CTHRepealedLegislation
Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2006 - Prudential Standard APS 110 - Capital Adequacy
Higher Minimum RatiosHigher Minimum Ratios
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Higher Minimum Ratios
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2006 - Prudential Standard APS 110 - Capital Adequacy.
Higher Minimum Ratios
- In assessing an authorised deposit-taking institution's (ADI’s) overall capital adequacy at Level 1 and Level 2, APRA will take account of other risk factors that have not been incorporated or accounted for quantitatively in the risk-based capital adequacy framework to ensure that the minimum capital adequacy requirements for the ADI are broadly proportional to its overall risk profiles at Level 1 and Level 2. These factors include, for example, credit risk concentrations, profitability, liquidity,[4] off-balance sheet exposures, concentration of particular types of assets or liabilities, operational risk and the effectiveness of the ADI’s management systems for monitoring and controlling risks.
- APRA will consider the above factors in deciding how much capital an ADI needs to hold above the minimum 8 per cent requirement at Level 1 and/or Level 2. All newly established ADIs are generally subject to a higher minimum risk-based capital ratio, both at Level 1 and Level 2, in their formative years.