Gives the Governor‑General power to make regulations that impose charges (taxes) connected with administering the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). (See section 7.)
Allows those charges to be set either as fixed amounts or by a formula in the regulations. (See section 8(1).)
Requires the Minister to be satisfied, before a regulation imposing a charge is made, that the charge is set to recover no more than the Commonwealth's likely costs in connection with the relevant matter. (See section 8(2).)
Permits the regulations to provide exemptions from charges. (See section 9.)
Confines the Act to charges that are neither customs duties nor excise duties (so the regulations must not attempt to impose customs or excise). (See section 7(4).)
Provides for extra‑territorial application and clarifies that the Act binds State and Territory Crowns (but not the Commonwealth Crown) and does not impose a tax on State property. (See sections 3–6.)
Gives a general regulation‑making power to carry the Act into effect. (See section 10.)
Who this affects
Parties who interact with the EPBC Act's regulatory processes: for example, proponents of proposed actions, holders of approvals or exemptions, applicants for assessments or approvals, or others whose activities are "prescribed matters" under the regulations. The exact classes of liable persons are to be set out in the regulations (sections 7 and 8).
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Act 2025 establishes a statutory framework for the Commonwealth to recover costs associated with administering the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 through general charges that are neither customs duties nor excise duties. Section 7 authorises the making of regulations that prescribe a charge in relation to any prescribed matter connected with the administration of the EPBC Act or regulations made under it. Such charges are imposed as taxes, and multiple charges may apply to the same matter or a single charge may cover several matters. Section 8 requires that before any regulation prescribing a charge is made, the Minister must be satisfied that the amount is set at a level designed to recover no more than the Commonwealth's likely costs in connection with the matter. The amount may be specified directly or calculated by a method set out in the regulations. Section 9 permits regulations to provide exemptions from prescribed charges. Section 6 ensures the Act does not impose tax on property of any kind belonging to a State within the meaning of section 114 of the Constitution. The Act binds the Crown in right of each State, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory but does not bind the Crown in right of the Commonwealth. It extends to external Territories and applies extra-territorially to acts, omissions, matters and things outside Australia. Sections 1 and 2 commenced on the day after royal assent, which occurred on 1 December 2025, while sections 3 to 10 commence on a day or days fixed by proclamation or, if not proclaimed within 12 months, on the day after that period ends. This Act forms part of a package of seven bills that implement the second stage of the Albanese Government's response to the Samuel Review of the EPBC Act. Companion bills address restoration charges, customs charges and excise charges, ensuring constitutional compliance under section 55 of the Constitution by separating the different classes of taxation. The framework enables cost recovery for functions performed by the new National Environmental Protection Agency and related bodies once the substantive reforms in the Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025 commence.
Official source available
Zoe has indexed the source text for search and analysis. Use the official register for the original document and download formats.
Part of a package of 7 bills to implement the recommendations of the 2020 Independent Review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the Samuel Review), the bill imposes charges in relation to prescribed matters connected with the administration of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
Parliamentary progress
Progress
House of Representatives
Introduced and read a first time
30 Oct 2025
Second reading moved
30 Oct 2025
Second reading debate
04 Nov 2025
Second reading debate
05 Nov 2025
Second reading debate
06 Nov 2025
Second reading agreed to
06 Nov 2025
Third reading agreed to
06 Nov 2025
Senate
Introduced and read a first time
24 Nov 2025
Second reading moved
24 Nov 2025
Second reading debate
27 Nov 2025
Second reading agreed to
27 Nov 2025
Committee of the Whole debate
27 Nov 2025
Third reading agreed to
27 Nov 2025
Finally passed both Houses
27 Nov 2025
Assent
Act no: 66
Year: 2025
01 Dec 2025
Notes
Documents and transcripts
Text of bill
First reading
As passed by both Houses
Explanatory memoranda
Explanatory memorandum
Transcript of speeches
All second reading speeches
Minister's second reading speech
Proposed amendments
No proposed amendments have been circulated.
Schedules of amendments
No documents at present
Bills digest
The Commonwealth department or agencies that administer the EPBC Act, because the charges are intended to recover Commonwealth costs of administering specific regulatory functions.
Why it matters (policy effect and legal framing)
It creates a delegated mechanism for the Commonwealth to recover the costs of administering parts of the national environment law by imposing targeted charges through regulations rather than by primary‑law fees spelled out in the EPBC Act itself. (s7–s10.)
The Act explicitly treats those charges as "taxes" (s7(2)), which has administrative and constitutional implications for how monies are collected, appropriated and potentially litigated.
The Minister must be satisfied that charges are cost‑recovery only (s8(2)). That test is the statutory guardrail limiting the level of charges, but the Act leaves the detailed design, who pays, and the exact amounts or formulas to regulation.
Official purpose claimed by the government and how the Act implements it
The government presents these provisions as enabling cost recovery for the administration of the EPBC Act. The Act implements that by authorising regulations to prescribe charges for "prescribed matters" connected with administering the EPBC Act, and by requiring ministerial satisfaction that charges are set to recover no more than likely Commonwealth costs. (Sections 7–8.)
Testing the official purpose against practical trade‑offs, incentives and risks
Who pays: The regulations will determine the liable persons or classes (s7). Practically, costs are likely to be borne by project proponents, approval or exemption holders, applicants, or other regulated actors — concentrated payers with identifiable transactions. (s7, s8.)
Who decides and discretion: The Act gives broad rule‑making discretion to the Governor‑General (in practice, the executive) to set charges by regulation; the Minister must be satisfied about the cost‑recovery level before making a regulation (s8(2)). That creates administrative discretion over both the decision to charge and the charge design. The legislation does not mandate independent review of the Minister's satisfaction or detailed cost‑allocation rules in primary legislation. (s8(2), s10.)
Compliance and administrative burden: Because the regulations can set fixed fees or formulae (s8(1)), regulated entities will need to budget for a new set of charges and comply with payment and reporting rules that the regulations will specify. The Act itself does not set collection or enforcement mechanics; those will also appear in regulation.
Incentives and market effects: Charging for regulatory services internalises part of the Commonwealth's administrative cost to regulated parties. This increases the direct cost of seeking approvals or exemptions, which may change project economics and behaviour (e.g. fewer applications, or changes in project design to avoid chargeable triggers). The Act does not itself target environmental behaviour (that is done through the EPBC Act); it only changes the price of regulatory transactions. (s7–s8.)
Fiscal and constitutional risk: The Act defines the charges as "taxes" (s7(2)) and expressly limits them to amounts that are not duties of customs or excise (s7(4)). The distinction between a permissible charge and an impermissible excise tax has been the subject of litigation in Australian constitutional law; designing regulations that are vulnerable to a legal challenge (as effectively excise) is a known risk. The Minister's cost‑recovery test narrows scope but does not remove legal exposure. (s7(2), s7(4), s8(2).)
Transparency and estimation risk: The Act requires ministerial satisfaction about "likely costs" but leaves methodology, audit, and review of cost estimates to regulation or administrative practice. That raises implementation risk (under‑ or over‑recovery, or disputes about the basis for charges) unless the regulations or departmental practice adopt transparent costing and review processes. (s8(2).)
Distributional effects, exemptions and political economy: The regulations may exempt classes of persons (s9). That creates opportunities for targeted relief (for small operators, Indigenous bodies, public authorities, etc.) but also creates potential for political contestation over which groups receive exemptions. Exemptions concentrate benefits while costs are diffused across other regulated parties.
Interaction with other Bills in the package: This Act is narrow and procedural. It complements companion Acts that deal with restoration charges and customs/excise variants by creating the general statutory authority for regulation‑based charges related to EPBC administration. The Act does not itself create restoration funds, offsets, or account arrangements: those are provided for in companion legislation.
