Defence Force Discipline Act 1982
101JAdmissibility of confessional evidence
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 101J
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.
101J Admissibility of confessional evidence
(1) Evidence of a confession made by a person in the presence of an investigating officer is not admissible in proceedings against the person for a service offence unless the service tribunal or, in the case of a court martial, the judge advocate of the court martial, is satisfied that the confession was made voluntarily.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a confession that is obtained from a person in consequence of:
(a) the use of physical violence, or a threat of physical violence, to any person; or
(b) the making of a promise, threat or other inducement (not being physical violence or a threat of physical violence) likely to cause the person to make a confession that is untrue;
shall be deemed not to be made voluntarily.
101JA Tape recording of confessions and admissions
(1) If a person who is being interviewed as a suspect (whether under arrest or not) makes a confession or admission to a police member, the confession or admission is inadmissible as evidence against the person in proceedings for a service offence unless:
(a) if the confession or admission was made in circumstances where it was reasonably practicable to tape record the confession or admission—the questioning of the person and anything said by the person during that questioning was tape recorded; or
(b) in any other case:
(i) at the time of the interview of the person or as soon as practicable afterwards, a record in writing was made, either in English or in another language used by the person in the interview, of the things said by or to the person in the course of the interview; and
(ii) as soon as practicable after the record was made, it was read to the person in the language used by him or her in the interview and a copy of the record was made available to the person; and
(iii) the person was given the opportunity to interrupt the reading at any time for the purpose of drawing attention to any error or omission that he or she claimed had been made in or from the record and, at the end of the reading, the person was given the opportunity to state whether he or she claimed that there were any errors in or omissions from the record in addition to any to which he or she had drawn attention in the course of the reading; and
(iv) a tape recording was made of the reading referred to in subparagraph (ii) and of everything said by or to the person as a result of compliance with subparagraph (iii), and the requirements of subsection (2) were observed in respect of that recording; and
(v) before the reading referred to in subparagraph (ii), an explanation, in accordance with the form set out in subsection (6), was given to the person of the procedure that would be followed for the purposes of compliance with that subparagraph and subparagraphs (iii) and (iv).