Crime and Corruption Regulation 2015
sec.11Surveillance warrant application
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.11
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Crime and Corruption Regulation 2015.
sec.11 Surveillance warrant application
For an application for a surveillance warrant, the information is as follows— when and where the application was made; if known, the name of the person the chairman reasonably believes has been, or is likely to be, involved in corruption being investigated by the commission; a description of the place mentioned in the application; the type of corruption to which the application relates; whether or not the warrant was issued; if the warrant was issued— when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and how long the warrant was in force; and the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption if and when powers were exercised under the warrant; and if a surveillance device was not installed under the warrant—why it was not installed.
- (a) when and where the application was made;
- (b) if known, the name of the person the chairman reasonably believes has been, or is likely to be, involved in corruption being investigated by the commission;
- (c) a description of the place mentioned in the application;
- (d) the type of corruption to which the application relates;
- (e) whether or not the warrant was issued;
- (f) if the warrant was issued— (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a surveillance warrant— • a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant • a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption (iv) if and when powers were exercised under the warrant; and (v) if a surveillance device was not installed under the warrant—why it was not installed.
- (i) when and where it was issued, and the court that issued it; and
- (ii) how long the warrant was in force; and
- (iii) the benefits derived from exercising powers under the warrant; and Examples of benefits derived from exercising powers under a surveillance warrant— • a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant • a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption
- • a proceeding started because of the use of a surveillance device under the warrant
- • a brief description of how using a surveillance device under the warrant helped in the investigation of the corruption