65Exception: criminal proceedings if maker not available

### 65 Exception: criminal proceedings if maker not available > > (1)  This section applies in a criminal proceeding if a person who made a previous representation is not available to give evidence about an asserted fact. > > > (2)  [*\[Section 65 Subsection (2) substituted by No. 46 of 2010, s. 19, Applied:01 Jan 2011\]*](/view/html/inforce/2011-01-01/act-2010-046#GS19@EN) The hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of a previous representation given by a person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the representation being made, if the representation – > > > > > > (a) was made under a duty to make that representation or to make representations of that kind; or > > > > > > > (b) was made when or shortly after the asserted fact occurred and in circumstances that make it unlikely that the representation is a fabrication; or > > > > > > > (c) was made in circumstances that make it highly probable that the representation is reliable; or > > > > > > > (d) was – > > > > > > > > > > (i) against the interests of the person who made it at the time it was made; and > > > > > > > > > > > (ii) made in circumstances that make it likely that the representation is reliable. > > > (3)  The hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of a previous representation made in the course of giving evidence in an Australian or overseas proceeding if, in that proceeding, the defendant in the proceeding to which this section is being applied – > > > > > > (a) cross-examined the person who made the representation about it; or > > > > > > > (b) had a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the representation about it. > > > (4)  If there is more than one defendant in the criminal proceeding, evidence of a previous representation that – > > > > > > (a) is given in an Australian or overseas proceeding; and > > > > > > > (b) is admitted into evidence in the criminal proceeding because of [subsection (3)](#GS65@Gs3@EN)  – > > > > cannot be used against a defendant who did not cross-examine, and did not have a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine, the person about the representation. > > > (5)  For the purposes of [subsections (3)](#GS65@Gs3@EN) and [(4)](#GS65@Gs4@EN) , a defendant is taken to have had a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine a person if the defendant was not present at a time when the cross-examination of a person might have been conducted but – > > > > > > (a) could reasonably have been present at that time; and > > > > > > > (b) if present could have cross-examined the person. > > > (6)  Evidence of the making of a representation to which [subsection (3)](#GS65@Gs3@EN) applies may be adduced by producing a transcript, or a recording, of the representation that is authenticated by – > > > > > > (a) the person to whom, or the court or other body to which, the representation was made; or > > > > > > > (b) if applicable, the registrar or other proper officer of the court or other body to which the representation was made; or > > > > > > > (c) the person or body responsible for producing the transcript or recording. > > > (7)  Without limiting [subsection (2)(d)](#GS65@Gs2@Hpd@EN) , a representation is taken, for the purpose of that subsection, to be against the interests of the person who made it if it tends – > > > > > > (a) to damage the person's reputation; or > > > > > > > (b) to show that the person committed an offence for which the person has not been convicted; or > > > > > > > (c) to show that the person is liable in an action for damages. > > > (8)  The hearsay rule does not apply to – > > > > > > (a) evidence of a previous representation adduced by a defendant if the evidence is given by a person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the representation being made; or > > > > > > > (b) a document tendered as evidence by a defendant so far as it contains a previous representation, or another representation to which it is reasonably necessary to refer in order to understand the representation. > > > (9)  If evidence of a previous representation about a matter has been adduced by a defendant and has been admitted, the hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of another representation about the matter that – > > > > > > (a) is adduced by another party; and > > > > > > > (b) is given by a person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the other representation being made.