ASA 300 - Planning an Audit of a Financial Report - October 2009
In ForceCTH
Jurisdiction
Commonwealth
Collection
legislative instrument
Plain English Summary
5/10 complexity
This Standard requires auditors to plan audits of financial reports by setting an overall audit strategy and a detailed audit plan, involving key engagement team members, performing preliminary engagement checks, documenting the strategy and plan, and updating them as needed (Aus 0.1; Paras 5–9,12–13). It applies to auditors and audit firms (who decide, resource and document the work) and to audited entities (which must provide information); compliance imposes professional‑judgement, record‑keeping and supervisory obligations and links to ASA 220, 210, 315 and 330 (Authority statement; A1–A4).
This instrument is the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s compiled Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as amended to 27 April 2022). Mechanically it does the following, as set out in the compilation and in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A24 and Appendix 1.
Applies the auditor’s planning obligations to audits of financial reports for financial years and half‑years under the Corporations Act 2001 and to audits of financial reports or complete sets of financial statements for any other purpose (Aus 0.1). It also applies, as appropriate, to audits of other historical financial information (Aus 0.2).
Makes operative the standard for financial reporting periods ending on or after 1 January 2010 (Aus 0.3) and incorporates amendments listed in the Compilation Details up to 27 April 2022.
States the auditor’s objective for planning: to plan the audit so it will be performed in an effective manner (Objective, paras 1).
Imposes specific planning requirements: involvement of the engagement partner and other key engagement team members in planning (para 5); preliminary engagement activities at the beginning of the current audit (para 6, which requires compliance with ASA 220 on acceptance/continuance and ethics, and ASA 210 on terms of engagement); establishing an overall audit strategy that sets scope, timing and direction (para 7‑8); developing an audit plan describing direction and supervision, planned risk assessment procedures under ASA 315, further procedures at the assertion level under ASA 330, and other procedures required by the Australian Auditing Standards (para 9); and updating and changing the strategy and plan as necessary (para 10). The engagement partner must review the overall audit strategy and audit plan (para 10.5).
Current sections
Direct links to the current provisions in ASA 300 - Planning an Audit of a Financial Report - October 2009.
28
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standa
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
The most recently compiled versions of Auditing Standards, original Standards and amending Standards (see Compilation Details) are available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au
Contact Details
Contact Details
Contact Details
Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardPhone: (03) 8080 7400E‑mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Otherwise, no part of this Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.
This Auditing Standard reproduces substantial parts of the corresponding International Standard on Auditing issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), in the manner described in the statement on Conformity with International Standards on Auditing. The AUASB acknowledges that IFAC is the owner of copyright in the International Standard on Auditing incorporated in this Auditing Standard throughout the world.
All existing rights in this material are reserved outside Australia. Reproduction outside Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non‑commercial use only.
Further information and requests for authorisation to reproduce this Auditing Standard for commercial purposes outside Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Any decision to approve a request may also require the agreement of IFAC.
ISSN 1833‑4393
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
COMPILATION DETAILS
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements...............................A24
Appendix 1: Considerations in Establishing the Overall Audit Strategy
COMPILATION DETAILS
COMPILATION DETAILS
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
The most recently compiled versions of Auditing Standards, original Standards and amending Standards (see Compilation Details) are available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au
Contact Details
Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardPhone: (03) 8080 7400E‑mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Otherwise, no part of this Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.
This Auditing Standard reproduces substantial parts of the corresponding International Standard on Auditing issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), in the manner described in the statement on Conformity with International Standards on Auditing. The AUASB acknowledges that IFAC is the owner of copyright in the International Standard on Auditing incorporated in this Auditing Standard throughout the world.
All existing rights in this material are reserved outside Australia. Reproduction outside Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non‑commercial use only.
Further information and requests for authorisation to reproduce this Auditing Standard for commercial purposes outside Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Any decision to approve a request may also require the agreement of IFAC.
ISSN 1833‑4393
CONTENTS
COMPILATION DETAILS
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements...............................A24
Appendix 1: Considerations in Establishing the Overall Audit Strategy
COMPILATION DETAILS
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as Amended)
This compilation takes into account amendments made up to and including 27 April 2022 and was prepared on 1 March 2023 by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB).
This compilation is not a separate Auditing Standard made by the AUASB. Instead, it is a representation of ASA 300 (October 2009) as amended by other Auditing Standards which are listed in the Table below.
Table of Standards
Standard
Date made
Operative Date
ASA 300 [A]
27 October 2009
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2010
ASA 2011‑1 [B]
27 June 2011
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2011
ASA 2013‑2 [C]
11 November 2013
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2014
ASA 2015‑1 [D]
1 December 2015
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2020‑1 [E]
3 March 2020
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2021[*]
ASA 2021-1 [F]
10 March 2021
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2022
ASA 2022-1 [G]
27 April 2022
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2023
Legislation History
Standard
Registration Number
Registration Date
Commencement Date
ASA 300
F2009L04077
11 November 2009
12 November 2009
ASA 2011‑1
F2011L01379
30 June 2011
1 July 2011
ASA 2013-2
F2013L01939
14 November 2013
15 November 2013
ASA 2015-1
F2015L02032
16 December 2015
17 December 2015
ASA 2020-1
F2020L00252
13 March 2020
14 December 2021
ASA 2021-1
F2021L00403
1 April 2021
14 December 2022
ASA 2022-1
F2022L00712
19 May 2022
14 December 2023
Table of Amendments
Paragraph affected
How affected
By … [paragraph]
Appendix 1 Last sub‑heading
Amended
ASA 2011‑1 [27]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2013‑2 [55] [56] [57]
9
Amended
ASA 2015‑1 [51]
A13 directly after existing A12
Addition
ASA 2015‑1 [52-53]
A14 directly after inserted A13
Addition
ASA 2015‑1 [54 and 56]
Footnote 9
Addition
ASA 2015-1 [55]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2015‑1 [57]
A4Footnote 8
Amended
ASA 2020‑1 [65]
A21
Amended
ASA 2020‑1 [66]
A21Footnote 11
Addition
ASA 2020‑1 [66]
2 and its heading
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [54]
6
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [55]
6Footnotes 1 and 2
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [56]
8
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [57]
8Footnote 4
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [58]
Renumbering of Footnotes
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [59]
9
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [60]
11
Deleted
ASA 2021-1 [61]
12
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [62]
13
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [63]
13Footnote 17
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [64]
A1 before existing A1
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [65]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [66]
A2
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [67]
A4
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [68]
A6
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [69]
A7
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [70]
A8
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [71]
A9
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [72]
A10 after existing A8
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [73]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [74]
A18
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [75]
A18Footnote 13
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [76]
Existing A17
Deleted
ASA 2021-1 [77]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [77]
A19
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [78]
A22 after existing A20
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [79]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [80]
A24
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [81]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [82]
11
Addition
ASA 2022-1 [25]
A9
Amended
ASA 2022-1 [26]
Appendix 1Footnote 17
Amended
ASA 2022-1 [27]
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as amended to 27 April 2022) is set out in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A24 and Appendix 1.
This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied. This Auditing Standard is to be read also in conjunction with ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 300 Planning an Audit of Financial Statements issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard‑setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 300.
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Au
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as Amended)
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as Amended)
This compilation takes into account amendments made up to and including 27 April 2022 and was prepared on 1 March 2023 by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB).
This compilation is not a separate Auditing Standard made by the AUASB. Instead, it is a representation of ASA 300 (October 2009) as amended by other Auditing Standards which are listed in the Table below.