Practical takeaways (who pays, who decides, likely next steps)
The Executive (via regulations) will decide the detailed charge rules; the Minister must be satisfied the charge equals no more than likely Commonwealth costs. (s8(2), s10.)
Regulated parties under the EPBC Act should expect new regulatory charges once regulations are made; the scale and incidence will depend on the regulations (fixed fees vs formula), any exemptions, and administrative collection rules. (s7–s9.)
Constitutional and implementation risk remains because the Act treats the measures as taxes and excludes customs/excise, so charges must be framed carefully in regulation to avoid legal challenge. (s7(2), s7(4).)
Key statutory citations: sections 3–6 (application and limits), 7 (power to prescribe charges; charges are taxes; not customs/excise), 8 (amounts and ministerial cost‑recovery test), 9 (exemptions), 10 (regulations).
Main concepts
The central concept is cost recovery through general charges imposed as taxes under section 7, limited strictly to matters connected with EPBC Act administration and calibrated so that they recover no more than the Commonwealth's likely costs. The Act distinguishes these general charges from duties of customs and duties of excise to satisfy constitutional requirements, with the three companion imposition bills covering the remaining categories. Prescribed matters are those identified in regulations, allowing flexibility to cover services such as assessments, approvals, audits, rulings under new Part 19C, bioregional plan processes, and functions transferred to the Chief Executive Officer of the National Environmental Protection Agency. The Minister's satisfaction requirement in section 8 creates a legal precondition that must be met before regulations are made, providing a safeguard against over-recovery. Exemptions under section 9 allow targeted relief for particular persons or classes of persons. The Act's extra-territorial application and extension to external Territories ensure charges can apply to actions with an overseas component that still require EPBC Act approval. The prohibition on taxing State property under section 6 preserves federal constitutional boundaries. These concepts operate alongside the broader reforms in the package, including national environmental standards, unacceptable impacts provisions, net gain requirements, restoration contributions, and the establishment of Environment Information Australia. The charges framework supports the operational funding of the new statutory agency without relying on general appropriation, consistent with the Samuel Review's emphasis on improved governance and accountability.
Who it affects
The Act primarily affects proponents of actions that require assessment or approval under the EPBC Act, including companies in the mining, energy, infrastructure, housing and agricultural sectors that trigger matters of national environmental significance. It also affects persons seeking permits under Part 13, strategic assessments under Part 10, bioregional plan registrations, national interest exemptions, or Part 13 exemptions, all of which may attract prescribed charges once regulations are made. The National Environmental Protection Agency and its Chief Executive Officer will administer many of the functions for which charges may be imposed, including compliance audits, environmental audits, environment protection orders and rulings. State and territory governments and their agencies are bound by the Act when they engage with EPBC processes, although the Crown in right of the Commonwealth is not bound. External Territory administrations and persons undertaking actions outside Australia that still require EPBC approval fall within the extended operation. Regulated industries such as offshore petroleum operators under the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act, waste exporters under the Recycling and Waste Reduction Act, and ozone-depleting substance licence holders will be subject to charges for functions now performed by the NEPA CEO. Environmental organisations, community groups and individuals who participate in assessment processes are indirectly affected through any changes in application fees or cost structures. The regulations will specify the persons or classes liable to pay or exempt, so the precise incidence depends on future subordinate legislation.
What people will want to know
People will want to know when charges will actually apply. Operative provisions commence on proclamation or automatically after 12 months from royal assent on 1 December 2025, whichever occurs first. They will want to know the amount of any charge. Regulations must set the amount or the method of calculation, and the Minister must be satisfied it recovers no more than likely Commonwealth costs. They will want to know which matters will be prescribed. The Act itself does not list them, leaving this to regulations that can cover any aspect of EPBC administration, including new processes such as restoration contributions, bioregional plans and rulings. They will want to know whether exemptions exist. Regulations may exempt particular persons or classes, for example small business or certain public interest projects. They will want to know how charges interact with existing fees. The new charges sit alongside, and may replace or supplement, current cost recovery arrangements once the NEPA assumes functions. They will want to know constitutional protections. The Act expressly avoids imposing tax on State property and separates general charges from customs and excise duties. They will want to know enforcement mechanisms. Non-payment would be pursued through existing EPBC compliance and debt recovery provisions rather than new penalties created by this Act. They will want to know transparency requirements. The Minister's satisfaction that charges do not exceed costs must be demonstrable before regulations are made, although the Act does not mandate public disclosure of the underlying cost calculations.
Status and what happens next
The bill received royal assent on 1 December 2025 and is now the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Act 2025, Act No. 66 of 2025. It originated in the House of Representatives, passed both Houses on 27 November 2025 and was assented to four days later. Sections 1 and 2 are already in force. Sections 3 to 10 await proclamation or will commence automatically on 1 December 2026. The Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee reported on the broader package on 2 April 2026. The Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills considered the bill in Scrutiny Digest 7 of 2025. No proposed amendments were circulated during passage. The next practical steps are the drafting and making of regulations that prescribe the actual charges, the matters to which they apply, the liable persons and any exemptions. These regulations must be accompanied by the Minister's satisfaction that each charge recovers no more than likely costs. Once made, the charges will support the operational costs of the National Environmental Protection Agency established by the companion National Environmental Protection Agency Act 2025, which commences on 1 July 2026. The three related imposition Acts for restoration charges, customs charges and excise charges will similarly require regulations before charges can be levied. An electronic version of the Act is available on the Federal Register of Legislation.
Powers, duties and rights created
The Act creates a power in the Governor-General to make regulations prescribing charges, the matters to which they relate, methods of calculation, and exemptions. Section 8 imposes a duty on the Minister to be satisfied, before recommending any regulation, that the charge recovers no more than the Commonwealth's likely costs in connection with the matter. This duty is a precondition to the valid exercise of the regulation-making power. The Act confers no new rights on individuals or corporations; instead it creates potential liabilities to pay charges once regulations are made. It preserves existing constitutional protections by not binding the Commonwealth Crown and by exempting State property from taxation. The extra-territorial and external Territory extension provisions expand the geographic reach of any future charges without creating new substantive rights. The Act does not confer inspection, audit or enforcement powers; those remain in the EPBC Act and the nine other environmental laws amended by Schedule 2 of the Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025. The regulations may identify classes of persons exempt from charges, thereby creating a limited right to exemption where the regulatory criteria are met. No new review or appeal rights are created by the Act itself.
Money, penalties and enforcement
Charges imposed under section 7 are taxes collected by the Commonwealth. The Act does not establish a special account or direct the destination of revenue; any amounts collected would be dealt with under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 or specific provisions in the broader reform package, such as the Restoration Contributions Special Account created for restoration charges. The Act contains no criminal or civil penalties for non-payment. Enforcement of charge liabilities would rely on general Commonwealth debt recovery mechanisms and any relevant provisions in the EPBC Act or the legislation under which the underlying matter arises. Section 8's cost-recovery cap is the principal control on the quantum of revenue that can be raised. Exemptions created by regulation under section 9 reduce the revenue base for prescribed classes of persons. Because the charges are limited to cost recovery and must be supported by the Minister's satisfaction, the framework is designed to avoid generating surplus revenue. The companion restoration charge bill links payments directly to environmental outcomes through the Restorations Contribution Holder, but the general charges bill has no equivalent earmarking provision in the official materials.
