Main changes from AUS 606 (July 2002) UsMain changes from AUS 606 (July 2002) Using the Work of an Expert

Main changes from AUS 606 (July 2002) Using the Work of an Expert

The main differences between this Auditing Standard and the Auditing Standard issued by the Auditing & Assurance Standards Board of the Australian Accounting Research Foundation, AUS 606 (July 2002) Using the Work of an Expert, are that in this Auditing Standard:

1. The word ‘shall’, in the bold-type paragraphs, is the terminology used to describe an auditor’s mandatory requirements, whereas an auditor’s degree of responsibility is described in AUS 606 by the word ‘should’.
2. The explanatory guidance paragraphs provide guidance and illustrative examples to assist the auditor in fulfilling the mandatory requirements, whereas in AUS 606 some obligations are implied within certain explanatory paragraphs. Accordingly, such paragraphs have been redrafted to clarify that the matter forms part of explanatory guidance.
3. Includes as an expert a person employed by the auditor, whereas in AUS 606, a person employed by the auditor is not considered an expert.

AUTHORITY STATEMENT

The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) makes Auditing Standard ASA 620 Using the Work of an Expert as set out in paragraphs 1 to 28, pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001.

This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with the Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out the intentions of the AUASB on how the Auditing Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied.

The mandatory requirements of this Auditing Standard are set out in bold-type paragraphs.

Dated 28 April 2006 M H Kelsall
Chairman - AUASB