[2025] VCAT 1028
General information, not legal advice.
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
2025-11-20
Original judgment source is linked above.
To construct two or more dwellings on a lot in the Residential Growth Zone Schedule 1.
To construct a building or construct or carry out work in the Significant Landscape Overlay Schedule 9.
To remove a tree (Chinese Photinia) in the Significant Landscape Overlay Schedule 9.
To construct a building or construct or carry out works in the Design and Development Overlay Schedule 11.
To construct fences with interfaces with Burwood Highway and Cavill Court in the Design and Development Overlay Schedule 11.
(a) Any screening measures to balconies of apartments 2.06 and 2.07 necessary to demonstrate no direct views into the secluded private open space of 2 and 2A Cavill Court to the south. This must be achieved using a fixed, angled fin and / or fixed shelf to prevent downward views to the SPOS of 2 and 2A Cavill Court, but if this is not practical or effective then fixed louvers may be used.
(b) The south-facing bedroom window of Apartment 2.05 dimensioned to have fixed, obscure glazing to 1.7 metres above the finished floor level.
(c) Annotation that all external habitable room windows are doubled glazed for noise attenuation.
(d) Functional layout plans to be updated to show all requirements in accordance with Standard D18 in clause 58 of the Whitehorse Planning Scheme.
(e) Convex Mirrors within the basement to be clearly identified and annotated at all blind spots within the vehicle basement areas.
(f) The easements on both basement plans to be clearly identified and annotated, distinguishing it from the rest of the plans.
(g) Location of stormwater pipe and pits to be annotated on the plans.
(h) Easement lines to be clearly identified on the elevations.
(i) Annotation on the basement and ground floor plans stating that no excavations and/or fill within the easement during construction.
(j) Annotate finished surface levels and natural ground levels of the secluded private open space areas and garden areas along the south and east boundaries as shown on VCAT Sketch, Sheet No. VSK100, Revision A, dated 18/08/2025.
(k) Annotate corrected height and details of the south boundary fence as shown on VCAT Sketch, Sheet No. VSK800, Revision A, dated 19/08/2025.
(l) Shift the communal rooftop terrace to the north so the southern edge of the outdoor communal area extends no further south than the north side of the lift core.
(m) A planter box in each of the secluded private open space of apartments G.06, G.07 and G.08 to achieve a minimum volume of 12 cubic metres, with minimum dimension of 2.5 metres and minimum depth of 800mm, to be capable of supporting a medium-sized indigenous canopy tree capable of growing to a mature height of between 12 metres and 15 metres. This may require modifications of the basement (such as bulkhead above bonnet) as necessary to minimise impact on the function of the terraces.
(n) Front fencing to Cavill Court to be visually permeable style.
(o) Cutouts along the street edge to Cavill Court by modifying front fence location and create garden beds at-grade with footpath level to support shrubs.
(p) A clear-glazed window in the northern living room wall of apartment G.04.
The landscape plan must be generally in accordance with the landscape concept plan appended to the evidence statement of Stephen Schutt, Hansen Partnership Pty Ltd, dated August 2025 in VCAT proceeding P258/2025 (Project No. 20705L, Drawing titles 'Landscape Concept Plan', 'Planting Schedule' and 'Landscape Specification', Revision 'For VCAT hearing', dated 2 July 2025, prepared by Ratio Consultants Pty Ltd), but amended to show:
(a) Any modifications required by Condition 1.
(b) A planter box in each of the secluded private open space of apartments G.06, G.07 and G.08 to achieve a minimum volume of 12 cubic metres, with minimum dimension of 2.5 metres and minimum depth of 800mm, to be capable of supporting a medium-sized indigenous canopy tree capable of growing to a mature height of between 12 metres and 15 metres.
(c) Alternate shrub species along south boundary with a maximum height of 4.0 metres at maturity and evergreen, upright, and density / spacing to be consistent with the landscape concept plan appended to the evidence statement of Stephen Schutt, Hansen Partnership Pty Ltd, dated August 2025 in VCAT proceeding P258/2025 (Project No. 20705L, Drawing titles 'Landscape Concept Plan', 'Planting Schedule' and 'Landscape Specification', Revision 'For VCAT hearing', dated 2 July 2025, prepared by Ratio Consultants Pty Ltd). Advanced species at minimum height of 1.5m at time of planting.
