AASB 9 - Financial Instruments - December 2009
The entity’s business model for managingThe entity’s business model for managing financial assets
Start here
Get a plain-English read of The entity’s business model for managing
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in AASB 9 - Financial Instruments - December 2009.
The entity’s business model for managing financial assets
B4.1 Paragraph 4.1(a) requires an entity to classify financial assets as subsequently measured at amortised cost or fair value on the basis of the entity’s business model for managing the financial assets. An entity assesses whether its financial assets meet this condition on the basis of the objective of the business model as determined by the entity’s key management personnel (as defined in AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures).
B4.2 The entity’s business model does not depend on management’s intentions for an individual instrument. Accordingly, this condition is not an instrument-by-instrument approach to classification and should be determined on a higher level of aggregation. However, a single entity may have more than one business model for managing its financial instruments. Therefore, classification need not be determined at the reporting entity level. For example, an entity may hold a portfolio of investments that it manages in order to collect contractual cash flows and another portfolio of investments that it manages in order to trade to realise fair value changes.
B4.3 Although the objective of an entity’s business model may be to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows, the entity need not hold all of those instruments until maturity. Thus an entity’s business model can be to hold financial assets to collect contractual cash flows even when sales of financial assets occur. For example, the entity may sell a financial asset if:
(a) the financial asset no longer meets the entity’s investment policy (e.g. the credit rating of the asset declines below that required by the entity’s investment policy);
(b) an insurer adjusts its investment portfolio to reflect a change in expected duration (i.e. the expected timing of payouts); or
(c) an entity needs to fund capital expenditures.
However, if more than an infrequent number of sales are made out of a portfolio, the entity needs to assess whether and how such sales are consistent with an objective of collecting contractual cash flows.
B4.4 The following are examples of when the objective of an entity’s business model may be to hold financial assets to collect the contractual cash flows. This list of examples is not exhaustive.
| Example | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Example 1An entity holds investments to collect their contractual cash flows but would sell an investment in particular circumstances. | Although an entity may consider, among other information, the financial assets’ fair values from a liquidity perspective (i.e. the cash amount that would be realised if the entity needs to sell assets), the entity’s objective is to hold the financial assets and collect the contractual cash flows. Some sales would not contradict that objective. |