to communicate key audit matters in accordance with ASA 701[21] for audits of a general purpose financial report of listed entities. For audits of a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 only applies when communication of key audit matters in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report is required by law or regulation or the auditor otherwise decides to communicate key audit matters. When key audit matters are communicated in the auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 applies in its entirety.[22]
Other Information
ASA 720[23] deals with the auditor’s responsibilities relating to other information. In the context of this Auditing Standard, reports containing or accompanying the special purpose financial report—the purpose of which is to provide owners (or similar stakeholders) with information on matters presented in the special purpose financial report—are considered to be annual reports for the purpose of ASA 720. In the case of a financial report prepared using a special purpose framework, the term “similar stakeholders” includes the specific users whose financial information needs are met by the design of the special purpose framework used to prepare the special purpose financial report. When the auditor determines that the entity plans to issue such a report, the requirements in ASA 720 apply to the audit of the special purpose financial report.
Name of the Engagement Partner
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A18.1]
Aus 18.1 The requirement in ASA 700 for the name of the engagement partner to be included in the auditor’s report where required by law or regulation also applies to audits of special purpose financial reports.[*]
Inclusion of a Reference to the Auditor’s Report on the General Purpose Financial Report
The auditor may deem it appropriate to refer, in an Other Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report, to the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report or to matter(s) reported therein (see ASA 706).[24] For example, the auditor may consider it appropriate to refer in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report to a Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern section included in the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report.
Alerting Readers that the Financial report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para. 14)
The special purpose financial report may be used for purposes other than those for which they were intended. For example, a regulator may require certain entities to place the special purpose financial report on public record. To avoid misunderstandings, the auditor alerts users of the auditor’s report by including an Emphasis of Matter paragraph explaining that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and, therefore, may not be suitable for another purpose. ASA 706 requires this paragraph to be included within a separate section of the auditor’s report with an appropriate heading that includes the term “Emphasis of Matter”.[25]
Restriction on Distribution or Use (Ref: Para. 14)
In addition to the alert required by paragraph 14, the auditor may consider it appropriate to indicate that the auditor’s report is intended solely for the specific users. Depending on the law or regulation of the particular jurisdiction, this may be achieved by restricting the distribution or use of the auditor’s report. In these circumstances, the paragraph referred to in paragraph 14 may be expanded to include these other matters, and the heading modified accordingly (see illustrations in the Appendix to this Auditing Standard).
Scope of this Auditing Standard
Scope of this Auditing Standard
Scope of this Auditing Standard
The Australian Standards on Auditing in the 100–700 series apply to an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard deals with special considerations in the application of those Australian Auditing Standards to an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework.
This Auditing Standard is written in the context of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. ASA 805[1] deals with special considerations relevant to an audit of a single financial statement or of a specific element, account or item of a financial statement.
This Auditing Standard does not override the requirements of the other Auditing Standards; nor does it purport to deal with all special considerations that may be relevant in the circumstances of the engagement.
Effective Date
Effective Date
Effective Date
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus 0.3]
Objective
Objective
Objective
The objective of the auditor, when applying Australian Auditing Standards in an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework, is to address appropriately the special considerations that are relevant to:
The acceptance of the engagement;
The planning and performance of that engagement; and
Forming an opinion and reporting on the financial report.
Definitions
Definitions
Definitions
For the purposes of this Auditing Standard, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:
Special purpose financial statements – Financial statements prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para.A4)
Special purpose framework – A financial reporting framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users. The financial reporting framework may be a fair presentation framework or a compliance framework.[2] (Ref: Para. A1–A4)
Aus 6.1 Special purpose financial report means a complete set of financial statements[*], including an assertion statement[#] by those responsible for the financial report, prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para. A1-A4)
Reference to “financial statements” in this Auditing Standard means “a complete set of special purpose financial statements”. The requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework determine the presentation, structure, and content of the financial statements, and what constitutes a complete set of financial statements. Reference to “special purpose financial statements” includes the related disclosures.
Requirements
Requirements
Auditing Standard ASA 800
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) made Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, on 26 July 2016.
This compiled version of ASA 800 incorporates subsequent amendments contained in other Auditing Standards made by the AUASB up to and including 7 September 2021 (see Compilation Details).
Auditing Standard ASA 800
Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard
The Australian Standards on Auditing in the 100–700 series apply to an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard deals with special considerations in the application of those Australian Auditing Standards to an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework.
This Auditing Standard is written in the context of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. ASA 805[1] deals with special considerations relevant to an audit of a single financial statement or of a specific element, account or item of a financial statement.
This Auditing Standard does not override the requirements of the other Auditing Standards; nor does it purport to deal with all special considerations that may be relevant in the circumstances of the engagement.
Effective Date
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus 0.3]
Objective
The objective of the auditor, when applying Australian Auditing Standards in an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework, is to address appropriately the special considerations that are relevant to:
The acceptance of the engagement;
The planning and performance of that engagement; and
Forming an opinion and reporting on the financial report.
Definitions
For the purposes of this Auditing Standard, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:
Special purpose financial statements – Financial statements prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para.A4)
Special purpose framework – A financial reporting framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users. The financial reporting framework may be a fair presentation framework or a compliance framework.[2] (Ref: Para. A1–A4)
Aus 6.1 Special purpose financial report means a complete set of financial statements[*], including an assertion statement[#] by those responsible for the financial report, prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para. A1-A4)
Reference to “financial statements” in this Auditing Standard means “a complete set of special purpose financial statements”. The requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework determine the presentation, structure, and content of the financial statements, and what constitutes a complete set of financial statements. Reference to “special purpose financial statements” includes the related disclosures.
Requirements
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.[3] In an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of: (Ref: Para. A5–A8)
The purpose for which the financial report is prepared;
The intended users; and
The steps taken by management to determine that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit
ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit.[4] In planning and performing an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall determine whether application of the Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration in the circumstances of the engagement. (Ref: Para. A9–A12)
ASA 315 requires the auditor to obtain an understanding of the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies.[5] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of any significant interpretations of the contract that management made in the preparation of that financial report. An interpretation is significant when adoption of another reasonable interpretation would have produced a material difference in the information presented in the financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations
When forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall apply the requirements in ASA 700.[6] (Ref: Para. A13–A19)
Description of the Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 700 requires the auditor to evaluate whether the financial report adequately refers to or describes the applicable financial reporting framework.[7] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall evaluate whether the financial report adequately describes any significant interpretations of the contract on which the financial report is based.
ASA 700 deals with the form and content of the auditor’s report, including the specific ordering for certain elements. In the case of an auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report:
The auditor’s report shall also describe the purpose for which the financial report is prepared and, if necessary, the intended users, or refer to a note in the special purpose financial report that contains that information; and
If management has a choice of financial reporting frameworks in the preparation of such a financial report, the explanation of management’s[8] responsibility for the financial report shall also make reference to its responsibility for determining that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Alerting Readers that the Financial Report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework
The auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report shall include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users of the auditor’s report that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and that, as a result, the financial report may not be suitable for another purpose. (Ref: Para. A20–A21)
* * *
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Definition of Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para 6)
Examples of special purpose frameworks are:
A tax basis of accounting for a financial report that accompanies an entity’s tax return;
The cash receipts and disbursements basis of accounting for cash flow information that an entity may be requested to prepare for creditors;
The financial reporting provisions established by a regulator to meet the requirements of that regulator; or
The financial reporting provisions of a contract, such as a bond indenture, a loan agreement, or a project grant.
Aus A1.1 The Corporations Act 2001,[*] other applicable law or regulation, or certain parties, may determine whether a financial report is required to be prepared and whether compliance with Australian Accounting Standards is required. Australian Accounting Standards set out requirements for General Purpose Financial Statements. In some circumstances, entities are permitted to prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements as defined in AASB 1054 Australian Additional Disclosures. Such circumstances include for-profit private sector entities required only by their constituting document or another document (e.g., a loan agreement) to prepare financial statements that comply with Australian Accounting Standards, provided that the relevant document was created or last amended before 1 July 2021, as well as not-for-profit entities that assess themselves to be non-reporting entities.
There may be circumstances where a special purpose framework is based on a financial reporting framework established by an authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation, but does not comply with all the requirements of that framework. An example is a contract that requires a financial report to be prepared in accordance with most, but not all, of the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X. When this is acceptable in the circumstances of the engagement, it is inappropriate for the description of the applicable financial reporting framework in the special purpose financial report to imply full compliance with the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation. In the above example of the contract, the description of the applicable financial reporting framework may refer to the financial reporting provisions of the contract, rather than make any reference to the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X.
In the circumstances described in paragraph A2, the special purpose framework may not be a fair presentation framework even if the financial reporting framework on which it is based is a fair presentation framework. This is because the special purpose framework may not comply with all the requirements of the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation that are necessary to achieve fair presentation of the financial report.
A financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework may be the only financial report an entity prepares. In such circumstances, that financial report may be used by users other than those for whom the financial reporting framework is designed. Despite the broad distribution of the financial report in those circumstances, the financial report is still considered to be a special purpose financial report for purposes of the Australian Auditing Standards. The requirements in paragraphs 13–14 are designed to avoid misunderstandings about the purpose for which the financial report is prepared. Disclosures comprise explanatory or descriptive information, set out as required, expressly permitted or otherwise allowed by the applicable financial reporting framework, on the face of a financial report, or in the notes, or incorporated therein by cross‑reference.[9]
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework (Ref: Para. 8)
In the case of a special purpose financial report, the financial information needs of the intended users are a key factor in determining the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting standards established by an organisation that is authorised or recognised to promulgate standards for a special purpose financial report. In that case, those standards will be presumed acceptable for that purpose if the organisation follows an established and transparent process involving deliberation and consideration of the views of relevant stakeholders. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may prescribe the financial reporting framework to be used by management in the preparation of a special purpose financial report for a certain type of entity. For example, a regulator may establish financial reporting provisions to meet the requirements of that regulator. In the absence of indications to the contrary, such a financial reporting framework is presumed acceptable for a special purpose financial report prepared by such entity.
