ASA 240 - The Auditor’s Responsibility to Consider Fraud in an Audit of a Financial Report - April 2006
Auditor Unable to Continue the EngagemenAuditor Unable to Continue the Engagement
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Auditor Unable to Continue the Engagemen
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in ASA 240 - The Auditor’s Responsibility to Consider Fraud in an Audit of a Financial Report - April 2006.
Auditor Unable to Continue the Engagement
111 If, as a result of a misstatement resulting from fraud or suspected fraud, the auditor encounters exceptional circumstances that bring into question the auditor’s ability to continue performing the audit the auditor shall:
(a) consider the professional and legal responsibilities applicable in the circumstances, including whether there is a requirement for the auditor to report to the person or persons who made the audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities;
(b) where permitted, consider the possibility of withdrawing from the engagement; and
(c) if the auditor withdraws:
(i) discuss with the appropriate level of management and those charged with governance the auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal; and
(ii) consider whether there is a professional or legal requirement to report to the person or persons who made the audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities, the auditor’s withdrawal from the engagement and the reasons for the withdrawal.
112 Such exceptional circumstances can arise, for example, when:
- The entity does not take the appropriate action regarding fraud that the auditor considers necessary in the circumstances, even when the fraud is not material to the financial report.
- The auditor’s consideration of the risks of material misstatement due to fraud and the results of audit tests indicate a significant risk of material and pervasive fraud.
- The auditor has significant concern about the competence or integrity of management or those charged with governance.
113 Because of the variety of the circumstances that may arise, it is not possible to describe definitively when withdrawal from an engagement is appropriate. Factors that affect the auditor’s conclusion include the implications of the involvement of a member of management or of those charged with governance (which may affect the reliability of management representations) and the effects on the auditor of a continuing association with the entity.
114 The auditor has professional and legal responsibilities in such circumstances. For example, the auditor may be entitled to, or required to, make a statement or report to the person or persons who made the audit appointment or, in some cases, to regulatory authorities. Given the exceptional nature of the circumstances and the need to consider the legal requirements, the auditor ordinarily considers seeking legal advice when deciding whether to withdraw from an engagement and in determining an appropriate course of action, including the possibility of reporting to shareholders, regulators or others.[6]