Table of Standards
Table of Standards
Table of Standards
Standard
Date made
Operative Date
ASA 300 [A]
27 October 2009
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2010
ASA 2011‑1 [B]
27 June 2011
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2011
ASA 2013‑2 [C]
11 November 2013
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2014
ASA 2015‑1 [D]
1 December 2015
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2020‑1 [E]
3 March 2020
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2021[*]
ASA 2021-1 [F]
10 March 2021
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2022
ASA 2022-1 [G]
27 April 2022
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2023
Legislation History
Standard
Registration Number
Registration Date
Commencement Date
ASA 300
F2009L04077
11 November 2009
12 November 2009
ASA 2011‑1
F2011L01379
30 June 2011
1 July 2011
ASA 2013-2
F2013L01939
14 November 2013
15 November 2013
ASA 2015-1
F2015L02032
16 December 2015
17 December 2015
ASA 2020-1
F2020L00252
13 March 2020
14 December 2021
ASA 2021-1
F2021L00403
1 April 2021
14 December 2022
ASA 2022-1
F2022L00712
19 May 2022
14 December 2023
Table of Amendments
Table of Amendments
Table of Amendments
Paragraph affected
How affected
By … [paragraph]
Appendix 1 Last sub‑heading
Amended
ASA 2011‑1 [27]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2013‑2 [55] [56] [57]
9
Amended
ASA 2015‑1 [51]
A13 directly after existing A12
Addition
ASA 2015‑1 [52-53]
A14 directly after inserted A13
Addition
ASA 2015‑1 [54 and 56]
Footnote 9
Addition
ASA 2015-1 [55]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2015‑1 [57]
A4Footnote 8
Amended
ASA 2020‑1 [65]
A21
Amended
ASA 2020‑1 [66]
A21Footnote 11
Addition
ASA 2020‑1 [66]
2 and its heading
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [54]
6
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [55]
6Footnotes 1 and 2
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [56]
8
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [57]
8Footnote 4
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [58]
Renumbering of Footnotes
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [59]
9
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [60]
11
Deleted
ASA 2021-1 [61]
12
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [62]
13
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [63]
13Footnote 17
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [64]
A1 before existing A1
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [65]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [66]
A2
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [67]
A4
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [68]
A6
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [69]
A7
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [70]
A8
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [71]
A9
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [72]
A10 after existing A8
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [73]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [74]
A18
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [75]
A18Footnote 13
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [76]
Existing A17
Deleted
ASA 2021-1 [77]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [77]
A19
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [78]
A22 after existing A20
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [79]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [80]
A24
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [81]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [82]
11
Addition
ASA 2022-1 [25]
A9
Amended
ASA 2022-1 [26]
Appendix 1Footnote 17
Amended
ASA 2022-1 [27]
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as amended to 27 April 2022) is set out in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A24 and Appendix 1.
This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied. This Auditing Standard is to be read also in conjunction with ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 300 Planning an Audit of Financial Statements issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard‑setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 300.
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as amended to 27 April 2022) is set out in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A24 and Appendix 1.
This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied. This Auditing Standard is to be read also in conjunction with ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Conformity with International Standards
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 300 Planning an Audit of Financial Statements issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard‑setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 300.
Auditing Standard ASA 300
Auditing Standard ASA 300
Auditing Standard ASA 300
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) made Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, on 27 October 2009.
This compiled version of ASA 300 incorporates subsequent amendments contained in other Auditing Standards made by the AUASB up to and including 27 April 2022 (see Compilation Details).
Auditing Standard ASA 300
Planning an Audit of a Financial Report
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 1 January 2010. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard
This Auditing Standard deals with the auditor’s responsibility to plan an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard is written in the context of recurring audits. Additional considerations in an initial audit engagement are separately identified.
Planning an audit involves establishing the overall audit strategy for the engagement and developing an audit plan. Quality management at the engagement level in accordance with ASA 220, in conjunction with adequate planning in accordance with this ASA, benefits the audit of a financial report in several ways, including the following: (Ref: Para. A1‑A4)
Helping the auditor to devote appropriate attention to important areas of the audit.
Helping the auditor identify and resolve potential problems on a timely basis.
Helping the auditor properly organise and manage the audit engagement so that it is performed in an effective and efficient manner
Planning an Audit of a Financial Report
Planning an Audit of a Financial Report
Auditing Standard ASA 300
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) made Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, on 27 October 2009.
This compiled version of ASA 300 incorporates subsequent amendments contained in other Auditing Standards made by the AUASB up to and including 27 April 2022 (see Compilation Details).
Auditing Standard ASA 300
Planning an Audit of a Financial Report
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 1 January 2010. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard
This Auditing Standard deals with the auditor’s responsibility to plan an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard is written in the context of recurring audits. Additional considerations in an initial audit engagement are separately identified.
Planning an audit involves establishing the overall audit strategy for the engagement and developing an audit plan. Quality management at the engagement level in accordance with ASA 220, in conjunction with adequate planning in accordance with this ASA, benefits the audit of a financial report in several ways, including the following: (Ref: Para. A1‑A4)
Helping the auditor to devote appropriate attention to important areas of the audit.
Helping the auditor identify and resolve potential problems on a timely basis.
Helping the auditor properly organise and manage the audit engagement so that it is performed in an effective and efficient manner
Application
Application
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Operative Date
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 1 January 2010. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Introduction
Auditing Standard ASA 300
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) made Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, on 27 October 2009.
This compiled version of ASA 300 incorporates subsequent amendments contained in other Auditing Standards made by the AUASB up to and including 27 April 2022 (see Compilation Details).
Auditing Standard ASA 300
Planning an Audit of a Financial Report
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half‑year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods ending on or after 1 January 2010. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an Amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard
This Auditing Standard deals with the auditor’s responsibility to plan an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard is written in the context of recurring audits. Additional considerations in an initial audit engagement are separately identified.
Planning an audit involves establishing the overall audit strategy for the engagement and developing an audit plan. Quality management at the engagement level in accordance with ASA 220, in conjunction with adequate planning in accordance with this ASA, benefits the audit of a financial report in several ways, including the following: (Ref: Para. A1‑A4)
Helping the auditor to devote appropriate attention to important areas of the audit.
Helping the auditor identify and resolve potential problems on a timely basis.
Helping the auditor properly organise and manage the audit engagement so that it is performed in an effective and efficient manner
Scope of this Auditing Standard
Scope of this Auditing Standard
Scope of this Auditing Standard
This Auditing Standard deals with the auditor’s responsibility to plan an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard is written in the context of recurring audits. Additional considerations in an initial audit engagement are separately identified.
Planning an audit involves establishing the overall audit strategy for the engagement and developing an audit plan. Quality management at the engagement level in accordance with ASA 220, in conjunction with adequate planning in accordance with this ASA, benefits the audit of a financial report in several ways, including the following: (Ref: Para. A1‑A4)
Helping the auditor to devote appropriate attention to important areas of the audit.
Helping the auditor identify and resolve potential problems on a timely basis.
Helping the auditor properly organise and manage the audit engagement so that it is performed in an effective and efficient manner
Effective Date
Effective Date
Effective Date
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus 0.3]
Objective
Objective
Objective
The objective of the auditor is to plan the audit so that it will be performed in an effective manner.
Requirements
Requirements
Assisting in the selection of engagement team members with appropriate levels of capabilities and competence to respond to anticipated risks, and the proper assignment of work to them.
Facilitating the direction and supervision of engagement team members and the review of their work.
Assisting, where applicable, in coordination of work done by auditors of components and experts.
Effective Date
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus 0.3]
Objective
The objective of the auditor is to plan the audit so that it will be performed in an effective manner.
Requirements
Involvement of Key Engagement Team Members
The engagement partner and other key members of the engagement team shall be involved in planning the audit, including planning and participating in the discussion among engagement team members. (Ref: Para. A5)
Preliminary Engagement Activities
The auditor shall undertake the following activities at the beginning of the current audit engagement:
Performing procedures required by ASA 220 regarding the acceptance and continuance of the client relationship and audit engagement;[1]
Evaluating compliance with relevant ethical requirements, including those related to independence, in accordance with ASA 220;[2] and
Establishing an understanding of the terms of the engagement, as required by ASA 210.[3] (Ref: Para. A6‑A8)
Planning Activities
The auditor shall establish an overall audit strategy that sets the scope, timing and direction of the audit, and that guides the development of the audit plan.
In establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor shall consider the information obtained from complying with the requirements of ASA 220 and:
Identify the characteristics of the engagement that define its scope;
Ascertain the reporting objectives of the engagement to plan the timing of the audit and the nature of the communications required;
Consider the factors that, in the auditor’s professional judgement, are significant in directing the engagement team’s efforts;
Consider the results of preliminary engagement activities and, where applicable, whether knowledge gained on other engagements performed by the engagement partner for the entity is relevant; and
Ascertain the nature, timing and extent of resources necessary to perform the engagement.[4] (Ref: Para. A9‑A13)
The auditor shall develop an audit plan that shall include a description of:
The nature, timing and extent of the planned direction and supervision of engagement team members and the review of their work. (Ref: Para. A18–A19)
The nature, timing and extent of planned risk assessment procedures, as determined under ASA 315.[5]
The nature, timing and extent of planned further audit procedures at the assertion level, as determined under ASA 330.[6]
Other planned audit procedures that are required to be carried out so that the engagement complies with the Australian Auditing Standards. (Ref: Para. A14‑A16)
The auditor shall update and change the overall audit strategy and the audit plan as necessary during the course of the audit. (Ref: Para. A17)
The engagement partner shall review the overall audit strategy and audit plan.