Where the financial reporting standards referred to in paragraph A6 are supplemented by legislative or regulatory requirements, ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine whether any conflicts between the financial reporting standards and the additional requirements exist, and prescribes actions to be taken by the auditor if such conflicts exist.[10]
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting provisions of a contract, or sources other than those described in paragraphs A6 and A7. In that case, the acceptability of the financial reporting framework in the circumstances of the engagement is determined by considering whether the framework exhibits attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks as described in Appendix 2 of ASA 210. In the case of a special purpose framework, the relative importance to a particular engagement of each of the attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks is a matter of professional judgement. For example, for purposes of establishing the value of net assets of an entity at the date of its sale, the vendor and the purchaser may have agreed that very prudent estimates of allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable are appropriate for their needs, even though such financial information is not neutral when compared with financial information prepared in accordance with a general purpose framework.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit (Ref: Para. 9)
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A9.1]
Aus A9.1 ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with (a) relevant ethical requirements, including those pertaining to independence, relating to financial report audit engagements, and (b) all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit. It also requires the auditor to comply with each requirement of an Australian Auditing Standard unless, in the circumstances of the audit, the entire Auditing Standard is not relevant or the requirement is not relevant because it is conditional and the condition does not exist; or application of the requirement(s) would relate to classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures that the auditor has determined are immaterial. In rare and exceptional circumstances, when there are factors outside the auditor’s control that prevent the auditor from complying with a requirement, the auditor where possible, performs appropriate alternative audit procedures.[11]
Application of some of the requirements of the Auditing Standards in an audit of a special purpose financial report may require special consideration by the auditor. For example, in ASA 320, judgements about matters that are material to users of the financial report are based on a consideration of the common financial information needs of users as a group.[12] In the case of an audit of a special purpose financial report, however, those judgements are based on a consideration of the financial information needs of the intended users.
In the case of a special purpose financial report, such as those prepared in accordance with the requirements of a contract, management may agree with the intended users on a threshold below which misstatements identified during the audit will not be corrected or otherwise adjusted. The existence of such a threshold does not relieve the auditor from the requirement to determine materiality in accordance with ASA 320 for purposes of planning and performing the audit of the special purpose financial report.
ASA 260 requires the auditor to determine the appropriate person(s) within the entity’s governance structure with whom to communicate.[13] ASA 260 notes that, in some cases, all of those charged governance are involved in managing the entity, and the application of the communication requirements is modified to recognise this position.[14] When a general purpose financial report is also prepared by the entity, those person(s) responsible for the oversight of the preparation of the special purpose financial report may not be the same as those charged with governance responsible for the oversight of the preparation of that general purpose financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations (Ref: Para. 11)
The Appendix to this Auditing Standard contains illustrations of independent auditors’ reports on a special purpose financial report. Other illustrations of auditor’s reports may be relevant to reporting on a special purpose financial report (see for example, the Appendices to ASA 700, ASA 705,[15] ASA 570,[16] ASA 720, and ASA 706[17]).
Application of ASA 700 When Reporting on a Special Purpose Financial Report
Paragraph 11 of this Auditing Standard explains that the auditor is required to apply ASA 700 when forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report. In doing so, the auditor is also required to apply the reporting requirements in other Auditing Standards and may find the special considerations addressed in paragraphs A15–A19 below helpful.
Going Concern
A special purpose financial report may or may not be prepared in accordance with a financial reporting framework for which the going concern basis of accounting is relevant (e.g., the going concern basis of accounting is not relevant for some financial report prepared on a tax basis in particular jurisdictions).[18] Depending on the applicable financial reporting framework used in the preparation of the special purpose financial report, the description in the auditor’s report of management’s responsibilities[19] relating to going concern may need to be adapted as necessary. The description in the auditor’s report of the auditor’s responsibilities[20] may also need to be adapted as necessary depending on how ASA 570 applies in the circumstances of the engagement.
Key Audit Matters
ASA 700 requires the auditor to communicate key audit matters in accordance with ASA 701[21] for audits of a general purpose financial report of listed entities. For audits of a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 only applies when communication of key audit matters in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report is required by law or regulation or the auditor otherwise decides to communicate key audit matters. When key audit matters are communicated in the auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 applies in its entirety.[22]
Other Information
ASA 720[23] deals with the auditor’s responsibilities relating to other information. In the context of this Auditing Standard, reports containing or accompanying the special purpose financial report—the purpose of which is to provide owners (or similar stakeholders) with information on matters presented in the special purpose financial report—are considered to be annual reports for the purpose of ASA 720. In the case of a financial report prepared using a special purpose framework, the term “similar stakeholders” includes the specific users whose financial information needs are met by the design of the special purpose framework used to prepare the special purpose financial report. When the auditor determines that the entity plans to issue such a report, the requirements in ASA 720 apply to the audit of the special purpose financial report.
Name of the Engagement Partner
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A18.1]
Aus 18.1 The requirement in ASA 700 for the name of the engagement partner to be included in the auditor’s report where required by law or regulation also applies to audits of special purpose financial reports.[*]
Inclusion of a Reference to the Auditor’s Report on the General Purpose Financial Report
The auditor may deem it appropriate to refer, in an Other Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report, to the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report or to matter(s) reported therein (see ASA 706).[24] For example, the auditor may consider it appropriate to refer in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report to a Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern section included in the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report.
Alerting Readers that the Financial report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para. 14)
The special purpose financial report may be used for purposes other than those for which they were intended. For example, a regulator may require certain entities to place the special purpose financial report on public record. To avoid misunderstandings, the auditor alerts users of the auditor’s report by including an Emphasis of Matter paragraph explaining that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and, therefore, may not be suitable for another purpose. ASA 706 requires this paragraph to be included within a separate section of the auditor’s report with an appropriate heading that includes the term “Emphasis of Matter”.[25]
Restriction on Distribution or Use (Ref: Para. 14)
In addition to the alert required by paragraph 14, the auditor may consider it appropriate to indicate that the auditor’s report is intended solely for the specific users. Depending on the law or regulation of the particular jurisdiction, this may be achieved by restricting the distribution or use of the auditor’s report. In these circumstances, the paragraph referred to in paragraph 14 may be expanded to include these other matters, and the heading modified accordingly (see illustrations in the Appendix to this Auditing Standard).
Considerations When Accepting the Engage
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.[3] In an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of: (Ref: Para. A5–A8)
The purpose for which the financial report is prepared;
The intended users; and
The steps taken by management to determine that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Considerations When Planning and Perform
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit
ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit.[4] In planning and performing an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall determine whether application of the Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration in the circumstances of the engagement. (Ref: Para. A9–A12)
ASA 315 requires the auditor to obtain an understanding of the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies.[5] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of any significant interpretations of the contract that management made in the preparation of that financial report. An interpretation is significant when adoption of another reasonable interpretation would have produced a material difference in the information presented in the financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Conside
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations
When forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall apply the requirements in ASA 700.[6] (Ref: Para. A13–A19)
Description of the Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 700 requires the auditor to evaluate whether the financial report adequately refers to or describes the applicable financial reporting framework.[7] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall evaluate whether the financial report adequately describes any significant interpretations of the contract on which the financial report is based.
ASA 700 deals with the form and content of the auditor’s report, including the specific ordering for certain elements. In the case of an auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report:
The auditor’s report shall also describe the purpose for which the financial report is prepared and, if necessary, the intended users, or refer to a note in the special purpose financial report that contains that information; and
If management has a choice of financial reporting frameworks in the preparation of such a financial report, the explanation of management’s[8] responsibility for the financial report shall also make reference to its responsibility for determining that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Alerting Readers that the Financial Report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework
The auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report shall include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users of the auditor’s report that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and that, as a result, the financial report may not be suitable for another purpose. (Ref: Para. A20–A21)
* * *
Application and Other Explanatory Materi
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Auditing Standard ASA 800
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) made Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, on 26 July 2016.
This compiled version of ASA 800 incorporates subsequent amendments contained in other Auditing Standards made by the AUASB up to and including 7 September 2021 (see Compilation Details).
Auditing Standard ASA 800
Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard
The Australian Standards on Auditing in the 100–700 series apply to an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard deals with special considerations in the application of those Australian Auditing Standards to an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework.
This Auditing Standard is written in the context of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. ASA 805[1] deals with special considerations relevant to an audit of a single financial statement or of a specific element, account or item of a financial statement.
This Auditing Standard does not override the requirements of the other Auditing Standards; nor does it purport to deal with all special considerations that may be relevant in the circumstances of the engagement.
Effective Date
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus 0.3]
Objective
The objective of the auditor, when applying Australian Auditing Standards in an audit of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework, is to address appropriately the special considerations that are relevant to:
The acceptance of the engagement;
The planning and performance of that engagement; and
Forming an opinion and reporting on the financial report.
Definitions
For the purposes of this Auditing Standard, the following terms have the meanings attributed below:
Special purpose financial statements – Financial statements prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para.A4)
Special purpose framework – A financial reporting framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users. The financial reporting framework may be a fair presentation framework or a compliance framework.[2] (Ref: Para. A1–A4)
Aus 6.1 Special purpose financial report means a complete set of financial statements[*], including an assertion statement[#] by those responsible for the financial report, prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework. (Ref: Para. A1-A4)
Reference to “financial statements” in this Auditing Standard means “a complete set of special purpose financial statements”. The requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework determine the presentation, structure, and content of the financial statements, and what constitutes a complete set of financial statements. Reference to “special purpose financial statements” includes the related disclosures.
