Deactivation must not create new continued airworthiness instructions: The Requirement expressly states that deactivation may not result in the need for additional instructions for continued airworthiness. That is a less obvious constraint because many deactivation methods could create new inspection or maintenance requirements. Operators must design the deactivation to be effectively maintenance-free with respect to continued airworthiness instructions, or justify how any residual requirements do not amount to new ongoing instructions (Requirement; Appendix A, para 10). This limits acceptable methods and will affect engineering choices.
Capping and vent handling specifics: Appendix A requires that fuel feed and fuel vent plumbing interfaces be disconnected and capped at the aeroplane OEM tank side and secured in accordance with an approved method; it cites FAA AC 25-8 as an example (para 4). It further instructs that, to prevent structural deformation during cabin decompression, disconnected auxiliary fuel tank vent lines should be left open and secured. Those two instructions can appear in tension: operators must cap fuel feed and vent plumbing at the tank side, yet leave the disconnected vent lines open and secured to prevent structural deformation. Failure to observe the vent-line instruction could create structural risk during decompression testing or events (Appendix A, para 4).
Electrical and avionics interfaces: The Appendix mandates full disconnection of FQIS electrical connections and related fuel-pump electrical circuits, and requires stowing those connections at the auxiliary tank interface (para 2). Operators must ensure the FQIS disconnection does not interfere with the OEM fuel quantity indication system or create false warnings or unanticipated cockpit indications. Appendix A further requires verification that the aeroplane FQIS and fuel distribution systems have not been adversely affected (para 9). Practical gotchas include unintended changes to cockpit indications, failure of integrated warning logic, or the need to reconcile avionics wiring in ways that are not self-evident.
Circuit breaker handling: The Appendix explicitly requires pulling and collaring circuit breakers used to operate the auxiliary tank (para 5). This is a physical and procedural requirement that must be documented and visible. Operators must ensure that these breakers are not inadvertently restored to service, and that associated cockpit checks are updated accordingly. Collaring and clearly documenting the breakers is required to show the auxiliary component is deactivated.
Weight and balance approval: Deactivation may change the aeroplane weight and balance. Appendix A requires revision of the weight and balance document and obtaining CASA approval if required (para 6). Operators must not return the aeroplane to service with an unapproved weight and balance amendment. Failure to obtain CASA approval where required may create a regulatory non-compliance independent of the physical deactivation work.
AFM and maintenance manual amendments: The Appendix requires removal of STC operating procedures from the AFM and removal of auxiliary tank maintenance procedures from the maintenance manual (paras 7-8). Operators should ensure that these document changes are made correctly and that any AFM supplements are clearly marked as not in effect. The Appendix suggests that inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM may accomplish the AFM revisions (para 7), but operators must check whether that method satisfies other regulatory documentation requirements.
Leak, pressure and system verification before return to service: Appendix A requires leak checks, pressure checks and verification that OEM FQIS and fuel distribution systems are unaffected before return to service (para 9). Operators must plan for these checks and for potential mitigation if OEM systems are found to be affected. If checks reveal an adverse effect, the operator must resolve it prior to return to service; however, the AD forbids deactivation methods that create ongoing continued-airworthiness instructions (Requirement), so resolution approaches must be consistent with that constraint.
Recordkeeping and proof of compliance: While the AD requires documentation changes and physical evidence, it does not prescribe a specific form for compliance records. Operators should retain work cards, maintenance release documentation, weight and balance approvals, AFM and maintenance manual amendment records, placard photos, and verification check evidence to demonstrate compliance at audit or inspection. The lack of a specified format is a practical gap that operators must fill.
Interaction with STC legal status: Appendix A requires that the AFM Supplement for the STC be indicated as not in effect (para 7). Operators must ensure that removal of STC procedures from operational documentation does not conflict with STC-holder obligations or contractual arrangements with the STC supplier. The AD does not direct the STC holder to remove or modify the STC, so the STC remains on the aircraft physically unless components are removed; operators must ensure that legal and maintenance positions match the physical configuration.
Timing pressure: The compliance date is short relative to typical maintenance scheduling windows. The AD became effective 28 August 2008 with compliance by 16 December 2008. Operators should note the time bound and prepare schedules, parts, and approvals early to avoid being non-compliant by the deadline.