Documentation
The auditor shall include in the audit documentation:[7]
The overall audit strategy;
The audit plan; and
Any significant changes made during the audit engagement to the overall audit strategy or the audit plan, including significant changes to the nature, timing and extent of the planned direction and supervision of engagement team members and the review of their work,[8] and the reasons for such changes. (Ref: Para. A19‑A23)
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements
The auditor shall undertake the following activities prior to starting an initial audit:
Performing procedures required by ASA 220 regarding the acceptance of client relationships and audit engagements;[9] and
Communicating with the predecessor auditor, where there has been a change of auditors, in compliance with relevant ethical requirements. (Ref: Para. A24)
* * *
Application and Other Explanatory Material
ASA 220 deals with the specific responsibilities of the auditor regarding quality management at the engagement level for an audit of financial reports, and the related responsibilities of the engagement partner. Information obtained from complying with the requirements of ASA 220 is relevant to this ASA. For example, in accordance with ASA 220, the engagement partner is required to determine that sufficient and appropriate resources to perform the engagement have been assigned or made available to the engagement team, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the audit engagement. Such a determination is directly relevant when ascertaining the nature, timing and extent of resources necessary to perform the engagement in the overall strategy, as required by paragraph 8 of this ASA.
The Role and Timing of Planning (Ref: Para. 2)
The nature and extent of planning activities will vary according to the size and complexity of the entity, the key engagement team members’ previous experience with the entity, and changes in circumstances that occur during the audit engagement. In planning the audit, the auditor may use project management techniques and tools. ASA 220[10] describes how such techniques and tools may support the engagement team in managing the quality of the engagement.
Planning is not a discrete phase of an audit, but rather a continual and iterative process that often begins shortly after (or in connection with) the completion of the previous audit and continues until the completion of the current audit engagement. Planning, however, includes consideration of the timing of certain activities and audit procedures that need to be completed prior to the performance of further audit procedures. For example, planning includes the need to consider, prior to the auditor’s identification and assessment of the risks of material misstatement, such matters as:
The analytical procedures to be applied as risk assessment procedures.
Obtaining a general understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the entity and how the entity is complying with that framework.
The determination of materiality.
The involvement of experts.
The performance of other risk assessment procedures.
The auditor may decide to discuss elements of planning with the entity’s management, or those charged with governance, to help the auditor manage and achieve quality at the engagement level (for example, to co‑ordinate some of the planned audit procedures with the work of the entity's personnel). Although these discussions often occur, the overall audit strategy and the audit plan remain the auditor's responsibility. When discussing matters included in the overall audit strategy or audit plan, care is required in order not to compromise the effectiveness of the audit. For example, discussing the nature and timing of detailed audit procedures with management, or those charged with governance, may compromise the effectiveness of the audit by making the audit procedures too predictable.
Involvement of Key Engagement Team Members (Ref: Para. 5)
The involvement of the engagement partner and other key members of the engagement team in planning the audit draws on their experience and insight, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the planning process.[11]
Preliminary Engagement Activities (Ref: Para. 6)
Performing the preliminary engagement activities specified in paragraph 6 at the beginning of the current audit engagement assists the auditor in identifying and evaluating events or circumstances that may adversely affect the auditor’s ability to manage and achieve quality at the engagement level in accordance with ASA 220.
Performing these preliminary engagement activities enables the auditor to plan an audit engagement in order to, for example:
Maintain the necessary independence and ability to perform the engagement.
Determine that there are no issues with management integrity that may affect the auditor’s willingness to continue the engagement.
Determine that there is no misunderstanding with the client as to the terms of the engagement.
Performing initial procedures on both client continuance and evaluation of relevant ethical requirements (including independence) at the beginning of the current audit engagement means that they are completed prior to the performance of other significant activities for the current audit engagement. For continuing audit engagements, such initial procedures often occur shortly after (or in connection with) the completion of the previous audit.
Planning Activities
The Overall Audit Strategy (Ref: Para. 7‑8)
The process of establishing the overall audit strategy, subject to the completion of the auditor’s risk assessment procedures, may include such matters as:
The nature of resources (human, technological or intellectual) to be deployed for specific audit areas. For example, the deployment of experienced team members for high risk areas or the assignment of experts to address complex matters;
The amount of resources to be allocated to specific audit areas. For example, the number of team members assigned to attend the physical inventory count at multiple locations, the nature and extent of direction and supervision of component auditors and the review of their work in the case of group audits, or the audit budget in hours to allocate to high risk areas;
When these resources are to be deployed, such as whether at an interim audit stage or at key cut‑off dates; and
How such resources are directed, supervised or used. For example, when team briefing and debriefing meetings are expected to be held, how engagement partner and manager reviews are expected to take place (for example, on‑site or off‑site).
ASA 220 contains requirements and guidance on engagement resources and engagement performance (including direction and supervision of the members of the engagement team and the review of their work).
Appendix 1 lists examples of considerations in establishing the overall audit strategy.
Once the overall audit strategy has been established, an audit plan can be developed to address the various matters identified in the overall audit strategy, taking into account the need to achieve the audit objectives through the efficient use of the auditor’s resources. The establishment of the overall audit strategy and the detailed audit plan are not necessarily discrete or sequential processes, but are closely inter‑related since changes in one may result in consequential changes to the other.
Considerations Specific to Smaller Entities
In audits of small entities, the entire audit may be conducted by a very small audit team. Many audits of small entities involve the engagement partner (who may be a sole practitioner) working with one engagement team member (or without any engagement team members). With a smaller team, co‑ordination of, and communication between, team members are easier. Establishing the overall audit strategy for the audit of a small entity need not be a complex or time‑consuming exercise; it varies according to the size of the entity, the complexity of the audit, and the size of the engagement team. For example, a brief memorandum prepared at the completion of the previous audit, based on a review of the working papers and highlighting issues identified in the audit just completed, updated in the current period based on discussions with the owner‑manager, can serve as the documented audit strategy for the current audit engagement if it covers the matters noted in paragraph 8.
The Audit Plan (Ref: Para. 9)
The audit plan is more detailed than the overall audit strategy in that it includes the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be performed by engagement team members. Planning for these audit procedures takes place over the course of the audit as the audit plan for the engagement develops. For example, planning of the auditor's risk assessment procedures occurs early in the audit process. However, planning the nature, timing and extent of specific further audit procedures depends on the outcome of those risk assessment procedures. In addition, the auditor may begin the execution of further audit procedures for some classes of transactions, account balances and disclosures before planning all remaining further audit procedures.
Determining the nature, timing and extent of planned risk assessment procedures, and the further audit procedures, as they relate to disclosures is important in light of both the wide range of information and the level of detail that may be encompassed in those disclosures. Further, certain disclosures may contain information that is obtained from outside of the general and subsidiary ledgers, which may also affect the assessed risks and the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to address them.
Consideration of disclosures early in the audit assists the auditor in giving appropriate attention to, and planning adequate time for, addressing disclosures in the same way as classes of transactions, events and account balances. Early consideration may also help the auditor to determine the effects on the audit of:
Significant new or revised disclosures required as a result of changes in the entity’s environment, financial condition or activities (for example, a change in the required identification of segments and reporting of segment information arising from a significant business combination);
Significant new or revised disclosures arising from changes in the applicable financial reporting framework;
The need for the involvement of an auditor’s expert to assist with audit procedures related to particular disclosures (for example, disclosures related to superannuation or other retirement benefit obligations); and
Matters relating to disclosures that the auditor may wish to discuss with those charged with governance.[12]
Changes to Planning Decisions during the Course of the Audit (Ref: Para. 10)
As a result of unexpected events, changes in conditions, or the audit evidence obtained from the results of audit procedures, the auditor may need to modify the overall audit strategy and audit plan and thereby the resulting planned nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures, based on the revised consideration of assessed risks. This may be the case when information comes to the auditor’s attention that differs significantly from the information available when the auditor planned the audit procedures. For example, audit evidence obtained through the performance of substantive procedures may contradict the audit evidence obtained through tests of controls.
Direction, Supervision and Review (Ref: Para. 11)
ASA 220 deals with the engagement partner’s responsibility for the nature, timing and extent of direction and supervision of the members of the engagement team and the review of their work. [13]
Documentation (Ref: Para. 12)
The documentation of the overall audit strategy is a record of the key decisions in managing quality at the engagement level and a means to communicate significant matters to the engagement team. For example, the auditor may summarise the overall audit strategy in the form of a memorandum that contains key decisions regarding the overall scope, timing and conduct of the audit.
The documentation of the audit plan is a record of the planned nature, timing and extent of risk assessment procedures and further audit procedures at the assertion level in response to the assessed risks. It also serves as a record of the proper planning of the audit procedures that can be reviewed and approved prior to their performance. The auditor may use standard audit programs or audit completion checklists, tailored as needed to reflect the particular engagement circumstances.
A record of the significant changes to the overall audit strategy and the audit plan, and resulting changes to the planned nature, timing and extent of audit procedures, explains why the significant changes were made, and the overall strategy and audit plan finally adopted for the audit. It also reflects the appropriate response to the significant changes occurring during the audit.
Documentation of the direction and supervision of engagement team members and the review of their work in accordance with ASA 220 may also provide a record of significant changes to the planned nature, timing and extent of the direction, supervision and review.
