CTHIn ForceLegislation
ASA 620 - Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert - October 2009
Evaluating the Adequacy of the Auditor’sEvaluating the Adequacy of the Auditor’s Expert’s Work
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Evaluating the Adequacy of the Auditor’s
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in ASA 620 - Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert - October 2009.
Evaluating the Adequacy of the Auditor’s Expert’s Work
- The auditor shall evaluate the adequacy of the auditor’s expert’s work for the auditor’s purposes, including: (Ref: Para. A32)
- The relevance and reasonableness of that expert’s findings or conclusions, and their consistency with other audit evidence; (Ref: Para. A33-A34)
- If that expert’s work involves use of significant assumptions and methods, the relevance and reasonableness of those assumptions and methods in the circumstances; and (Ref: Para. A35-A37)
- If that expert’s work involves the use of source data that is significant to that expert’s work, the relevance, completeness, and accuracy of that source data.
(Ref: Para. A38-A39)
- If the auditor determines that the work of the auditor’s expert is not adequate for the auditor’s purposes, the auditor shall: (Ref: Para. A40)
- Agree with that expert on the nature and extent of further work to be performed by that expert; or
- Perform additional audit procedures appropriate to the circumstances.