Charitable and Non-Profit Gaming Act 1999
sec.81Submitting reports for category 3 games
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.81
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Charitable and Non-Profit Gaming Act 1999.
sec.81 Submitting reports for category 3 games
A person conducting a category 3 game must give a written report to the chief executive as required by this section about the person’s general gaming operations. Maximum penalty—40 penalty units. The report must be given at the reasonable times stated in a notice given to the person by the chief executive. After receiving a report under this section, the chief executive may, by a further notice given to the person, require the person to give the chief executive a further report within the reasonable time stated in the further notice to explain a matter contained in a previous report. The person must not give the chief executive a report the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular. Maximum penalty—40 penalty units. It is enough for a complaint against a person for an offence against subsection (4) to state that the report was ‘false or misleading’ to the person’s knowledge, without specifying which. (sec.81-ssec.1) A person conducting a category 3 game must give a written report to the chief executive as required by this section about the person’s general gaming operations. Maximum penalty—40 penalty units. (sec.81-ssec.2) The report must be given at the reasonable times stated in a notice given to the person by the chief executive. (sec.81-ssec.3) After receiving a report under this section, the chief executive may, by a further notice given to the person, require the person to give the chief executive a further report within the reasonable time stated in the further notice to explain a matter contained in a previous report. (sec.81-ssec.4) The person must not give the chief executive a report the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular. Maximum penalty—40 penalty units. (sec.81-ssec.5) It is enough for a complaint against a person for an offence against subsection (4) to state that the report was ‘false or misleading’ to the person’s knowledge, without specifying which.