Considerations Specific to Smaller Entities
As discussed in paragraph A11, a suitable, brief memorandum may serve as the documented strategy for the audit of a smaller entity. For the audit plan, standard audit programs or checklists (see paragraph A17) drawn up on the assumption of few controls[14], as is likely to be the case in a smaller entity, may be used provided that they are tailored to the circumstances of the engagement, including the auditor’s risk assessments.
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements (Ref: Para. 13)
The purpose and objective of planning the audit are the same whether the audit is an initial or recurring engagement. However, for an initial audit, the auditor may need to expand the planning activities because the auditor does not ordinarily have the previous experience with the entity that is considered when planning recurring engagements. For an initial audit engagement, additional matters the auditor may consider in establishing the overall audit strategy and audit plan include the following:
Unless prohibited by law or regulation, arrangements to be made with the predecessor auditor, for example, to review the predecessor auditor’s working papers.
Any major issues (including the application of accounting principles or of auditing and reporting standards) discussed with management in connection with the initial selection as auditor, the communication of these matters to those charged with governance and how these matters affect the overall audit strategy and audit plan.
The audit procedures necessary to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding opening balances.[15]
Other responses designed and implemented by the firm for initial audit engagements (e.g., the firm’s system of quality management may include responses that require another partner or individual with appropriate authority to review the overall audit strategy prior to commencing significant audit procedures or to review reports prior to their issuance).
Involvement of Key Engagement Team Membe
Involvement of Key Engagement Team Members
Involvement of Key Engagement Team Members
The engagement partner and other key members of the engagement team shall be involved in planning the audit, including planning and participating in the discussion among engagement team members. (Ref: Para. A5)
Preliminary Engagement Activities
Preliminary Engagement Activities
Preliminary Engagement Activities
The auditor shall undertake the following activities at the beginning of the current audit engagement:
Performing procedures required by ASA 220 regarding the acceptance and continuance of the client relationship and audit engagement;[1]
Evaluating compliance with relevant ethical requirements, including those related to independence, in accordance with ASA 220;[2] and
Establishing an understanding of the terms of the engagement, as required by ASA 210.[3] (Ref: Para. A6‑A8)
Planning Activities
Planning Activities
Planning Activities
The auditor shall establish an overall audit strategy that sets the scope, timing and direction of the audit, and that guides the development of the audit plan.
In establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor shall consider the information obtained from complying with the requirements of ASA 220 and:
Identify the characteristics of the engagement that define its scope;
Ascertain the reporting objectives of the engagement to plan the timing of the audit and the nature of the communications required;
Consider the factors that, in the auditor’s professional judgement, are significant in directing the engagement team’s efforts;
Consider the results of preliminary engagement activities and, where applicable, whether knowledge gained on other engagements performed by the engagement partner for the entity is relevant; and
Ascertain the nature, timing and extent of resources necessary to perform the engagement.[4] (Ref: Para. A9‑A13)
The auditor shall develop an audit plan that shall include a description of:
The nature, timing and extent of the planned direction and supervision of engagement team members and the review of their work. (Ref: Para. A18–A19)
The nature, timing and extent of planned risk assessment procedures, as determined under ASA 315.[5]
The nature, timing and extent of planned further audit procedures at the assertion level, as determined under ASA 330.[6]
Other planned audit procedures that are required to be carried out so that the engagement complies with the Australian Auditing Standards. (Ref: Para. A14‑A16)
The auditor shall update and change the overall audit strategy and the audit plan as necessary during the course of the audit. (Ref: Para. A17)
The engagement partner shall review the overall audit strategy and audit plan.
Documentation
Documentation
Documentation
The auditor shall include in the audit documentation:[7]
The overall audit strategy;
The audit plan; and
Any significant changes made during the audit engagement to the overall audit strategy or the audit plan, including significant changes to the nature, timing and extent of the planned direction and supervision of engagement team members and the review of their work,[8] and the reasons for such changes. (Ref: Para. A19‑A23)
Additional Considerations in Initial Aud
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements
The auditor shall undertake the following activities prior to starting an initial audit:
Performing procedures required by ASA 220 regarding the acceptance of client relationships and audit engagements;[9] and
Communicating with the predecessor auditor, where there has been a change of auditors, in compliance with relevant ethical requirements. (Ref: Para. A24)
* * *
Application and Other Explanatory Materi
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Application and Other Explanatory Material
ASA 220 deals with the specific responsibilities of the auditor regarding quality management at the engagement level for an audit of financial reports, and the related responsibilities of the engagement partner. Information obtained from complying with the requirements of ASA 220 is relevant to this ASA. For example, in accordance with ASA 220, the engagement partner is required to determine that sufficient and appropriate resources to perform the engagement have been assigned or made available to the engagement team, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the audit engagement. Such a determination is directly relevant when ascertaining the nature, timing and extent of resources necessary to perform the engagement in the overall strategy, as required by paragraph 8 of this ASA.
The Role and Timing of Planning (Ref: Pa
The Role and Timing of Planning (Ref: Para. 2)
The Role and Timing of Planning (Ref: Para. 2)
The nature and extent of planning activities will vary according to the size and complexity of the entity, the key engagement team members’ previous experience with the entity, and changes in circumstances that occur during the audit engagement. In planning the audit, the auditor may use project management techniques and tools. ASA 220[10] describes how such techniques and tools may support the engagement team in managing the quality of the engagement.
Planning is not a discrete phase of an audit, but rather a continual and iterative process that often begins shortly after (or in connection with) the completion of the previous audit and continues until the completion of the current audit engagement. Planning, however, includes consideration of the timing of certain activities and audit procedures that need to be completed prior to the performance of further audit procedures. For example, planning includes the need to consider, prior to the auditor’s identification and assessment of the risks of material misstatement, such matters as:
The analytical procedures to be applied as risk assessment procedures.
Obtaining a general understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the entity and how the entity is complying with that framework.
The determination of materiality.
The involvement of experts.
The performance of other risk assessment procedures.
The auditor may decide to discuss elements of planning with the entity’s management, or those charged with governance, to help the auditor manage and achieve quality at the engagement level (for example, to co‑ordinate some of the planned audit procedures with the work of the entity's personnel). Although these discussions often occur, the overall audit strategy and the audit plan remain the auditor's responsibility. When discussing matters included in the overall audit strategy or audit plan, care is required in order not to compromise the effectiveness of the audit. For example, discussing the nature and timing of detailed audit procedures with management, or those charged with governance, may compromise the effectiveness of the audit by making the audit procedures too predictable.
Preliminary Engagement Activities (Ref:
Preliminary Engagement Activities (Ref: Para. 6)
Preliminary Engagement Activities (Ref: Para. 6)
Performing the preliminary engagement activities specified in paragraph 6 at the beginning of the current audit engagement assists the auditor in identifying and evaluating events or circumstances that may adversely affect the auditor’s ability to manage and achieve quality at the engagement level in accordance with ASA 220.
Performing these preliminary engagement activities enables the auditor to plan an audit engagement in order to, for example:
Maintain the necessary independence and ability to perform the engagement.
Determine that there are no issues with management integrity that may affect the auditor’s willingness to continue the engagement.
Determine that there is no misunderstanding with the client as to the terms of the engagement.
Performing initial procedures on both client continuance and evaluation of relevant ethical requirements (including independence) at the beginning of the current audit engagement means that they are completed prior to the performance of other significant activities for the current audit engagement. For continuing audit engagements, such initial procedures often occur shortly after (or in connection with) the completion of the previous audit.
Documentation (Ref: Para. 12)
Documentation (Ref: Para. 12)
Documentation (Ref: Para. 12)
The documentation of the overall audit strategy is a record of the key decisions in managing quality at the engagement level and a means to communicate significant matters to the engagement team. For example, the auditor may summarise the overall audit strategy in the form of a memorandum that contains key decisions regarding the overall scope, timing and conduct of the audit.
The documentation of the audit plan is a record of the planned nature, timing and extent of risk assessment procedures and further audit procedures at the assertion level in response to the assessed risks. It also serves as a record of the proper planning of the audit procedures that can be reviewed and approved prior to their performance. The auditor may use standard audit programs or audit completion checklists, tailored as needed to reflect the particular engagement circumstances.
A record of the significant changes to the overall audit strategy and the audit plan, and resulting changes to the planned nature, timing and extent of audit procedures, explains why the significant changes were made, and the overall strategy and audit plan finally adopted for the audit. It also reflects the appropriate response to the significant changes occurring during the audit.
Documentation of the direction and supervision of engagement team members and the review of their work in accordance with ASA 220 may also provide a record of significant changes to the planned nature, timing and extent of the direction, supervision and review.
Considerations Specific to Smaller Entities
As discussed in paragraph A11, a suitable, brief memorandum may serve as the documented strategy for the audit of a smaller entity. For the audit plan, standard audit programs or checklists (see paragraph A17) drawn up on the assumption of few controls[14], as is likely to be the case in a smaller entity, may be used provided that they are tailored to the circumstances of the engagement, including the auditor’s risk assessments.
