53Inconsistency with agreements

53 Inconsistency with agreements

53 Inconsistency with agreements

In the event of an inconsistency between this Division and the provisions of any agreement, covenant or instrument, this Division is to prevail, but to the extent only of the inconsistency.

Note.

For example, the requirement under this Division that the owner of a dangerous or menacing dog display a warning sign on premises would override a provision in a lease prohibiting the fixing of any sign to a building.

s 53: Am 2013 No 86, Sch 1 [47].