ASA 250 - Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of a Financial Report - October 2009
Auditing Standard ASA 250Auditing Standard ASA 250
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Auditing Standard ASA 250
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in ASA 250 - Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of a Financial Report - October 2009.
Image unavailable in extracted textAuditing Standard ASA 250
Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of a Financial Report
Application
Aus 0.1 This Auditing Standard applies to:
(a) an audit of a financial report for a financial year, or an audit of a financial report for a half-year, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
(b) an audit of a financial report, or a complete set of financial statements, for any other purpose.
Aus 0.2 This Auditing Standard also applies, as appropriate, to an audit of other historical financial information.
Operative Date
Aus 0.3 This Auditing Standard is operative for financial reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2010. [Note: For operative dates of paragraphs changed or added by an amending Standard, see Compilation Details.]
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard
This Auditing Standard deals with the auditor’s responsibility to consider laws and regulations in an audit of a financial report. This Auditing Standard does not apply to other assurance engagements in which the auditor is specifically engaged to test and report separately on compliance with specific laws or regulations.
Effect of Laws and Regulations
The effect on a financial report of laws and regulations varies considerably. Those laws and regulations to which an entity is subject constitute the legal and regulatory framework. The provisions of some laws or regulations have a direct effect on the financial report in that they determine the reported amounts and disclosures in an entity’s financial report. Other laws or regulations are to be complied with by management or set the provisions under which the entity is allowed to conduct its business but do not have a direct effect on an entity’s financial report. Some entities operate in heavily regulated industries (such as banks and chemical companies). Others are subject only to the many laws and regulations that relate generally to the operating aspects of the business (such as those related to occupational safety and health, and equal employment opportunity). Non-compliance with laws and regulations may result in fines, litigation or other consequences for the entity that may have a material effect on the financial report.
Responsibility for Compliance with Laws and Regulations (Ref: Para. A1-A6)
It is the responsibility of management, with the oversight of those charged with governance, to ensure that the entity’s operations are conducted in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, including compliance with the provisions of laws and regulations that determine the reported amounts and disclosures in an entity’s financial report.
Part Auditing Standard ASA 250 - ASA 250 - Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of a Financial Report - October 2009 - Auditing Standard ASA 250 | Zoe
Responsibility of the Auditor
The requirements in this Auditing Standard are designed to assist the auditor in identifying material misstatement of the financial report due to non-compliance with laws and regulations. However, the auditor is not responsible for preventing non-compliance and cannot be expected to detect non-compliance with all laws and regulations.
The auditor is responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial report, taken as a whole, is free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.[1] In conducting an audit of a financial report, the auditor takes into account the applicable legal and regulatory framework. Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements in the financial report may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards.[2] In the context of laws and regulations, the potential effects of inherent limitations on the auditor’s ability to detect material misstatements are greater for such reasons as the following:
There are many laws and regulations, relating principally to the operating aspects of an entity, that typically do not affect the financial report and are not captured by the entity’s information systems relevant to financial reporting.
Non-compliance may involve conduct designed to conceal it, such as collusion, forgery, deliberate failure to record transactions, management override of controls or intentional misrepresentations being made to the auditor.
Whether an act constitutes non-compliance is ultimately a matter for legal determination by a court of law.
Ordinarily, the further removed non-compliance is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial report, the less likely the auditor is to become aware of it or to recognise the non-compliance.
This Auditing Standard distinguishes the auditor’s responsibilities in relation to compliance with two different categories of laws and regulations as follows:
The provisions of those laws and regulations generally recognised to have a direct effect on the determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial report such as tax and superannuation laws and regulations (see paragraph 13 of this Auditing Standard); and
Other laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the determination of the amounts and disclosures in the financial report, but compliance with which may be fundamental to the operating aspects of the business, to an entity’s ability to continue its business, or to avoid material penalties (for example, compliance with the terms of an operating license, compliance with regulatory solvency requirements, or compliance with environmental regulations); non-compliance with such laws and regulations may therefore have a material effect on the financial report (see paragraph 14 of this Auditing Standard).
In this Auditing Standard, differing requirements are specified for each of the above categories of laws and regulations. For the category referred to in paragraph 6(a) of this Auditing Standard, the auditor’s responsibility is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding compliance with the provisions of those laws and regulations. For the category referred to in paragraph 6(b) of this Auditing Standard, the auditor’s responsibility is limited to undertaking specified audit procedures to help identify non-compliance with those laws and regulations that may have a material effect on the financial report.