Source text: opening excerpt
Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation (legislation.gov.au), CC BY 4.0.
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standa Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
The most recently compiled versions of Auditing Standards, original Standards and amending Standards (see Compilation Details) are available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au
Contact Details Contact Details
Contact Details
Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardPhone: (03) 8080 7400E‑mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Otherwise, no part of this Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.
This Auditing Standard reproduces substantial parts of the corresponding International Standard on Auditing issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), in the manner described in the statement on Conformity with International Standards on Auditing. The AUASB acknowledges that IFAC is the owner of copyright in the International Standard on Auditing incorporated in this Auditing Standard throughout the world.
All existing rights in this material are reserved outside Australia. Reproduction outside Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non‑commercial use only.
Further information and requests for authorisation to reproduce this Auditing Standard for commercial purposes outside Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to . Any decision to approve a request may also require the agreement of IFAC.
Requires documentation of the overall audit strategy, the audit plan and any significant changes during the engagement, together with reasons for such changes (para 12; Ref: A19‑A23).
Identifies additional, pre‑commencement obligations where the engagement is an initial audit (para 13), including procedures required by ASA 220 and communication with a predecessor auditor where there has been a change of auditor (para 13.2), subject to ethical requirements.
Signals that the standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards and ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards (Authority Statement).
Declares conformity with International Standard on Auditing ISA 300 and identifies Australian‑specific paragraphs by the prefix “Aus” (Conformity with International Standards on Auditing).
In short, ASA 300 converts international planning principles into a binding Australian auditing standard framework, prescribes discrete planning steps and documentation requirements, integrates those steps with ASA 220, ASA 210, ASA 315 and ASA 330, and requires the engagement partner and key team members to be actively involved and to document the strategy and plan.
Main concepts
ASA 300 is structured around a small number of tightly defined concepts. The document’s operative requirements and the accompanying explanatory material use these concepts to allocate responsibilities and to constrain behaviour.
Overall audit strategy (paras 7‑8; A14‑A16): a high‑level document that sets the scope, timing and direction of the audit and guides the audit plan. The standard requires the auditor to consider information from ASA 220 when establishing the strategy, and to identify characteristics defining the engagement’s scope, reporting objectives, significant factors that direct team effort, results of preliminary engagement activities, and the resources necessary to perform the engagement (para 8).
Audit plan (para 9; A17‑A19): the more detailed operational plan derived from the overall audit strategy. It must describe the nature, timing and extent of planned direction and supervision and review of team members (para 9.1), planned risk assessment procedures per ASA 315 (para 9.2), planned further audit procedures at the assertion level per ASA 330 (para 9.3), and other procedures required by the Australian Auditing Standards (para 9.4). The audit plan is iterative and may be updated during the audit (para 10; A13).
Preliminary engagement activities (para 6; A6‑A8): actions that the auditor must take at the beginning of the current audit, namely the procedures required by ASA 220 on client acceptance/continuance, evaluation of ethical requirements including independence, and establishing an understanding of the terms of engagement as required by ASA 210 (para 6.1-6.3). These are to be completed before other significant activities (A7).
Involvement of key engagement team members (para 5; A5): the engagement partner and other key members are explicitly required to be involved in planning and in team discussions during planning (para 5). The involvement is framed as drawing on experience to improve planning effectiveness (A5).
Direction, supervision and review (para 11; A18‑A19): the standard cross‑references ASA 220 for obligations on the nature, timing and extent of direction, supervision and review of engagement team members. The audit plan must record plans for direction and supervision (para 9.1; A18‑A19).
Documentation (para 12; A19‑A23): the auditor must include the overall audit strategy, the audit plan and any significant changes to them, with reasons, in the audit documentation. The explanatory material sets out that documentation serves as a record for quality management and communication to the team (A19‑A21).
Iteration, timing and disclosure risk (A2‑A4): planning is an iterative process that begins early and continues through the audit (A2). The standard warns that discussions with management over planning elements may be helpful for co‑ordination but may compromise audit effectiveness if they reveal detailed procedures (A3).
Considerations for smaller entities and initial engagements (A11; para 13; A24): the standard recognises that smaller engagements often have limited resources and that for initial audit engagements additional planning activities are necessary, including, where not prohibited, arrangements with predecessor auditors and procedures for opening balances (para 13; A24).
ASA 300 also establishes relationships with other ASAs: it requires compliance with ASA 220 for acceptance/continuance and quality management matters, ASA 210 for terms of engagement, ASA 315 for risk assessment procedures, and ASA 330 for the design of further audit procedures (Authority Statement; paras 6, 9.2‑9.3). The explanatory material and Appendix 1 give practical examples and considerations for tailoring strategy and plan.
Who it affects
The standard identifies, directly and indirectly, who bears the obligations and who bears the costs of compliance.
Engagement partners and engagement team members: the standard assigns primary operational responsibility to the engagement partner and other key engagement team members. The engagement partner must be involved in planning and must review the overall strategy and audit plan (paras 5; 10.5). Engagement team members are required to participate in planning discussions (para 5). These persons decide resource allocation, supervise and review work, and make professional judgements on the nature, timing and extent of procedures (paras 8‑11; A5; A18‑A19).
Audit firms: firms must design processes and allocate resources so individual engagements meet ASA 300 requirements. ASA 220 (cross‑referenced throughout) allocates responsibility to the firm for engagement quality management (Authority Statement; A1). Firms may bear increased internal cost in training, resourcing and documentation systems to ensure compliance, and may need to upgrade project management tools where recommended (A1).
Audited entities and their management: the standard affects entities by imposing audit procedures and planning steps that may require management cooperation, provision of information, and coordination. The explanatory material contemplates that auditors may discuss elements of planning with management or those charged with governance to co‑ordinate procedures (A3), but warns against disclosing details that would make procedures predictable and thus compromise effectiveness (A3).
Predecessor auditors: where an audit is an initial engagement with a change of auditor, ASA 300 obliges the incoming auditor to communicate with the predecessor auditor, subject to ethical permissions (para 13; A24). This creates a behavioural requirement on predecessor auditors to provide information when released to do so.
Regulators and users of financial reports: the standard is made pursuant to s 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and s 336 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Auditing Standard ASA 300 made by AUASB). While the standard itself does not list enforcement penalties, regulators and legislative frameworks that require audits (for example under the Corporations Act) are relevant to the application and expectation of compliance.
Small‑entity auditors and sole practitioners: the standard explicitly addresses audits of small entities and notes that planning can be brief and proportionate (A11). A sole practitioner or very small team may use short memoranda and tailored checklists as long as they cover required matters (A11; A19‑A20).
Who pays and who decides: as a practical matter, audit firms and ultimately the audited entity pay the resource cost. The engagement partner and firm decide how to implement the strategy and plan, including assignment of team members and engagement budgets, consistent with ASA 220’s requirements that firms determine sufficient resources to perform the engagement (A1).
Distribution of costs and benefits: the immediate costs are borne by auditors and audit firms through planning time, documentation and supervision resources; clients bear procedural and information‑provision costs and audit fees. The standard centralises decision‑making with the engagement partner and the auditor, by requiring the auditor to retain responsibility for the strategy and audit plan even when discussing matters with management (A3).
Key duties and rights
ASA 300 sets out clear duties for auditors and prescribes specific planning and documentation obligations. It does not create express statutory rights for parties beyond those implicit in the audit relationship; its focal point is duties and the auditor’s discretion in meeting them.
Primary duties imposed on the auditor (with paragraph references):
Plan the audit to be performed in an effective manner, with the objective explicitly stated (Objective, para 1).
Ensure the engagement partner and other key engagement team members are involved in planning and in team discussions (para 5; A5). This is a mandated duty on the engagement partner and key personnel to participate.
Perform preliminary engagement activities at the start of the current audit: carry out procedures required by ASA 220 on acceptance and continuance, evaluate compliance with ethical requirements including independence under ASA 220, and establish an understanding of the terms of engagement under ASA 210 (para 6; A6‑A8). These preliminary activities must be completed prior to other significant activities (A7).
Establish an overall audit strategy that defines scope, timing and direction and guides the audit plan (paras 7‑8). The strategy must consider ASA 220 outputs and identify engagement characteristics, reporting objectives, significant directing factors, preliminary activity results and resource needs (para 8).
Develop an audit plan detailing direction and supervision of team members (para 9.1), planned risk assessment procedures (para 9.2), further procedures at the assertion level (para 9.3) and other procedures required by Australian Auditing Standards (para 9.4).
Update and change the overall audit strategy and audit plan as necessary during the audit (para 10). The engagement partner must review the strategy and plan (para 10.5).
Maintain audit documentation that includes the overall audit strategy, the audit plan and any significant changes during the engagement with reasons (para 12; A19‑A23).
For initial audit engagements, undertake specified pre‑commencement activities, including procedures under ASA 220 for client acceptance and communicating with predecessor auditors where there has been a change of auditors, consistent with ethical requirements (para 13).