Pressure points and controversies
A key policy trade-off lies in balancing full cost recovery against the risk that charges deter proponents from seeking approvals or investing in projects that deliver environmental or economic benefits. The requirement that charges recover no more than likely costs provides a legal ceiling, yet the breadth of matters that may be prescribed leaves open the possibility that cumulative charges across multiple EPBC processes could become significant. Another trade-off concerns constitutional compliance. By separating general charges from customs and excise duties and expressly protecting State property, the Act avoids section 55 and section 114 challenges, but any future regulation that inadvertently crosses those boundaries could be vulnerable. The absence of mandatory public disclosure of the cost calculations supporting the Minister's satisfaction creates a transparency trade-off between administrative efficiency and public accountability. Because the Act is part of a larger reform package that introduces national environmental standards, unacceptable impacts and net gain requirements, stakeholders may view charges as an additional layer of financial obligation at the same time as substantive decision-making rules are tightened. The official materials records general stakeholder concerns about whether the overall reforms reduce or increase regulatory burden, and this charges framework sits at the intersection of those concerns. The 12-month default commencement period allows time for consultation on regulations but also creates uncertainty for project planning until the regulations are made.
What changes if it passes
Once the operative provisions commence, the Commonwealth gains a flexible statutory power to impose general charges for any prescribed matter connected with EPBC Act administration, provided the Minister is satisfied the charges do not exceed likely costs. This changes the funding model for functions now performed or to be performed by the National Environmental Protection Agency, including assessments, audits, rulings, bioregional planning and compliance activities under nine environmental statutes. Proponents will face new potential liabilities once regulations prescribe charges for specific processes, although existing fee structures may be rationalised or replaced. The constitutional separation of general charges from customs and excise duties is formalised, reducing legal risk for the overall cost-recovery architecture. Exemptions can be tailored by regulation, allowing policy adjustments without further primary legislation. The framework supports the operational independence of the new NEPA by providing a dedicated revenue stream tied to the services it delivers. Because the Act binds State and Territory Crowns but not the Commonwealth, intergovernmental cost-recovery arrangements may need to be reviewed. The extra-territorial reach ensures that overseas elements of actions requiring EPBC approval can be brought within the charging regime. Overall, the Act completes the legislative architecture for cost recovery across the reform package, enabling the government to implement the Samuel Review's governance recommendations without ongoing reliance on general revenue for day-to-day administration.
Social post angles
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025: what changes if it passes. A plain-English angle on the powers, duties and institutions the bill would create or change.
The practical question in this royal assent bill. Focus on who would need to act differently if Parliament passes it.
What the bill actually says, not the political noise. Pull out the main operational changes and point readers back to the clauses.
The compliance angle. Explain which agencies, regulated entities or decision-makers would carry new obligations.
The next-step angle. Use the bill's current status to explain what still has to happen before the changes become law.
Why this bill is worth watching. Tie the hook to: The bill received royal assent on 1 December 2025 and became Act No. 66 of 2025.
Bills Digest
Notes
Referred to Committee (30/10/2025): Environment and Communications Legislation Committee; Committee report (02/04/2026)
Considered by scrutiny committee (05/11/2025): Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills; Scrutiny Digest 7 of 2025
An electronic version of this Act is available on the Federal Register of Legislation (www.legislation.gov.au)
This package of 7 Bills implements the second and now final stage of the Albanese Government’s response to the second independent statutory review of the EPBC Act (Samuel Review).
The Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025 amends the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and 11 other Acts to implement substantive reforms. These include national environmental standards, ‘unacceptable impacts’, ‘net gain’ and restoration charges in lieu of environmental offsets, reforms to the national interest exemption and a new ‘national interest proposal’, streamlining reforms to approvals and accreditation pathways, reforms of the nuclear actions trigger, improved compliance and enforcement powers, and increases in criminal penalties and civil penalties.
The National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025 establishes a statutory agency to be known as the National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA). The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is given functions and powers under 9 environmental laws. The Minister may also delegate additional functions and powers to the CEO under the EPBC Act.
The Environment Information Australia Bill 2025 establishes the SES position of Head of Environment Information Australia (EIA) within the department and sets out the Head’s functions.
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Restoration Charge Imposition) Bill 2025 establishes a framework to enable the imposition of restoration charges in lieu of a proponent establishing environmental offsets.
Three additional Bills provide for regulations to prescribe general charges, customs charges and excise charges, as necessary for cost recovery purposes.
In the lead up to the introduction of the Bills, stakeholders have variously raised significant concerns about whether the proposed reforms will actually protect the environment or will reduce and/or remove ‘red and green tape’ for business.
The Bills have been referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications for inquiry and report by 24 March 2026.
Introductory Info
Date of introduction: 30 October 2025
House introduced in: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water
Commencement: the Bills or specific schedules of the Bills commence as set out below:
Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025:
Sections 1 to 3
On Royal Assent.
Schedule 1, Parts 1 and 2 other than item 571
On the earlier of proclamation or 12 months after Royal Assent.
Schedule 1, item 571
Schedule 1, Part 3
On the day after Royal Assent.
Schedule 2, Part 1
Schedule 2, Part 3
Schedule 3
At the same time as the National Environment Protection Agency Act 2025, but does not commence if that Act does not commence.
Schedule 2, Part 2
On the later of (a) the same time as National Environment Protection Agency Act 2025and (b) the time item 35 of Schedule 1 to the Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Act 2023 commences; the provisions do not commence if the provisions in (b) do not commence.
National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025: 1 July 2026.
Environment Information Australia Bill 2025: At the same time as the National Environmental Protection Agency Act 2025, but does not commence if that Act does not commence.
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Restoration Charge Imposition) Bill 2025: sections 1 and 2 commence the day after Royal Assent; sections 3 to 18 commence on the earlier of proclamation or 12 months after Royal Assent.
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Customs Charges Imposition) Bill 2025 and Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Excise Charges Imposition) Bill 2025: sections 1 and 2 commence the day after Royal Assent; sections 3 to 10 commence on the earlier of proclamation or 12 months after Royal Assent.
This is a preliminary Bills Digest produced to assist early consideration of the Bill. It provides some background and links to relevant resources. It will be replaced with a more comprehensive Bills Digest in due course.
Purpose of the Bills
This package of 7 Bills implement the second and now final stage of the Albanese Government’s response to the second independent statutory review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) (formerly referred to as the Nature Positive Plan).
Background to the EPBC Act and EPBC Act reforms is provided in the following Parliamentary Library publications:
Sophie Power, ‘Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: a quick guide’, Research paper series, 2018-19, (Canberra: Parliamentary Library, May 2019)
Dr Emily Gibson, ‘Reform of Australia’s national environmental law’, in Parliamentary Library Briefing Book: Key issues for the 47th Parliament, (Canberra: Parliamentary Library, June 2022)
Dr Emily Gibson, ‘Reforming Australia’s national environmental law: an overview of the government’s response to the Samuel Review’, Research paper series, 2023-24, (Canberra: Parliamentary Library, November 2023)
Dr Emily Gibson, ‘Nature Positive Reforms - April 2024 update’, Flagpost, (Canberra: Parliamentary Library, 3 May 2024)
Dr Emily Gibson, ‘Nature Positive (Environment Protection Australia) Bill 2024 [and related Bills]’, Bills Digest, No. 75, 2023-24, (Canberra: Parliamentary Library, 24 June 2024).
The Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications’ report from its inquiry into the 3 Nature Positive Bills introduced in May 2024 as part of the ‘second stage’ of the Nature Positive reforms also provides helpful analysis and information on stakeholder views.
Structure of the Bills
Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025
The Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025 (Reform Bill) implements a significant number of substantive reforms to the EPBC Act. It also amends 8 environmental laws to allow the CEO of the National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA) to exercise a range of functions and powers. The Bill has 3 Schedules.
Schedule 1,General amendments
Note: there are a significant number of amendments, and this list is not comprehensive.