Requirements
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.[3] In an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of: (Ref: Para. A5–A8)
The purpose for which the financial report is prepared;
The intended users; and
The steps taken by management to determine that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit
ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit.[4] In planning and performing an audit of a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall determine whether application of the Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration in the circumstances of the engagement. (Ref: Para. A9–A12)
ASA 315 requires the auditor to obtain an understanding of the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies.[5] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of any significant interpretations of the contract that management made in the preparation of that financial report. An interpretation is significant when adoption of another reasonable interpretation would have produced a material difference in the information presented in the financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations
When forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report, the auditor shall apply the requirements in ASA 700.[6] (Ref: Para. A13–A19)
Description of the Applicable Financial Reporting Framework
ASA 700 requires the auditor to evaluate whether the financial report adequately refers to or describes the applicable financial reporting framework.[7] In the case of a financial report prepared in accordance with the provisions of a contract, the auditor shall evaluate whether the financial report adequately describes any significant interpretations of the contract on which the financial report is based.
ASA 700 deals with the form and content of the auditor’s report, including the specific ordering for certain elements. In the case of an auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report:
The auditor’s report shall also describe the purpose for which the financial report is prepared and, if necessary, the intended users, or refer to a note in the special purpose financial report that contains that information; and
If management has a choice of financial reporting frameworks in the preparation of such a financial report, the explanation of management’s[8] responsibility for the financial report shall also make reference to its responsibility for determining that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Alerting Readers that the Financial Report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework
The auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report shall include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users of the auditor’s report that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and that, as a result, the financial report may not be suitable for another purpose. (Ref: Para. A20–A21)
* * *
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Definition of Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para 6)
Examples of special purpose frameworks are:
A tax basis of accounting for a financial report that accompanies an entity’s tax return;
The cash receipts and disbursements basis of accounting for cash flow information that an entity may be requested to prepare for creditors;
The financial reporting provisions established by a regulator to meet the requirements of that regulator; or
The financial reporting provisions of a contract, such as a bond indenture, a loan agreement, or a project grant.
Aus A1.1 The Corporations Act 2001,[*] other applicable law or regulation, or certain parties, may determine whether a financial report is required to be prepared and whether compliance with Australian Accounting Standards is required. Australian Accounting Standards set out requirements for General Purpose Financial Statements. In some circumstances, entities are permitted to prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements as defined in AASB 1054 Australian Additional Disclosures. Such circumstances include for-profit private sector entities required only by their constituting document or another document (e.g., a loan agreement) to prepare financial statements that comply with Australian Accounting Standards, provided that the relevant document was created or last amended before 1 July 2021, as well as not-for-profit entities that assess themselves to be non-reporting entities.
There may be circumstances where a special purpose framework is based on a financial reporting framework established by an authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation, but does not comply with all the requirements of that framework. An example is a contract that requires a financial report to be prepared in accordance with most, but not all, of the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X. When this is acceptable in the circumstances of the engagement, it is inappropriate for the description of the applicable financial reporting framework in the special purpose financial report to imply full compliance with the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation. In the above example of the contract, the description of the applicable financial reporting framework may refer to the financial reporting provisions of the contract, rather than make any reference to the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X.
In the circumstances described in paragraph A2, the special purpose framework may not be a fair presentation framework even if the financial reporting framework on which it is based is a fair presentation framework. This is because the special purpose framework may not comply with all the requirements of the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation that are necessary to achieve fair presentation of the financial report.
A financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework may be the only financial report an entity prepares. In such circumstances, that financial report may be used by users other than those for whom the financial reporting framework is designed. Despite the broad distribution of the financial report in those circumstances, the financial report is still considered to be a special purpose financial report for purposes of the Australian Auditing Standards. The requirements in paragraphs 13–14 are designed to avoid misunderstandings about the purpose for which the financial report is prepared. Disclosures comprise explanatory or descriptive information, set out as required, expressly permitted or otherwise allowed by the applicable financial reporting framework, on the face of a financial report, or in the notes, or incorporated therein by cross‑reference.[9]
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement
Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework (Ref: Para. 8)
In the case of a special purpose financial report, the financial information needs of the intended users are a key factor in determining the acceptability of the financial reporting framework applied in the preparation of the financial report.
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting standards established by an organisation that is authorised or recognised to promulgate standards for a special purpose financial report. In that case, those standards will be presumed acceptable for that purpose if the organisation follows an established and transparent process involving deliberation and consideration of the views of relevant stakeholders. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may prescribe the financial reporting framework to be used by management in the preparation of a special purpose financial report for a certain type of entity. For example, a regulator may establish financial reporting provisions to meet the requirements of that regulator. In the absence of indications to the contrary, such a financial reporting framework is presumed acceptable for a special purpose financial report prepared by such entity.
Where the financial reporting standards referred to in paragraph A6 are supplemented by legislative or regulatory requirements, ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine whether any conflicts between the financial reporting standards and the additional requirements exist, and prescribes actions to be taken by the auditor if such conflicts exist.[10]
The applicable financial reporting framework may encompass the financial reporting provisions of a contract, or sources other than those described in paragraphs A6 and A7. In that case, the acceptability of the financial reporting framework in the circumstances of the engagement is determined by considering whether the framework exhibits attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks as described in Appendix 2 of ASA 210. In the case of a special purpose framework, the relative importance to a particular engagement of each of the attributes normally exhibited by acceptable financial reporting frameworks is a matter of professional judgement. For example, for purposes of establishing the value of net assets of an entity at the date of its sale, the vendor and the purchaser may have agreed that very prudent estimates of allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable are appropriate for their needs, even though such financial information is not neutral when compared with financial information prepared in accordance with a general purpose framework.
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit (Ref: Para. 9)
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A9.1]
Aus A9.1 ASA 200 requires the auditor to comply with (a) relevant ethical requirements, including those pertaining to independence, relating to financial report audit engagements, and (b) all Australian Auditing Standards relevant to the audit. It also requires the auditor to comply with each requirement of an Australian Auditing Standard unless, in the circumstances of the audit, the entire Auditing Standard is not relevant or the requirement is not relevant because it is conditional and the condition does not exist; or application of the requirement(s) would relate to classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures that the auditor has determined are immaterial. In rare and exceptional circumstances, when there are factors outside the auditor’s control that prevent the auditor from complying with a requirement, the auditor where possible, performs appropriate alternative audit procedures.[11]
Application of some of the requirements of the Auditing Standards in an audit of a special purpose financial report may require special consideration by the auditor. For example, in ASA 320, judgements about matters that are material to users of the financial report are based on a consideration of the common financial information needs of users as a group.[12] In the case of an audit of a special purpose financial report, however, those judgements are based on a consideration of the financial information needs of the intended users.
In the case of a special purpose financial report, such as those prepared in accordance with the requirements of a contract, management may agree with the intended users on a threshold below which misstatements identified during the audit will not be corrected or otherwise adjusted. The existence of such a threshold does not relieve the auditor from the requirement to determine materiality in accordance with ASA 320 for purposes of planning and performing the audit of the special purpose financial report.
ASA 260 requires the auditor to determine the appropriate person(s) within the entity’s governance structure with whom to communicate.[13] ASA 260 notes that, in some cases, all of those charged governance are involved in managing the entity, and the application of the communication requirements is modified to recognise this position.[14] When a general purpose financial report is also prepared by the entity, those person(s) responsible for the oversight of the preparation of the special purpose financial report may not be the same as those charged with governance responsible for the oversight of the preparation of that general purpose financial report.
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations (Ref: Para. 11)
The Appendix to this Auditing Standard contains illustrations of independent auditors’ reports on a special purpose financial report. Other illustrations of auditor’s reports may be relevant to reporting on a special purpose financial report (see for example, the Appendices to ASA 700, ASA 705,[15] ASA 570,[16] ASA 720, and ASA 706[17]).
Application of ASA 700 When Reporting on a Special Purpose Financial Report
Paragraph 11 of this Auditing Standard explains that the auditor is required to apply ASA 700 when forming an opinion and reporting on a special purpose financial report. In doing so, the auditor is also required to apply the reporting requirements in other Auditing Standards and may find the special considerations addressed in paragraphs A15–A19 below helpful.
Going Concern
A special purpose financial report may or may not be prepared in accordance with a financial reporting framework for which the going concern basis of accounting is relevant (e.g., the going concern basis of accounting is not relevant for some financial report prepared on a tax basis in particular jurisdictions).[18] Depending on the applicable financial reporting framework used in the preparation of the special purpose financial report, the description in the auditor’s report of management’s responsibilities[19] relating to going concern may need to be adapted as necessary. The description in the auditor’s report of the auditor’s responsibilities[20] may also need to be adapted as necessary depending on how ASA 570 applies in the circumstances of the engagement.
Key Audit Matters
ASA 700 requires the auditor to communicate key audit matters in accordance with ASA 701[21] for audits of a general purpose financial report of listed entities. For audits of a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 only applies when communication of key audit matters in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report is required by law or regulation or the auditor otherwise decides to communicate key audit matters. When key audit matters are communicated in the auditor’s report on a special purpose financial report, ASA 701 applies in its entirety.[22]
Other Information
ASA 720[23] deals with the auditor’s responsibilities relating to other information. In the context of this Auditing Standard, reports containing or accompanying the special purpose financial report—the purpose of which is to provide owners (or similar stakeholders) with information on matters presented in the special purpose financial report—are considered to be annual reports for the purpose of ASA 720. In the case of a financial report prepared using a special purpose framework, the term “similar stakeholders” includes the specific users whose financial information needs are met by the design of the special purpose framework used to prepare the special purpose financial report. When the auditor determines that the entity plans to issue such a report, the requirements in ASA 720 apply to the audit of the special purpose financial report.
