11Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of the plan

11 Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of the plan

This plan should be reviewed no later than five years from when it was endorsed and the review should be made publicly available. The review will determine the performance of the plan and assess:

• whether the plan continues unchanged, is varied to remove completed actions, or varied to include new conservation priorities; or
• whether a recovery plan is no longer necessary for the species as either a conservation advice will suffice, or the species can be removed from the threatened species list.

As part of this review, the listing status of the species will be re-assessed against the EPBC Act species listing criteria. The review will be coordinated by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water in association with relevant Australian and state government agencies, the national Swift Parrot Recovery Team and key stakeholder groups such as non-governmental organisations, local community groups, scientific research organisations and individual experts.

Australian Government

• Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water

State/territory governments

• Victoria – Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action
• New South Wales – Department of Planning, Industry and Environment; Forestry Corporation of NSW
• Queensland – Department of Environment and Science
• South Australia – Department for Environment and Water
• Tasmania – Department of Natural Resources and Environment
• Australian Capital Territory – Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate
• Natural Resource Management bodies
• local government bodies

Non-government organisations

• BirdLife Australia
• local conservation groups
• local communities
• private landholders
• Indigenous communities
• industry
• universities and other research organisations
• Swift Parrot Recovery Team