Discretion and professional judgement:
The standard repeatedly places professional judgement with the auditor: the auditor must consider factors that, in the auditor’s professional judgement, are significant in directing team efforts (para 8.3). The auditor determines the nature, timing and extent of resources and procedures, guided by ASA 220, ASA 315 and ASA 330 (paras 8, 9; Authority Statement).
The auditor retains the responsibility for the overall audit strategy and the audit plan even when discussing elements with management or those charged with governance (A3). Thus, while auditors can consult, ultimate planning decisions belong to them.
Rights and expectations of other parties:
The standard does not grant express legal rights to management, audited entities or third parties to demand particular planning documents. It contemplates discussions with management for coordination (A3), but warns against disclosing detailed procedures that would reduce audit effectiveness (A3).
Predecessor auditors are expected to communicate with successor auditors where permitted by ethical requirements (para 13; A24). This imposes an expectation on predecessor auditors to provide information when authorised.
Interplay with other duties:
ASA 220 is central to many duties: acceptance/continuance, independence, resource allocation and quality management at the engagement level are all routed through ASA 220 (Authority Statement; para 6; A1). ASA 101 and ASA 200 set interpretative frameworks for how the AUASB Standards are to be understood (Authority Statement).
In short, ASA 300 converts a set of planning principles into duties: involvement by key personnel, preliminary checks, formulation and documentation of strategy and plan, iteration and review, and extra procedures for initial audits. It leaves substantive professional judgement to the auditor, constrained by cross‑referenced ASAs and documentation requirements.
Penalties and enforcement
The standard itself does not set out criminal sanctions or specific statutory penalties. The source text is an AUASB‑issued Auditing Standard and describes its authority and application; it does not contain enforcement clauses or penalty schedules.
What the source does state about legal and regulatory context:
The AUASB made ASA 300 pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Auditing Standard ASA 300 made by AUASB). This records the legislative authority under which the AUASB issues standards (Authority Statement; Auditing Standard ASA 300).
The standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 and ASA 200 (Authority Statement). Those instruments set out interpretive and conduct frameworks that may, in practice, inform regulatory assessment of compliance.
How enforcement and sanctioning typically operate, as implied by the document and the structure of Australian auditing requirements:
The standard is part of the suite of Australian Auditing Standards that auditors are expected to apply when performing audits of financial reports. The document’s explanatory material frames its role in quality management and in meeting regulatory expectations (A1, A19‑A21). The source does not itself state which regulator will enforce or the enforcement mechanism for non‑compliance.
In practice (not prescribed within this source), failure to comply with auditing standards commonly becomes relevant in professional disciplinary processes, regulator assessments (for example by ASIC), civil litigation (where the standard may be used as evidence of proper audit practice), or peer reviews. The standard’s Authority Statement and its legislative provenance support its use in such contexts, but the source contains no express text establishing those enforcement modalities.
Certainty and limits in the source:
The standard contains mandatory language for auditors (for example, “shall” in paras 5, 6, 7‑9, 12, 13). The document therefore creates clear duties in the professional standard sense. However, the source does not translate those duties into specified statutory penalties or schedules.
Where obligations are referenced through other ASAs (for example, ASA 220 for independence procedures), any enforcement tied to those obligations is governed by those instruments and any regulator or professional body that references the ASAs. ASA 300 itself is silent on the identity or mechanics of sanction.
Practical implication for practitioners reading the standard:
Treat ASA 300’s “shall” provisions as binding professional obligations required for a quality audit under the Australian Auditing Standards regime (paras 5‑13, 12). Non‑compliance may expose auditors to professional, regulatory or civil consequences in settings outside of the standard itself, because the standard informs expectations of proper audit conduct. The standard’s authoritative status is reinforced by its statutory making (s 227B ASIC Act; s 336 Corporations Act), but the source does not set out penalties or enforcement steps.
How it interacts with other laws
ASA 300 is explicitly designed to be read with other Australian Auditing Standards and to align with international auditing norms. The source sets out these interactions and cross‑references; it does not create new statutory rules outside its domain.
Statutory and standard cross‑references in the source:
Legislative authority: the AUASB made ASA 300 pursuant to s 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and s 336 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Auditing Standard ASA 300). These citations indicate the statutory basis for AUASB standard‑setting, but ASA 300 does not itself reproduce those Acts’ provisions.
AUASB standard framework: ASA 300 is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 (Preamble to AUASB Standards) which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied, and ASA 200 (Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards) which sets the auditor’s overall objectives (Authority Statement). This means ASA 300 operates within an interpretive architecture informed by ASA 101 and ASA 200.
Direct cross‑ASAs: ASA 300 requires compliance with provisions of, or information from, several other ASAs:
ASA 220 (Quality management for an audit engagement): preliminary engagement activities regarding acceptance/continuance and independence are required by ASA 220 and must be performed at the start of the current audit (para 6; A1). ASA 220 also informs resource allocation and supervision responsibilities referred to in paras 8 and 11.
ASA 210 (Agreeing the terms of audit engagements): establishing the terms of the engagement is required under ASA 210 and is one of the preliminary activities (para 6.3).
ASA 315 (Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement): ASA 300 requires planned risk assessment procedures per ASA 315 to be described in the audit plan (para 9.2).
ASA 330 (The auditor’s responses to assessed risks): the audit plan must include planned further audit procedures at the assertion level as determined under ASA 330 (para 9.3).
International conformity: ASA 300 conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 300 and adds Australian‑specific paragraphs identified by the prefix “Aus” (Conformity with International Standards on Auditing). The source states that compliance with ASA 300 enables compliance with ISA 300.
Practical interaction effects:
Ethical and independence rules are integrated: the standard requires the auditor to evaluate compliance with ethical requirements, including independence, in accordance with ASA 220 at the start of the engagement (para 6.2; A6‑A8). Those ethical rules may, in turn, interact with statutory reporting obligations under the Corporations Act in regulated circumstances, although ASA 300 does not itself set those statutory duties out.
Initial audit transitions interact with predecessor auditor communications: ASA 300 requires incoming auditors to communicate with the predecessor auditor where there has been a change of auditors, subject to ethical requirements (para 13). That interaction may be constrained or enabled by professional confidentiality duties, statutory secrecy provisions, or contractual clauses; ASA 300 itself notes the ethical constraint but does not override other legal limits.
Documentation and regulatory review: the requirement to document the overall audit strategy, the audit plan and significant changes (para 12) creates a record that regulators and courts may examine in enforcement, oversight, or litigation. ASA 300 does not itself specify disclosure rules to third parties, but the documentation is designed to support quality management and external review.
Limits and boundaries in the source:
ASA 300 defers to other ASAs for obligations beyond planning; it does not replace them. For example, risk assessment content is governed by ASA 315 and the design of responses by ASA 330 (paras 9.2‑9.3). ASA 300 therefore functions as a planning scaffold that integrates other ASAs rather than a standalone code of conduct.
The standard’s conformity with ISA 300 makes it compatible with international practice, but the Australian‑specific “Aus” paragraphs introduce local requirements and clarifications (Conformity statement).
In sum, ASA 300 sits within a layered legal‑standard architecture: it is statutory in provenance via AUASB rule‑making authority, operationally bound to and dependent on other AUASB Standards (ASA 101, 200, 210, 220, 315, 330) and designed to conform with ISA 300. It interacts with legal duties (for example under the Corporations Act) only indirectly through the audit role it helps define and document.
Amendment history
The compilation and amendment record is set out in the Compilation Details and the Table of Amendments in the source. Key mechanical points and dates are:
The original ASA 300 was made on 27 October 2009 with operative application to financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2010 (Table of Standards; ASA 300 entry).
The compilation takes into account amendments made up to and including 27 April 2022 and was prepared on 1 March 2023 by the AUASB (Compilation Details).
The Tabulated Standards entry lists subsequent amending standards and their operative dates:
ASA 2011‑1, made 27 June 2011, operative for periods commencing on or after 1 July 2011.
ASA 2013‑2, made 11 November 2013, operative for periods commencing on or after 1 January 2014.
ASA 2015‑1, made 1 December 2015, operative for periods ending on or after 15 December 2016.
ASA 2020‑1, made 3 March 2020, operative for periods commencing on or after 15 December 2021[*].
ASA 2021‑1, made 10 March 2021, operative for periods commencing on or after 15 December 2022.
ASA 2022‑1, made 27 April 2022, operative for periods commencing on or after 15 December 2023.
The Legislation History table lists the registration numbers, registration dates and commencement dates for the standards (e.g., ASA 300 registration F2009L04077, registration date 11 November 2009, commencement date 12 November 2009).
The Table of Amendments enumerates specific paragraphs, appendices and footnotes that were amended, added or deleted by the various amending standards. Examples include:
Appendix 1 amendments by ASA 2011‑1 and ASA 2013‑2.