Name of the Engagement Partner
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus A18.1]
Aus 18.1 The requirement in ASA 700 for the name of the engagement partner to be included in the auditor’s report where required by law or regulation also applies to audits of special purpose financial reports.[*]
Inclusion of a Reference to the Auditor’s Report on the General Purpose Financial Report
The auditor may deem it appropriate to refer, in an Other Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report, to the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report or to matter(s) reported therein (see ASA 706).[24] For example, the auditor may consider it appropriate to refer in the auditor’s report on the special purpose financial report to a Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern section included in the auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report.
Alerting Readers that the Financial report is Prepared in Accordance with a Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para. 14)
The special purpose financial report may be used for purposes other than those for which they were intended. For example, a regulator may require certain entities to place the special purpose financial report on public record. To avoid misunderstandings, the auditor alerts users of the auditor’s report by including an Emphasis of Matter paragraph explaining that the financial report is prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and, therefore, may not be suitable for another purpose. ASA 706 requires this paragraph to be included within a separate section of the auditor’s report with an appropriate heading that includes the term “Emphasis of Matter”.[25]
Restriction on Distribution or Use (Ref: Para. 14)
In addition to the alert required by paragraph 14, the auditor may consider it appropriate to indicate that the auditor’s report is intended solely for the specific users. Depending on the law or regulation of the particular jurisdiction, this may be achieved by restricting the distribution or use of the auditor’s report. In these circumstances, the paragraph referred to in paragraph 14 may be expanded to include these other matters, and the heading modified accordingly (see illustrations in the Appendix to this Auditing Standard).
Definition of Special Purpose Framework
Definition of Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para 6)
Definition of Special Purpose Framework (Ref: Para 6)
Examples of special purpose frameworks are:
A tax basis of accounting for a financial report that accompanies an entity’s tax return;
The cash receipts and disbursements basis of accounting for cash flow information that an entity may be requested to prepare for creditors;
The financial reporting provisions established by a regulator to meet the requirements of that regulator; or
The financial reporting provisions of a contract, such as a bond indenture, a loan agreement, or a project grant.
Aus A1.1 The Corporations Act 2001,[*] other applicable law or regulation, or certain parties, may determine whether a financial report is required to be prepared and whether compliance with Australian Accounting Standards is required. Australian Accounting Standards set out requirements for General Purpose Financial Statements. In some circumstances, entities are permitted to prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements as defined in AASB 1054 Australian Additional Disclosures. Such circumstances include for-profit private sector entities required only by their constituting document or another document (e.g., a loan agreement) to prepare financial statements that comply with Australian Accounting Standards, provided that the relevant document was created or last amended before 1 July 2021, as well as not-for-profit entities that assess themselves to be non-reporting entities.
There may be circumstances where a special purpose framework is based on a financial reporting framework established by an authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation, but does not comply with all the requirements of that framework. An example is a contract that requires a financial report to be prepared in accordance with most, but not all, of the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X. When this is acceptable in the circumstances of the engagement, it is inappropriate for the description of the applicable financial reporting framework in the special purpose financial report to imply full compliance with the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation. In the above example of the contract, the description of the applicable financial reporting framework may refer to the financial reporting provisions of the contract, rather than make any reference to the Financial Reporting Standards of Jurisdiction X.
In the circumstances described in paragraph A2, the special purpose framework may not be a fair presentation framework even if the financial reporting framework on which it is based is a fair presentation framework. This is because the special purpose framework may not comply with all the requirements of the financial reporting framework established by the authorised or recognised standards setting organisation or by law or regulation that are necessary to achieve fair presentation of the financial report.
A financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework may be the only financial report an entity prepares. In such circumstances, that financial report may be used by users other than those for whom the financial reporting framework is designed. Despite the broad distribution of the financial report in those circumstances, the financial report is still considered to be a special purpose financial report for purposes of the Australian Auditing Standards. The requirements in paragraphs 13–14 are designed to avoid misunderstandings about the purpose for which the financial report is prepared. Disclosures comprise explanatory or descriptive information, set out as required, expressly permitted or otherwise allowed by the applicable financial reporting framework, on the face of a financial report, or in the notes, or incorporated therein by cross‑reference.[9]
Illustrations of Independent Auditor’s R
Illustrations of Independent Auditor’s Reports on a Special Purpose Financial Report
Illustrations of Independent Auditor’s Reports on a Special Purpose Financial Report
Illustration 1: An auditor’s report on a financial report of an entity other than a listed entity prepared in accordance with the financial reporting provisions of a contract (for purposes of this illustration, a compliance framework).
Illustration 2: An auditor’s report on a financial report of an entity other than a listed entity prepared in accordance with the tax basis of accounting in Jurisdiction X (for purposes of this illustration, a compliance framework).
Illustration 3:[Deleted by the AUASB.]
[Aus] Illustration 4: [Deleted by the AUASB as a result of changes to the Australian Accounting Standards impacting the ability for certain for-profit entities to prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements[#]]
[Aus] Illustration 5: An auditor’s report on a financial report prepared by a not-for-profit incorporated association in accordance with the financial reporting provisions of the applicable legislation (for purposes of this illustration, a fair presentation framework).
Illustration 1: An auditor’s report on a financial report of an entity other than a listed entity prepared in accordance with the financial reporting provisions of a contract (for purposes of this illustration, a compliance framework).For purposes of this illustrative auditor’s report, the following circumstances are assumed:The financial report has been prepared by management of the entity in accordance with the financial reporting provisions of a contract (that is, a special purpose framework). Management does not have a choice of financial reporting frameworks. The financial report is not prepared under the Corporations Act 2001.The applicable financial reporting framework is a compliance framework.An auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report was not issued.The terms of the audit engagement reflect the description of management’s responsibility for the financial report in ASA 210.The auditor has concluded an unmodified (i.e., “clean”) opinion is appropriate based on the audit evidence obtained.The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are the Accounting Professional & Ethical Standards Board’s APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including Independence Standards).Based on the audit evidence obtained, the auditor has concluded that a material uncertainty does not exist related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with ASA 570.Distribution and use of the auditor’s report are restricted.The auditor is not required, and has otherwise not decided, to communicate key audit matters in accordance with ASA 701.The auditor has determined that there is no other information (i.e., the requirements of ASA 720 do not apply).Those responsible for oversight of the financial reporting process differ from those responsible for the preparation of the financial report.The auditor has no other reporting responsibilities required under law or regulation.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
[Appropriate Addressee]
More sections below
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation (legislation.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standa Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
The most recently compiled versions of Auditing Standards, original Standards and amending Standards (see Compilation Details) are available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au
Contact Details Contact Details
Contact Details
Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardPodium LevelLevel 14, 530 Collins StreetMelbourne Victoria 3000AUSTRALIA
Phone: (03) 8080 7400E‑mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Otherwise, no part of this Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.
This Auditing Standard reproduces substantial parts of the corresponding International Standard on Auditing issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), in the manner described in the statement on Conformity with International Standards on Auditing. The AUASB acknowledges that IFAC is the owner of copyright in the International Standard on Auditing incorporated in this Auditing Standard throughout the world.
All existing rights in this material are reserved outside Australia. Reproduction outside Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non‑commercial use only.
Further information and requests for authorisation to reproduce this Auditing Standard for commercial purposes outside Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to . Any decision to approve a request may also require the agreement of IFAC.
The AUASB sets out that compliance with ASA 800 enables compliance with the equivalent ISA 800 (Authority Statement). The Standard is to be read together with ASA 101 Preamble and ASA 200 Overall Objectives (Authority Statement). The AUASB identifies some paragraphs added to the Australian Standard that do not appear in the ISA by the prefix “Aus” (Authority Statement).
The official rationale presented in the Standard is to address special considerations that are relevant to accepting an engagement, planning and performing the audit, and forming an opinion and reporting on a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework (Objective, Para. 5). The Authority Statement also asserts conformity with ISA 800 and notes that certain ethical requirements that appear in ISA 800 are included instead in ASA 102 in the Australian framework.
Testing that official rationale against costs and incentives: the Standard raises compliance tasks for auditors (documenting acceptability of frameworks, identifying intended users, assessing contractual interpretations) which increase audit upfront work and judgment demands. Those tasks transfer information‑gathering and judgement costs to the auditor; the Standard presumes auditors will exercise professional judgement (Aus A9.1; Para. 9), but does not prescribe objective thresholds for many determinations (for example, when a framework is “acceptable” beyond the guidance in ASA 210 and Aus A6-A7). The Standard attempts to reduce mis‑use by third parties by requiring explicit Emphasis of Matter paragraphs and optional restrictions on distribution (Para. 14; Para. A20-A21), but it acknowledges that a special purpose financial report can be the only report an entity prepares and may be used by users other than those intended (Aus A3). That admission identifies an implementation risk: disclosures designed to limit misunderstanding may not prevent third‑party reliance in practice. The Standard also creates potential for conservatism in accounting choices: it explicitly allows that parties to a contract might require more prudent measures than general purpose frameworks (Aus A6-A7), which changes incentives for preparers and auditors in negotiating contract terms and in evaluating materiality (Aus A9.1; Para. A9.1).
In short, ASA 800 mechanically extends the Australian Auditing Standards framework to audits of special purpose financial reports, adds targeted requirements about acceptability of frameworks and disclosure in audit reports, and cross‑references existing Australian Auditing Standards (ASA 200, ASA 210, ASA 315, ASA 700, ASA 720, ASA 701, ASA 706 and others) to guide application. The text sets out a policy rationale (avoid misunderstandings, align with ISA 800), but its mechanisms impose judgement burdens and documentation costs on auditors, and leave open risks from broad distribution and differing stakeholder expectations (Aus A3; Para. 14).
Main concepts
This Standard revolves around three principal concepts: special purpose frameworks, acceptability of the financial reporting framework, and reporting adaptations for special purpose financial reports.