The auditor is required by this Auditing Standard to remain alert to the possibility that other audit procedures applied for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial report may bring instances of identified or suspected non-compliance to the auditor’s attention. Maintaining professional scepticism throughout the audit, as required by ASA 200,[3] is important in this context, given the extent of laws and regulations that affect the entity.
Effective Date
[Deleted by the AUASB. Refer Aus 0.3]
Objectives
The objectives of the auditor are:
To obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding compliance with the provisions of those laws and regulations generally recognised to have a direct effect on the determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial report;
To perform specified audit procedures to help identify instances of non-compliance with other laws and regulations that may have a material effect on the financial report; and
To respond appropriately to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations identified during the audit.
Definition
For the purposes of this Auditing Standard, the following term has the meaning attributed below:
Non-compliance means acts of omission or commission by the entity, either intentional or unintentional, which are contrary to the prevailing laws or regulations. Such acts include transactions entered into by, or in the name of, the entity, or on its behalf, by those charged with governance, management or employees. Non-compliance does not include personal misconduct (unrelated to the business activities of the entity) by those charged with governance, management or employees of the entity.
Requirements
The Auditor’s Consideration of Compliance with Laws and Regulations
As part of obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment in accordance with ASA 315,[4] the auditor shall obtain a general understanding of:
The legal and regulatory framework applicable to the entity and the industry or sector in which the entity operates; and
How the entity is complying with that framework.
(Ref: Para. A7)
The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding compliance with the provisions of those laws and regulations generally recognised to have a direct effect on the determination of material amounts and disclosures in the financial report. (Ref: Para. A8)
The auditor shall perform the following audit procedures to help identify instances of non-compliance with other laws and regulations that may have a material effect on the financial report:
(Ref: Para. A9-A10)
Enquiring of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, as to whether the entity is in compliance with such laws and regulations; and
Inspecting correspondence, if any, with the relevant licensing or regulatory authorities.
During the audit, the auditor shall remain alert to the possibility that other audit procedures applied may bring instances of
non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations to the auditor’s attention. (Ref: Para. A11-Aus A11.1)
The auditor shall request management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, to provide written representations that all known instances of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations whose effects should be considered when preparing the financial report have been disclosed to the auditor. (Ref: Para. A12)
In the absence of identified or suspected non-compliance, the auditor is not required to perform audit procedures regarding the entity’s compliance with laws and regulations, other than those set out in paragraphs 12-16 of this Auditing Standard.
Audit Procedures When Non-Compliance Is Identified or Suspected
If the auditor becomes aware of information concerning an instance of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations, the auditor shall obtain: (Ref: Para. A13)
An understanding of the nature of the act and the circumstances in which it has occurred; and
Further information to evaluate the possible effect on the financial report. (Ref: Para. A14)
If the auditor suspects there may be non-compliance, the auditor shall discuss the matter with management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance. If management or, as appropriate, those charged with governance do not provide sufficient information that supports that the entity is in compliance with laws and regulations and, in the auditor’s judgement, the effect of the suspected non-compliance may be material to the financial report, the auditor shall consider the need to obtain legal advice.
(Ref: Para. A15-A16)
If sufficient information about suspected non-compliance cannot be obtained, the auditor shall evaluate the effect of the lack of sufficient appropriate audit evidence on the auditor’s opinion.
The auditor shall evaluate the implications of non-compliance in relation to other aspects of the audit, including the auditor’s risk assessment and the reliability of written representations, and take appropriate action. (Ref: Para. A17-A18)
Reporting of Identified or Suspected Non-Compliance
Reporting Non-Compliance to Those Charged with Governance
Unless all of those charged with governance are involved in management of the entity, and therefore are aware of matters involving identified or suspected non-compliance already communicated by the auditor,[5] the auditor shall communicate with those charged with governance matters involving non-compliance with laws and regulations that come to the auditor’s attention during the course of the audit, other than when the matters are clearly inconsequential.
If, in the auditor’s judgement, the non-compliance referred to in paragraph 22 of this Auditing Standard is believed to be intentional and material, the auditor shall communicate the matter to those charged with governance as soon as practicable.
If the auditor suspects that management or those charged with governance are involved in non-compliance, the auditor shall communicate the matter to the next higher level of authority at the entity, if it exists, such as an audit committee or supervisory board. Where no higher authority exists, or if the auditor believes that the communication may not be acted upon or is unsure as to the person to whom to report, the auditor shall consider the need to obtain legal advice.