Multiple paragraph amendments by ASA 2015‑1 (including para 9 and additions to A13 and A14).
A series of amendments and additions by ASA 2020‑1 and ASA 2021‑1 that renumbered paragraphs, added new paragraphs (for example A1 before existing A1), amended A2, A4, A6‑A10, A18 and others, and deleted an existing A17 by ASA 2021‑1.
ASA 2022‑1 added paragraph 11 and amended Appendix 1 and A9.
The compilation makes clear that it is not a separate Auditing Standard; it is a representation of ASA 300 as amended by other Auditing Standards listed in the Table (Compilation Details).
The source records the precise amending paragraphs and the amending instruments by code (for example ASA 2011‑1 [27], ASA 2015‑1 [51‑57], ASA 2021‑1 [54‑82], ASA 2022‑1 [25‑27]).
Practical reading of the amendment history:
If a practitioner needs to know the current operative wording for a particular financial reporting period, the Compilation Details and Table of Standards specify the operative dates for each amending standard; the compiled ASA 300 in the document represents the text as at 27 April 2022.
The Table of Amendments provides a map from specific paragraphs to the instrument that changed them, which is useful where a firm needs to trace the policy intent or the original exposure drafts for a particular change.
The compilation emphasises that Australian‑specific paragraphs are identified by the prefix “Aus,” signalling where the AUASB has added material to ISA 300 (Authority Statement).
The source also provides administrative metadata that is relevant to copyright and distribution (Copyright section) and details where to find the most recently compiled versions on the AUASB website.
Litigation history
The source document (the compiled ASA 300 as published by the AUASB) contains no judicial decisions, litigation history or case law citations. It is a standards instrument and its text does not record, cite or summarise court rulings.
What the source does provide that bears on litigation and evidentiary use:
The Authority Statement and Conformity with International Standards sections set out that compliance with the Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 300 and that Australian additions are identified by “Aus”. The standard therefore forms part of the professional benchmark that may be used as evidence of proper practice in legal or regulatory proceedings, although the standard itself does not discuss its legal evidentiary status (Authority Statement; Conformity).
The documentation requirements (para 12; A19‑A23) create records that, while intended for quality management and internal communication, may be tendered or considered in enforcement proceedings or civil litigation. The standard requires recording the overall audit strategy, audit plan and significant changes and reasons (para 12), which will likely be central to any post‑hoc review of the audit’s planning phase.
Practical consequences for practitioners:
Because the standard is silent on concrete litigation outcomes, actuate caution: the absence of litigation history in the text does not mean ASA 300 has not been the subject of adjudication in courts. The standard simply does not include that material. Practitioners needing to assess litigation risk should search external legal databases and regulator decisions for cases that interpret the application of audit planning standards in Australia.
The standard’s content and mandatory language (“shall” obligations) mean that audit documentation created to satisfy ASA 300 provides a direct evidentiary trail of an auditor’s planning decisions, including resource allocation, risk assessment procedures and changes to plans (para 12; A19‑A23). That documentation can be probative in disputes over negligent or deficient audit conduct, even though the standard itself contains no litigation annotations.
In sum, ASA 300 contains no litigation history inside the instrument. Its role in litigation is as a professional standard that establishes planning duties and required documentation; assessing its treatment in disputes will require external research into regulatory and court decisions.
Gotchas
ASA 300 contains a number of practical pitfalls and implementation risks that auditors and firms should note. These “gotchas” derive from the standard’s interaction with other ASAs, its iterative planning model, the documentation requirements and the balance it draws between coordination with management and maintaining audit effectiveness.
Planning is iterative, not a single phase (A2). Practitioners sometimes treat planning as a one‑off checklist activity at the start of fieldwork. ASA 300 requires continual planning through to completion of the audit (A2), and para 10 requires updating strategy and plan as necessary during the audit. Gotcha: insufficient updating of the plan when facts change can leave procedures mismatched to assessed risks.
Documentation thresholds and granularity (para 12; A19‑A23). The standard requires documenting the overall audit strategy, the audit plan and any significant changes and reasons. Gotcha: auditors can under‑document reasons for changes to the plan or the details of direction and supervision; such gaps are often exposed in quality reviews and regulatory inquiries. The explanatory material emphasises that documentation is a record of key decisions in managing quality (A19).
Disclosure to management can compromise effectiveness (A3). ASA 300 contemplates discussions with management or those charged with governance about certain planning elements to assist coordination (A3), but warns that discussing the nature and timing of detailed procedures with management can make those procedures predictable and thus compromise their effectiveness (A3). Gotcha: well‑intentioned coordination that reveals detailed procedures may reduce the auditor’s ability to detect fraud or manipulation.
Reliance on other ASAs without explicit cross‑checking. ASA 300 delegates content on risk assessment and responses to ASA 315 and ASA 330 (paras 9.2‑9.3). Gotcha: auditors who prepare a planning document that lists procedures without confirming conformity with ASA 315/ASA 330 may miss critical risk assessment steps.
Small entity shortcuts can be inappropriately applied (A11; A19). ASA 300 recognises that audits of small entities may have brief documented strategies and standard programmes tailored on the assumption of few controls. Gotcha: applying “small‑entity” shortcuts where the entity’s complexity or risk profile warrants more detailed planning exposes the firm to quality failures.
Responsibility remains with the auditor even when involving management or external experts (A3; para 8.4). The standard makes plain that the auditor remains responsible for the overall audit strategy and plan. Gotcha: delegating planning decisions or over‑relying on management’s descriptions without critical evaluation is inconsistent with ASA 300.
Initial audit transitions and predecessor auditor communication (para 13; A24). The standard requires predecessor communication where there has been a change of auditors, subject to ethical restrictions. Gotcha: confidentiality or client constraints may limit predecessor cooperation; the incoming auditor must document the steps taken and alternatives if communication is not possible.
Resource allocation and ASA 220 interactions (A1; para 8.5). ASA 220 requires the engagement partner to determine that sufficient resources are available, and ASA 300 requires the auditor to ascertain the nature, timing and extent of resources (para 8.5; A1). Gotcha: firms that assign lower resource levels for cost reasons may be unable to meet planned procedures, necessitating late changes to the plan that require documentation and may affect audit quality.
Making audit procedures too predictable. The explanatory material warns that revealing detailed procedures to the entity risks predictability and reduces effectiveness (A3). Gotcha: audit teams that over‑record step‑by‑step procedures in openly shared documents could inadvertently create predictable procedures.
Footnote and renumbering traps. The compilation history shows numerous amendments, renumberings and additions to explanatory paragraphs (Table of Amendments). Gotcha: practitioners relying on older templates or prior paragraph numbers may misapply current requirements; always use the compiled, current text for the relevant operative date.
Each of these practical pitfalls is grounded in the standard’s language: the iterative planning requirement (A2), the documentation duty (para 12; A19‑A23), the caution on management discussions (A3), cross‑references to ASA 220/ASA 315/ASA 330 (Authority Statement; paras 6, 9.2‑9.3), small entity guidance (A11), and initial audit communication requirements (para 13).
How to comply
Below is a practical, source‑grounded checklist and implementation roadmap that aligns directly to ASA 300’s paragraphs and explanatory material. Use this as a procedural scaffold and adapt for the entity’s size and complexity; the standard allows tailoring as long as the required outcomes are achieved.
Confirm applicability and operative date
Verify that the engagement falls within ASA 300’s application (Aus 0.1‑0.2) and that the financial reporting period is within the standard’s operative window (Aus 0.3). Use the Compilation Details to confirm which amending paragraphs apply for the period.
Read the standard in context
Ensure awareness of and compliance with related ASAs: ASA 101 and ASA 200 (Authority Statement). For planning and quality management matters, consult ASA 220; for terms of engagement consult ASA 210; for risk assessment consult ASA 315; for responses to risk consult ASA 330 (Authority Statement; paras 6, 9.2‑9.3).
Preliminary engagement activities (complete before other significant work) , follow para 6 and A6‑A8
Perform client acceptance/continuance procedures required by ASA 220 (para 6.1).
Evaluate compliance with relevant ethical requirements, including independence, in accordance with ASA 220 (para 6.2).
Establish an understanding of the terms of the engagement in accordance with ASA 210 (para 6.3).
Document that these steps were completed and the conclusions reached, as they inform planning (A7).
Involve key engagement team members in planning (para 5; A5)
Schedule a planning discussion involving the engagement partner and other key team members. Record who attended, the issues discussed, and the conclusions reached. Use this input to shape the overall strategy and plan.
Establish the overall audit strategy (paras 7‑8; A9‑A13; Appendix 1)
Identify characteristics that define the scope (para 8.1).
Ascertain the reporting objectives to plan timing and communications (para 8.2).
Consider significant factors that will direct team effort (para 8.3).
Consider results of preliminary activities and relevant prior knowledge (para 8.4).