Special purpose framework and special purpose financial report: The Standard defines a special purpose framework as a financial reporting framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users; it may be a fair presentation framework or a compliance framework (Definitions, Para. 6; Ref: Para. A1-A4). Aus 6.1 further defines a special purpose financial report as a complete set of financial statements (including an assertion statement by those responsible for the financial report) prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework (Aus 6.1; Ref: Para. A1-A4). The application material (Aus A1.1 and A1-A4) gives examples: tax basis reports accompanying tax returns, cash receipts and disbursements basis for creditor cash flow information, regulator‑prescribed financial reporting provisions, and contractually specified financial reporting provisions (Para. A1 and Appendix examples).
Acceptability of the financial reporting framework: ASA 210 requires the auditor to determine whether the chosen financial reporting framework is acceptable for the engagement. ASA 800 prescribes that, for special purpose financial reports, the auditor must obtain an understanding of (i) the purpose of the report, (ii) the intended users, and (iii) steps management took to determine the framework’s acceptability (Para. 8; Aus A5-A8). The application material explains that frameworks promulgated by recognised standard‑setting organisations or prescribed by law or regulation are presumed acceptable absent indications to the contrary (Aus A6-A7). When the framework is contract‑based or a bespoke source, acceptability is judged against attributes normally exhibited by acceptable frameworks as set out in Appendix 2 of ASA 210; relative importance of those attributes is a matter of professional judgment (Aus A6-A7).
Special considerations in planning and performance: ASA 200 requires auditors to comply with all relevant Australian Auditing Standards. ASA 800 emphasises that application of those standards to special purpose financial reports may require special consideration (Para. 9; Aus A9.1). Materiality judgements (ASA 320) and communications (ASA 260) must be formed with reference to the intended users and the specific purpose, not to the common information needs of a broad group (Aus A9.1; Para. A9.1). Where a special purpose report is drawn from a contract, auditors must understand significant interpretations management has made in applying contract provisions; an interpretation is significant when an alternative reasonable interpretation would have produced a material difference (Para. 9(2)).
Forming an opinion and reporting adaptations: ASA 700 applies when forming an opinion on a special purpose financial report (Para. 11). The auditor must evaluate whether the financial report adequately refers to or describes the applicable financial reporting framework and, in contract‑based cases, whether it adequately describes significant contract interpretations (Para. 12). The auditor’s report for a special purpose financial report must additionally describe the purpose for which the financial report is prepared and, if necessary, intended users, or it must refer to a note in the special purpose financial report that contains that information (Para. 12(1)). If management had a choice of frameworks, management’s responsibility paragraph must explicitly reference management’s responsibility for determining the framework’s acceptability (Para. 12(2)). The auditor must include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users that the financial report was prepared under a special purpose framework and may not be suitable for other purposes (Para. 14; Para. A20-A21). The Standard also covers optional distribution/use restrictions and how to reference general purpose auditor’s reports in an Other Matter paragraph (Para. A15-A19).
Cross‑references and interactions: The Standard is not standalone. It explicitly directs auditors to read ASA 101, ASA 200, ASA 210, ASA 315, ASA 700 and other standards (Authority Statement; Para. 1-3; Para. 9; Para. 11). It notes that the Australian equivalent of certain ISA ethical requirements are contained in ASA 102 (Authority Statement). Key audit matters (ASA 701) apply to special purpose reports only if required by law or the auditor elects to include them (Para. A15-A19).
In sum, the main concepts are: the definition and examples of special purpose frameworks and reports (Aus A1-A4, Para. 6; Aus 6.1); the obligation to assess acceptability of the framework in light of purpose and intended users (Para. 8; Aus A5-A8); the need to adjust materiality, communication and other audit judgements to the narrower user group (Aus A9.1); and the requirement to adapt reporting (ASA 700) and include Emphasis of Matter and, where appropriate, distribution restrictions (Para. 12; Para. 14; Para. A20-A21).
Who it affects
Primary affected parties identified in the Standard are auditors who perform audits of special purpose financial reports, entities (management and those charged with governance) that prepare such reports, intended users as defined by management and regulators or contracting parties who set reporting requirements.
Auditors: The Standard places specific procedural and reporting duties on auditors. It requires auditors to obtain an understanding of the purpose of the special purpose financial report, identify intended users, and assess acceptability of the reporting framework in the engagement circumstances (Para. 8; Aus A5-A8). Auditors must decide whether application of Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration (Para. 9; Aus A9.1), apply ASA 700 when forming opinions (Para. 11), and include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report on special purpose financial reports (Para. 14). The auditor’s obligations also include understanding significant interpretations management made of contracts (for contract‑based frameworks) and applying ASA 315 requirements where relevant (Para. 9(2)).
Management and those charged with governance: Management is responsible for preparing the financial report under the applicable framework and, where management has a choice of frameworks, for determining that the chosen framework is acceptable in the circumstances (Para. 12(2); Para. 8). Aus 6.1 emphasises that special purpose financial reports must include an assertion statement by those responsible for the financial report. ASA 800 also notes that the persons responsible for oversight of the special purpose report may differ from those charged with governance of a general purpose report, which affects audit communications (Aus A9.1; Para. A9.1).
Intended users, contracting parties and regulators: The Standard defines the special purpose framework in terms of meeting financial information needs of specific users (Para. 6; Aus A1.1). Examples include regulators, creditors under loan agreements, vendors and purchasers in sale contracts, and tax authorities (Para. A1 and Appendix examples). Where law or regulation prescribes a framework, such framework is presumed acceptable absent indications to the contrary (Aus A6-A7). Contracting parties may specify reporting provisions that affect accounting choices and disclosures; auditors must evaluate significant interpretations under contract provisions (Para. 9(2); Aus A2).
Standards‑setting and oversight bodies: The AUASB is the issuer of the Standard; the Authority Statement records the standard was made under s227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and s336 of the Corporations Act 2001 on 26 July 2016 (Auditing Standard ASA 800 section). The Standard conforms with ISA 800 issued by the IAASB (Authority Statement), and the AUASB identifies paragraphs it has added with the prefix “Aus”.
Third parties and broader users: The Standard acknowledges that a special purpose financial report may be the only financial report an entity prepares and so may be used by users other than those for whom it was designed (Aus A3). It mandates the auditor include an Emphasis of Matter warning that the special purpose report may not be suitable for other purposes, and allows for optional restrictions on distribution or use (Para. 14; Para. A20-A21). That recognition signals potential secondary effects on lenders, purchasers, investors and the public when such reports are publicly available, but the Standard does not regulate those third parties.
Professional and ethical standards: The Standard references other auditing and ethical standards. It notes that certain ethical requirements equivalent to those in ISA 800 are included in the Australian Standard ASA 102 and that auditors should follow the APES 110 Code where relevant (Authority Statement; Illustrations). Those requirements affect auditors’ independence and conduct, particularly in engagements where user groups and contractual obligations are specific.
In short, ASA 800 primarily affects auditors and preparers of special purpose financial reports, but it also engages contracting parties, regulators, intended users and standards‑setting or oversight bodies by shaping the audit approach, reporting content (including limitations of use) and documentary evidence auditors must obtain (Para. 8-14; Aus A1-A9).
Key duties and rights
The Standard sets out auditor duties and preparer responsibilities rather than rights. It also cross‑references duties from other Australian Auditing Standards that apply to these engagements.
Auditor duties specified in ASA 800
Acceptability of the financial reporting framework: The auditor must determine the acceptability of the financial reporting framework used to prepare the special purpose financial report by obtaining an understanding of (i) the purpose for which the financial report is prepared, (ii) the intended users and (iii) the steps taken by management to determine the framework’s acceptability (Para. 8; Aus A5-A8). This duty reiterates ASA 210 obligations in the special purpose context.
Determine special considerations in planning and performing the audit: The auditor must determine whether the application of Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration in the circumstances of the engagement (Para. 9; Aus A9.1). That duty links to ASA 200’s general requirement to comply with relevant auditing standards and to use professional judgement where standards involve conditional application.
Understand selection and application of accounting policies: Under ASA 315 (cross‑referenced) the auditor must obtain an understanding of the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies. For contract‑based frameworks, the auditor has a duty to understand significant contract interpretations management made in preparing the special purpose report; an interpretation is significant where an alternative reasonable interpretation would have produced a material difference (Para. 9(2)).
Apply ASA 700 when forming an opinion: The auditor must apply ASA 700 requirements when forming an opinion on the special purpose financial report, including assessing whether the financial report adequately refers to or describes the applicable framework and describing the report’s purpose and intended users in the auditor’s report where appropriate (Para. 11; Para. 12).
Include Emphasis of Matter: The auditor must include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report to alert users that the financial report is prepared under a special purpose framework and may not be suitable for other purposes (Para. 14; Para. A20-A21).
Consider reporting elements from other Standards: The auditor must apply reporting requirements in other relevant standards (ASA 701 for key audit matters if required by law or if the auditor chooses to report them, ASA 720 for other information, ASA 570 for going concern considerations as applicable) (Para. A15-A19; A20-A21).
Management and governance duties identified in the Standard
Prepare the financial report under the applicable framework and make assertion: Management is responsible for preparation of the special purpose financial report in accordance with the applicable framework and for providing an assertion statement as part of the report (Aus 6.1; Illustrations sections on Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance).
Determine framework acceptability where a choice exists: Where management has a choice of frameworks in preparing the report, the management responsibility paragraph in the auditor’s report must reference management’s responsibility for determining that the chosen framework is acceptable in the circumstances (Para. 12(2)).
Disclose basis and purpose of the report: The applicable financial reporting framework or the notes should disclose the basis of accounting and the purpose for which the report is prepared, especially where the framework is contract‑based or differs from recognised financial reporting standards (Para. 12; Para. A2; Aus A1.1).
Rights and discretionary elements
Auditor discretion on key audit matters: ASA 701 (key audit matters) applies to special purpose reports only if law or regulation requires communication of key audit matters or if the auditor elects to do so; the auditor has discretion in such cases (Para. A15-A19).