Part 1:
allows the Minister to make, vary and revoke national environmental standards, as legislative instruments, and inserts new provisions to require that approvals and certain other instruments are not inconsistent with the national environmental standard (new Part 19B (item 571).
inserts a new definition of unacceptable impacts on protected matters (new section 527F) and amends or inserts new provisions requiring that actions or classes of actions not be approved (including when approved under other instruments) if the action would have an unacceptable impact.
inserts a new definition of ‘net gain test’ (new sections 527J and 527K) and inserts new provisions requiring that approved actions (and actions authorised under certain instruments) pass the net gain test; that is, that restoration actions taken to address the residual significant impacts of a controlled action achieve a ‘net gain’ environmental outcome.
introduces a new framework for delivering restoration actions (formerly environmental offsets), comprising a Restorations Contributions Holder (an SES employee of the department), a Restoration Actions Advisory Committee, and Restoration Contributions Special Account (new Part 12B; item 323). Proponents may be able to pay a restoration contribution charge to be invested by the Restorations Contribution Holder to achieve environmental outcomes.
introduces national interest proposals (new Division 2A of Part 11; item 291), allowing the Minister, on their own initiative or the proponent’s application, to enable the Minister to approve an action even if it had unacceptable impacts, was not consistent with national environmental standards, and did not meet the net gain test.
repeals and replaces the national interest exemption (new Division 3 of Part 11; item 292), allowing the Minister to, on their own initiative or on an application from or on behalf of a proponent (including a Commonwealth, state or territory Minister) exempt a proposed action from the application of Part 3 (requirements for environmental approvals) or Chapter 4 (environmental assessments and approvals) of the EPBC Act ‘in the national interest’.
introduce a new requirement for a proponent to provide information about the greenhouse gas emissions for the action at the assessment stage (new section 84A; item 191), with key matters to be provided in regulation, and for the Minister to be satisfied that certain arrangements provide for the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions information.
amends Part 8 (assessing impacts of controlled actions) to introduce streamlined assessment pathways; the available assessment pathways would be an accredited assessment process, a streamlined assessment, an environmental impact statement or a public inquiry. The amendments also introduce new Subdivision C in Division 3 of Part 8, which allows the Minister to revoke an assessment determination and make a substituted assessment determination.
amends various provisions to clarify requirements for requests for further information and how time is counted.
amends provisions in Part 10 relating to strategic assessments with the aim of improving processes such as allowing for revocation, variation or the addition of conditions of a Part 10 approval, and for the transfer, variation and surrender of Part 10 approvals. The Minister would not be able to approve the taking of an action or class of actions under a Part 10 approval unless satisfied of specified matters such as prescribed national environmental standards and that actions would not have unacceptable impacts (new sections 146FA to 146FC).
amends or repeals and replaces provisions in Chapter 3 relating to bilateral agreements, including by allowing states and territories to approve actions under an accredited management or authorisation framework if the Minister is satisfied that the framework is not inconsistent with specified matters (such as national environmental standards and net gain provisions) and that action would not have unacceptable impacts. The amendments make corresponding amendments to provisions allowing states and territories to assess actions under an accredited framework. Bilateral agreements would be of no effect unless the relevant state or territory has provided mandatory undertakings (new sections 48A, 48B and 48C). The amendments provide for suspension, revocation and review of a bilateral agreement and for an exclusion determination such that the agreement would not apply to actions in a class of action.
amends Division 3 of Part 7 relating to reconsiderations by introducing a 28-day time limit on when a person other than a designated proponent can request reconsideration of a decision that an action is (or is not) a controlled action under subsection 75(1) (new subsection 78A(1A)) and inserting new section 79A allowing a person to request reconsideration of a decision that an action is not a controlled action if taken in a particular manner. The amendments also clarify the standard of information that must be provided. The Minister would be able to issue a determination allowing a proponent affected by a reconsideration decision to continue the action until the Minister makes a final reconsideration decision.
inserts new Part 19C (item 572) to allow the Minister and CEO of the NEPA to publish ‘rulings’, as written instruments, which set out the Minister or CEO’s opinion on the ‘way in which provisions of environmental law should apply in relation to persons, activities and other matters’.
repeals and replaces existing provisions relating to bioregional plans to allow the Minister to make bioregional guidance plans (new sections 176 to 176E) and inserts new Part 12A (item 323) allowing the Minister to make bioregional plans. Both will be written instruments (not legislative instruments). A bioregional plan must specify development zones in which one or more classes of action (a priority class of action) may be taken, conservation zones in which one or more classes of action (restricted action) may not be taken, and bioregional restoration measures. The Minister would be able to vary, suspend or revoke a bioregional plan, and to grant exemptions for restricted actions in exceptional circumstances and in the national interest.
amends subsection 29(1) to allow state and territories to approve controlled actions relating to the ‘water trigger’ under a bilaterally accredited management arrangement or authorisation process (item 77)
renames the nuclear action trigger the ‘radiological exposure action’ trigger and clarifies its application to certain mining activities (see new definition, item 36)
repeals and replaces Subdivision A of Division 4 of Part 11 (‘special environmental assessment process’ (section 160)) (item 299) and makes consequential amendments to Part 3 of the EPBC Act and to the Airports Act 1996, Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Act 1981, Hazardous Waste (Regulation of Exports and Imports) Act 1989, Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989 so that proposed actions are assessed by the standard assessment and approval pathways.
amends conservation planning and heritage provisions to:
update requirements for recovery plans for listed threatened species or listed threatened ecological communities, for listed key threatening processes and threat abatement plans, was well as for National Heritage and Commonwealth Heritage listing
introduce a new definition of critical habitat (new subsection 207A(4))
introduce new ‘protection statements’ for listed threatened species and listed threatened ecological communities (new Subdivision BA of Division 5 of Part 13, at item 431); the purpose of the protection statement is to translate ‘the scientific information in recovery plans and approved conservation advices into language and requirements that are able to be more easily applied to regulatory decisions’ (p. 409). A protection statement would be the primary conservation planning document, which the Minister would be required to not act inconsistently with, and would be required to have regard to, when making a relevant decision or approving a particular instrument or arrangement (‘turning off’ recovery plans and approved conservation advice (p. 75)).
repeals and replaces Division 12 (environmental audits) of Part 17 (enforcement) to allow the CEO of the NEPA to direct or require 2 different types of audits - a directed environmental audit and a compliance audit, and to require the CEO of the NEPA to establish a register or auditors (item 550).
The amendments in Division 12 of Part 17 to are substantially similar to the amendments in Part 1 of Schedule 11 of the Nature Positive (Environmental Law Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2024 (2024 Amendment Bill) (with the addition of a provision allowing the CEO of the NEPA to impose conditions on registration of an auditor).
inserts new Division 13A of Part 17 allowing the CEO to issue environment protection orders.
The amendments in Division 13A of Part 17 to are substantially similar to the amendments in Part 1 of Schedule 11 of the 2024 Amendment Bill (with the addition of a power to issue an order in relation to a contravention of an environmental exemption).
amends the Nature Repair Act 2023 to repeal the prohibition on the use of biodiversity certificates for an environmental offsetting purpose and to allow methodology determinations made under that Act to specify whether or not a biodiversity certificate can be used for an environmental offsetting purpose (items 625 to 627).
amends the EPBC Act (new Division 2A of Part 4, at item 114) and the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 (OPGGS Act; items 628 to 635) to provide that actions covered by a NOPSEMA management or authorisation framework (i.e. under the OPGGS Act and associated regulations) do not require approval under Part 9 of the EPBC Act. The Minister would be able to declare, in writing, the specified class of actions that are covered by this arrangement and may only do so if satisfied that the framework is not inconsistent with specified matters such as prescribed national environmental standards and that actions would not have unacceptable impacts. NOPSEMA would be required to report annually on how the framework complies with any relevant conditions. This would in effect replace the approved strategic assessment under Part 10 of the EPBC Act.