Reporting Non-Compliance in the Auditor’s Report on the Financial Report
If the auditor concludes that the non-compliance has a material effect on the financial report, and has not been adequately reflected in the financial report, the auditor shall, in accordance with ASA 705, express a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion on the financial report.[6] (Ref: Para. A18.1)
If the auditor is precluded by management or those charged with governance from obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence to evaluate whether non-compliance that may be material to the financial report has, or is likely to have, occurred, the auditor shall express a qualified opinion or disclaim an opinion on the financial report on the basis of a limitation on the scope of the audit in accordance with ASA 705.
If the auditor is unable to determine whether non-compliance has occurred because of limitations imposed by the circumstances rather than by management or those charged with governance, the auditor shall evaluate the effect on the auditor’s opinion in accordance with ASA 705.
Reporting Non-Compliance to Regulatory and Enforcement Authorities
If the auditor has identified or suspects non-compliance with laws and regulations, the auditor shall determine whether the auditor has a responsibility to report the identified or suspected non-compliance to parties outside the entity. (Ref: Para. A19-A20)
Documentation
The auditor shall include in the audit documentation identified or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations and the results of discussion with management and, where applicable, those charged with governance and other parties outside the entity.[7]
(Ref: Para. A21)
* * *
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Responsibility for Compliance with Laws and Regulations (Ref: Para. 3-8)
It is the responsibility of management, with the oversight of those charged with governance, to ensure that the entity’s operations are conducted in accordance with laws and regulations. Laws and regulations may affect an entity’s financial report in different ways: for example, most directly, they may affect specific disclosures required of the entity in the financial report or they may prescribe the applicable financial reporting framework. They may also establish certain legal rights and obligations of the entity, some of which will be recognised in the entity’s financial report. In addition, laws and regulations may impose penalties in cases of non-compliance.
The following are examples of the types of policies and procedures an entity may implement to assist in the prevention and detection of non-compliance with laws and regulations:
Monitoring legal requirements and ensuring that operating procedures are designed to meet these requirements.
Instituting and operating appropriate systems of internal control.
Developing, publicising and following a code of conduct.
Ensuring employees are properly trained and understand the code of conduct.
Monitoring compliance with the code of conduct and acting appropriately to discipline employees who fail to comply with it.
Engaging legal advisors to assist in monitoring legal requirements.
Maintaining a register of significant laws and regulations with which the entity has to comply within its particular industry and a record of complaints.
In larger entities, these policies and procedures may be supplemented by assigning appropriate responsibilities to the following:
An internal audit function.
An audit committee.
A compliance function.
Responsibility of the Auditor
Non-compliance by the entity with laws and regulations may result in a material misstatement of the financial report. Detection of non-compliance, regardless of materiality, may affect other aspects of the audit including, for example, the auditor’s consideration of the integrity of management or employees.
Whether an act constitutes non-compliance with laws and regulations is a matter for legal determination, which is ordinarily beyond the auditor’s professional competence to determine. Nevertheless, the auditor’s training, experience and understanding of the entity and its industry or sector may provide a basis to recognise that some acts, coming to the auditor’s attention, may constitute non-compliance with laws and regulations.
In accordance with specific statutory requirements, the auditor may be specifically required to report, as part of the audit of the financial report, on whether the entity complies with certain provisions of laws or regulations. In these circumstances, ASA 700[8] or ASA 800[9] deal with how these audit responsibilities are addressed in the auditor’s report. Furthermore, where there are specific statutory reporting requirements, it may be necessary for the audit plan to include appropriate tests for compliance with these provisions of the laws and regulations.
Considerations Specific to Public Sector Entities
In the public sector, there may be additional audit responsibilities with respect to the consideration of laws and regulations which may relate to the audit of a financial report or may extend to other aspects of the entity’s operations.
The Auditor’s Consideration of Compliance with Laws and Regulations
Obtaining an Understanding of the Legal and Regulatory Framework
(Ref: Para. 12)
To obtain a general understanding of the legal and regulatory framework, and how the entity complies with that framework, the auditor may, for example:
Use the auditor’s existing understanding of the entity’s industry, regulatory and other external factors;
Update the understanding of those laws and regulations that directly determine the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial report;
Enquire of management as to other laws or regulations that may be expected to have a fundamental effect on the operations of the entity;
Enquire of management concerning the entity’s policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and regulations; and
Enquire of management regarding the policies or procedures adopted for identifying, evaluating and accounting for litigation claims.
