Auditing Standard ASA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement
The Inherent Risk FactorsThe Inherent Risk Factors
Start here
Get a plain-English read of The Inherent Risk Factors
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Auditing Standard ASA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement.
The Inherent Risk Factors
-
Inherent risk factors are characteristics of events or conditions that affect susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transactions, account balance or disclosure, to misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and before consideration of controls. Such factors may be qualitative or quantitative, and include complexity, subjectivity, change, uncertainty or susceptibility to misstatement due to management bias or other fraud risk factors[71] insofar as they affect inherent risk. In obtaining the understanding of the entity and its environment, and the applicable financial reporting framework and the entity’s accounting policies, in accordance with paragraphs 19(a)‒(b), the auditor also understands how inherent risk factors affect susceptibility of assertions to misstatement in the preparation of the financial report.
-
Inherent risk factors relating to the preparation of information required by the applicable financial reporting framework (referred to in this paragraph as “required information”) include:
- Complexity―arises either from the nature of the information or in the way that the required information is prepared, including when such preparation processes are more inherently difficult to apply. For example, complexity may arise:
- In calculating supplier rebate provisions because it may be necessary to take into account different commercial terms with many different suppliers, or many interrelated commercial terms that are all relevant in calculating the rebates due; or
- When there are many potential data sources, with different characteristics used in making an accounting estimate, the processing of that data involves many inter-related steps, and the data is therefore inherently more difficult to identify, capture, access, understand or process.
- Subjectivity―arises from inherent limitations in the ability to prepare required information in an objective manner, due to limitations in the availability of knowledge or information, such that management may need to make an election or subjective judgement about the appropriate approach to take and about the resulting information to include in the financial report. Because of different approaches to preparing the required information, different outcomes could result from appropriately applying the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework. As limitations in knowledge or data increase, the subjectivity in the judgements that could be made by reasonably knowledgeable and independent individuals, and the diversity in possible outcomes of those judgements, will also increase.
- Change―results from events or conditions that, over time, affect the entity’s business or the economic, accounting, regulatory, industry or other aspects of the environment in which it operates, when the effects of those events or conditions are reflected in the required information. Such events or conditions may occur during, or between, financial reporting periods. For example, change may result from developments in the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework, or in the entity and its business model, or in the environment in which the entity operates. Such change may affect management’s assumptions and judgements, including as they relate to management’s selection of accounting policies or how accounting estimates are made or related disclosures are determined.