ASA 230 - Audit Documentation - April 2006
Main changes from AUS 208 (July 2002) DoMain changes from AUS 208 (July 2002) Documentation
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Main changes from AUS 208 (July 2002) Do
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in ASA 230 - Audit Documentation - April 2006.
Main changes from AUS 208 (July 2002) Documentation
The main differences between this Auditing Standard and the Auditing Standard issued by the Auditing & Assurance Standards Board of the Australian Accounting Research Foundation, AUS 208 (July 2002) Documentation, are that in this Auditing Standard:
- The word ‘shall’, in the bold-type paragraphs, is the terminology used to describe an auditor’s mandatory requirements, whereas an auditor’s degree of responsibility is described in AUS 208 by the word ‘should’.
- The explanatory guidance paragraphs provide guidance and illustrative examples to assist the auditor in fulfilling the mandatory requirements, whereas in AUS 208 some obligations are implied within certain explanatory paragraphs. Accordingly, such paragraphs have been redrafted to clarify that the matter forms part of the explanatory guidance.
- The following mandatory requirements, not contained in AUS 208 are included:
(a) The auditor shall prepare, on a timely basis, audit documentation that provides a sufficient and appropriate record of the basis for the auditor’s report, and evidence that the audit was carried out in accordance with Auditing Standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements (paragraph 5).
(b) The auditor shall prepare the audit documentation so as to enable an experienced auditor, having no previous connection with the audit, to understand the audit work performed, the results and audit evidence obtained, and the significant matters identified and conclusions reached thereon (paragraph 11).
(c) Where, in rare and exceptional circumstances, factors outside the auditor’s control prevent the auditor from complying with an essential procedure contained within a relevant mandatory requirement, the auditor shall document the circumstances surrounding the inability to comply, the reasons for the inability to comply, and justification of how alternative audit procedures achieve the objectives of the mandatory requirement (paragraph 23).
(d) New requirements regarding the form, content and extent of audit documentation in regard to identifying characteristics, discussions with those charged with governance, management and others, contradictory information and identification of preparer and reviewer (paragraphs 14, 18, 20 and 26).
(e) The auditor shall complete the assembly of the final audit file on a timely basis after the date of the auditor’s report (paragraph 28).
(f) The auditor shall not delete or discard audit documentation before the end of its retention period, and shall document all modifications and additions (paragraphs 31 and 34).
(g) When exceptional circumstances arise after the date of the auditor’s report that require the auditor to perform new or additional audit procedures or that lead the auditor to new conclusions, the auditor shall document certain matters (paragraph 35).