CTHRepealedLegislation
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative—Reforestation and Afforestation 2.0) Methodology Determination 2015
//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative—Reforestation and Afforestation 2.0) Methodology Determination 2015
Start here
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative—Reforestation and Afforestation 2.0) Methodology Determination 2015.
53 Ex post analysis—plot location and size
(1) The project proponent must conduct an ex post comparison:
(a) between:
(i) the intended location coordinates generated in accordance with section 34; and
(ii) the actual location coordinates logged in accordance with subsection 45(2); and
(b) between:
(i) the target plot size from paragraph 25(2)(c); and
(ii) the measured plot size from paragraph 45(1)(b).
(2) Except where subsection 36(2) applies, the variation between the coordinates specified in subsection (1) must be no greater than 10 metres (the location tolerance).
Note: Subsection 36(2) requires the project proponent to relocate a plot to the nearest safe point if establishing a plot at the intended location coordinates would constitute a serious safety risk.
(3) The variation between the target plot size and the measured plot size of each plot must be no greater than the minimum difference specified in paragraph 38(c).