sec.35Content of land use plan

sec.35 Content of land use plan

A land use plan for an airport lessee’s airport land must— state details of— the airport land; and the current and intended uses of the airport land; and coordinate and integrate the core matters relevant to the land use plan; and include a schedule of charges (a charges schedule ) the local government may, subject to section 43 , levy for infrastructure provided by the local government in relation to development on the airport land; and include an infrastructure interface plan for the land use plan; and include any other matter prescribed by regulation. A land use plan for airport land may, for the Planning Act , do 1 or more of the following— categorise development on the airport land as assessable development or accepted development; state whether development categorised as assessable development under the plan requires code assessment or impact assessment under the Planning Act ; state assessment benchmarks for the Planning Act that assessable development under the plan must be assessed against; categorise particular development on the airport land that is inconsistent with the plan as assessable development requiring impact assessment under the Planning Act . Also, a land use plan may— state that particular development is consistent or inconsistent with the plan; or state that any part of the airport land is intended to remain undeveloped land or part of a buffer zone; or include details of any land proposed to become part of the airport land. Despite subsection (2) (a) and (d) , the land use plan must not, for the Planning Act , categorise any of the following development on the airport land as assessable development— development that is a material change of use of premises for core airport infrastructure if the development is consistent with the plan; development categorised as accepted development under a regulation made under the Planning Act ; development that a local categorising instrument under the Planning Act is prohibited, under section 43 (5) (b) of that Act, from stating is assessable development. s 35 amd 2016 No. 27 s 13 (sec.35-ssec.1) A land use plan for an airport lessee’s airport land must— state details of— the airport land; and the current and intended uses of the airport land; and coordinate and integrate the core matters relevant to the land use plan; and include a schedule of charges (a charges schedule ) the local government may, subject to section 43 , levy for infrastructure provided by the local government in relation to development on the airport land; and include an infrastructure interface plan for the land use plan; and include any other matter prescribed by regulation. (sec.35-ssec.2) A land use plan for airport land may, for the Planning Act , do 1 or more of the following— categorise development on the airport land as assessable development or accepted development; state whether development categorised as assessable development under the plan requires code assessment or impact assessment under the Planning Act ; state assessment benchmarks for the Planning Act that assessable development under the plan must be assessed against; categorise particular development on the airport land that is inconsistent with the plan as assessable development requiring impact assessment under the Planning Act . (sec.35-ssec.3) Also, a land use plan may— state that particular development is consistent or inconsistent with the plan; or state that any part of the airport land is intended to remain undeveloped land or part of a buffer zone; or include details of any land proposed to become part of the airport land. (sec.35-ssec.4) Despite subsection (2) (a) and (d) , the land use plan must not, for the Planning Act , categorise any of the following development on the airport land as assessable development— development that is a material change of use of premises for core airport infrastructure if the development is consistent with the plan; development categorised as accepted development under a regulation made under the Planning Act ; development that a local categorising instrument under the Planning Act is prohibited, under section 43 (5) (b) of that Act, from stating is assessable development.