Auditor discretion on distribution restrictions: The auditor may consider, and where law permits, indicate that the auditor’s report is intended solely for the specific users by restricting distribution or use; this is discretionary and depends on law or regulation of the jurisdiction (Para. A20-A21).
Reference to other auditor’s reports: The auditor may, if appropriate, refer in an Other Matter paragraph to a separate auditor’s report on the general purpose financial report or matters reported therein (Para. A15-A19).
Cross‑standard duties
Compliance with ethical requirements: The Standard refers auditors to apply relevant ethical requirements; in the Australian context some ethical requirements related to ISA 800 are included in ASA 102 (Authority Statement). The Illustrations also reference APES 110 as the applicable code of ethics for professional accountants in Australia.
Materiality and communications: ASA 320 and ASA 260 continue to govern materiality assessments and communications, but ASA 800 requires that those judgements be made with reference to the intended users of the special purpose report rather than the general user group (Aus A9.1; Para. A9.1).
What the Standard does not create
The Standard does not in itself create statutory rights or penalties within its text; it is a professional auditing standard issued by the AUASB and is to be read with ASA 101 and ASA 200 (Authority Statement). The Standard does not set out enforcement mechanisms or sanctions in its text.
In summary, ASA 800 bundles duties for auditors to assess framework acceptability, adjust audit planning to the intended users, obtain clarity on accounting interpretations (especially contract‑based), and adapt the auditor’s report (including mandatory Emphasis of Matter). Management carries duties for framework selection, disclosure and preparing an assertion statement; auditors retain limited discretionary rights (e.g., to include key audit matters and restrict report distribution) which are conditioned by law or regulation (Para. 8-14; Aus A5-A21).
Penalties and enforcement
The text of ASA 800, as provided, does not articulate specific statutory penalties or enforcement procedures within the standard itself. Instead, the Standard is a pronouncement of the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) and contains an Authority Statement that it was made pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Auditing Standard ASA 800 section). That legislative provenance identifies the AUASB’s statutory basis to make standards, but the Standard’s text does not set out the mechanics by which compliance will be enforced, nor does it prescribe civil or criminal penalties.
What the Standard does provide on compliance and professional obligations:
The Authority Statement directs that ASA 800 is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 and ASA 200 (Authority Statement). Those Australian Auditing Standards carry professional obligations on auditors to comply with relevant standards; ASA 800 cross‑references a number of these (ASA 200, ASA 210, ASA 315, ASA 700, ASA 720, ASA 701, ASA 706, ASA 705, ASA 570). Compliance with these standards ordinarily forms part of the professional conduct expected of auditors and may be relevant to professional disciplinary review by professional bodies and to regulatory oversight where applicable.
The Standard notes that compliance with ASA 800 enables compliance with ISA 800 (Authority Statement). That conformity statement situates ASA 800 within an international standard framework but does not itself create enforcement measures.
Implied enforcement channels (as stated or inferable from the text)
Professional obligations: The Standard repeatedly instructs auditors to comply with Australian Auditing Standards and relevant ethical requirements; those obligations, while not enforced by the Standard text, typically fall within the remit of professional bodies, registration and licensing regimes and, where relevant, regulatory supervision (the Standard itself references ethical requirements being included in ASA 102 and notes APES 110 in the Illustrations).
Legislative context: The Standard was made under section 227B of the ASIC Act and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Auditing Standard ASA 800). Those sections provide statutory authority for the AUASB but the Standard does not specify whether failure to follow ASA 800 would give rise to statutory penalties under those Acts; such consequences (if any) would be determined by the framework of the relevant Acts, regulators (for example ASIC) and professional disciplinary regimes, not by the Standard’s text.
Limitations in the Standard text about enforcement and penalties
No sanctions described: ASA 800 does not describe any fines, criminal offences or administrative sanctions that apply for non‑compliance with the Standard.
No audit oversight procedures set out: The Standard does not set out inspection regimes, audit quality review processes or reporting lines for enforcement; those mechanisms, if present, exist outside the Standard (for example in regulator or professional body processes).
Practical implication for practitioners
Although ASA 800 does not specify penalties, the Standard is part of the body of Australian Auditing Standards that auditors are professionally required to apply (Authority Statement). Non‑compliance may therefore have consequences in professional disciplinary or regulatory settings, depending on applicable law and the policies of professional and regulatory bodies. The Standard itself, however, does not enumerate those consequences.
Where the Standard directly references law or regulation: cite to the Authority Statement and the paragraph noting the AUASB made ASA 800 pursuant to s227B ASIC Act and s336 Corporations Act 2001 (Auditing Standard ASA 800 section).
How it interacts with other laws
ASA 800 explicitly situates itself within the broader Australian auditing and legislative architecture and cross‑references a range of auditing standards and legislative instruments. The Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards and ASA 200 Overall Objectives (Authority Statement). It also references the legislative authority for the AUASB and the Corporations Act 2001.
Statutory basis and relation to Corporations Act and ASIC Act
The AUASB made ASA 800 pursuant to s227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and s336 of the Corporations Act 2001, and records the date of making as 26 July 2016 (Auditing Standard ASA 800 section). That statement identifies the statutory basis for the AUASB to issue standards, which situates ASA 800 within the legislative framework governing company reporting and audit requirements in Australia. The Standard applies to audits under the Corporations Act (Aus 0.1).
Interaction with other Australian Auditing Standards
ASA 800 is explicitly cross‑referenced with and dependent on other Auditing Standards:
ASA 101 (to be read together) sets out how AUASB standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied (Authority Statement).
ASA 200 (Overall Objectives) frames the requirement to comply with all relevant auditing standards; ASA 800 requires auditors to determine whether the application of Australian Auditing Standards requires special consideration (Para. 9; Aus A9.1).
ASA 210 (Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements) requires the auditor to determine acceptability of the financial reporting framework; ASA 800 applies that duty to special purpose engagements and specifies information the auditor must obtain about purpose and intended users (Para. 8; Aus A5-A8).
ASA 315 (Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement) is cross‑referenced for understanding the entity’s selection and application of accounting policies, particularly for contract‑based frameworks where significant interpretations must be understood (Para. 9(2)).
ASA 700 (Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements) is the primary reporting standard to be applied when forming an opinion; ASA 800 prescribes additional reporting requirements and ordering of elements for special purpose reports (Para. 11-12).
ASA 701 (Key Audit Matters), ASA 705 (Modifications), ASA 570 (Going Concern), ASA 720 (Other Information), and ASA 706 (Emphasis of Matter and Other Matter paragraphs) are also referenced as applicable for particular reporting elements (Para. A15-A19; A13-A21).
The Authority Statement notes that equivalent ISA material relating to "relevant ethical requirements" is included in ASA 102, which has no international equivalent. ASA 800 directs auditors to apply ethical requirements in the Australian context via ASA 102 (Authority Statement).
Interaction with accounting standards and reporting regimes
The Standard acknowledges that Australian Accounting Standards set out requirements for General Purpose Financial Statements and that in some circumstances entities may prepare Special Purpose Financial Statements as defined in AASB 1054 (Aus A1.1). It notes that certain constituting documents existing prior to 1 July 2021 may permit the preparation of statements that comply with Australian Accounting Standards, and that not‑for‑profit entities that assess themselves to be non‑reporting entities may be permitted to prepare special purpose financial statements (Aus A1.1). This interacts with legislative and accounting requirements determining when general purpose standards apply.
ASA 800 emphasises that if a special purpose framework is based on a recognised financial reporting framework but does not comply with all its requirements (for example, for contracts requiring most but not all of a jurisdiction’s standards), the special purpose report should not claim full compliance with that jurisdiction’s Financial Reporting Standards; rather, it should describe the financial reporting provisions of the contract (Para. A2). That instruction is an interactional rule between the auditor’s reporting duty and accounting framework descriptions.
Interaction with contractual and regulatory frameworks
Where the applicable financial reporting framework is a contract (bond indenture, loan agreement, project grant), ASA 800 requires auditors to obtain an understanding of significant management interpretations of the contract and to evaluate whether the financial report adequately describes those interpretations (Para. 9(2); Para. 12). The Standard instructs auditors to consider attributes of acceptable reporting frameworks as described in Appendix 2 of ASA 210 when the framework is contractual or bespoke (Aus A6-A7). It also notes that in some jurisdictions law or regulation may prescribe the financial reporting framework for a certain type of entity and such frameworks are presumed acceptable absent contrary indications (Aus A6-A7).
Interaction with international standards
The Standard states it conforms with ISA 800 issued by the IAASB and that compliance with ASA 800 enables compliance with ISA 800 (Authority Statement). Paragraphs added by the AUASB that do not appear in ISA 800 are identified by the prefix “Aus” (Authority Statement). This shows the Standard is designed to be consistent with the international standard while adding Australian‑specific guidance.
Limitations and boundaries
ASA 800 does not override requirements of other Auditing Standards (Para. 3). It is written in the context of a financial report prepared in accordance with a special purpose framework and does not purport to deal with all special considerations that may be relevant to a given engagement (Para. 3).
The Standard clarifies that the going concern basis may not be relevant for certain special purpose frameworks (for instance some tax bases), and audit reporting language about going concern may need to be adapted depending on whether ASA 570 applies (Para. A15-A19).
In summary, ASA 800 interacts primarily by integrating with the Australian Auditing Standards hierarchy (ASA 101 and ASA 200 as foundational references) and by instructing auditors how to apply these standards when the financial reporting framework is designed for specific users or purposes. It also interfaces with accounting standards guidance, contract provisions, jurisdictional law, and international auditing standards (Authority Statement; Para. 8-14; Aus A1-A9).
Amendment history
The compilation details at the front of ASA 800 record the amendments incorporated up to 7 September 2021 and list the amending Standards and operative dates. The compilation is dated 10 November 2021 and the compilation statement clarifies that this version is a representation of ASA 800 (July 2016) as amended by other Auditing Standards listed. The Table of Standards and Table of Amendments in the Compilation Details provide the amendment history entries.
