212MMatters NT EPA must consider in relation to significant

212M Matters NT EPA must consider in relation to significant under regulation 212N on a significant variation: regulation 212C; (c) any submissions received under regulation 212J or 212K;

Environment Protection Regulations 2020 95 (d) in the case of a significant variation of a non-assessed action or non-assessed strategic proposal: (i) the referral made under section 48 or 49 of the Act of the action or strategic proposal; and (ii) any additional information given to the NT EPA under regulation 40 in relation to the referral mentioned in subparagraph (i); and (iii) any submissions received under regulation 52 or 53 in relation to the referral mentioned in subparagraph (i); (e) the matters mentioned in subregulation (2) or (3), as the case requires. (2) In assessing a significant variation of an EAA referred action to determine whether or not the variation requires an environmental impact assessment, the NT EPA must consider the following: way from the impacts already identified in any assessment process under the Environmental Assessment Act 1982 for the action; output of the action in a way that significantly changes the potential significant impacts from those already identified in any assessment process under the Environmental Assessment Act 1982 for the action; (3) In assessing a significant variation of a non-assessed action or a non-assessed strategic proposal to determine whether or not the variation requires an environmental impact assessment, the NT way from the impacts already identified in relation to the action or strategic proposal referred under section 48 or 49 of the Act;

Environment Protection Regulations 2020 96 output of an action in a way that significantly changes the potential significant impacts from those already identified in relation to the action or strategic proposal referred under section 48 or 49 of the Act;