© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2006 - Prudential Standard APS 110 - Capital Adequacy
Start here
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2006 - Prudential Standard APS 110 - Capital Adequacy.
Image unavailable in extracted text
This Prudential Standard aims to ensure that ADIs maintain adequate capital to support the risks associated with their activities on both a stand-alone and group basis.
This Prudential Standard outlines the overall framework adopted by APRA for assessing an ADI’s capital adequacy.
Authority and application
(a) have adequate systems and procedures in place to identify, measure, monitor and manage the risks arising from its activities on a continuous basis to ensure that capital is held at a level consistent with the ADI’s risk profile; and
(b) maintain and implement a capital management plan, consistent with the overall business plan, for managing its capital levels on an ongoing basis. Essentially, the plan must set out:
(i) the ADI’s strategy for maintaining capital resources over time, for example, by outlining its capital needs for supporting the degree of risks involved in the ADI’s activities, how the required level of capital is to be met, as well as the means available for sourcing additional capital where required; and
(ii) actions and procedures for monitoring the ADI’s compliance with minimum regulatory capital adequacy requirements, including the setting of trigger ratios to alert management of, and avert, potential breaches to the minimum capital ratios required by APRA.
(a) group risks posed by other members in the group to the ADI;
(b) obligations (direct or indirect) arising from associations with group entities which might give rise to a call on the capital of the ADI; and
(c) the ability to readily extract capital from other members in the group should the need to recapitalise the ADI arise (this would include consideration of the integration of business within the group, the importance of subsidiaries to the group, the impact of taxation, regulatory requirements and other factors on the ability to realise investments in, or transfer surplus capital from, subsidiaries).
(a) establish policies on group capital adequacy (which should have regard to the type and distribution of capital resources held by the group) and implement a group capital management plan (with coverage similar to those outlined in paragraph 3(b) above) to ensure that the group overall is adequately capitalised to cover the risks faced by the group and to meet regulatory, market and strategic needs;
(b) ensure that appropriate systems and adequate procedures are in place to identify, assess, measure and monitor group risks on a continuous basis; and
(c) ensure that the group has sufficient capital freely available to meet unexpected losses and adverse shocks impacting on the group.
(a) Level 1 – the ADI on a stand-alone basis;
(b) Level 2 – the consolidated banking group i.e. the ADI and all its subsidiaries other than non-consolidated subsidiaries (refer AGN 110.2); and
(c) Level 3 – the conglomerate group at the widest level.
Level 1 and Level 2 assessments are applicable to all ADIs. Level 3 assessment applies only to ADIs prescribed by APRA (refer AGN 110.3).
Measurement of an ADI’s capital adequacy at each of the above three levels is based on:
(a) Level 1 & Level 2 – a risk-based capital adequacy framework based on the Basel Capital Accord (refer AGN 110.4); and
(b) Level 3 – the methodology agreed with APRA (refer AGN 110.3).
An ADI must, at a minimum, maintain a risk-based capital ratio (refer AGN 110.4) of 8 per cent at all times under Level 1 and Level 2. At least half of the ratio must take the form of Tier 1 capital (refer APS 111) i.e. a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 4 per cent must be maintained. Where considered appropriate, APRA may require an ADI to maintain a minimum capital ratio above 8 per cent (at least half of the ratio must take the form of Tier 1 capital) at Level 1 and Level 2 (refer AGN 110.5). APRA expects all ADIs, as part of their capital management plans (refer paragraphs 3(b) and 5(a) above), to target and maintain Level 1 and Level 2 capital ratios (both Tier 1 and total) above regulatory minimums.
ADIs subject to Level 3 capital adequacy assessment must meet the minimum group-wide capital adequacy benchmarks agreed with APRA on a continuous basis. APRA may impose additional or higher Level 1 and/or Level 2 capital requirements on an ADI in a conglomerate group where it is not satisfied with the methodology for measuring the group’s capital adequacy at Level 3 (refer AGN 110.3).
(a) any breach of the minimum capital adequacy requirements under paragraphs 9 and 10 and any potential breach of these requirements (e.g. breaches of trigger ratios), including remedial actions taken/planned to deal with the problem; and
(b) any concerns it has about its capital adequacy (whether at Level 1, 2 or 3), along with proposed measures to address these concerns.
An ADI must provide APRA each quarter (or more frequently if required by APRA) with information on its Level 1 and Level 2 capital adequacy in a form to be determined by APRA from time to time.
ADIs subject to Level 3 capital adequacy assessment must provide APRA each quarter (or more frequently if required by APRA) with the group’s capital adequacy reports in a form agreed with APRA.
Attachment
Level 1 – An ADI assessed on a stand-alone basis
Level 2 – An ADI and all its subsidiary entities (other than non-consolidated subsidiaries) assessed on a consolidated banking group basis
Image unavailable in extracted text
Level 3 – Entire group assessed