Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006
17Determination of application for continuing detention order
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 17
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006.
17 Determination of application for continuing detention order
17 Determination of application for continuing detention order
(1) The Supreme Court may determine an application under this Part for a continuing detention order—
(a) by making an extended supervision order, or
(b) by making a continuing detention order, or
(c) by dismissing the application.
(2) In determining whether or not to make a continuing detention order or extended supervision order, the safety of the community must be the paramount consideration of the Supreme Court.
(3), (3A) (Repealed)
(4) In determining whether or not to make a continuing detention order or extended supervision order, the Supreme Court must also have regard to the following matters in addition to any other matter it considers relevant—
(a) (Repealed)
(b) the reports received from the persons appointed under section 15 (4) to conduct examinations of the offender, and the level of the offender’s participation in any such examination,
(c) the results of any other assessment prepared by a qualified psychiatrist, registered psychologist or registered medical practitioner as to the likelihood of the offender committing a further serious offence, the willingness of the offender to participate in any such assessment, and the level of the offender’s participation in any such assessment,
(d) the results of any statistical or other assessment as to the likelihood of persons with histories and characteristics similar to those of the offender committing a further serious offence,
(d1) any report prepared by Corrective Services NSW as to the extent to which the offender can reasonably and practicably be managed in the community,
(e) any treatment or rehabilitation programs in which the offender has had an opportunity to participate, the willingness of the offender to participate in any such programs, and the level of the offender’s participation in any such programs,
(e1) if the offender is kept in custody or is in the community (whether or not under supervision)—any options available that might reduce the likelihood of the offender re-offending over time,