Ascertain the nature, timing and extent of resources necessary (para 8.5; A1 and A18 provide examples of resource deployment).
For smaller entities, document an appropriately brief strategy (A11). Appendix 1 contains examples to consider when establishing the strategy.
Develop the audit plan (para 9; A17‑A19)
Document the nature, timing and extent of planned direction, supervision and review of engagement team members and the review of their work (para 9.1; A18‑A19).
Describe planned risk assessment procedures per ASA 315 (para 9.2).
Describe planned further audit procedures at the assertion level per ASA 330 (para 9.3).
Add other planned procedures required for compliance with Australian Auditing Standards (para 9.4).
Tailor standard audit programs and checklists to the engagement circumstances, especially for small entities (A19‑A20).
Make the engagement partner’s review explicit (para 10.5)
Record the engagement partner’s review and approval of the overall audit strategy and audit plan.
Implement iterative updating (para 10; A13)
Establish a change control step: if unexpected events, new information or audit evidence lead to reassessed risks, update the strategy and plan. Document the change, why it was needed and the implications for resources and procedures (para 10; para 12.3; A13).
Documentation requirements (para 12; A19‑A23)
Maintain a documented overall audit strategy and audit plan.
Record any significant changes, including changes to the nature, timing and extent of direction, supervision and review, together with reasons (para 12).
Ensure documentation is sufficient to communicate key decisions and to support quality management (A19‑A21).
Planning for disclosures and specialised areas (A17)
At planning stage, consider disclosures and whether external experts are needed (A17). Document approach for disclosure testing if disclosures come from outside the general ledger.
Direction, supervision and review procedures (para 11; ASA 220)
Ensure the audit plan captures how direction and supervision will occur (on‑site/off‑site, timing of reviews, documentation of review).
Follow ASA 220 requirements for engagement performance and quality management (A1; para 11).
Additional steps for initial audit engagements (para 13; A24)
Before starting an initial audit, perform the ASA 220 procedures for acceptance and continuance (para 13.1).
Communicate with the predecessor auditor where there has been a change of auditor and where ethical rules permit (para 13.2). Document attempts and outcomes.
Practical systems and resourcing
Adopt project management tools where appropriate (A1).
Use standardised templates for strategy and plans, but tailor them for the engagement profile and ensure they are not so detailed that sharing them with the client would reveal sensitive procedures (A3; A19).
For small entities, a short memorandum capturing key planning decisions can be sufficient (A11). For complex or group audits, ensure component audit coordination and the supervision of component auditors is captured in the plan (A14).
Record retention, review and quality assurance
Retain planning documentation as part of the audit file consistent with firm policy and any regulatory record‑keeping obligations. ASA 300 requires documentation of significant planning decisions and changes (para 12; A19‑A23).
Use engagement quality control reviews where required by the firm’s system of quality management (A24).
Keep the standard and amendments under review
The compilation details list several amending standards. Ensure you refer to the version of ASA 300 that applies to the financial reporting period being audited (Compilation Details; Table of Standards).
Practical checks before fieldwork:
Have you documented the overall audit strategy and audit plan and recorded the engagement partner’s review (paras 8‑10; para 12)?
Have you completed ASA 220 preliminary activities and recorded independence decisions (para 6; A6‑A8)?
Does the plan describe supervision and review arrangements in sufficient detail for team members (para 9.1; A18)?
If this is an initial audit or there has been a change of auditor, have you sought predecessor auditor communication and documented the outcome (para 13; A24)?
Where to obtain and reproduction constraints:
The most recent compiled versions of auditing standards are available on the AUASB website (Compilation Details; Obtaining a Copy). The document is subject to Commonwealth copyright; reproduction for personal and non‑commercial use is permitted with acknowledgement; commercial reproduction requires AUASB permission (Copyright).
Following this roadmap aligns the engagement with the mandatory “shall” provisions of ASA 300 (paras 5‑13 and para 12 documentation) and integrates the standard with related ASAs to create an auditable planning file that supports quality management and regulatory scrutiny.
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements...............................A24
Appendix 1: Considerations in Establishing the Overall Audit Strategy
COMPILATION DETAILS COMPILATION DETAILS
Obtaining a Copy of this Auditing Standard
The most recently compiled versions of Auditing Standards, original Standards and amending Standards (see Compilation Details) are available on the AUASB website: www.auasb.gov.au
Contact Details
Auditing and Assurance Standards BoardPhone: (03) 8080 7400E‑mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.auPostal Address:PO Box 204Collins Street WestMelbourne Victoria 8007AUSTRALIA
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes within Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Otherwise, no part of this Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.
This Auditing Standard reproduces substantial parts of the corresponding International Standard on Auditing issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), in the manner described in the statement on Conformity with International Standards on Auditing. The AUASB acknowledges that IFAC is the owner of copyright in the International Standard on Auditing incorporated in this Auditing Standard throughout the world.
All existing rights in this material are reserved outside Australia. Reproduction outside Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non‑commercial use only.
Further information and requests for authorisation to reproduce this Auditing Standard for commercial purposes outside Australia should be addressed to the Technical Director, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Any decision to approve a request may also require the agreement of IFAC.
ISSN 1833‑4393
CONTENTS
COMPILATION DETAILS
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING
Additional Considerations in Initial Audit Engagements...............................A24
Appendix 1: Considerations in Establishing the Overall Audit Strategy
COMPILATION DETAILS
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as Amended)
This compilation takes into account amendments made up to and including 27 April 2022 and was prepared on 1 March 2023 by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB).
This compilation is not a separate Auditing Standard made by the AUASB. Instead, it is a representation of ASA 300 (October 2009) as amended by other Auditing Standards which are listed in the Table below.
Table of Standards
Standard
Date made
Operative Date
ASA 300 [A]
27 October 2009
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2010
ASA 2011‑1 [B]
27 June 2011
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2011
ASA 2013‑2 [C]
11 November 2013
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2014
ASA 2015‑1 [D]
1 December 2015
Financial reporting periods ending on or after 15 December 2016
ASA 2020‑1 [E]
3 March 2020
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2021[*]
ASA 2021-1 [F]
10 March 2021
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2022
ASA 2022-1 [G]
27 April 2022
Financial reporting periods commencing on or after 15 December 2023
Legislation History
Standard
Registration Number
Registration Date
Commencement Date
ASA 300
F2009L04077
11 November 2009
12 November 2009
ASA 2011‑1
F2011L01379
30 June 2011
1 July 2011
ASA 2013-2
F2013L01939
14 November 2013
15 November 2013
ASA 2015-1
F2015L02032
16 December 2015
17 December 2015
ASA 2020-1
F2020L00252
13 March 2020
14 December 2021
ASA 2021-1
F2021L00403
1 April 2021
14 December 2022
ASA 2022-1
F2022L00712
19 May 2022
14 December 2023
Table of Amendments
Paragraph affected
How affected
By … [paragraph]
Appendix 1 Last sub‑heading
Amended
ASA 2011‑1 [27]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2013‑2 [55] [56] [57]
9
Amended
ASA 2015‑1 [51]
A13 directly after existing A12
Addition
ASA 2015‑1 [52-53]
A14 directly after inserted A13
Addition
ASA 2015‑1 [54 and 56]
Footnote 9
Addition
ASA 2015-1 [55]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2015‑1 [57]
A4Footnote 8
Amended
ASA 2020‑1 [65]
A21
Amended
ASA 2020‑1 [66]
A21Footnote 11
Addition
ASA 2020‑1 [66]
2 and its heading
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [54]
6
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [55]
6Footnotes 1 and 2
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [56]
8
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [57]
8Footnote 4
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [58]
Renumbering of Footnotes
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [59]
9
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [60]
11
Deleted
ASA 2021-1 [61]
12
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [62]
13
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [63]
13Footnote 17
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [64]
A1 before existing A1
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [65]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [66]
A2
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [67]
A4
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [68]
A6
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [69]
A7
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [70]
A8
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [71]
A9
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [72]
A10 after existing A8
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [73]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [74]
A18
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [75]
A18Footnote 13
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [76]
Existing A17
Deleted
ASA 2021-1 [77]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [77]
A19
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [78]
A22 after existing A20
Addition
ASA 2021-1 [79]
Renumbering of Paragraphs
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [80]
A24
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [81]
Appendix 1
Amended
ASA 2021-1 [82]
11
Addition
ASA 2022-1 [25]
A9
Amended
ASA 2022-1 [26]
Appendix 1Footnote 17
Amended
ASA 2022-1 [27]
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as amended to 27 April 2022) is set out in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A24 and Appendix 1.
This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied. This Auditing Standard is to be read also in conjunction with ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 300 Planning an Audit of Financial Statements issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard‑setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 300.
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Au Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as Amended)
Auditing Standard ASA 300 Planning an Audit of a Financial Report (as Amended)
This compilation takes into account amendments made up to and including 27 April 2022 and was prep
This is an opening excerpt, not the complete document.