Laws and Regulations Generally Recognised to Have a Direct Effect on the Determination of Material Amounts and Disclosures in the Financial Report (Ref: Para. 13)
Certain laws and regulations are well-established, known to the entity and within the entity’s industry or sector, and relevant to the entity’s financial report (as described in paragraph 6(a)). They could include those that relate to, for example:
The form and content of the financial report;
Industry-specific financial reporting issues;
Accounting for transactions under government contracts; or
The accrual or recognition of expenses for income tax or superannuation costs.
Some provisions in those laws and regulations may be directly relevant to specific assertions in the financial report (for example, the completeness of income tax provisions), while others may be directly relevant to the financial report as a whole (for example, the required statements constituting a complete set of financial statements). The aim of the requirement in paragraph 13 is for the auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the determination of amounts and disclosures in the financial report in compliance with the relevant provisions of those laws and regulations.
Non-compliance with other provisions of such laws and regulations and other laws and regulations may result in fines, litigation or other consequences for the entity, the costs of which may need to be provided for in the financial report, but are not considered to have a direct effect on the financial report as described in paragraph 6(a).
Procedures to Identify Instances of Non-Compliance – Other Laws and Regulations (Ref: Para. 14)
Certain other laws and regulations may need particular attention by the auditor because they have a fundamental effect on the operations of the entity (as described in paragraph 6(b)). Non-compliance with laws and regulations that have a fundamental effect on the operations of the entity may cause the entity to cease operations, or call into question the entity’s continuance as a going concern. For example, non-compliance with the requirements of the entity’s license or other entitlement to perform its operations could have such an impact (for example, for a bank, non-compliance with capital or investment requirements). There are also many laws and regulations relating principally to the operating aspects of the entity that typically do not affect the financial report and are not captured by the entity’s information systems relevant to financial reporting.
As the financial reporting consequences of other laws and regulations can vary depending on the entity’s operations, the audit procedures required by paragraph 14 are directed to bringing to the auditor’s attention instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that may have a material effect on the financial report.
Non-Compliance Brought to the Auditor’s Attention by Other Audit Procedures (Ref: Para. 15)
Audit procedures applied to form an opinion on the financial report may bring instances of non-compliance or suspected
non-compliance with laws and regulations to the auditor’s attention. For example, such audit procedures may include:
Reading minutes;
Enquiring of the entity’s management and in-house legal counsel or external legal counsel concerning litigation, claims and assessments; and
Performing substantive tests of details of classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures; and
Aus A11.1 Review of breach registers and equivalent records (for example, complaints, whistleblower or suspicious matter reports registers).
Written Representations (Ref: Para. 16)
Because the effect on the financial report of laws and regulations can vary considerably, written representations provide necessary audit evidence about management’s knowledge of identified or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations, whose effects may have a material effect on the financial report. However, written representations do not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence on their own and, accordingly, do not affect the nature and extent of other audit evidence that is to be obtained by the auditor.[10]
Image unavailable in extracted textAudit Procedures When Non-Compliance Is Identified or Suspected
Indications of Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations (Ref: Para. 18)
If the auditor becomes aware of the existence of, or information about, the following matters, it may be an indication of non-compliance with laws and regulations:
Investigations by regulatory organisations and government departments or payment of fines or penalties.
Payments for unspecified services or loans to consultants, related parties, employees or government employees.
Sales commissions or agent’s fees that appear excessive in relation to those ordinarily paid by the entity or in its industry or to the services actually received.
Purchasing at prices significantly above or below market price.
Unusual payments in cash, purchases in the form of cashiers’ cheques payable to bearer or transfers to numbered bank accounts.
Unusual transactions with companies or entities registered in tax havens.
Payments for goods or services made other than to the country from which the goods or services originated.
Payments without proper exchange control documentation.
Existence of an information system which fails, whether by design or by accident, to provide an adequate audit trail or sufficient evidence.
Unauthorised transactions or improperly recorded transactions.
Adverse media comment.
Matters Relevant to the Auditor’s Evaluation (Ref: Para. 18(b))
Matters relevant to the auditor’s evaluation of the possible effect on the financial report include:
The potential financial consequences of non-compliance with laws and regulations on the financial report including, for example, the imposition of fines, penalties, damages, threat of expropriation of assets, enforced discontinuation of operations, and litigation.