Part 2:
Division 1 amends the EPBC Act to increase criminal penalties in Part 3 of the Act (taking an action without an approval)
Division 2 amends the EPBC Act to increase civil penalties and introduce a new civil penalty formula for civil penalty provisions in Part 3 and subsection 142(1).
The amendments in Part 2 to are identical to the amendments in Part 2 of Schedule 11 of the 2024 Amendment Bill (noting there are new civil penalty provisions in new Part 12A-Bioregional plans).
Part 3: sets out application and transitional provisions which prescribe how amendments apply to particular circumstances.
Schedule 2,Consequential amendments and transitional provisions for the National Environment Protection Agency Act 2025
Part 1:
Items 1 to 187 amend the EPBC Act to replace select references to the Minister, and the Secretary of the department, with the CEO of the NEPA, including to allow the CEO to issue evidentiary certificates under Part 3, grant or refuse to grant permits under Part 13 and undertake compliance and enforcement activities under Parts 17, 18 and Schedule 1 of the Act. It also inserts proposed section 515AAA (item 155) to allow the Minister to delegate some or all of the Minister’s powers and functions to the CEO or a member of the staff of the NEPA (other than powers and functions in new subsection 515(1A), at item 574 of Schedule 1), and to allow the Secretary to similarly delegate some or all of the Secretary’s powers and functions to the CEO or a member of staff of the NEPA. It also requires that a public register of instruments of delegations is established (item 157).
Items 188 to 216 amend the Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Act 1981 to replace select references to the Minister with the CEO to allow the CEO to grant (or refuse to grant) permits, vary, suspend, revoke or cancel permits, appoint inspectors and analysts, and issue evidentiary certificates.
Items 217 to 290 amends the Hazardous Waste (Regulation of Exports and Imports Act 1989 to replace select references to the Minister with the CEO, to allow the CEO to grant (or refuse to grant) permits, vary, suspend or revoke permits, issue certain orders, appoint inspectors, and exercise regulatory powers.
Items 291 and 292 amend the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas (Import Levy) Act 1995 to replace select references to the Minister with the CEO, for example to allow the CEO to grant exemptions from levies, and to make consequential repeals.
Items 293 to 364 amend the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989 to replace select references to the Minister and Secretary with the CEO and make related consequential amendments. It would allow the CEO to grant (or refuse to grant) licences, vary, suspend or cancel licences, appoint inspectors, exercise regulatory powers, and deal with seized and forfeited goods.
Items 365 and 366 amend the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas (Manufacture Levy) Act 1995 to replace select references to the Minister with the CEO, for example to allow the CEO to grant exemptions from levies, and to make consequential repeals.
Items 367 to 387 amend the Product Emissions Standards Act 2017 to replace select references to the Minister and Secretary with the CEO and to make related consequential amendments. It would allow the CEO to determine if a product complies with an emissions reduction standard, grant exemptions from compliance, appoint inspectors, exercise regulatory powers, and deal with seized and forfeited goods.
Items 388 to 590 amend the Recycling and Waste Reduction Act 2020 to replace select references to the Minister and Secretary with the CEO. It would allow the CEO to grant (or refuse to grant) export licences, vary, suspend or cancel export licences, appoint authorised officers, and exercise regulatory powers. The Schedule would also allow the CEO to approve new co-regulatory product stewardship arrangements, and to issue improvement notices to underperforming co-regulatory product stewardship arrangements.
Items 591 to 598 amends the Underwater Cultural Heritage Act 2018 to replace select references to the Minister and Secretary with the CEO and inserts proposed section 54A to allow the Minister to share information with the CEO. It would allow the CEO to exercise regulatory powers, deal with forfeited vessels, equipment or articles, and appoint inspectors.
Part 2: provides a contingent amendment to the Sea Dumping Act.
Part 3: provides transitional provisions relating to the formation of the NEPA, including for the transfer of documents and records and the application of an Enterprise Agreement to APS staff of the NEPA.
Items 1 to 187 in Part 1 are substantially similar to Schedule 2 of the 2024 Amendment Bill.
Items 188 to 598 in Part 1 and Parts 2 and 3 are substantially similar to Schedules 1 and 3 to 10 of 2024 Amendment Bill.
Schedule 3,Consequential amendments and transitional provisions for the Head of Environment Information Australia
Part 1: amends Part 21 (reporting) of the EPBC Act as a consequence of responsibility for preparation of State of the Environment reports transferring to the Head of Environment Information Australia (HEIA).
Part 2: provides transitional provisions which specify the time that the HEIA would be required to prepare and publish its first State of the Environment report (no later than 15 December 2028) and first statement of national environmental economic accounts; it also clarifies that the national environmental goals for the first State of the Environment report are those publicly available environmental targets identified and notified by the Minister.
National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025
The National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025 establishes a statutory agency to be known as the National Environmental Protection Australia (NEPA), which is to be led by a Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The Bill contains provisions relating to the governance and operation of the CEO and NEPA. The CEO is given functions and powers under 9 environmental laws, as provided for by amendments made by Schedule 2 of the Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025.
The Bill is substantially similar to the Nature Positive (Environment Protection Australia) Bill 2024. The principal differences are:
NEPA will also be responsible for monitoring and auditing the operation of certain declarations, bilateral agreements and bioregional plans under the EPBC Act
the CEO of NEPA will not be permitted to delegate a power or function under new Part 19C (rulings) of the EPBC Act.
The Minister would be able to designate the CEO as the designated report writer for recommendation reports under certain new assessment pathways (new section 84B; Reform Bill).
Environment Information Australia Bill 2025
The Environment Information Australia Bill 2025 establishes the SES position of Head of Environment Information Australia (HEIA) within the department. The Bill sets out the functions of the Head of the EIA (HEIA) which are to prepare and publish the State of the Environment report, establish and maintain environmental economic accounts, and declare national environmental information assets.
The Bill is substantially similar to the Nature Positive (Environment Information Australia) Bill 2024. The principal difference is that references to nature positive and the associated monitoring, evaluation and reporting framework for determining whether nature positive is being achieved in Australia are removed.
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Restoration Charge Imposition) Bill 2025
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Restoration Charge Imposition) Bill 2025 would enable a restoration contribution charge, bioregional plan registration charge, national interest exemption charge and Part 13 exemption charge to be imposed if specified as a condition of an approval or exemption granted under the relevant provisions of the EPBC Act. A restoration contribution charge could be imposed as a condition of a standard approval or in relation to an approved strategic assessment under Part 10 of the Act.
The charge is intended to enable the approval or exemption holder ‘to discharge their liability to compensate for the damage likely to be caused by the residual significant impacts of their proposed action’ by paying the charge to the Commonwealth to compensate ‘for any such damage to a net gain’ (p. 5). The charge would be imposed in lieu of the approval or exemption holder being required to provide environmental offsets.
The charge would be determined by the regulations, with the Explanatory Memorandum indicating that this would either be a prescribed flat rate for the bioregional plan registration charge, national interest exemption charge or Part 13 exemption charge, or prescribing a method to work out the charge (pp. 2-3). The regulations would prescribe the persons or classes of persons who are liable for the charges or are exempt from the charges.
The charge would be credited to the proposed new Restoration Contributions Special Account and the proposed new Restorations Contribution Holder would be able to use the monies to ‘deliver benefits for matters of national environmental significance’, such as delivering restoration actions (p. 2).
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025 enables regulations to prescribe general charges in relation to prescribed matters connected with the EPBC Act. The charges are intended to be limited to those ‘necessary for cost recovery purposes’ (p. 1).