Table of Standards (as compiled)
ASA 800 [A], made 26 July 2016, operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016.
ASA 2017‑1 [B], made 30 May 2017, operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016.
ASA 2020‑2 [C], made 30 June 2020, operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 July 2020.
ASA 2021‑4 [D], made 7 September 2021, operative for financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2021.
ASA 2020‑1 [E], made 3 March 2020, operative for financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2021 [*note added in table].
Federal Register of Legislation references for the amending standards are given in the Compilation Details (for example, ASA 800 [A] registered F2016L01268, 8 August 2016; ASA 2017‑1 [B] registered F2017L00693, 19 June 2017; ASA 2020‑2 [C] registered F2020L00885, 7 July 2020; ASA 2021‑4 [D] registered F2021L01301, 20 September 2021; ASA 2020‑1 [E] registered F2020L00252, 13 March 2020).
Table of Amendments (recorded in compilation)
Renumbering of paragraphs Aus 1.1 - 1.3: Amended by ASA 2017‑1 [12-14].
Specific paragraph amendments referenced in the compilation include changes to the Appendix illustrations and renumbering of Aus paragraphs. The compilation notes that paragraphs that have been added in the Australian Standard but are not in the equivalent ISA are identified with the prefix “Aus” (Authority Statement). Examples of Aus paragraphs include Aus 0.1-0.3, Aus 6.1, Aus A1.1, Aus A9.1 and Aus 18.1.
Operative dates and transitional provisions
The compilation includes operative dates for each amending standard, which identify when particular changes took effect for reporting periods. For example, ASA 2021‑4 [D] (7 September 2021) is operative for reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2021. ASA 2020‑2 [C] is operative for reporting periods ending on or after 15 July 2020. Users of the Standard need to consult the Compilation Details to determine the applicable operative dates for particular paragraphs amended by these amending standards (Aus 0.3 note).
Deleted and added content
The compilation records deletions and additions: for instance, Appendix 1[Aus] Illustration 4 was deleted by ASA 2021‑4 [10]; Aus A18.1 was added by ASA 2017‑1 [16]; A18 was deleted by ASA 2017‑1 [15]. These specific editorial changes affect illustrative material and reporting examples rather than the core requirements, but they may change practical reporting templates and wording.
Relationship to ISA 800
The Authority Statement reiterates that ASA 800 conforms with ISA 800 and that paragraphs added by AUASB are marked “Aus”. Consequently, the amendment history reflects both changes to conform with international developments and Australian‑specific regulatory or policy needs.
Practical note for practitioners
Because the compilation incorporates amendments up to September 2021, auditors and preparers must check the Compilation Details and the Federal Register of Legislation registration numbers when determining which paragraphs and illustrative material apply to a particular reporting period (Compilation Details table). The Standard itself highlights that for operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see the Compilation Details (Aus 0.3).
In sum, ASA 800’s amendment history is documented in the Compilation Details, listing amending standards, operative dates and specific paragraph changes (Table of Standards; Table of Amendments). The compilation makes clear which material is Australian‑specific (Aus paragraphs) and indicates that practitioners should consult the compilation notes and operative dates to determine applicability.
Litigation history
The text of ASA 800 as provided contains no references to litigation, case law, disputes or judicial interpretations. The Standard does not cite any court decisions or judicial authorities, nor does it summarise case law interpreting its provisions. The Authority Statement, compilation details and application material refer only to the AUASB’s standards, the equivalent ISA 800, associated Australian Auditing Standards (ASA 101, ASA 200, ASA 210, ASA 315, ASA 700, ASA 701, ASA 720), and relevant legislative provisions (s227B ASIC Act; s336 Corporations Act 2001) as the normative context. Illustrative auditor’s reports and application material include suggested wording and situations but do not reference judicial rulings.
What to take from the absence of litigation references in the Standard
ASA 800 is a standards pronouncement, not a judicial instrument. As such, the Standard records normative audit procedures, reporting requirements and application guidance but does not record litigated disputes or interpretive case law.
The absence of litigation history in the Standard does not imply there have been no disputes or challenges in practice related to audits of special purpose financial reports; it only reflects that the Standard itself does not catalogue litigation.
Practical implication for users
Practitioners seeking judicial interpretations or case law applying ASA 800 or disputes about special purpose financial reports will need to consult external legal databases, regulatory enforcement records or professional disciplinary case reports. ASA 800 does not provide such materials nor does it summarise how courts or tribunals have interpreted the standard or its application.
In short, ASA 800’s text contains no litigation history, cases, or precedent citations. The Standard provides normative audit guidance and illustrative auditor’s reports but leaves case‑law and enforcement matters outside its content.
Gotchas
The Standard contains a number of practical pitfalls and judgement traps that auditors and preparers should be aware of; these are identified in the text and the application material. Below are concrete “gotchas” grounded in the Standard’s paragraphs.
Special purpose reports may be the only report yet remain ‘special purpose’: Aus A3 explicitly states that a special purpose financial report may be the only financial report an entity prepares, and despite broad distribution it is still considered a special purpose financial report for auditing purposes. Gotcha: auditors cannot assume that broad distribution converts a special purpose report into a general purpose one; they must still follow ASA 800’s special considerations and include the required Emphasis of Matter (Para. 14; Para. A20-A21). However, the Standard also recognises that such broad distribution creates an implementation risk of misunderstanding by unintended users.
“Acceptability” is judgemental and context‑sensitive: Para. 8 and Aus A6-A7 require the auditor to determine whether the reporting framework is acceptable given the purpose and intended users. Gotcha: acceptability is not a binary automatic rule , even frameworks based on recognised standard setters or regulation are only presumed acceptable absent indications to the contrary (Aus A6-A7). Auditors must obtain documentation on steps management took to determine acceptability.
Contractual frameworks can produce material differences via interpretation: Para. 9(2) states auditors must understand any significant interpretations management made of contracts. An interpretation is “significant” if another reasonable interpretation would produce a material difference. Gotcha: auditors must evaluate alternative reasonable interpretations and document why management’s interpretation was or was not reasonable. Failure to do so risks undetected material misstatement or disagreement with management.
Materiality is user‑specific: Aus A9.1 explains that ASA 320 materiality judgements for special purpose reports are based on the intended users’ financial information needs. Gotcha: conventional thresholds used for general purpose audits may be inappropriate; auditors must justify materiality choices in relation to intended users, which increases analytical burden and documentation needs.
Emphasis of Matter is mandatory and may need to include distribution restriction: Para. 14 mandates an Emphasis of Matter paragraph to alert users that the report is prepared under a special purpose framework and may not be suitable for other purposes. Para. A20-A21 allows expansion to include restrictions on use where law permits. Gotcha: the auditor must craft the Emphasis of Matter carefully; if distribution restrictions are used, auditors should confirm legal permissibility and the practical enforceability of such restrictions.
Going concern wording may require adaptation or may be irrelevant: The Standard notes some special purpose frameworks (e.g., some tax bases) make the going concern basis irrelevant (Para. A15-A19). Gotcha: auditors must not mechanically apply standard going concern wording; they must assess whether ASA 570 applies given the framework and adapt the auditor’s responsibilities wording accordingly.
Key audit matters are discretionary: ASA 701 applies to special purpose reports only if law requires or auditor elects to communicate key audit matters (Para. A15-A19). Gotcha: if the auditor elects to include KAMs, ASA 701 applies in full; electing to include KAMs increases reporting and disclosure obligations and may change stakeholder expectations.
Describing the framework must avoid implying full compliance with other frameworks: Aus A2 warns that if the special purpose framework is based on a broader framework but does not comply with all its requirements, the special purpose report should not imply full compliance with that broader framework. Gotcha: auditors must ensure the financial report and auditor’s report wording does not create misleading impressions about compliance with a general purpose framework.
Multiple governance actors: Aus A9.1 and Para. A9.1 note that the persons responsible for oversight of the special purpose report may differ from those responsible for a general purpose report. Gotcha: auditors must carefully identify the appropriate communication recipients within the entity’s governance structure for the special purpose engagement and document communications under ASA 260.
Illustrative reports are helpful but not prescriptive: Appendix 1 provides illustrative auditor’s reports for specific fact patterns. Gotcha: these are illustrations; auditors must tailor wording to the actual circumstances and jurisdictional legal requirements, and must ensure any partner‑name disclosure is included only where law or regulation requires it (Aus 18.1).
Amendments and operative dates matter: The Compilation Details table lists multiple amending standards with different operative dates. Gotcha: auditors must check the operative dates of amending paragraphs to determine which wording applied for a given reporting period (see Compilation Details; Aus 0.3 note).
Ethical requirements and ASA 102 linkage: The Authority Statement notes that the equivalent ISA ethical requirements have been incorporated into ASA 102 in Australia and that ASA 102 has no international equivalent. Gotcha: auditors must ensure they are familiar with ASA 102’s provisions as they apply to audits of special purpose financial reports.
Each of these “gotchas” increases the need for documentation and professional judgement. Auditors should plan engagements with explicit steps to address these risks (documenting intended users and purpose, assessing acceptability, testing contract interpretations, calibrating materiality to intended users, and drafting Emphasis of Matter language appropriate for the circumstances).
How to comply
Below is a practical compliance checklist for auditors and preparers grounded in the Standard’s paragraphs and application material. It is framed as actionable steps with paragraph references to ASA 800.
Confirm application of ASA 800 to the engagement (Aus 0.1; Aus 0.2)
Determine whether the engagement is an audit of a financial report for the purposes listed in Aus 0.1 (Corporations Act audit or other purpose).
If the audit relates to other historical financial information, consider Aus 0.2.
Establish operative dates and applicable amendments (Aus 0.3; Compilation Details)
Check the Compilation Details and the Table of Standards to confirm which amending paragraphs are operative for the reporting period in question.
