Several aspects of the by-law are easy to overlook or misinterpret. Practitioners and importers should pay close attention to the following traps.
Motor vehicles and parts are absolutely excluded. The definition of “personal goods” explicitly excludes motor vehicles and motor vehicle parts. This means even a personally owned car that is used daily overseas cannot be imported duty-free under this by-law. The exclusion covers all parts, so even a set of alloy wheels would be excluded if claimed under this instrument. There are other concessions (such as the Personal Effects Importation Scheme under s.162 of the Customs Act) that may allow vehicles, but not under this by-law. The term “motor vehicles” is not defined, so it would include cars, motorbikes, trailers with motors, and other self-propelled road vehicles.
Boats, aircraft, and machinery have a two-year disposal restriction that applies to the “arriving resident” or “arriving person”. For boats (item 2), the condition is that the goods “will not be sold or otherwise disposed of in Australia by or on behalf of the arriving resident, within two years after the date of importation”. This prohibits sale, gift, trade-in, or any similar transfer. Importantly, it applies to “any of” the arriving resident or their behalf, so a family member selling the boat would breach the condition even if the arriving resident did not personally sell it. The control obligation is strict. For machinery (item 4), the condition extends to lease, hire, mortgage, or other disposal. This means the machinery cannot be used as collateral for a loan within two years. For aircraft, the condition is the same as for boats (no sale or disposal). Breaching these conditions triggers duty liability.
The “family” cap on boats and aircraft is per three years, not per importation. The by-law says “only one article selected from each of the three groups (a), (b) and (c) will be allowed for the family per three years.” This means if a family imports a boat under item 2(c), they cannot import another boat (or any other article from groups (a), (b) or (c) of item 2) for three years. The same applies to aircraft under item 3 (one per family per three years). The cap runs from the date of importation of the first item. If a family imports a boat in 2021, they cannot import another boat until 2024. This is easy to forget, especially if multiple family members own separate items.
The “used” definition is more onerous than simply owning the goods. Goods are “used” only if they were available for use on a continuing basis in each country where the person was residing on a long term basis. If a person lived in two countries over the twelve month period, the goods must have been available for use in both countries on a continuing basis. Goods stored in a warehouse or left with a relative may not qualify. This could be a trap for frequent travellers or expatriates who move between countries.
Alcoholic beverages and tobacco products are excluded from item 5. Even though personal effects and furniture include many consumables and household supplies, the by-law specifically removes alcohol and tobacco. These must be declared and duty paid. There is no de minimis exception. The definition of “tobacco products” includes “other products containing tobacco”, which captures e-cigarette liquids containing nicotine? Possibly, but that would depend on definitions in other legislation. At minimum, it catches cigarettes, cigars, and loose tobacco.
Fur apparel and perfume concentrates are excluded from item 1. Even though item 1 covers personal clothing and hygiene articles, fur apparel and perfume concentrates cannot be imported duty-free under that item. They may fall under item 5 (personal effects) if they meet the twelve-month ownership condition and are not alcohol or tobacco. But perfume concentrates may be considered alcoholic (if alcohol-based), and the exclusion from item 5 for “alcoholic beverages” does not explicitly cover perfume, so there is uncertainty. Importers would be wise to classify perfume concentrates carefully.
No transitional provisions for the revocation of the previous by-law. Goods imported before 1 February 2018 under By-law No. 1300942 are presumably grandfathered, but the new by-law does not say so. Importers who obtained approvals under the old by-law for future imports after 1 February 2018 would find those approvals void. Customs may exercise administrative discretion, but the instrument does not provide for it.
“Intend immediately to take up or resume residence” is a subjective state of mind that may be scrutinised. An arriving person who enters on a tourist visa but claims to be an arriving resident would be problematic. The ABF may examine evidence of the person’s intention, such as lease agreements, job offers, or family ties. If the person later departs Australia quickly, the ABF may conclude the intention was not genuine, potentially voiding the duty-free treatment.