22Making of assets forfeiture order

#### 22 Making of assets forfeiture order 22 Making of assets forfeiture order > > (1) The Commission may apply to the Supreme Court for an order forfeiting to, and vesting in, the Crown specified interests, a specified class of interests or all the interests, in property of a person (an assets forfeiture order). > > > (1A) The application must specify that the interest in property is an interest in property of any one or more of the following kinds— > > > > > (a) an interest in property of a person suspected by an authorised officer, at the time of the application, of having engaged in a serious crime related activity or serious crime related activities, > > > > > (b) an interest in property suspected by an authorised officer, at the time of the application, of being serious crime derived property because of a serious crime related activity or serious crime related activities of a person, > > > > > (c) an interest in property held in a false name that is suspected by an authorised officer, at the time of the application, to be fraudulently acquired property that is illegally acquired property, > > > > > (d) an interest in property suspected by an authorised officer, at the time of the application, of being— > > > > > > > (i) an available interest relating to serious crime use property, or > > > > > > > (ii) an interest that is capable of being the subject of a substituted serious crime use property declaration in relation to the serious crime related activity concerned. > > > (1B) An assets forfeiture order may be made whether or not an application for a restraining order relating to the interests in property the subject of the application for the assets forfeiture order has been made or granted. > > > (2) The Supreme Court must make an assets forfeiture order in respect of an interest in property referred to in subsection (1A) (a) or (b) if the Court finds it to be more probable than not that the person whose suspected serious crime related activity, or serious crime related activities, formed the basis of the application for the assets forfeiture order was, at any time, engaged in— > > > > > (a) a serious crime related activity involving an indictable quantity, or > > > > > (b) a serious crime related activity involving an offence punishable by imprisonment for 5 years or more. > > > (2A) The Supreme Court must make an assets forfeiture order if the Court finds it more probable than not that interests in property subject to an application are fraudulently acquired property that is also illegally acquired property. > > > (2B) The Supreme Court must make an assets forfeiture order in respect of an interest in property if the Court finds it more probable than not that the interest is an available interest relating to serious crime use property. > > > (3) A finding of the Court for the purposes of subsection (2) need not be based on a finding as to the commission of a particular offence or a finding as to any particular quantity involved, and can be based— > > > > > (a) on a finding that some offence or other constituting a serious crime related activity and punishable by imprisonment for 5 years or more was committed, or > > > > > (b) on a finding that some offence or other constituting a serious crime related activity was committed involving some quantity or other that was an indictable quantity. > > > (3A) A finding of the Supreme Court for the purposes of subsection (2A) need not be based on a particular finding as to the commission of a particular offence and can be based on a finding that some offence or other constituting illegal activity was committed. > > > (4) When an assets forfeiture order is made it must be made so as to apply to specified interests in property. > > > (5) (Repealed) > > > (6) The raising of a doubt as to whether a person engaged in a serious crime related activity or whether a quantity is an indictable quantity is not of itself sufficient to avoid a finding by the Supreme Court under subsection (2). > > > (6A) The raising of a doubt as to whether a person engaged in an illegal activity is not of itself sufficient to avoid a finding by the Supreme Court under subsection (2A) or (2B). > > > (7) The quashing or setting aside of a conviction for a serious crime related activity or illegal activity does not affect the validity of an assets forfeiture order that was made before or after the conviction was quashed or set aside and was based on the activity. > > > (8) The making of an assets forfeiture order does not prevent the making of a proceeds assessment order or unexplained wealth order under Division 2 which assesses the value of the proceeds of, or is based on, the serious crime related activity or illegal activity on which the assets forfeiture order was based. > > > (9) Notice of an application under this section is to be given to a person to whom the application relates and the person may appear, and adduce evidence, at the hearing of the application. > > > (10) The absence of a person entitled to be given notice of an application for an assets forfeiture order does not prevent the Court from making the order. > > **s 22:** Am 1997 No 68, Sch 1 \[32\] \[33\]; 2005 No 32, Sch 1 \[20\]–\[26\]; 2009 No 92, Sch 1 \[5\]; 2010 No 65, Sch 1 \[5\]; 2016 No 16, Sch 3 \[5\]–\[7\]; 2025 No 81, Sch 1\[7\] \[8\].