164Corroboration requirements abolished

### 164 Corroboration requirements abolished > > (1)  It is not necessary that evidence on which a party relies be corroborated. > > > (2)  [Subsection (1)](#GS164@Gs1@EN) does not affect the operation of a rule of law that requires corroboration with respect to the offence of perjury or a similar or related offence. > > > (3)  Despite any rule, whether of law or practice, to the contrary, but subject to the other provisions of this Act, if there is a jury, it is not necessary that the judge – > > > > > > (a) warn the jury that it is dangerous to act on uncorroborated evidence or give a warning to the same or similar effect; or > > > > > > > (b) give a direction relating to the absence of corroboration. > > > (4)  [*\[Section 164 Subsection (4) omitted by No. 46 of 2010, s. 43, Applied:01 Jan 2011\]*](/view/html/inforce/2011-01-01/act-2010-046#GS43@EN) .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .