79Consideration of applications

#### 79 Consideration of applications 79 Consideration of applications > > (1) After considering an application under section 78 or on its own motion— > > > > > (a) the Supreme Court may direct that an inquiry be conducted by a judicial officer into the conviction or sentence, or > > > > > (b) the Supreme Court may refer the whole case to the Court of Criminal Appeal, to be dealt with as an appeal under the [Criminal Appeal Act 1912](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1912-016). > > > (2) Action under subsection (1) may only be taken if it appears that there is a doubt or question as to the convicted person’s guilt, as to any mitigating circumstances in the case or as to any part of the evidence in the case. > > > (3) The Supreme Court may refuse to consider or otherwise deal with an application. Without limiting the foregoing, the Supreme Court may refuse to consider or otherwise deal with an application if— > > > > > (a) it appears that the matter— > > > > > > > (i) has been fully dealt with in the proceedings giving rise to the conviction or sentence (or in any proceedings on appeal from the conviction or sentence), or > > > > > > > (ii) has previously been dealt with under this Part or under the previous review provisions, or > > > > > > > (iii) has been the subject of a right of appeal (or a right to apply for leave to appeal) by the convicted person but no such appeal or application has been made, or > > > > > > > (iv) has been the subject of appeal proceedings commenced by or on behalf of the convicted person (including proceedings on an application for leave to appeal) where the appeal or application has been withdrawn or the proceedings have been allowed to lapse, and > > > > > (b) the Supreme Court is not satisfied that there are special facts or special circumstances that justify the taking of further action. > > > (3A) The Supreme Court may defer consideration of an application under section 78 if— > > > > > (a) the time within which an appeal may be made against the conviction or sentence (including an application for leave to appeal) is yet to expire, or > > > > > (b) the conviction or sentence is the subject of appeal proceedings (including proceedings on an application for leave to appeal) that are yet to be finally determined, or > > > > > (c) the application fails to disclose sufficient information to enable the conviction or sentence to be properly considered. > > > (3B) This section does not authorise a direction to be given, or a referral to be made to the Court of Criminal Appeal, if the Supreme Court is satisfied that the grounds for the direction or referral arise only from— > > > > > (a) the fact that the convicted person was— > > > > > > > (i) questioned under section 24 of the [Crime Commission Act 2012](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2012-066), or > > > > > > > (ii) required under section 24 or 29 of that Act to produce a document or thing, or > > > > > (b) either or both of the following— > > > > > > > (i) evidence obtained directly from that questioning or requirement, > > > > > > > (ii) any further information, evidence, document or thing obtained as a result of the questioning or the production of the document or thing. > > > (4) Proceedings under this section are not judicial proceedings. However, the Supreme Court may consider any written submissions made by the Crown with respect to an application. > > > (5) The registrar of the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court must report to the Minister as to any action taken by the Supreme Court under this section (including a refusal to consider or otherwise deal with an application). > > **s 79:** Ins 2006 No 70, Sch 2.1 \[1\] (transferred from the Crimes Act 1900 No 40, sec 474E). Am 2006 No 70, Sch 2.1 \[1\]–\[3\]; 2014 No 82, Sch 3 \[1\].