Casino (Management Agreement) Act 1993
Sch 6Fifth deed of variation to the management agreement
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Sch 6
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Casino (Management Agreement) Act 1993.
Schedule 6—Fifth deed of variation to the management agreement
DEED dated 1 October 1998
BETWEEN THE HONOURABLE ROGER M. HALLAM MLC, the Minister of the Crown for the time being administering the Casino Control Act acting for and on behalf of the State of Victoria ('State')
AND CROWN LIMITED ACN 006 973 262 of 8 Whiteman Street, Southbank, Victoria ('Company')
A. The State and the Company entered into an agreement dated 20 September 1993 ratified by and scheduled to the Casino (Management Agreement) Act 1993 ('Management Agreement').
B. The Management Agreement was varied by:
(a) a deed of variation dated 14 November 1994 ratified by and scheduled to the Casino (Management Agreement) (Amendment) Act 1994;
(b) a deed of variation dated 12 October 1995 ratified by and scheduled to the Casino (Management Agreement) (Further Amendment) Act 1995;
(c) a deed of variation dated 3 June 1996 ratified by and scheduled to the Gaming Acts (Amendment) Act 1996; and
(d) a deed of variation dated 7 November 1996 ratified by and scheduled to the Casino (Management Agreement) (Amendment) Act 1996.
C. The parties have agreed to further vary the Management Agreement as provided in this document.
Unless the context otherwise requires or the contrary intention appears, terms defined in the Casino Control Act or the Management Agreement have the same meaning when used in this document.
2.1 A Minister of the State must introduce and sponsor a Bill in the Parliament of Victoria to ratify this document as soon as reasonably practicable after its execution.
2.2 Clauses 3 and 4 of this document shall come into operation on the date on which the Bill referred to in clause 2.1 receives Royal Assent.
2.3 Clauses 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 of this document shall come into operation on the date of this document.
2.4 If the condition in clause 2.2 is not satisfied by 31 January 1999 or such later date agreed by the parties, this document other than clause 5 will terminate. Following such termination neither party shall have any claim against the other with respect to any matter or thing antecedent to or arising out of or done, performed, or omitted to be done or performed under this document.
The State and the Company agree to vary the Management Agreement in the following manner: