What it does
The Construction Industry Long Service Leave Regulations 2018 (SA) are subordinate legislation that supplies the operational detail missing from the parent Act. They do not create the long service leave scheme; they define its moving parts. The regulations prescribe how the Board calculates a worker’s service, which absences still count as service, how employers register and report, what payments form part of ordinary weekly pay and remuneration, and the penalties for late payments. They also set out corresponding laws from other states and territories so that service in multiple jurisdictions can be aggregated for portable long service leave. Mechanically, the regulations revoke the 2003 version and replace it with updated amounts, definitions and procedures. The key changes from the revoked regulations are not listed in the source, so a reader must compare both texts to find any real difference. The regulations establish the following numeric and procedural values: the cap on paid‑sick‑leave allowances as allowable absence (10 days per year), the cap on paid‑annual‑leave allowances as allowable absence (20 days per year), the 104‑week cut‑off for workers’ compensation weekly payments to count as allowable absence, the bi‑monthly return periods (six per financial year), the late‑payment interest rate of 20 per cent per annum, and the flat late‑payment fee of $75. They also prescribe the information an employer must provide on registration, the statutory‑declaration requirement for a supervisor’s notice, and the method for crediting effective service to self‑employed contractors and working directors who pay the levy. By specifying these details, the regulations reduce administrative discretion and provide a uniform rulebook. However, they also impose fixed costs on employers: registration must occur within one month of becoming an employer, returns are due every two months, and the late‑payment penalty of 20 per cent plus a fixed $75 is steep enough to penalise a small administrative oversight disproportionately. The regulations do not adjust these figures for inflation or business size, so the compliance burden falls equally on a one‑person builder and a large construction firm.