NTIn ForceAct
Criminal Property Forfeiture Act 2002
66Innocent party
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 66
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Criminal Property Forfeiture Act 2002.
66 Innocent party
(1) A person is an innocent party in relation to crime-used property if:
(a) he or she did not know and had no reasonable grounds for
suspecting:
(i) that the relevant forfeiture offence was being or would be
committed; or
(ii) that the property was being or would be used in or in
connection with the commission of a forfeiture offence;
or
(b) he or she took all reasonable steps to prevent:
(i) the commission of the offence; or
(ii) the use of the property in or in connection with the
commission of the offence;
and the person was not in any way involved in the commission of
the relevant forfeiture offence.
(2) A person who owns or effectively controls crime-used property is an
innocent party in relation to the property if:
(a) the person did not acquire the property or its effective control
before the time that the relevant forfeiture offence was
committed or is likely to have been committed; and
(b) at the time of acquiring the property or its effective control, the
person did not know and had no reasonable grounds for
suspecting that the property was crime-used; and
Criminal Property Forfeiture Act 2002 46
(c) if the person acquired the property for valuable
consideration – the consideration was lawfully acquired; and
(d) the person did not acquire the property or its effective control,
whether by gift or for valuable consideration, with the intention
of avoiding the operation of this Act.
(3) A person is an innocent party in relation to crime-derived property if:
(a) the person acquired the property, or the person's share of it (if
it is owned by more than one person), for valuable
consideration; and
(b) the consideration was lawfully acquired; and
(c) before acquiring the property or share, the person made
reasonable inquiries, and took all other action reasonable in
the circumstances, to ascertain whether or not the property
was crime-derived; and
(d) despite the inquiries made under paragraph (c), at the time of
acquiring the property or share the person did not know and
had no reasonable grounds for suspecting that the property
was crime-derived; and
(e) the person did not acquire the property or share with the
intention of avoiding the operation of this Act.