117Interplay between civil penalties and criminal proceedings

117 Interplay between civil penalties and criminal proceedings

(1) An application cannot be made to the Supreme Court under section 115 in relation to a contravention of section 113(3) if the person has been convicted or acquitted of an offence constituted by conduct that is substantially the same as the conduct to which the application relates.

(2) The Supreme Court must stay a proceeding under section 115 against a person if a criminal proceeding is or has been commenced against the person for an offence constituted by conduct that is substantially the same as the conduct to which the application under that section relates.

(3) A proceeding stayed in accordance with subsection (2) must be dismissed by the Supreme Court if the person is convicted or acquitted of the offence but otherwise may be resumed by it.

(4) A criminal proceeding may be commenced against a person for conduct that is substantially the same as conduct to which an application under section 115 relates or in respect of which an order has been made under that section.

(5) Evidence of information given, or evidence of the production of documents, by a person is not admissible in a proceeding against the person for an offence if—

(a) the person previously gave the evidence or produced the documents in a proceeding against the person under section 115; and

(b) the conduct alleged to constitute the offence is substantially the same as the conduct to which the proceeding under that section related.

(6) Subsection (5) does not apply to a criminal proceeding in respect of the falsity of evidence given in a proceeding under section 115.

S. 118 inserted by No. 63/2017 s. 18.