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Customs Charges Imposition) Bill 2025
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Customs Charges Imposition) Bill 2025 enables regulations to prescribe customs charges in relation to prescribed matters connected with the EPBC Act. The charges are intended to be limited to those ‘necessary for cost recovery purposes’ (p. 1).
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Excise Charges Imposition) Bill 2025
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Excise Charges Imposition) Bill 2025 enables regulations to prescribe excise charges in relation to prescribed matters connected with the EPBC Act. The charges are intended to be limited to those ‘necessary for cost recovery purposes’ (p. 1).
Background
Brief overview of the EPBC Act
The EPBC Act is the primary Commonwealth environmental law and is administered by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW; the department). The Act implements key aspects of the 1992 Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment and the 1997 Heads of Agreement on Commonwealth and State Roles and Responsibilities for the Environment, and consolidates 5 Commonwealth laws relating to environmental impact assessment, national parks, world heritage, and endangered species.
The Act establishes 9 ‘matters of national environmental significance’ (MNES) (protected matters), largely drawn from Australia’s international obligations under a range of environment and heritage treaties, and also provides for the protection of the environment on Commonwealth land. The Act sets out 2 regimes:
an environmental impact assessment and approval regime for actions by any person that are likely to have a significant impact on protected matters, actions by Commonwealth agencies that are likely to have a significant impact on the environment, and actions by any person likely to have a significant impact on the environment on Commonwealth land (Parts 3 to 11)
a regime for biodiversity conservation (for example, processes for listing and managing threatened species and ecological communities), protected areas (for example, National and Commonwealth Heritage places, Commonwealth reserves), and regulation of the trade in wildlife (Parts 11A to 15B).
The Act also:
establishes a range of advisory, expert and management bodies, namely the Threatened Species Scientific Committee, the Director of National Parks, and the Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Unconventional Gas Development and Large Coal Mining Development
sets out compliance and enforcement provisions
provides for review of decisions, including extended standing for judicial review
provides for annual reports and 5-yearly state of the environment reports
sets out interpretive provisions, including key definitions.
The Act mandates 10-yearly independent statutory reviews of the Act’s operation and the extent to which its objects have been achieved (section 522A).
Need for reform
The reforms are being introduced in response to the second independent statutory review of the EPBC Act (Samuel Review). The statutory review was initiated in October 2019 and was led by Professor Graeme Samuel, with the support of an expert panel comprising Bruce Martin, Dr Wendy Craik, Dr Erica Smyth and Professor Andrew Macintosh.
The Samuel Review, having observed that ‘Australia’s natural environment and iconic places are in an overall state of decline and under increasing threat’ (p. ii), concluded (p. ii):
The EPBC Act is out dated and requires fundamental reform. It does not enable the Commonwealth to effectively fulfill its environmental management responsibilities to protect nationally important matters. The Act, and the way it is implemented, results in piecemeal decisions, which rarely work in concert with the environmental management responsibilities of the States and Territories. The Act is a barrier to holistic environmental management which, given the nature of Australia’s federation, is essential for success. [emphasis added]
The Final report made 38 recommendations for improving the operation and effectiveness of the Act as part of a staged pathway of reform (p. ii):
The reforms … are designed to enable the Commonwealth to step up its efforts to deliver nationally important outcomes for the environment by:
setting clear outcomes through new, legally enforceable National Environmental Standards that set the boundaries for decision-making to deliver the protections needed
actively restoring the environment and facilitating the scale of investment needed to deliver better outcomes
taking an adaptive approach, through better planning, measuring the effectiveness of implementation and adjusting where needed to achieve outcomes
harnessing the knowledge of Indigenous Australians to better inform how the environment is managed.
Early in the 47th Parliament, the then Minister for the Environment Tanya Plibersek released the Albanese Government’s response to the review, Nature Positive Plan: Better for the environment, better for business. Among the range of reforms, the Minister promised legislation built ‘on three basic principles: clear national standards of environmental protection, improving and speeding up decisions, and building trust and integrity’ and an independent Environment Protection Agency.
The Minister subsequently split the reforms into 3 stages and, having achieved stage 1, introduced a suite of Bills in May 2024 to implement the stage 2 reforms. The Minister is reported to have negotiated amendments with the Australian Greens and Independent Senator David Pocock to secure passage of the Bills through the Senate; however, in the face of lobbying from industry and an upcoming election, the Prime Minister reportedly intervened, and the Bills were withdrawn in February 2025.
At the beginning of the 48th Parliament, the newly-appointed Minister for the Environment Senator Murray Watt described reform of the EPBC Act as ‘a very high and immediate priority for the government’. The reforms been repositioned as central to improving national productivity and facilitating Australia’s transition to a decarbonised economy.
For example, in August 2025, the Productivity Commission’s interim report Investing in cheaper, cleaner energy and the net zero transformation recommended (p. 37):
Reform national environment laws
The Australian Government should reform environment laws to expedite approvals for clean energy projects and better protect the environment. The reforms should:
introduce national environmental standards
facilitate regional planning, particularly within renewable energy zones, with stricter statutory deadlines for assessing projects in ‘go zones’
provide accessible, high-quality information about the environment and past assessment decisions
make offsetting arrangements more efficient, such as by enabling developers to meet their offset obligations by contributing to an Australian Government offsets fund
set clear expectations about engagement with local communities and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Following the government’s August 2025 Economic Reform Roundtable, Minister Watt announced that the reform timetable would be accelerated, and would focus on implementing the three core principles of the Samuel Review: ‘stronger environmental protection and restoration, more efficient and robust project assessments and greater accountability and transparency in decision-making’.
The Minister has pointed to departmental analysis that determined that speeding up the consideration of projects and their approval would save the ‘business community and the national economy… at least half a billion dollars and potentially up to $7 billion in savings to the national economy’ (p. 3).
Policy position of non-government parties / independents
Australian Greens
The Australian Greens have long called for significant changes to the EPBC Act to ensure the Act actually protects the environment, considers climate impacts of actions, and operates efficiently. The Australian Greens spokesperson for the Environment, Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, recently outlined key areas of concern:
Environment laws that protect nature must include:
protection of critical habitat and forests
stop species extinction
a climate trigger
federal control over approvals.
Senator Hanson-Young has previously indicated that there ‘was “no prospect” of a deal on passage of the legislation unless Labor committed to a plan to end native forest logging’.
Following an October 2025 briefing on draft legislation, Senator Hanson-Young described the proposed laws as ‘not worth the paper they’re printed on’. The Senator said:
This bill has been drafted with the interests of mining industry front and centre. It weakens environmental protection. It will take us backwards and is worse than the status quo.
Coalition
The Liberal-National Coalition has been highly critical of the Albanese Government’s Nature Positive Plan. Reflecting previous ‘one stop shop’ policies, the Coalition has argued in favour of measures that streamline approvals processes and remove duplication with state and territory assessment and approval processes. It has described the establishment of the EPA as an ‘added layer of bureaucracy that is the last thing our economy and environment needs’.
Following an October 2025 briefing on draft legislation, Leader of the Opposition Sussan Ley described the proposed amendments as ‘a red light to jobs and … a handbrake to investment and development’ (p. 3). Ms Ley reportedly wrote to the Prime Minister seeking that the reforms be split into ‘“practical” measures to speed up assessment times for projects’ and deal with the ‘more contentious environmental elements’ of the reforms later.
The new Shadow Minister for the Environment, Angie Bell, has indicated a willingness to work with Labor in good faith negotiations, saying:
We want to make sure that we strike a balance between conserving our environment but also making sure there is certainty for industry moving forward and investment and jobs in our country.
More recently, Ms Bell:
…called on the government to immediately regulate ‘unacceptable impacts’, provide certainty on the definition of ‘net gain’ whiles removing scope one and two emissions reporting and cleaning up Labor’s “sad excuse” of an Environmental Protection Authority (EPA).
