Criminal Code (Animal Valuers) Regulation 2014
sec.4Suitability for appointment as animal valuer
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.4
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Criminal Code (Animal Valuers) Regulation 2014.
sec.4 Suitability for appointment as animal valuer
Subject to subsection (2) , a person is suitable for appointment as an animal valuer if the chief executive reasonably believes the person— is qualified for appointment as an animal valuer because the person has the necessary expertise or experience; and is competent to perform the functions of an animal valuer. However, despite subsection (1) , the chief executive may decide a person is not suitable for appointment as an animal valuer having regard to the following— any applications for appointment as an animal valuer previously made by the person that have been refused; the person’s criminal history; any other matter the chief executive reasonably considers relevant. (sec.4-ssec.1) Subject to subsection (2) , a person is suitable for appointment as an animal valuer if the chief executive reasonably believes the person— is qualified for appointment as an animal valuer because the person has the necessary expertise or experience; and is competent to perform the functions of an animal valuer. (sec.4-ssec.2) However, despite subsection (1) , the chief executive may decide a person is not suitable for appointment as an animal valuer having regard to the following— any applications for appointment as an animal valuer previously made by the person that have been refused; the person’s criminal history; any other matter the chief executive reasonably considers relevant.
- (a) is qualified for appointment as an animal valuer because the person has the necessary expertise or experience; and
- (b) is competent to perform the functions of an animal valuer.
- (a) any applications for appointment as an animal valuer previously made by the person that have been refused;
- (b) the person’s criminal history;
- (c) any other matter the chief executive reasonably considers relevant.