Obtain understanding of purpose, intended users and management’s steps on acceptability (Para. 8; Aus A5-A8)
Document the purpose for which the special purpose financial report is prepared.
Identify and document intended users explicitly.
Obtain and retain records of steps management undertook to determine that the chosen financial reporting framework is acceptable in the circumstances.
Assess framework acceptability (ASA 210 cross‑reference; Aus A6-A7)
If the framework is prescribed by law or a recognised standards setter, document presumption of acceptability and any indicators to the contrary.
If contractual or bespoke, evaluate whether the framework exhibits attributes of acceptable frameworks as per Appendix 2 of ASA 210; document the relative importance of attributes for the engagement.
Plan audit with special considerations (Para. 9; Aus A9.1)
Apply ASA 200’s requirement to comply with all relevant Australian Auditing Standards.
Specifically consider adjustments to materiality thresholds and risk assessments to reflect the special purpose report’s intended users (ASA 320 considerations under Aus A9.1).
Determine the appropriate governance recipients for audit communications under ASA 260 (Aus A9.1 notes these may differ from general purpose reporting governance).
Obtain understanding of accounting policies and contract interpretations (Para. 9(2); ASA 315)
Where the report is prepared under a contract, obtain and document management’s significant interpretations of the contract.
Evaluate alternative reasonable interpretations and document why management’s interpretation is reasonable or whether an alternative would materially change the report.
Perform audit procedures tailored to intended users (Aus A9.1)
Design procedures reflecting the specific user needs (e.g., creditors, regulator or tax authorities).
Maintain professional scepticism and ensure audit evidence is sufficient and appropriate for the narrower user group.
Determine materiality in context (Aus A9.1; ASA 320)
Calculate and document materiality and performance materiality with explicit reference to the intended users and the purpose of the special purpose report.
If management and intended users agreed a threshold below which misstatements will not be corrected, document that this agreement does not relieve the auditor from determining materiality under ASA 320.
Form opinion using ASA 700 with required additions (Para. 11-12)
Apply ASA 700 when forming the audit opinion.
Ensure the auditor’s report describes the purpose for which the report is prepared and, if necessary, the intended users, or refers to a note in the special purpose financial report with that information (Para. 12(1)).
If management had a choice of frameworks, ensure management’s responsibility paragraph references management’s responsibility for determining acceptability (Para. 12(2)).
Include Emphasis of Matter and consider distribution restrictions (Para. 14; Para. A20-A21)
Include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph alerting users that the report is prepared under a special purpose framework and may not be suitable for other purposes.
Where lawful and appropriate, consider adding a restriction on distribution or use in the same paragraph (modify heading to include “Emphasis of Matter” as required by ASA 706; Para. A20-A21).
Address going concern and key audit matters appropriately (Para. A15-A19)
Evaluate whether the going concern basis is relevant to the special purpose framework and adapt auditor’s report wording in light of ASA 570 if applicable.
Consider whether communication of key audit matters is required by law/regulation; if electing to include KAMs, apply ASA 701 in full.
Apply ASA 720 where other information exists (Para. A15-A19)
If the entity plans to issue reports containing or accompanying the special purpose financial report (e.g., annual reports for owners or similar stakeholders), apply ASA 720 responsibilities for other information.
Consider inclusion of engagement partner’s name where required (Aus 18.1)
Where law or regulation requires disclosure of the engagement partner’s name in the auditor’s report, include it in accordance with ASA 700 and Aus 18.1.
Use illustrative auditor’s reports only as templates and adapt wording (Appendix 1)
Refer to Appendix 1 illustrations for example wording in common fact patterns (contractual compliance frameworks, tax basis reports, NFP legislation frameworks).
Tailor wording to the actual circumstances and confirm compliance with local legal requirements and AUASB guidance.
Document conclusions and retain evidence
Document judgements about framework acceptability, intended users, materiality and significant contract interpretations.
Retain evidence supporting the decision to include (or not) key audit matters and any distribution restrictions.
Cross‑check ethical and independence requirements (Authority Statement; ASA 102)
Ensure compliance with relevant ethical requirements, including independence, as applicable to financial report audit engagements (ASA 102 linkage; Illustrations reference APES 110).
Keep up to date with amendments and operative dates (Compilation Details)
Verify which versions of paragraphs and illustrations applied at the time of the engagement using the Compilation Details and the Registered Federal Register entries listed.
By following the steps above, auditors will align their engagement approach with ASA 800’s requirements: assessing acceptability of the reporting framework, tailoring audit planning to intended users, obtaining required understandings (including contract interpretations), applying ASA 700 with mandated Emphasis of Matter language, and documenting key judgements. Preparers (management) should ensure supporting documentation about the purpose of the report, intended users, basis of accounting and any assertion statements are available to facilitate the audit.
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement......................................8
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit..............................9-10
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations.................................11-14
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Definition of Special Purpose Framework.......................................A1-A4
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement..................................A5-A8
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit...........................A9-A12
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations...............................A13-A21
Appendix 1: Illustrations of Independent Auditor’s Reports on a Special Purpose Financial Report
COMPILATION DETAILS COMPILATION DETAILS
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
The most recently compiled versions of Auditing Standards, original Standards and amending Standards (see Compilation Details) are available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au
Contact Details
Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardPodium LevelLevel 14, 530 Collins StreetMelbourne Victoria 3000AUSTRALIA
Phone: (03) 8080 7400E‑mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Otherwise, no part of this Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.
This Auditing Standard reproduces substantial parts of the corresponding International Standard on Auditing issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), in the manner described in the statement on Conformity with International Standards on Auditing. The AUASB acknowledges that IFAC is the owner of copyright in the International Standard on Auditing incorporated in this Auditing Standard throughout the world.
All existing rights in this material are reserved outside Australia. Reproduction outside Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non‑commercial use only.
Further information and requests for authorisation to reproduce this Auditing Standard for commercial purposes outside Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Any decision to approve a request may also require the agreement of IFAC.
ISSN 1833‑4393
CONTENTS
COMPILATION DETAILS
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement......................................8
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit..............................9-10
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations.................................11-14
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Definition of Special Purpose Framework.......................................A1-A4
Considerations When Accepting the Engagement..................................A5-A8
Considerations When Planning and Performing the Audit...........................A9-A12
Forming an Opinion and Reporting Considerations...............................A13-A21
Appendix 1: Illustrations of Independent Auditor’s Reports on a Special Purpose Financial Report
COMPILATION DETAILS
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as Amended)
This compilation takes into account amendments made up to and including 7 September 2021 and was prepared on 10 November 2021 by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB).
This compilation is not a separate Auditing Standard made by the AUASB. Instead, it is a representation of ASA 800 (July 2016) as amended by other Auditing Standards which are listed in the Table below.
Table of Standards
Standard
Date made
Operative Date
ASA 800 [A]
26 July 2016
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2017‑1 [B]
30 May 2017
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2020-2 [C]
30 June 2020
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 July 2020
ASA 2021-4 [D]
7 September 2021
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2021
ASA 2020-1 [E]
3 March 2020
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2021[*]
[A] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2016L01268, 8 August 2016.
[B] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2017L00693, 19 June 2017
[C] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2020L00885, 7 July 2020
[D] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2021L01301, 20 September 2021
[E] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2020L00252, 13 March 2020
Table of Amendments
Paragraph affected
How affected
By … [paragraph]
Renumbering of paragraphs Aus 1.1 – 1.3
Amended
ASA 2017-1 [12-14]
A18
Deleted
ASA 2017-1 [15]
Aus A18.1
Addition
ASA 2017-1 [16]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2020-2 [83] to [87]
Aus A1.1
Amended
ASA 2021-4 [8]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2021-4 [9]
Appendix 1[Aus] Illustration 4
Deleted
ASA 2021-4 [10]
10Footnote 5
Amended
ASA 2020-1 [212]
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as amended to 7 September 2021) is set out in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A21 and Appendix 1.
This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied. This Auditing Standard is to be read also in conjunction with ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard‑setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
The equivalent requirements and related application and other explanatory material included in ISA 800 in respect of “relevant ethical requirements”, have been included in Auditing Standard, ASA 102 Compliance with Ethical Requirements when Performing Audits, Reviews and Other Assurance Engagements. There is no international equivalent to ASA 102.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 800.
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Consid Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as Amended)
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (as Amended)
This compilation takes into account amendments made up to and including 7 September 2021 and was prepared on 10 November 2021 by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB).
This compilation is not a separate Auditing Standard made by the AUASB. Instead, it is a representation of ASA 800 (July 2016) as amended by other Auditing Standards which are listed in the Table below.
Table of Standards Table of Standards
Table of Standards
Standard
Date made
Operative Date
ASA 800 [A]
26 July 2016
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2017‑1 [B]
30 May 2017
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2020-2 [C]
30 June 2020
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 July 2020
ASA 2021-4 [D]
7 September 2021
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2021
ASA 2020-1 [E]
3 March 2020
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2021[*]
[A] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2016L01268, 8 August 2016.
[B] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2017L00693, 19 June 2017
[C] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2020L00885, 7 July 2020
[D] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2021L01301, 20 September 2021
[E] Federal Register of Legislation – registration number F2020L00252, 13 March 2020
Table of Amendments Table of Amendments
Table of Amendments
Paragraph affected
How affected
By … [paragraph]
Renumbering of paragraphs Aus 1.1 – 1.3
Amended
ASA 2017-1 [12-14]
A18
Deleted
ASA 2017-1 [15]
Aus A18.1
Addition
ASA 2017-1 [16]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2020-2 [83] to [87]
Aus A1.1
Amended
ASA 2021-4 [8]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2021-4 [9]
Appendix 1[Aus] Illustration 4
Deleted
ASA 2021-4 [10]
10Footnote 5
Amended
ASA 2020-1 [212]
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 800 Special Considerations – Audits of Financial Reports
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.