(d) Cutouts along the street edge to Cavill Court by modifying front fence location and creating garden beds at-grade with footpath level to support shrub planting.
(a) Irrigation system/program for all common property landscaping and containerised plantings, including details of frequency and water delivery method.
(a) Tree Protection Zone distances:
- Tree 1 - 8.0 metre radius from the centre of the tree base.
- Tree 2 - 3.0 metre radius from the centre of the tree base.
- Tree 3 - 5.6 metre radius from the centre of the tree base.
- Tree 17 - 3.4 metre radius from the centre of the tree base.
(b) Tree Protection Zone measures are to be established in accordance with Australian Standard 4970-2009 and including the following:
- Erection of solid chain mesh or similar type fencing at a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height held in place with concrete feet.
- Signage placed around the outer edge of the perimeter fencing identifying the area as a TPZ. The signage should be visible from within the development, with the lettering complying with AS 1319.
- Mulch across the surface of the TPZ to a depth of 100mm and undertake supplementary watering in summer months as required.
- No excavation, construction works or activities, grade changes, surface treatments or storage of materials of any kind are permitted within the TPZ unless otherwise approved within this permit or further approved in writing by the responsible authority.
- All supports and bracing should be outside the TPZ and any excavation for supports, or bracing should avoid damaging roots where possible.
- No trenching is allowed within the TPZ for the installation of utility services unless tree sensitive installation methods such as boring have been approved by the responsible authority.
- Where construction is approved within the TPZ, fencing and mulching should be placed at the outer point of the construction area.
- Where there are approved works within the TPZ, it may only be reduced to the required amount by an authorised person only during approved construction within the TPZ and must be restored in accordance with the above requirements at all other times.
(c) be removed once all buildings and works have been completed.
(a) Waste collection vehicles to enter and leave the site in a forward direction, as demonstrated by swept path diagrams.
Sustainability Management Plan and Water Sensitive Urban Design Report
When approved, the CMP will be endorsed and will form part of this permit and must be complied with, to the satisfaction of the responsible authority, to the extent that this is under the control of the owner of the land. The owner of the land is to be responsible for all costs associated with the works to be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the approved CMP.
(a) the development is not commenced within two (2) years from the date of issue of this permit;
(b) the development is not completed within four (4) years from the date of this permit.
The responsible authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is made in writing pursuant to the provisions of s 69 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic).
[1] The submissions and evidence of the parties, any supporting exhibits given at the hearing and the statements of grounds filed have all been considered in the determination of the proceeding. In accordance with the practice of the Tribunal, not all of this material will be cited or referred to in these reasons.
[2] The parties did not articulate a question of law or question of mixed fact and law they wished to be determined. We are not Australian lawyers or judicial members. To the extent that this raises a question of law or a question of mixed fact and law, pursuant to cl 66 of Schedule 1 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic) no party present at the hearing disagreed with Member Byrne, in her capacity as the presiding member in this proceeding, determining the question of law.
[3] Clause 15.01-4S Healthy neighbourhoods and cl 16.01-1R Housing supply - Metropolitan Melbourne.
[5] Clause 16.01-1L Housing change; Objectives.
[6] Clause 16.01-1L Housing change; General strategies.
[8] Clause 11.01-1S Settlement; Strategies.
[10] Table 1 - Metropolitan Melbourne Housing Targets, cl 16.01-1S Housing supply.
[11] Clause 02.04 Plan 2: Housing Framework Plan.
[12] Clause 16.01-1L Substantial Change Areas strategies.
[13] Clause 1.0, Design objectives, DDO11.
[15] We note that post-VC267, this objective remains unchanged but is now found at cl 55.04-3.
[17] Such as at clause 16.01-1L, which seeks to 'encourage medium and higher density housing, in the form of... flats and apartments' in substantial change areas.
Ye
Whitehorse CC [2025] VCAT 1028