Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Legislation/Cross-border Justice Act 2009/136

NTIn ForceAct

Cross-border Justice Act 2009

136Inconsistency between Act and agreement

Start here

Get a plain-English read of 136

Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Cross-border Justice Act 2009.

Ask Zoe about this section View in full context

136 Inconsistency between Act and agreement If there is an inconsistency between this Act and an agreement mentioned in section 135(1), this Act prevails to the extent of the inconsistency.

Previous section135Power of Minister to enter agreements

Next section137Protection of office holders of Territory taking action in

Section 136 - Cross-border Justice Act 2009 - Inconsistency between Act and agreement | Zoe