Ms Bell also called for the proposed ‘unacceptable impacts’ provisions to be moved into an environmental standard, greater clarification on key definitions (such as ‘net gain’), and for the CEO of the EPA to instead be made accountable to (and dismissible by) the Minister, with an official statement of expectations, and subject to a binding direction of the Minister.
The Deputy Leader of the Nationals Kevin Hogan has indicated reservations with the proposed legislation, including a requirement that proponents of major projects disclose their carbon emissions and the application of national environmental standards to regional forest agreements. He said ‘we think this will make it harder for industry to produce economic income for this country’ (p. 1).
Independent members and senators
Numerous independent members of the Parliament have campaigned for improvements to the EPBC Act, principally by incorporating a ‘climate trigger’ and removing the exemption for native forest logging under regional forest agreements.
Senator David Pocock and Senator Lidia Thorpe, along with the Australian Greens, are reported to want EPBC Act ‘to assess land clearing to try to stop native forest logging, climate considerations included in environmental assessments and decision-making, and a greater inclusion of Indigenous knowledge in environmental governance and decision-making’.
Independent MP Zali Steggall has expressed deep concern about attempts to rush legislation through the Parliament, stating ‘while reform is urgently needed, Australians expect such monumental legislation to undergo proper and meaningful parliamentary scrutiny before being passed’. As well as calling for the ‘deforestation loophole’ to be closed, Ms Steggall has foreshadowed amendments that would require the Environment Minister to take into account the following when deciding whether to grant an approval:
the economic costs and benefits an affected ecosystems would deliver if the damage from development did not occur, compared to the costs and benefits of the development
risks to the climate of the proposed development.
Stakeholder response to the Bills
The following table provides links to key stakeholder statements - both during the weeks prior to the introduction of the Bills and immediately following their introduction.
Stakeholder(s)
Statement
Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF)
ACF’s position on national nature law reform
ACF responds to Labor’s Environment Protection Agency announcement
ACF warns weak nature laws risk repeating decades of destruction
ACF
Greenpeace
WWF Australia
Environment groups welcome new enforcement powers and increases in penalties for nature laws
Climate Council
EPBC: How Australia’s national environmental law measures up on climate
Humane World for Animals
EPBC Act reforms must prevent bad decision-making, put nature first
Greenpeace
Nature law reform can’t be “big rubber stamp for the big end of town”: Greenpeace
Invasive Species Council
EPBC Act: Reforms to address threats to nature
Central Land Council
Tiwi Land Council
Northern Land Council
Anindilyakwa Land Council
Environmental law reform must safeguard future of remote communities
Environmental Defenders Office
Long-awaited EPBC reforms fall short of fixing a failing Act - Environmental Defenders Office
National Farmers Federation
Farmers urge balance and practicality in EPBC overhaul
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Environmental laws must get the balance right
Australian Industry Group
Environment reform is a decent balance and a strong improvement
Business Council of Australia (BCA)
Business Council welcomes Government’s decision to fast-track EPBC reform
Business Council says environmental approvals reform needed but warms key changes are critical to success
Housing Industry Association
Time to stop playing politics and fast track overdue EPBC reforms
Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC)
Reforms to EPBC Act are on track after WA and Federal Governments reach agreement
Vital step forward for environmental approvals but some clarity still needed
Australian Energy Producers
EPBC reforms an opportunity to fix Australia’s broken environmental laws
Minerals Council of Australia
EPBC reform must deliver outcomes for communities, environment and economy
Work needed to ensure environmental laws succeed
Other relevant expert commentary includes:
Justine Bell-James, ‘Labor’s environmental law overhaul: a little progress and a lot of compromise’, The Conversation, 30 October 2025
Justine Bell-James, Martine Maron, Phillipa C McCormack and James EM Watson, ‘Groundhog Day: The EPBC Act reform process’, Environment and Planning Law Journal, 41 (2025): 19-40
Atticus Fleming and Andrew Macintosh, ‘Biodiversity is in catastrophic decline. Here are three ways to ensure Australia’s conservation law actually works’, The Guardian, 28 October 2025
Ken Henry (Chair of the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation), Speech to the National Press Club: Our last, best change - national environmental laws to restore nature and power the net zero economy, Canberra, 16 July 2025
Phillipa C. McCormack, ‘Ken Henry urges nature law reform after decades of “intergenerational bastardry”’, The Conversation, 16 July 2025
Frances Medlock and Rachael Chick, ‘One step forward, two steps back - EPA, EIA and the long awaited reformed to Australia’s environmental laws’, Environment and Planning Law Journal, 41 (2025): 19-40 (authors employed by Environmental Defenders Office)
Euan Ritchie, Phillipa C. McCormack and Yung En Chee, ‘Labor is close to a deal on environmental law reforms. There are troubling signs these will fall short’, The Conversation, 10 October 2025.
Appendix
A brief history of efforts to reform the EPBC Act
Date
Description
12 November 1998
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Bill 1998 [1999] introduced. It passed both Houses on 29 June 1999 and substantive provisions commenced on 16 July 2000.
31 October 2008
First independent statutory review of the EPBC Act (Hawke Review), commissioned by the then Minister for the Environment Peter Garrett, commences. The review is led by Dr Allan Hawke, with the support of an expert panel comprising Paul Stein, Professor Mark Burgman, Professor Tim Bonyhady and Rosemary Warnock.
The review’s Final report, released on 21 December 2009, makes 71 wide-ranging recommendations revolving around 9 core elements.
The government releases its formal response on 24 August 2011; however, ‘[e]xcept for an environmental offsets policy, the response to the Hawke Review was never implemented’.
29 October 2019
Second independent statutory review of the EPBC Act (Samuel Review), commissioned by the then Minister for the Environment Sussan Ley, commences. The review is led by Professor Graeme Samuel, with the support of an expert panel comprising Bruce Martin, Dr Wendy Craik, Dr Erica Smyth and Professor Andrew Macintosh.
The review’s Final report, provided to the then Minister on 30 October 2020 and publicly released on 28 January 2021, concludes that (p. i):
The EPBC Act is out dated and requires fundamental reform. It does not enable the Commonwealth to effectively fulfill its environmental management responsibilities to protect nationally important matters. The Act, and the way it is implemented, results in piecemeal decisions, which rarely work in concert with the environmental management responsibilities of the States and Territories. The Act is a barrier to holistic environmental management which, given the nature of Australia’s federation, is essential for success.
27 August 2020
The then Minister for the Environment introduces the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Streamlining Environmental Approvals) Bill 2020 to support single-touch environmental approvals. The Bill is almost identical to a Bill introduced in 2014 and is widely viewed as inconsistent with the Samuel Review’s Interim Report (p. 3). It lapses at the end of 46th Parliament.
25 February 2021
The then Minister for the Environment introduces the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standards and Assurance) Bill 2020 to establish National Environmental Standards and an Environmental Assurance Commissioner. The Bill was viewed by some stakeholders as ‘cherry picking’ recommendations from the Samuel Review’s Final report (p. 3). It lapses at the end of the 46th Parliament.
16 June 2021
The then Minister for the Environment releases the Morrison Government’s response, A pathway for reforming national environmental law, recognising that reform was long overdue and agreeing with the central pillars of the Samuel Review’s recommendations (pp. 2-3).
19 July 2022
Following the election of the Albanese Government, the new Minister for the Environment Tanya Plibersek releases the 2021 State of the environment report, which documents the continuing decline in Australia’s environment. The Minister commits to providing a formal response to the Samuel Review by the end of 2022, with the aim of developing new environmental legislation for 2023 (p. 9).
