© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2014] VCAT 888
procedural. The Tribunal declared that the conduct is a special measure under section 12(1) of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic). The application for exemption was struck out under section 75(1)(a) of the...
The Yorta Yorta Nation Aboriginal Corporation wanted to hire only an Indigenous person as their Chief Executive Officer. They applied to VCAT for permission (an exemption) to do this under equal opportunity laws, which normally prohibit racial discrimination in employment. VCAT decided that the corporation didn't actually need an exemption because their plan was a 'special measure'—a type of affirmative action allowed under the law to help disadvantaged groups achieve equality. Because the CEO job involved managing cultural heritage, working closely with the Yorta Yorta community, and maintaining cultural protocols, it was appropriate and legal to restrict the job to Indigenous applicants. Since the 'special measure' rule already made this legal, the application for an exemption was unnecessary and was struck out, though VCAT formally declared that the hiring plan was indeed a special measure.
AI-generated legal information, not legal advice. Zoe can make mistakes. Check the cited source, and for advice about your situation consult a qualified Australian lawyer.
4 cited instruments linked from this judgment.
Yorta Yorta Nation Aboriginal Corporation - special measure declaration (Human Rights) [2014] VCAT 888
The applicant has applied for an exemption under section 89 of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (EO Act) to enable the applicant to advertise for and employ only an Indigenous person in the role of Chief Executive Officer (the conduct).
On the material filed in support of the application, including the affidavits of Leon Atkinson, the Tribunal is satisfied that the conduct is a special measure under the EO Act. The Tribunal noted:
Accordingly, under section 124 of the Victorian Civil & Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (VCAT Act), the Tribunal declares that the conduct is a special measure under section 12(1) of the EO Act.
Under section 12(2) of the EO Act, the applicant will not discriminate against another person contrary to the EO Act by taking that special measure. Having regard to the considerations in section 90 of the EO Act, the Tribunal is satisfied that no exemption under section 89 is necessary.
Section 75(1)(a) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1988 allows the Tribunal to strike out an application where it is misconceived. To the extent that no exemption is required for the conduct, the application is misconceived and so it is struck out under section 75(1)(a).
The Tribunal declared that the conduct is a special measure under section 12(1) of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic). The application for exemption was struck out under section 75(1)(a) of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic) to the extent that no exemption was required.