Whether the potential financial consequences require disclosure.
Whether the potential financial consequences are so serious as to call into question the fair presentation of the financial report, or otherwise make the financial report misleading.
Audit Procedures (Ref: Para. 19)
The auditor may discuss the findings with those charged with governance where they may be able to provide additional audit evidence. For example, the auditor may confirm that those charged with governance have the same understanding of the facts and circumstances relevant to transactions or events that have led to the possibility of non-compliance with laws and regulations.
If management or, as appropriate, those charged with governance do not provide sufficient information to the auditor that the entity is in fact in compliance with laws and regulations, the auditor may consider it appropriate to consult with the entity’s in-house legal counsel or external legal counsel about the application of the laws and regulations to the circumstances, including the possibility of fraud, and the possible effects on the financial report. If it is not considered appropriate to consult with the entity’s legal counsel or if the auditor is not satisfied with the legal counsel’s opinion, the auditor may consider it appropriate to consult the auditor’s own legal counsel as to whether a contravention of a law or regulation is involved, the possible legal consequences, including the possibility of fraud, and what further action, if any, the auditor would take.
Evaluating the Implications of Non-Compliance (Ref: Para. 21)
As required by paragraph 21, the auditor evaluates the implications of non-compliance in relation to other aspects of the audit, including the auditor’s risk assessment and the reliability of written representations. The implications of particular instances of non-compliance identified by the auditor will depend on the relationship of the perpetration and concealment, if any, of the act to specific control activities and the level of management or employees involved, especially implications arising from the involvement of the highest authority within the entity.
In exceptional cases, the auditor may consider whether withdrawal from the engagement, where withdrawal is possible under applicable law or regulation, is necessary when management or those charged with governance do not take the remedial action that the auditor considers appropriate in the circumstances, even when the non-compliance is not material to the financial report. When deciding whether withdrawal from the engagement is necessary, the auditor may consider seeking legal advice. If withdrawal from the engagement is not possible, the auditor may consider alternative actions, including describing the non-compliance in an Other Matter(s) paragraph in the auditor’s report.[11]
Reporting of Identified or Suspected Non-Compliance
Reporting Non-Compliance in the Auditor’s Report on the Financial Report
(Ref: Para. 25)
Aus A18.1 If, in the case of an audit conducted under the Corporations Act 2001, the auditor identifies non-compliance with an Australian Accounting Standard, defects or irregularities in the financial report or deficiencies, failures or shortcomings in respect of sec 307 of the Act , the auditor’s report is to include the information required by the Act. The auditor needs to consider any other relevant laws and regulations. If the auditor is in doubt as to the proper interpretation of laws or regulations, or whether non-compliance has in fact occurred, the auditor ordinarily seeks legal advice before expressing an opinion on the financial report.
Reporting Non-Compliance to Regulatory and Enforcement Authorities
(Ref: Para. 28)
The auditor’s professional duty to maintain the confidentiality of client information may preclude reporting identified or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations to a party outside the entity. However, the auditor’s legal responsibilities vary by jurisdiction and, in certain circumstances, the duty of confidentiality may be overridden by statute, the law or courts of law. In some jurisdictions, the auditor of a financial institution has a statutory duty to report the occurrence, or suspected occurrence, of non-compliance with laws and regulations to supervisory authorities. Also, in some jurisdictions, the auditor has a duty to report misstatements to authorities in those cases where management and, where applicable, those charged with governance fail to take corrective action. The auditor may consider it appropriate to obtain legal advice to determine the appropriate course of action.
Aus A19.1 In certain circumstances, the auditor has a statutory responsibility to report instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. For example, in certain circumstances, the auditor is required under the Corporations Act 2001, to report to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Establishing the appropriate authority to which such a report would be made in a particular instance will depend on the nature and circumstances of the non-compliance. When in doubt, the auditor would ordinarily seek legal advice.
Considerations Specific to Public Sector Entities
A public sector auditor may be obliged to report on instances of non-compliance to the legislature or other governing body or to report them in the auditor’s report.
Documentation (Ref: Para. 29)
The auditor’s documentation of findings regarding identified or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations may include, for example:
Copies of records or documents.
Minutes of discussions held with management, those charged with governance or parties outside the entity.
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 250 Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements (Redrafted), issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard-setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 250.