ASA 220 - Quality Control for an Audit of a Financial Report and Other Historical Financial Information - October 2009
Table of AmendmentsTable of Amendments
Start here
Get a plain-English read of Table of Amendments
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in ASA 220 - Quality Control for an Audit of a Financial Report and Other Historical Financial Information - October 2009.
Section Table of Amendments - ASA 220 - Quality Control for an Audit of a Financial Report and Other Historical Financial Information - October 2009 - Table of Amendments | Zoe
ASA 2020-2 [26]
A30 Footnote 14
Amended
ASA 2020-1 [8]
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
Auditing Standard ASA 220 Quality Control for an Audit of a Financial Report and Other Historical Financial Information (as amended to 30 June 2020) is set out in paragraphs Aus 0.1 to A37.
This Auditing Standard is to be read in conjunction with ASA 101 Preamble to AUASB Standards, which sets out how AUASB Standards are to be understood, interpreted and applied. This Auditing Standard is to be read also in conjunction with ASA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Conformity with International Standards on Auditing
This Auditing Standard conforms with International Standard on Auditing ISA 220 Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard‑setting board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).
Paragraphs that have been added to this Auditing Standard (and do not appear in the text of the equivalent ISA) are identified with the prefix “Aus”.
The following requirement is additional to ISA 220:
Paragraph Aus 21.1 - For audits of financial reports of listed entities, and those other audit engagements, if any, for which the firm has determined that an engagement quality control review is required, the engagement quality control reviewer, on performing an engagement quality control review, shall also consider the following:
The engagement team’s evaluation of the firm’s independence in relation to the audit engagement;
Whether appropriate consultation has taken place on matters involving differences of opinion or other difficult or contentious matters, and the conclusions arising from those consultations; and
Whether audit documentation selected for review reflects the work performed in relation to the significant judgements made and supports the conclusions reached.
This Auditing Standard incorporates terminology and definitions used in Australia.
The equivalent requirements and related application and other explanatory material included in ISA 220 in respect of “relevant ethical requirements”, have been included in Auditing Standard, ASA 102 Compliance with Ethical Requirements when Performing Audits, Reviews and Other Assurance Engagements. There is no international equivalent to ASA 102.
Compliance with this Auditing Standard enables compliance with ISA 220.