Australian Research Council Funding Rules for schemes under the Discovery Program (2017 edition)
B9Selection Process
Start here
Get a plain-English read of B9
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Australian Research Council Funding Rules for schemes under the Discovery Program (2017 edition).
B9. Selection Process
B9.1 Selection Criteria
B9.1.1 Proposals will be assessed and ranked using the following selection criteria:
a. Investigator 40%
- Research Opportunity and Performance Evidence (ROPE);
- Evidence of outstanding Research Output and achievement taking into account research opportunity;
- Potential to undertake ground-breaking research;
- Outstanding leadership ability;
- Potential to create an enduring legacy that would be enhanced by the Australian Laureate Fellowship;
- Contribution to national and international public policy debates and initiatives;
b. Program of Research Activity 30%
- Innovation
- Are the proposed Project aims and concepts original and innovative, representing the leading edge of research in the field?
- Will new methods, technologies, theories or ideas be developed?
- How does the research program enhance innovation in Australia?
ii. Approach
- Are the conceptual framework, design, methods and analyses adequately developed, well integrated and appropriate to the aims of the Project?
iii. Significance and National Benefit
- Does the research address an important problem?
- How will the anticipated outcomes advance the knowledge base?
- Is there a major contribution to public policy formulation and debate?
- Will the proposed research maximise economic, environmental, social and/or cultural benefit to Australia?
- Will this research build new international research collaboration or links between research and industry?
c. Mentoring/Capacity Building 30%
- Does the Proposal show how the Project will build new teams and create world-class research capacity, collaboration and innovation?
- Does the Australian Laureate Fellowship Candidate:
- demonstrate exceptional ability to supervise and to mentor postdoctoral researchers and other early-mid career researchers?
- have a record of successful postgraduate supervision, where applicable?