Evidence Act 2001
139Cautioning person
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 139
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Evidence Act 2001.
139 Cautioning person
(1) For the purpose of section 138(1)(a) , evidence of a statement made or an act done by a person during questioning is taken to have been obtained improperly if –
(a) the person was under arrest for an offence at the time; and
(b) the questioning was conducted by an investigating official who was at the time empowered, because of the office that he or she held, to arrest the person; and
(c) before starting the questioning the investigating official did not caution the person that the person does not have to say or do anything but that anything the person does say or do may be used in evidence.
(2) [Section 139 Subsection (2) amended by No. 46 of 2010, s. 40, Applied:01 Jan 2011] For the purpose of section 138(1)(a) , evidence of a statement made or an act done by a person during questioning is taken to be obtained improperly if –
(a) the questioning was conducted by an investigating official who did not have the power to arrest the person; and
(b) the statement was made, or the act was done, after the investigating official formed a belief that there was sufficient evidence to establish that the person committed an offence; and
(c) the investigating official did not, before the statement was made or the act was done, caution the person that the person does not have to say or do anything but that anything the person does say or do may be used in evidence.
(3) The caution must be given in, or translated into, a language in which the person is able to communicate with reasonable fluency, but need not be given in writing unless the person cannot hear adequately.
(4) Subsections (1) , (2) and (3) do not apply so far as any Australian law requires the person to answer questions put by, or do things required by, the investigating official.
(5) A reference in subsection (1) to a person who is under arrest includes a reference to a person who is in the company of an investigating official for the purpose of being questioned, if –