CTHIn ForceLegislation
Auditing Standard ASA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement
Limitations of Internal ControlLimitations of Internal Control
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Limitations of Internal Control
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Auditing Standard ASA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement.
Limitations of Internal Control
- The entity’s system of internal control, no matter how effective, can provide an entity with only reasonable assurance about achieving the entity’s financial reporting objectives. The likelihood of their achievement is affected by the inherent limitations of internal control. These include the realities that human judgement in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in the entity’s system of internal control can occur because of human error. For example, there may be an error in the design of, or in the change to, a control. Equally, the operation of a control may not be effective, such as where information produced for the purposes of the entity’s system of internal control (for example, an exception report) is not effectively used because the individual responsible for reviewing the information does not understand its purpose or fails to take appropriate action.
- Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the collusion of two or more people or inappropriate management override of controls. For example, management may enter into side agreements with customers that alter the terms and conditions of the entity’s standard sales contracts, which may result in improper revenue recognition. Also, edit checks in an IT application that are designed to identify and report transactions that exceed specified credit limits may be overridden or disabled.
- Further, in designing and implementing controls, management may make judgements on the nature and extent of the controls it chooses to implement, and the nature and extent of the risks it chooses to assume.