8 December 2022
The then Minister for the Environment releases the Albanese Government’s response, Nature Positive Plan: Better for business, better for the environment. The Minister promises legislation built ‘on three basic principles: clear national standards for environmental protection, improving and speeding up decisions, and building trust and integrity’ as well as an independent Environment Protection Agency.
30 October 2023
Formal closed consultations commence with key stakeholder groups, as well as Commonwealth, state and territories agencies (p. 92).
December 2023
During final negotiations on the Nature Repair Bill 2023 and Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023, the government introduces a proposed amendment to the EPBC Act to amend the ‘water trigger’ to include all forms of unconventional gas development. This helps secure passage of the Bills through the Senate and partially achieves the Samuel Review’s first recommendation (p. 48).
16 April 2024
The then Minister for the Environment announces that the Nature Positive reforms would be progressed in a staged manner:
Establishing the nature repair scheme and expanding the ‘water trigger’ (completed in December 2023)
Creating Environment Protection Australia (EPA) and Environment Information Australia (EIA)
Delivering substantive reform to the EPBC Act, as outlined in the Nature Positive Plan.
29 May 2024
The then Minister for the Environment introduces the Nature Positive (Environment Protection Australia) Bill 2024, Nature Positive (Environment Information Australia) Bill 2024, and Nature Positive (Environmental Law Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2024. The Bills comprise the second stage of reforms and pass the House on 4 July 2024.
The Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee conducts an inquiry into the Bills and recommends their passage with amendments. However, the Coalition, Australian Greens, Senator David Pocock and Senator Lidia Thorpe each make separate recommendations.
25 November 2024
The then Minister for the Environment negotiated amendments with the Australian Greens and independent Senator David Pocock to secure passage of the Nature Positive Bills. These are reportedly set aside following Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s intervention, and the Bills are discharged from the Notice Paper on 5 February 2025.
25 March 2025
The then Minister for the Environment introduces the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Reconsiderations) Bill 2025. The Bill removes the minister’s ability to overturn a controlled action decision in certain circumstances where the request for reconsideration was made more than 5 years after the action commenced.
The heavily criticised Bill, which responds explicitly to a request for reconsideration of salmon aquaculture in Macquarie Harbour and its impacts on the critically endangered Maugean Skate, passes both Houses the following day and commences on 28 March 2025.
16 May 2025
Following re-election of the Albanese Government, the new Minister for the Environment Senator Murray Watt states that reform of the EPBC Act is one of the highest priorities for the Albanese Government during the 48th Parliament.
19 June 2025
The Minister for the Environment hosts a high-level roundtable, bringing together stakeholders from environmental, resources, energy, climate, housing and agricultural sectors, as well as First Nations Representatives. The Minister noted support for reforms based on three pillars (p. 1):
Stronger environmental protection and restoration
More efficient and robust project assessments
Greater accountability and transparency in decision making.
The Minister also noted ‘strong support for key components of the reforms, such as National Environmental Standards, Streamlined approval processes, Regional planning, More robust offset regimes, Better data on environmental outcomes’ (p. 1).
27 August 2025
The Assistant Minister for Climate Change and Energy Josh Wilson introduces the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Board of Management Functions) Bill 2025. The Bill enables a Board for a Commonwealth reserve to continue making decisions after a management plan expires, provided those decisions are consistent with the expired management plan. While the Samuel Review made a number of recommendations relating to jointly managed Commonwealth reserves and, in particular, improving the contribution of Indigenous Australian’s traditional knowledge and participation in EPBC Act processes, the Bill primarily responds to the impending expiry of management plans for 2 reserves.
The Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee considered the Bill and recommends its passage.
The Bill passed both Houses on 28 October 2025 but is yet to receive Royal Assent.
30 October 2025
The package of Bills is introduced to the House of Representatives.
Links
The links to the Bills, their Explanatory Memoranda and second reading speeches can be found on the Bill home pages, linked above, or through the Australian Parliament website.
When Bills have been passed and have received Royal Assent, they become Acts, which can be found at the Federal Register of Legislation website.
All hyperlinks in this Bills Digest are correct as of November 2025.
Creative Commons
With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this publication, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence.
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to webmanager@aph.gov.au.
Disclaimer
Bills Digests are prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament. They are produced under time and resource constraints and aim to be available in time for debate in the Chambers. The views expressed in Bills Digests do not reflect an official position of the Australian Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion. Bills Digests reflect the relevant legislation as introduced and do not canvass subsequent amendments or developments. Other sources should be consulted to determine the official status of the Bill.
Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the ParliamentaryLibrarian at webmanager@aph.gov.au. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Enquiry Point for referral.
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Act 2025
No. 66, 2025
An Act to impose charges that are neither duties of customs nor duties of excise in relation to matters connected with the administration of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, and for related purposes
Contents
1 Short title 2
2 Commencement 2
3 Act binds the Crown 3
4 Extension to external Territories 3
5 Extra‑territorial application 3
6 Act does not impose tax on property of a State 3
7 Imposition of charges 3
8 Matters relating to amount of charges 4
9 Exemptions from charges 4
10 Regulations 4
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Act 2025
No. 66, 2025
An Act to impose charges that are neither duties of customs nor duties of excise in relation to matters connected with the administration of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, and for related purposes
[Assented to 1 December 2025]
The Parliament of Australia enacts:
1 Short title
This Act is the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Act 2025.
2 Commencement
(1) Each provision of this Act specified in column 1 of the table commences, or is taken to have commenced, in accordance with column 2 of the table. Any other statement in column 2 has effect according to its terms.
Commencement information
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Provisions
Commencement
Date/Details
Sections 1 and 2 and anything in this Act not elsewhere covered by this table
The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
2 December 2025
Sections 3 to 10
A day or days to be fixed by one or more Proclamations.
However, if any of the provisions do not commence within the period of 12 months beginning on the day this Act receives the Royal Assent, they commence on the day after the end of that period.
Note: This table relates only to the provisions of this Act as originally enacted. It will not be amended to deal with any later amendments of this Act.
(2) Any information in column 3 of the table is not part of this Act. Information may be inserted in this column, or information in it may be edited, in any published version of this Act.
3 Act binds the Crown
This Act binds the Crown in right of each of the States, of the Australian Capital Territory and of the Northern Territory. However, it does not bind the Crown in right of the Commonwealth.
4 Extension to external Territories
This Act extends to the external Territories.
5 Extra‑territorial application
This Act extends to acts, omissions, matters and things outside Australia.
6 Act does not impose tax on property of a State
(1) This Act does not impose a tax on property of any kind belonging to a State.
(2) In this section:
property of any kind belonging to a State has the same meaning as in section 114 of the Constitution.
7 Imposition of charges
(1) The regulations may prescribe a charge in relation to a prescribed matter connected with the administration of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 or regulations made under that Act.
(2) Charges prescribed under subsection (1) are imposed as taxes.
(3) Two or more charges may be prescribed in relation to the same matter, and a single charge may be prescribed in relation to 2 or more matters.
(4) This section imposes a charge only so far as that charge is neither a duty of customs nor a duty of excise within the meaning of section 55 of the Constitution.
8 Matters relating to amount of charges
(1) The regulations may prescribe a charge under subsection 7(1):
(a) by specifying an amount as the charge; or
(b) by specifying a method for calculating the amount of the charge.
(2) Before the Governor‑General makes a regulation under subsection 7(1) prescribing a charge in relation to a matter, the Minister must be satisfied that the amount of the charge is set at a level that is designed to recover no more than the Commonwealth’s likely costs in connection with the matter.
9 Exemptions from charges
The regulations may provide for exemptions from a charge prescribed under subsection 7(1).
10 Regulations
The Governor‑General may make regulations prescribing matters:
(a) required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed by the regulations; or
(b) necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act.